This patch adds more precise side effects to the current ops with memory
effects, allowing us to determine which OpOperand/OpResult/BlockArgument
the
operation reads or writes, rather than just recording the reading and
writing
of values. This allows for convenient use of precise side effects to
achieve
analysis and optimization.
Related discussions:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-add-operandindex-to-sideeffect-instance/79243
Add support for reasoning about operations with recursive memory effects
to CSE. The recursive effects are gathered by a helper function. I
decided to allow returning duplicates from the helper function because
there's no benefit to spending the computation time to remove them in
the existing use case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156805
The greedy pattern rewrite driver removes ops that are "trivially dead". This could include symbols that are still referenced by other ops. Dead symbols should be removed with the `-symbol-dce` pass instead.
This bug was not triggered for `func::FuncOp`, because ops are not considered "trivally dead" if they do not implement the `MemoryEffectOpInterface`, indicating that the op may or may not have side effects. It is, however, triggered for `transform::NamedSequenceOp`, which implements that interface because it is required for all transform dialect ops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152994
This allows to inline regions containing pure LLVM ops into their call
sites. (Note that this is not related to inlining of llvm.func but to
any the inlining of any Callable.) For now, we only allow the inlining
of Pure ops to be conservative but other ops may be considered inlinable
in the future.
Testing for purity of ops requires the C++ equivalent of the Pure trait
from SideEffectInterfaces.td, which this patch also provide. Its
implementation calls the C++ equivalents of the two traits that the Pure
trait is based on and, thus, has to be kept with the tablegen trait.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139187
The methods in `SideEffectUtils.h` (and their implementations in
`SideEffectUtils.cpp`) seem to have similar intent to methods already
existing in `SideEffectInterfaces.h`. Move the decleration (and
implementation) from `SideEffectUtils.h` (and `SideEffectUtils.cpp`)
into `SideEffectInterfaces.h` (and `SideEffectInterface.cpp`).
Also drop the `SideEffectInterface::hasNoEffect` method in favor of
`mlir::isMemoryEffectFree` which actually recurses into the operation
instead of just relying on the `hasRecursiveMemoryEffectTrait`
exclusively.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137857
This patch takes the first step towards a more principled modeling of undefined behavior in MLIR as discussed in the following discourse threads:
1. https://discourse.llvm.org/t/semantics-modeling-undefined-behavior-and-side-effects/4812
2. https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-mark-tensor-dim-and-memref-dim-as-side-effecting/65729
This patch in particular does the following:
1. Introduces a ConditionallySpeculatable OpInterface that dynamically determines whether an Operation can be speculated.
2. Re-defines `NoSideEffect` to allow undefined behavior, making it necessary but not sufficient for speculation. Also renames it to `NoMemoryEffect`.
3. Makes LICM respect the above semantics.
4. Changes all ops tagged with `NoSideEffect` today to additionally implement ConditionallySpeculatable and mark themselves as always speculatable. This combined trait is named `Pure`. This makes this change NFC.
For out of tree dialects:
1. Replace `NoSideEffect` with `Pure` if the operation does not have any memory effects, undefined behavior or infinite loops.
2. Replace `NoSideEffect` with `NoSideEffect` otherwise.
The next steps in this process are (I'm proposing to do these in upcoming patches):
1. Update operations like `tensor.dim`, `memref.dim`, `scf.for`, `affine.for` to implement a correct hook for `ConditionallySpeculatable`. I'm also happy to update ops in other dialects if the respective dialect owners would like to and can give me some pointers.
2. Update other passes that speculate operations to consult `ConditionallySpeculatable` in addition to `NoMemoryEffect`. I could not find any other than LICM on a quick skim, but I could have missed some.
3. Add some documentation / FAQs detailing the differences between side effects, undefined behavior, speculatabilty.
Reviewed By: rriddle, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135505
In the current state, this is only special cased for Allocation effects, but any effects on results allocated by the operation may be ignored when checking whether the op may be removed, as none of them are possible to be observed if the result is unused.
A use case for this is for IRs for languages which always initialize on allocation. To correctly model such operations, a Write as well as an Allocation effect should be placed on the result. This would prevent the Op from being deleted if unused however. This patch fixes that issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129854
Clean up checks for alloc-like ops in analysis. Use the analysis
utility to properly check for the desired kind of effects. The previous
locality utility worked for all practical purposes but wasn't sound and
was locally duplicate code. Instead, use mlir::hasSingleEffect.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129439
Erase gpu.memcpy op when only uses of dest are
the memcpy op in question, its allocation and deallocation
ops.
Reviewed By: bondhugula, csigg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124257
These properties were useful for a few things before traits had a better integration story, but don't really carry their weight well these days. Most of these properties are already checked via traits in most of the code. It is better to align the system around traits, and improve the performance/cost of traits in general.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96088
