The AArch64 procedure call standard does not mandate that the callee
extends the return value. Clang does not add signext to functions
returning i8 or i16 on linux aarch64, but flang does.
This means that runtime routines returning i8's will have signext on the
callsite/declaration, but not on the implementation, and the call site
will assume the return value has already been sign extended when it has
not. This showed up in a test case calling MINVAL on an array of
INTEGER*1.
Adjust our integer extension flags to match clang and aarch64pcs on
linux. The behavior on Darwin should be preserved. This is listed on the
apple developer guide as a divergence from aarch64pcs.
Pointers are already handled as taking up a register in the ABI
handling, but the handling for structs was not taking this into account.
This patch changes the struct handling to acknowledge that pointer
arguments take up an integer register.
Fixes#123075
Fix issue #116844.
The issue came from a look-up on the func.func for the sret attribute
when lowering fir.call with character arguments. This was broken because
the func.func may or may not have been rewritten when dealing with the
fir.call, but the lookup assumed it had not been rewritten yet. If the
func.func was rewritten and the result moved to a sret argument, the
call was lowered as if the character was meant to be the result, leading
to bad call code and an assert.
It turns out that the whole logic is actually useless since fir.boxchar
are never lowered as sret arguments, instead, lowering directly breaks
the character result into the first two `fir.ref<>, i64` arguments. So,
the sret case was actually never used, except in this bug.
Hence, instead of fixing the logic (probably by looking for argument
attributes on the call itself), just remove this logic that brings
unnecessary complexity.
This patch:
- Supports both the passing and returning of BIND(C) type parameters.
- Adds `mabi` check for LoongArch64. Currently, flang only supports
`mabi=` option
set to `lp64d` in LoongArch64, other ABIs will report an error and may
be supported
in the future.
Reference ABI:
https://github.com/loongson/la-abi-specs/blob/release/lapcs.adoc#subroutine-calling-sequence
This patch adds support for BIND(C) derived types as return values
matching the AArch64 Procedure Call Standard for C.
Support for BIND(C) derived types as value parameters will be in a
separate patch.
In loongarch64 LP64D ABI, `unsigned 32-bit` types, such as unsigned int,
are stored in general-purpose registers as proper sign extensions of
their 32-bit values. Therefore, Flang also follows it if a function
needs to be interoperable with C.
Reference:
https://github.com/loongson/la-abi-specs/blob/release/lapcs.adoc#Fundamental-types
In LoongArch64, the passing and returning of type `complex16` is similar
to that of structure type like `struct {fp128, fp128}`, meaning they are
passed and returned by reference. This behavior is similar to clang, so
it can implement conveniently `iso_c_binding`.
Additionally, this patch fixes the failure in flang test
Integration/debug-complex-1.f90:
```
llvm-project/flang/lib/Optimizer/codeGen/Target.cpp:56:
not yet implemented: complex for this precision for return type
Derived type results of BIND(C) function should be returned according
the the C ABI for returning the related C struct type.
This currently did not happen since the abstract-result pass was forcing
the Fortran ABI for all derived type results.
use the bind_c attribute that was added on call/func/dispatch in FIR to
prevent such rewrite in the abstract result pass, and update the
target-rewrite pass to deal with the struct return ABI.
So far, the target specific part of the target-rewrite is only
implemented for X86-64 according to the "System V Application Binary
Interface AMD64 v1", the other targets will hit a TODO, just like for
BIND(C), VALUE derived type arguments.
This intends to deal with #102113.
This is a re-land of #111678 with an extra commit to keep rewriting `type(c_ptr)`
results to `!fir.ref<none>` in the abstract result pass regardless of the ABIs.
Derived type results of BIND(C) function should be returned according
the the C ABI for returning the related C struct type.
This currently did not happen since the abstract-result pass was forcing
the Fortran ABI for all derived type results.
use the bind_c attribute that was added on call/func/dispatch in FIR to
prevent such rewrite in the abstract result pass, and update the
target-rewrite pass to deal with the struct return ABI.
So far, the target specific part of the target-rewrite is only
implemented for X86-64 according to the "System V Application Binary
Interface AMD64 v1", the other targets will hit a TODO, just like for
BIND(C), VALUE derived type arguments.
This intends to deal with
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/102113.
This PR adds initial debug support for derived type. It handles
`RecordType` and generates appropriate `DICompositeTypeAttr`. The
`TypeInfoOp` is used to get information about the parent and location of
the derived type.
We use `getTypeSizeAndAlignment` to get the size and alignment of the
components of the derived types. This function needed a few changes to
be suitable to be used here:
1. The `getTypeSizeAndAlignment` errored out on unsupported type which
would not work with incremental way we are building debug support. A new
variant of this function has been that returns an std::optional. The original
function has been renamed to `getTypeSizeAndAlignmentOrCrash` as it
will call `TODO()` for unsupported types.
2. The Character type was returning size of just element and not the
whole string which has been fixed.
The testcase checks for offsets of the components which had to be
hardcoded in the test. So the testcase is currently enabled on x86_64.
With this PR in place, this is how the debugging of derived types look
like:
```
type :: t_date
integer :: year, month, day
end type
type :: t_address
integer :: house_number
end type
type, extends(t_address) :: t_person
character(len=20) name
end type
type, extends(t_person) :: t_employee
type(t_date) :: hired_date
real :: monthly_salary
end type
type(t_employee) :: employee
(gdb) p employee
$1 = ( t_person = ( t_address = ( house_number = 1 ), name = 'John', ' ' <repeats 16 times> ), hired_date = ( year = 2020, month = 1, day = 20 ), monthly_salary = 3.1400001 )
```
This PR adds -mtune as a valid flang flag and passes the information
through to LLVM IR as an attribute on all functions. No specific
architecture optimizations are added at this time.
…ted. (#89998)" (#90250)
This partially reverts commit 7aedd7dc754c74a49fe84ed2640e269c25414087.
This change removes calls to the deprecated member functions. It does
not mark the functions deprecated yet and does not disable the
deprecation warning in TypeSwitch. This seems to cause problems with
MSVC.
Four "issues" on GitHub report possible performance problems, likely
detected by static analysis. None of them would ever make a measureable
difference in compilation time, but I'm resolving them to clean up the
open issues list.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/79703, .../79705,
.../79706, & .../79707.
This patch forwards the target CPU and features information from the
Flang frontend to MLIR func.func operation attributes, which are later
used to populate the target_cpu and target_features llvm.func
attributes.
This is achieved in two stages:
1. Introduce the `fir.target_cpu` and `fir.target_features` module
attributes with information from the target machine immediately after
the initial creation of the MLIR module in the lowering bridge.
2. Update the target rewrite flang pass to get this information from the
module and pass it along to all func.func MLIR operations, respectively
as attributes named `target_cpu` and `target_features`. These attributes
will be automatically picked up during Func to LLVM dialect lowering and
used to initialize the corresponding llvm.func named attributes.
The target rewrite and FIR to LLVM lowering passes are updated with the
ability to override these module attributes, and the `CodeGenSpecifics`
optimizer class is augmented to make this information available to
target-specific MLIR transformations.
This completes a full flow by which target CPU and features make it all
the way from compiler options to LLVM IR function attributes.
The existing type size computation in LoopVersioning does not work
for REAL*10, because the compute element size is 10 bytes,
which violates the power-of-two assertion.
We'd better use the DataLayout for computing the storage size
of each element of an array of the given type.
Derived type passed with VALUE in BIND(C) context must be passed like C
struct and LLVM is not implementing the ABI for this (it is up to the
frontends like clang).
Previous patch #75802 implemented the simple cases where the derived
type have one field, this patch implements the general case. Note that
the generated LLVM IR is compliant from a X86-64 C ABI point of view and
compatible with clang generated assembly, but that it is not guaranteed
to match the LLVM IR signatures generated by clang for the C equivalent
functions because several LLVM IR signatures may lead to the same X86-64
signature.
Implement the C struct passing ABI on X86-64 for the trivial case where
the structs have one element. This is required to cover some cases of
BIND(C) derived type pass with the VALUE attribute.
In the context of C/Fortran interoperability (BIND(C)), it is possible
to give the VALUE attribute to a BIND(C) derived type dummy, which
according to Fortran 2018 18.3.6 - 2. (4) implies that it must be passed
like the equivalent C structure value. The way C structure value are
passed is ABI dependent.
LLVM does not implement the C struct ABI passing for LLVM aggregate type
arguments. It is up to the front-end, like clang is doing, to split the
struct into registers or pass the struct on the stack (llvm "byval") as
required by the target ABI.
So the logic for C struct passing sits in clang. Using it from flang
requires setting up a lot of clang context and to bridge FIR/MLIR
representation to clang AST representation for function signatures (in
both directions). It is a non trivial task.
See
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/39438033/passing-structs-by-value-in-llvm-ir/75002581#75002581.
Since BIND(C) struct are rather limited as opposed to generic C struct
(e.g. no bit fields). It is easier to provide a limited implementation
of it for the case that matter to Fortran.
This patch:
- Updates the generic target rewrite pass to keep track of both the new
argument type and attributes. The motivation for this is to be able to
tell if a previously marshalled argument is passed in memory (it is a C
pointer), or if it is being passed on the stack (has the byval llvm
attributes).
- Adds an entry point in the target specific codegen to marshal struct
arguments, and use it in the generic target rewrite pass.
- Implements limited support for the X86-64 case. So far, the support
allows telling if a struct must be passed in register or on the stack,
and to deal with the stack case. The register case is left TODO in this
patch.
The X86-64 ABI implemented is the System V ABI for AMD64 version 1.0
COMPLEX(10) passing by value and returning follows C complex
passing/returning ABI.
Cover the COMPLEX(10) case (X87 / __Complex long double on X86-64).
Implements System V ABI for AMD64 version 1.0.
The LLVM signatures match the one generated by clang for the __Complex
long double case.
Note that a FIXME is added for the COMPLEX(8) case that is incorrect in
a corner case. This will be fixed when dealing with passing derived type
by value in BIND(C) context.
This update makes the user visible messages relating to features that
are not yet implemented be more consistent. I also cleaned up some of
the code.
For NYI messages that refer to intrinsics, I made sure the the message
begins with "not yet implemented: intrinsic:" to make them easier to
recognize.
I created some utility functions for NYI reporting that I put into
.../include/Optimizer/Support/Utils.h. These mainly convert MLIR types
to their Fortran equivalents.
I converted the NYI code to use the newly created utility functions.
Function arguments or return values that are complex floating point values
aren't correctly lowered for Windows x86 32-bit and 64-bit targets.
See: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61976
Add targets that are specific for these platforms and OS.
With thanks to @mstorsjo for pointing out the fix.
Reviewed By: vzakhari
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147768
After the extraction of the TypeConverter, move the header files
to the include dir so the shared library build is fine.
Reviewed By: PeteSteinfeld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147979
Add LoongArch64 linux target specifics to Target.cpp which is similar to
RISCV-64 in D136547.
For LoongArch, a complex floating-point number, or a structure
containing just one complex floating-point number, is passed as though
it were a structure containing two floating-point reals.
Reviewed By: vzakhari
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143131
This is the first patch of several that will enable generating code for AMD
GPUs. It adds the AMDGPU target so it can be used with the --target and -mcpu
options.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143102
Clang uses signext/zeroext attributes for integer arguments shorter than
the default 'int' type on a target. So Flang has to match this for functions
from Fortran runtime and also for BIND(C) routines. This patch implements
ABI adjustments only for Fortran runtime calls. BIND(C) part will be done
separately.
This resolves https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/58579
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142677
Adding support for ppc64 (big endian) in order to support flang on 64 bit AIX
Reviewed By: clementval, kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138390
Clang uses signext/zeroext attributes for integer arguments shorter than
the default 'int' type on a target. So Flang has to match this for functions
from Fortran runtime and also for BIND(C) routines. This patch implements
ABI adjustments only for Fortran runtime calls. BIND(C) part will be done
separately.
This resolves https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/58579
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137050
As an attempt to fix errors in Flang regression tests on RISCV64 platform, RISCV64 target was added, and subsequent tests were provided.
Reviewed By: vzakhari
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136547
Clang uses signext/zeroext attributes for integer arguments shorter than
the default 'int' type on a target. So Flang has to match this for functions
from Fortran runtime and also for BIND(C) routines. This patch implements
ABI adjustments only for Fortran runtime calls. BIND(C) part will be done
separately.
This resolves https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/58579
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137050
This allows all ELF operating systems to use target specifics tuned for Linux,
since they use mostly the same ABIs. If some triples are to excluded, it's
better done at the driver layer.
Reviewed By: emaste
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135100
As described in Issue #57642, `flang` currently lacks SPARC support in
`Optimizer/CodeGen/Target.cpp`, which causes a considerable number of tests
to `FAIL` with
error: flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/Target.cpp:310: not yet implemented:
target not implemented
This patch fixes this by following GCC`s documentation of the ABI described
in the Issue.
Tested on `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133561
When testing LLVM 15.0.0 rc1 on Solaris, I found that 50+ flang tests
`FAIL`ed with
error:
/vol/llvm/src/llvm-project/local/flang/lib/Optimizer/CodeGen/Target.cpp:310:
not yet implemented: target not implemented
This patch fixes that for Solaris/x86, where the fix is trivial (just
handling it like the other x86 OSes).
Tested on `amd64-pc-solaris2.11`; only a single failure remains now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131054
This patch is part of the upstreaming effort from fir-dev branch.
Reviewed By: jeanPerier, PeteSteinfeld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128331
Co-authored-by: Jean Perier <jperier@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Eric Schweitz <eschweitz@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Kiran Chandramohan <kiran.chandramohan@arm.com>
This patch is part of the upstreaming effort from fir-dev branch.
Reviewed By: jeanPerier, PeteSteinfeld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127634
Co-authored-by: Eric Schweitz <eschweitz@nvidia.com>
