Updated the affected scalable_of_scalable tests in sve-gep.ll, as isConstantSplatValue now returns true in DAGCombiner::visitMUL and folds `(mul x, 1) -> x`
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91363
Reverted because the compile time impact is still too high.
isKnownViaNonRecursiveReasoning is used twice, we can do it just once.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92152
This reverts commit 3d4c0460ec6040fc071e56dc113afd181294591e.
Compile time impact is still high. Need to understand why.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92153
Previously we tried to using isKnownPredicateAt, but it makes an
extra query to isKnownPredicate, which has negative impact on compile
time. Let's try to use more lightweight isBasicBlockEntryGuardedByCond.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92152
This reverts commit 14f2ad0e3cc54d5eb254b545a469e8ffdb62b119.
Reverting to investigate compile time drop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92152
It's more future-proof to use isGFX10Plus from the start, on the
assumption that future architectures will be based on current
architectures.
Also make use of the existing isGFX9Plus in a few places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92092
This addresses post review comment for D92018.
The warning was:
```
error: loop variable 'Note' is always a copy because the range of type 'iterator_range<llvm::object::ELFFile<llvm::object::ELFType<llvm::support::big, true> >::Elf_Note_Iterator>' (aka 'iterator_range<Elf_Note_Iterator_Impl<ELFType<(llvm::support::endianness)0U, true> > >') does not return a reference [-Werror,-Wrange-loop-analysis]
for (const typename ELFT::Note &Note : Obj.notes(S, Err))
```
A piece of code in `isLoopBackedgeGuardedByCond` basically duplicates
the dominators traversal from `isBlockEntryGuardedByCond` called from
`isKnownPredicateAt`, but it's less powerful because it does not give context
to `isImpliedCond`. This patch reuses the `isKnownPredicateAt `function there,
reducing the amount of code duplication and making it more powerful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92152
Reviewed By: skatkov
Use more context to prove contextual facts about the last iteration. It is
only executed when the backedge is taken, so we can use `isLoopBackedgeGuardedByCond`
to make this check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91535
Reviewed By: skatkov
LoopLoadElim may end up expanding an AddRec from a loop
which is not the current loop. This loop may not be in simplify
form. We figure it out after the no-return point, so cannot bail
in this case.
AddRec requires simplify form to expand. The only way to ensure
this does not crash is to simplify all loops beforehand.
The issue only exists in new PM. Old PM requests LoopSimplify
required pass and it simplifies all loops before the opt begins.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91525
Reviewed By: asbirlea, aeubanks
Define ConstantData::PoisonValue.
Add support for poison value to LLLexer/LLParser/BitcodeReader/BitcodeWriter.
Add support for poison value to llvm-c interface.
Add support for poison value to OCaml binding.
Add m_Poison in PatternMatch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71126
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D89072 I added static const data members
to the debug subsection for globals. It skipped emitting an S_CONSTANT if it
didn't have a value, which meant the subsection could be empty.
This patch fixes the empty subsection issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92049
Start with an assumption that FMA is faster than Fmul+FAdd. If thats not true
on some particular implementation we can add a tuning parameter in the future.
I've update the fmuladd test cases and added new test cases for fast math flag
based contraction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91987
We currently don't match this which limits the effectiveness of D91120 until
InstCombine starts canonicalizing to llvm.abs. This should be easy to remove
if/when we remove the SPF_ABS handling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92118
In text-item contexts, %expr expands to a string containing the results of evaluating `expr`.
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89736
This is the logically correct thing to do. But it generates worse
code for i32 umin/umax on the rv64 due to type legalize requesting
zext even though the arguments are sext. Maybe we can teach type
legalizer to use sext for umin/umax for RISCV.
It's also producing possibly worse code on i64 on RV32 since we
still end up with selects that become branches. But this seems
like something we could improve in type legalization or DAG combine.
Hopefully this makes D92095 work for RISCV with Zbb.
This should handle the basic integer min/max handling - the HVX ops are still TODO.
This is some necessary cleanup work for min/max ops to eventually help us move the add/sub sat patterns into DAGCombine - D91876.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92112
Update costs now that D92095 and D92102 have tweaked the SSE2 implementation
The SSE42 BLENDVPD cost can actually be used on SSE41 as we don't attempt to generate PCMPGT anymore
Add scalar i16/i32/i64 costs as we can do this cheaply with CMOV
Local values are constants or addresses that can't be folded into
the instruction that uses them. FastISel materializes these in a
"local value" area that always dominates the current insertion
point, to try to avoid materializing these values more than once
(per block).
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43093 added code to sink these local
value instructions to their first use, which has two beneficial
effects. One, it is likely to avoid some unnecessary spills and
reloads; two, it allows us to attach the debug location of the
user to the local value instruction. The latter effect can
improve the debugging experience for debuggers with a "set next
statement" feature, such as the Visual Studio debugger and PS4
debugger, because instructions to set up constants for a given
statement will be associated with the appropriate source line.
There are also some constants (primarily addresses) that could be
produced by no-op casts or GEP instructions; the main difference
from "local value" instructions is that these are values from
separate IR instructions, and therefore could have multiple users
across multiple basic blocks. D43093 avoided sinking these, even
though they were emitted to the same "local value" area as the
other instructions. The patch comment for D43093 states:
Local values may also be used by no-op casts, which adds the
register to the RegFixups table. Without reversing the RegFixups
map direction, we don't have enough information to sink these
instructions.
This patch undoes most of D43093, and instead flushes the local
value map after(*) every IR instruction, using that instruction's
debug location. This avoids sometimes incorrect locations used
previously, and emits instructions in a more natural order.
This does mean materialized values are not re-used across IR
instruction boundaries; however, only about 5% of those values
were reused in an experimental self-build of clang.
(*) Actually, just prior to the next instruction. It seems like
it would be cleaner the other way, but I was having trouble
getting that to work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91734
This adds custom opcodes for FSLW/FSRW so we can type legalize
fshl/fshr without needing to match a sign_extend_inreg.
I've used the operand order from fshl/fshr to make the isel
pattern similar to the non-W form. It was also hard to decide
another order since the register instruction has the shift amount
as the second operand, but the immediate instruction has it as
the third operand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91479
The TypeSize warning would occur because RuntimePointerChecking::insert
was not scalable vector aware. The fix is to use
ScalarEvolution::getSizeOfExpr to grab the size of types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90171
The indirect function table, synthesized by the linker, is needed if and
only if there are TABLE_INDEX relocs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91637
Currently, `-indvars` runs first, and then immediately after `-loop-idiom` does.
I'm not really sure if `-loop-idiom` requires `-indvars` to run beforehand,
but i'm *very* sure that `-indvars` requires `-loop-idiom` to run afterwards,
as it can be seen in the phase-ordering test.
LoopIdiom runs on two types of loops: countable ones, and uncountable ones.
For uncountable ones, IndVars obviously didn't make any change to them,
since they are uncountable, so for them the order should be irrelevant.
For countable ones, well, they should have been countable before IndVars
for IndVars to make any change to them, and since SCEV is used on them,
it shouldn't matter if IndVars have already canonicalized them.
So i don't really see why we'd want the current ordering.
Should this cause issues, it will give us a reproducer test case
that shows flaws in this logic, and we then could adjust accordingly.
While this is quite likely beneficial in-the-wild already,
it's a required part for the full motivational pattern
behind `left-shift-until-bittest` loop idiom (D91038).
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91800
This commit factors out a WasmTableType definition from WasmTable, as is
the case for WasmGlobal and other data types. Also add support for
extracting the SymbolName for a table from the linking section's symbol
table.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91849
Add .shader_functions to pal metadata, which contains the stack frame
size for all non-entry-point functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90036
If smax() is legal, this is likely to result in smaller codegen expansion for abs(x) than the xor(add,ashr) method.
This is also what PowerPC has been doing for its abs implementation, so it lets us get rid of a load of custom lowering code there (and which was never updated when they added smax lowering).
Alive2: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/xRk3cD
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92095
