Note that PointerUnion::{is,get} have been soft deprecated in
PointerUnion.h:
// FIXME: Replace the uses of is(), get() and dyn_cast() with
// isa<T>, cast<T> and the llvm::dyn_cast<T>
I'm not touching PointerUnion::dyn_cast for now because it's a bit
complicated; we could blindly migrate it to dyn_cast_if_present, but
we should probably use dyn_cast when the operand is known to be
non-null.
Unifies parsing and printing for DLTI attributes. Introduces a format of
`#dlti.attr<key1 = val1, ..., keyN = valN>` syntax for all queryable
DLTI attributes similar to that of the DictionaryAttr, while retaining
support for specifying key-value pairs with `#dlti.dl_entry` (whether to
retain this is TBD).
As the new format does away with most of the boilerplate, it is much easier
to parse for humans. This makes an especially big difference for nested
attributes.
Updates the DLTI-using tests and includes fixes for misc error checking/
error messages.
As specified in the docs,
1) raw_string_ostream is always unbuffered and
2) the underlying buffer may be used directly
( 65b13610a5226b84889b923bae884ba395ad084d for further reference )
* Don't call raw_string_ostream::flush(), which is essentially a no-op.
* Avoid unneeded calls to raw_string_ostream::str(), to avoid excess indirection.
**Rationale**
- With the current flexibility of supporting any type of value, we will
need to offer type-specific APIs to fetch a value (e.g.,
`getDevicePropertyValueAsInt` for integer type,
`getDevicePropertyValueAsFloat` for float type, etc.) A single type of
value will eliminate this need.
- Current flexibility can also lead to typing errors when a user fetches
the value of a property using an API that is not consistent with the
type of the value.
**What is the change**
For following system description,
```
module attributes {
dlti.target_system_spec = #dlti.target_system_spec<
"CPU": #dlti.target_device_spec<
#dlti.dl_entry<"max_vector_op_width", 64.0 : f32>>,
"GPU": #dlti.target_device_spec<
#dlti.dl_entry<"max_vector_op_width", 128 : ui32>>
>} {}
```
a user no longer needs to use `getDevicePropertyValueAsInt` for
retrieving GPU's `max_vector_op_width` and
`getDevicePropertyValueAsFloat` for retrieving CPU's
`max_vector_op_width`. Instead it can be done with a uniform API of
`getDevicePropertyValue`.
and Interfaces. This is a newer implementation of PR
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85141 and
[RFC](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-target-description-and-cost-model-in-mlir/76990)
by considering reviews and comments on the original PR.
As an example of attributes supported by this commit:
```
module attributes {
dlti.target_system_spec =
#dlti.target_device_spec<
#dlti.dl_entry<"dlti.device_id", 0: ui32>,
#dlti.dl_entry<"dlti.device_type", "CPU">,
#dlti.dl_entry<"dlti.L1_cache_size_in_bytes", 8192 : ui32>>,
#dlti.target_device_spec <
#dlti.dl_entry<"dlti.device_id", 1: ui32>,
#dlti.dl_entry<"dlti.device_type", "GPU">,
#dlti.dl_entry<"dlti.max_vector_op_width", 64 : ui32>>,
#dlti.target_device_spec <
#dlti.dl_entry<"dlti.device_id", 2: ui32>,
#dlti.dl_entry<"dlti.device_type", "XPU">>>
}
```
This commit extends the data layout to support scalable vectors. For
scalable vectors, the `TypeSize`'s scalable field is set accordingly,
and the alignment information remains the same as for normal vectors.
This behavior is in sync with what LLVM's data layout queries are
producing.
Before this change, scalable vectors incorrectly returned the same size
as "normal" vectors.
This commit extends the data layout subsystem with accessors for the
endianness. The implementation follows the structure implemented for
alloca, global, and program memory spaces.
When importing from LLVM IR the data layout of all pointer types
contains an index bitwidth that should be used for index computations.
This revision adds a getter to the DataLayout that provides access to
the already stored bitwidth. The function returns an optional since only
pointer-like types have an index bitwidth. Querying the bitwidth of a
non-pointer type returns std::nullopt.
The new function works for the built-in Index type and, using a type
interface, for the LLVMPointerType.
This patch is based on a previous PR https://reviews.llvm.org/D144657
that added alloca address space handling to MLIR's DataLayout and DLTI
interface. This patch aims to add identical features to import and
access the global and program memory space through MLIR's
DataLayout/DLTI system.
Data layout queries may be issued for types whose size exceeds the range
of 32-bit integer as well as for types that don't have a size known at
compile time, such as scalable vectors. Use best practices from LLVM IR
and adopt `llvm::TypeSize` for size-related queries and `uint64_t` for
alignment-related queries.
See #72678.
The MLIR classes Type/Attribute/Operation/Op/Value support
cast/dyn_cast/isa/dyn_cast_or_null functionality through llvm's doCast
functionality in addition to defining methods with the same name.
This change begins the migration of uses of the method to the
corresponding function call as has been decided as more consistent.
Note that there still exist classes that only define methods directly,
such as AffineExpr, and this does not include work currently to support
a functional cast/isa call.
Context:
- https://mlir.llvm.org/deprecation/ at "Use the free function variants
for dyn_cast/cast/isa/…"
- Original discussion at https://discourse.llvm.org/t/preferred-casting-style-going-forward/68443
Implementation:
This patch updates all remaining uses of the deprecated functionality in
mlir/. This was done with clang-tidy as described below and further
modifications to GPUBase.td and OpenMPOpsInterfaces.td.
Steps are described per line, as comments are removed by git:
0. Retrieve the change from the following to build clang-tidy with an
additional check:
main...tpopp:llvm-project:tidy-cast-check
1. Build clang-tidy
2. Run clang-tidy over your entire codebase while disabling all checks
and enabling the one relevant one. Run on all header files also.
3. Delete .inc files that were also modified, so the next build rebuilds
them to a pure state.
```
ninja -C $BUILD_DIR clang-tidy
run-clang-tidy -clang-tidy-binary=$BUILD_DIR/bin/clang-tidy -checks='-*,misc-cast-functions'\
-header-filter=mlir/ mlir/* -fix
rm -rf $BUILD_DIR/tools/mlir/**/*.inc
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151542
The MLIR classes Type/Attribute/Operation/Op/Value support
cast/dyn_cast/isa/dyn_cast_or_null functionality through llvm's doCast
functionality in addition to defining methods with the same name.
This change begins the migration of uses of the method to the
corresponding function call as has been decided as more consistent.
Note that there still exist classes that only define methods directly,
such as AffineExpr, and this does not include work currently to support
a functional cast/isa call.
Caveats include:
- This clang-tidy script probably has more problems.
- This only touches C++ code, so nothing that is being generated.
Context:
- https://mlir.llvm.org/deprecation/ at "Use the free function variants
for dyn_cast/cast/isa/…"
- Original discussion at https://discourse.llvm.org/t/preferred-casting-style-going-forward/68443
Implementation:
This first patch was created with the following steps. The intention is
to only do automated changes at first, so I waste less time if it's
reverted, and so the first mass change is more clear as an example to
other teams that will need to follow similar steps.
Steps are described per line, as comments are removed by git:
0. Retrieve the change from the following to build clang-tidy with an
additional check:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/compare/main...tpopp:llvm-project:tidy-cast-check
1. Build clang-tidy
2. Run clang-tidy over your entire codebase while disabling all checks
and enabling the one relevant one. Run on all header files also.
3. Delete .inc files that were also modified, so the next build rebuilds
them to a pure state.
4. Some changes have been deleted for the following reasons:
- Some files had a variable also named cast
- Some files had not included a header file that defines the cast
functions
- Some files are definitions of the classes that have the casting
methods, so the code still refers to the method instead of the
function without adding a prefix or removing the method declaration
at the same time.
```
ninja -C $BUILD_DIR clang-tidy
run-clang-tidy -clang-tidy-binary=$BUILD_DIR/bin/clang-tidy -checks='-*,misc-cast-functions'\
-header-filter=mlir/ mlir/* -fix
rm -rf $BUILD_DIR/tools/mlir/**/*.inc
git restore mlir/lib/IR mlir/lib/Dialect/DLTI/DLTI.cpp\
mlir/lib/Dialect/Complex/IR/ComplexDialect.cpp\
mlir/lib/**/IR/\
mlir/lib/Dialect/SparseTensor/Transforms/SparseVectorization.cpp\
mlir/lib/Dialect/Vector/Transforms/LowerVectorMultiReduction.cpp\
mlir/test/lib/Dialect/Test/TestTypes.cpp\
mlir/test/lib/Dialect/Transform/TestTransformDialectExtension.cpp\
mlir/test/lib/Dialect/Test/TestAttributes.cpp\
mlir/unittests/TableGen/EnumsGenTest.cpp\
mlir/test/python/lib/PythonTestCAPI.cpp\
mlir/include/mlir/IR/
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150123
When the natural stack alignment is not set or is larger than or equal
to the target alignment required by a read-only byval argument defined
by an alloca, avoid the copy by just realigning the alloca to the target
alignment.
The code to check existing alignment is reorganized a bit to avoid
redundant casts.
This also includes a bugfix for passing a null DataLayoutInterface to
the DataLayout constructor when no parent op defines
DataLayoutInterface, and will now pass ModuleOp instead in this case.
Reviewed By: gysit
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148557
The revision adds the stack alignment to the
data layout dialect and it extends the LLVM dialect
import and export to support the new data layout
entry.
One possible use case for the flag is the LLVM dialect
inliner. The LLVM inliner queries the flag to
determine if it is safe to update the alignment of an
existing alloca. We may want to perform the same
optimization inside of MLIR.
Reviewed By: Dinistro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147332
This patch adds alloca address space information to the data layout interface
and implementation in the DLTI dialect. This is needed for targets that use
separate address spaces for local/stack data.
Reviewed By: ftynse, krzysz00
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144657
Add support for integer and float types into the data layout subsystem with
default logic similar to LLVM IR. Given the flexibility of the sybsystem, the
logic can be easily overwritten by operations if necessary. This provides the
connection necessary, e.g., for the GPU target where alignment requirements for
integers and floats differ from those provided by default (although still
compatible with the LLVM IR model). Previously, it was impossible to use
non-default alignment requirements for integer and float types, which could
lead to incorrect address and size calculations when targeting GPUs.
Depends On D120737
Reviewed By: wsmoses
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120739
This matches the same API usage as attributes/ops/types. For example:
```c++
Dialect *dialect = ...;
// Instead of this:
if (auto *interface = dialect->getRegisteredInterface<DialectInlinerInterface>())
// You can do this:
if (auto *interface = dyn_cast<DialectInlinerInterface>(dialect))
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117859
Identifier and StringAttr essentially serve the same purpose, i.e. to hold a string value. Keeping these seemingly identical pieces of functionality separate has caused problems in certain situations:
* Identifier has nice accessors that StringAttr doesn't
* Identifier can't be used as an Attribute, meaning strings are often duplicated between Identifier/StringAttr (e.g. in PDL)
The only thing that Identifier has that StringAttr doesn't is support for caching a dialect that is referenced by the string (e.g. dialect.foo). This functionality is added to StringAttr, as this is useful for StringAttr in generally the same ways it was useful for Identifier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113536
As described on D111049, we're trying to remove the <string> dependency from error handling and replace uses of report_fatal_error(const std::string&) with the Twine() variant which can be forward declared.
The `DataLayout` class currently contains the member `layoutStack` which is hidden behind a preprocessor region dependant on the NDEBUG macro. Code wise this makes a lot of sense, as the `layoutStack` is used for extra assertions that users will want when compiling a debug build.
It however has the uncomfortable consequence of leading to a different ABI in Debug and Release builds. This I think is a bit annoying for downstream projects and others as they may want to build against a stable Release of MLIR in Release mode, but be able to debug their own project depending on MLIR.
This patch changes the related uses of NDEBUG to LLVM_ENABLE_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS. As the macro is computed at configure time of LLVM, it may not change based on compiler settings of a downstream projects like NDEBUG would.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107227
The top-level verifier of data layout specifications delegates verification of
entries with identifier keys to the dialect of the identifier prefix. This flow
was missing a check whether the dialect actually implements the relevant
interface.
Reviewed By: gysit
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103945
The patch enables the use of index type in vectors. It is a prerequisite to support vectorization for indexed Linalg operations. This refactoring became possible due to the newly introduced data layout infrastructure. The data layout of a module defines the bitwidth of the index type needed to verify bitcasts and similar vector operations.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99948
Index type is an integer type of target-specific bitwidth present in many MLIR
operations (loops, memory accesses). Converting values of this type to
fixed-size integers has always been problematic. Introduce a data layout entry
to specify the bitwidth of `index` in a given layout scope, defaulting to 64
bits, which is a commonly used assumption, e.g., in constants.
Port builtin-to-LLVM type conversion to use this data layout entry when
converting `index` type and untie it from pointer size. This is particularly
relevant for GPU targets. Keep a possibility to forcibly override the index
type in lowerings.
Depends On D98525
Reviewed By: herhut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98937
Even if the layout specification is missing from an op that supports it, the op
is still expected to provide meaningful responses to data layout queries.
Forward them to the op instead of directly calling the default implementation.
Depends On D98524
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98525
This is useful for bit-packing types such as vectors and tuples as well as for
exotic architectures that have non-8-bit bytes.
Depends On D98500
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98524
ModuleOp is a natural place to provide scoped data layout information. However,
it is undesirable for ModuleOp to implement the entirety of
DataLayoutOpInterface because that would require either pushing the interface
inside the IR library instead of a separate library, or putting the default
implementation of the interface as inline functions in headers leading to
binary bloat. Instead, ModuleOp accepts an arbitrary data layout spec attribute
and has a dedicated hook to extract it, and DataLayout is modified to know
about ModuleOp particularities.
Reviewed By: herhut, nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98500
Data layout information allows to answer questions about the size and alignment
properties of a type. It enables, among others, the generation of various
linear memory addressing schemes for containers of abstract types and deeper
reasoning about vectors. This introduces the subsystem for modeling data
layouts in MLIR.
The data layout subsystem is designed to scale to MLIR's open type and
operation system. At the top level, it consists of attribute interfaces that
can be implemented by concrete data layout specifications; type interfaces that
should be implemented by types subject to data layout; operation interfaces
that must be implemented by operations that can serve as data layout scopes
(e.g., modules); and dialect interfaces for data layout properties unrelated to
specific types. Built-in types are handled specially to decrease the overall
query cost.
A concrete default implementation of these interfaces is provided in the new
Target dialect. Defaults for built-in types that match the current behavior are
also provided.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97067
