24 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
vfdev
f136c800b6
Enabled freethreading support in MLIR python bindings (#122684)
Reland reverted https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107103 with
the fixes for Python 3.8

cc @jpienaar

Co-authored-by: Peter Hawkins <phawkins@google.com>
2025-01-13 03:00:31 -08:00
Jacques Pienaar
3f1486f08e Revert "Added free-threading CPython mode support in MLIR Python bindings (#107103)"
Breaks on 3.8, rolling back to avoid breakage while fixing.

This reverts commit 9dee7c44491635ec9037b90050bcdbd3d5291e38.
2025-01-12 18:30:42 +00:00
vfdev
9dee7c4449
Added free-threading CPython mode support in MLIR Python bindings (#107103)
Related to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/105522

Description:

This PR is a joint work with Peter Hawkins (@hawkinsp) originally done
by myself for pybind11 and then reworked to nanobind based on Peter's
branch: https://github.com/hawkinsp/llvm-project/tree/nbdev .

- Added free-threading CPython mode support for MLIR Python bindings
- Added a test which can reveal data races when cpython and LLVM/MLIR
compiled with TSAN

Context:
- Related to https://github.com/google/jax/issues/23073

Co-authored-by: Peter Hawkins <phawkins@google.com>
2025-01-12 09:56:49 -08:00
Peter Hawkins
b56d1ec6cb
[mlir python] Port Python core code to nanobind. (#120473)
Relands #118583, with a fix for Python 3.8 compatibility. It was not
possible to set the buffer protocol accessers via slots in Python 3.8.

Why? https://nanobind.readthedocs.io/en/latest/why.html says it better
than I can, but my primary motivation for this change is to improve MLIR
IR construction time from JAX.

For a complicated Google-internal LLM model in JAX, this change improves
the MLIR
lowering time by around 5s (out of around 30s), which is a significant
speedup for simply switching binding frameworks.

To a large extent, this is a mechanical change, for instance changing
`pybind11::` to `nanobind::`.

Notes:
* this PR needs Nanobind 2.4.0, because it needs a bug fix
(https://github.com/wjakob/nanobind/pull/806) that landed in that
release.
* this PR does not port the in-tree dialect extension modules. They can
be ported in a future PR.
* I removed the py::sibling() annotations from def_static and def_class
in `PybindAdapters.h`. These ask pybind11 to try to form an overload
with an existing method, but it's not possible to form mixed
pybind11/nanobind overloads this ways and the parent class is now
defined in nanobind. Better solutions may be possible here.
* nanobind does not contain an exact equivalent of pybind11's buffer
protocol support. It was not hard to add a nanobind implementation of a
similar API.
* nanobind is pickier about casting to std::vector<bool>, expecting that
the input is a sequence of bool types, not truthy values. In a couple of
places I added code to support truthy values during casting.
* nanobind distinguishes bytes (`nb::bytes`) from strings (e.g.,
`std::string`). This required nb::bytes overloads in a few places.
2024-12-18 18:55:42 -08:00
Jacques Pienaar
6e8b3a3e0c Revert "[mlir python] Port Python core code to nanobind. (#118583)"
This reverts commit 41bd35b58bb482fd466aa4b13aa44a810ad6470f.

Breakage detected, rolling back.
2024-12-18 19:31:32 +00:00
Peter Hawkins
41bd35b58b
[mlir python] Port Python core code to nanobind. (#118583)
Why? https://nanobind.readthedocs.io/en/latest/why.html says it better
than I can, but my primary motivation for this change is to improve MLIR
IR construction time from JAX.

For a complicated Google-internal LLM model in JAX, this change improves
the MLIR
lowering time by around 5s (out of around 30s), which is a significant
speedup for simply switching binding frameworks.

To a large extent, this is a mechanical change, for instance changing
`pybind11::`
to `nanobind::`.

Notes:
* this PR needs Nanobind 2.4.0, because it needs a bug fix
(https://github.com/wjakob/nanobind/pull/806) that landed in that
release.
* this PR does not port the in-tree dialect extension modules. They can
be ported in a future PR.
* I removed the py::sibling() annotations from def_static and def_class
in `PybindAdapters.h`. These ask pybind11 to try to form an overload
with an existing method, but it's not possible to form mixed
pybind11/nanobind overloads this ways and the parent class is now
defined in nanobind. Better solutions may be possible here.
* nanobind does not contain an exact equivalent of pybind11's buffer
protocol support. It was not hard to add a nanobind implementation of a
similar API.
* nanobind is pickier about casting to std::vector<bool>, expecting that
the input is a sequence of bool types, not truthy values. In a couple of
places I added code to support truthy values during casting.
* nanobind distinguishes bytes (`nb::bytes`) from strings (e.g.,
`std::string`). This required nb::bytes overloads in a few places.
2024-12-18 11:16:11 -08:00
Maksim Levental
392622d084
Revert "Revert "[mlir python] Add nanobind support (#119232)
Reverts revert #118517 after (hopefully) fixing builders
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-zorg/pull/328,
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-zorg/pull/327)

This reverts commit 61bf308cf2fc32452f14861c102ace89f5f36fec.
2024-12-09 16:37:43 -05:00
Maksim Levental
61bf308cf2
Revert "[mlir python] Add nanobind support for standalone dialects." (#118517)
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#117922 because deps aren't met on some of the
post-commit build bots.
2024-12-03 09:26:33 -08:00
Peter Hawkins
afe75b4d5f
[mlir python] Add nanobind support for standalone dialects. (#117922)
This PR allows out-of-tree dialects to write Python dialect modules
using nanobind instead of pybind11.

It may make sense to migrate in-tree dialects and some of the ODS Python
infrastructure to nanobind, but that is a topic for a future change.

This PR makes the following changes:
* adds nanobind to the CMake and Bazel build systems. We also add
robin_map to the Bazel build, which is a dependency of nanobind.
* adds a PYTHON_BINDING_LIBRARY option to various CMake functions, such
as declare_mlir_python_extension, allowing users to select a Python
binding library.
* creates a fork of mlir/include/mlir/Bindings/Python/PybindAdaptors.h
named NanobindAdaptors.h. This plays the same role, using nanobind
instead of pybind11.
* splits CollectDiagnosticsToStringScope out of PybindAdaptors.h and
into a new header mlir/include/mlir/Bindings/Python/Diagnostics.h, since
it is code that is no way related to pybind11 or for that matter,
Python.
* changed the standalone Python extension example to have both pybind11
and nanobind variants.
* changed mlir/python/mlir/dialects/python_test.py to have both pybind11
and nanobind variants.

Notes:
* A slightly unfortunate thing that I needed to do in the CMake
integration was to use FindPython in addition to FindPython3, since
nanobind's CMake integration expects the Python_ names for variables.
Perhaps there's a better way to do this.
2024-12-03 09:13:34 -08:00
Ingo Müller
56feea7307
[mlir][python] Update minimal version of pybind11 to 2.10. (#117314)
This PR updates the minimal required version of pybind11 from 2.9.0 to
2.10.0. New new version is almost 2.5 years old, which is half a year
less than the previous version. This change is necessary to support the
changes introduced in #115307, which does not compile with pybind11
v.2.9.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Müller <ingomueller@google.com>
2024-11-23 12:48:59 +01:00
Marius Brehler
f5e6c8e0b7
[mlir][python] Raise maximum allowed version (#114050)
Raises the maximum allowed versions to more recent versions, which is a
basic enabler to install them in a venv using Python 3.13.
2024-10-31 17:39:26 +01:00
Nhat Nguyen
d60008d861
[mlir] [python] Update PyYAML minimum version to 5.4 and limit ml_dtypes to 0.4.0 (#102178)
PyYAML 5.3.1 has a security vulnerability as described here:
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-14343. Update the minimum
PyYAML version to 5.4. Also limit ml_dtypes version to 0.4.0.
2024-08-07 08:24:15 -07:00
Bimo
5ef087b705
Reapply "[MLIR][Python] add ctype python binding support for bf16" (#101271)
Reapply the PR which was reverted due to built-bots, and now the bots
get updated.
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/need-a-help-with-the-built-bots/79437
original PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92489, reverted
in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93771
2024-07-31 10:24:27 +02:00
Mehdi Amini
e6821dd8c8
Revert "[MLIR][Python] add ctype python binding support for bf16" (#93771)
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#92489

This broke the bots.
2024-05-29 23:21:04 -06:00
Bimo
89801c74c3
[MLIR][Python] add ctype python binding support for bf16 (#92489)
Since bf16 is supported by mlir, similar to
complex128/complex64/float16, we need an implementation of bf16 ctype in
Python binding. Furthermore, to resolve the absence of bf16 support in
NumPy, a third-party package [ml_dtypes
](https://github.com/jax-ml/ml_dtypes) is introduced to add bf16
extension, and the same approach was used in `torch-mlir` project.

See motivation and discussion in:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/how-to-run-executionengine-with-bf16-dtype-in-mlir-python-bindings/79025
2024-05-29 22:01:40 -07:00
Kirill Podoprigora
4cd7bb07c7
[mlir] Remove `dataclasses package from mlir requirements.txt` (#87223)
The ``dataclasses`` package makes sense for Python 3.6, becauses
``dataclasses`` is only included in the standard library with 3.7
version. Now, 3.6 has reached EOL, so all current supported versions of
Python (3.8, 3.9, 3.10, 3.11, 3.12) have this feature in their standard
libraries.

Therefore there's no need to install the ``dataclasses`` package now.
2024-04-01 12:07:10 -07:00
Maksim Levental
6f44f87011
[mlir][python] Enable py312. (#68009)
Python 3.12 has been released so why not support it.
2023-10-04 20:35:24 -05:00
Rahul Kayaith
478e392c0c [mlir][python] Bump min pybind11 version to 2.9.0
2.9.0 was released on December 28, 2021, and some following changes
require at least this version.

Reviewed By: stellaraccident

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150247
2023-05-23 13:51:40 -04:00
Stella Stamenova
97fbbd657f [mlir] Relax version requirement for PyYAML in mlir
Some Ubuntu 20.04 images come with PyYAML 5.3.1 pre-installed through distutils. This makes pip very angry. See https://github.com/yaml/pyyaml/issues/349.

Since older versions of PyYAML should work for mlir, relax the version requirement to ease developer setup.

Reviewed By: stellaraccident

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143523
2023-02-07 14:24:55 -08:00
Stella Stamenova
ca174f12c4 [mlir] Pin for the PyPi requirements for mlir
This change is pinning the requirements to a specific version (or a range) depending on the requirement. A couple of considerations:

* numpy 1.24 deprecates np.object, np.bool, np.float, np.complex, np.str, and np.int which are used heavily in onnx-mlir
* not all versions of each package are available on every platform - to the best of my knowledge, these ranges should work on Ubuntu, CentOS and Windows

Adding a minimum and maximum version, or pinning to a specific versions where possible, helps with two major goals - security and maintainability. It gives us an opportunity to make sure that the packages being used are not part of a security attack as well as guaranteeing that they support the features that mlir depends on (see note about numpy deprecation).

Let me know if you are aware of better versions or ranges to pin to.

Reviewed By: stellaraccident

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142563
2023-02-01 10:25:58 -08:00
Bixia Zheng
b7fd91c84b Upstream MLIR PyTACO implementation.
Add TACO tests to test/Integration/Dialect/SparseTensor/taco. Add the MLIR
PyTACO implementation as tools under the directory.

Reviewed By: aartbik, mehdi_amini

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117260
2022-01-21 08:38:36 -08:00
Alex Zinenko
89a92fb3ba [mlir] Rework subclass construction in PybindAdaptors.h
The constructor function was being defined without indicating its "__init__"
name, which made it interpret it as a regular fuction rather than a
constructor. When overload resolution failed, Pybind would attempt to print the
arguments actually passed to the function, including "self", which is not
initialized since the constructor couldn't be called. This would result in
"__repr__" being called with "self" referencing an uninitialized MLIR C API
object, which in turn would cause undefined behavior when attempting to print
in C++. Even if the correct name is provided, the mechanism used by
PybindAdaptors.h to bind constructors directly as "__init__" functions taking
"self" is deprecated by Pybind. The new mechanism does not seem to have access
to a fully-constructed "self" object (i.e., the constructor in C++ takes a
`pybind11::detail::value_and_holder` that cannot be forwarded back to Python).

Instead, redefine "__new__" to perform the required checks (there are no
additional initialization needed for attributes and types as they are all
wrappers around a C++ pointer). "__new__" can call its equivalent on a
superclass without needing "self".

Bump pybind11 dependency to 3.8.0, which is the first version that allows one
to redefine "__new__".

Reviewed By: stellaraccident

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117646
2022-01-19 18:09:05 +01:00
Stella Laurenzo
3d25fa21d0 Exclude pybind11 2.7.0 from MLIR python requirements.
Appears to have a broken CMake installation. Reported bug: https://github.com/pybind/pybind11/issues/3136
2021-07-20 06:56:05 -07:00
Stella Laurenzo
9f3f6d7bd8 Move MLIR python sources to mlir/python.
* NFC but has some fixes for CMake glitches discovered along the way (things not cleaning properly, co-mingled depends).
* Includes previously unsubmitted fix in D98681 and a TODO to fix it more appropriately in a smaller followup.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101493
2021-05-03 18:36:48 +00:00