In https://reviews.llvm.org/D89072 I added static const data members
to the debug subsection for globals. It skipped emitting an S_CONSTANT if it
didn't have a value, which meant the subsection could be empty.
This patch fixes the empty subsection issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92049
Local values are constants or addresses that can't be folded into
the instruction that uses them. FastISel materializes these in a
"local value" area that always dominates the current insertion
point, to try to avoid materializing these values more than once
(per block).
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43093 added code to sink these local
value instructions to their first use, which has two beneficial
effects. One, it is likely to avoid some unnecessary spills and
reloads; two, it allows us to attach the debug location of the
user to the local value instruction. The latter effect can
improve the debugging experience for debuggers with a "set next
statement" feature, such as the Visual Studio debugger and PS4
debugger, because instructions to set up constants for a given
statement will be associated with the appropriate source line.
There are also some constants (primarily addresses) that could be
produced by no-op casts or GEP instructions; the main difference
from "local value" instructions is that these are values from
separate IR instructions, and therefore could have multiple users
across multiple basic blocks. D43093 avoided sinking these, even
though they were emitted to the same "local value" area as the
other instructions. The patch comment for D43093 states:
Local values may also be used by no-op casts, which adds the
register to the RegFixups table. Without reversing the RegFixups
map direction, we don't have enough information to sink these
instructions.
This patch undoes most of D43093, and instead flushes the local
value map after(*) every IR instruction, using that instruction's
debug location. This avoids sometimes incorrect locations used
previously, and emits instructions in a more natural order.
This does mean materialized values are not re-used across IR
instruction boundaries; however, only about 5% of those values
were reused in an experimental self-build of clang.
(*) Actually, just prior to the next instruction. It seems like
it would be cleaner the other way, but I was having trouble
getting that to work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91734
This patch moves the selection of the style used to emit the numbers
(DW_OP_implicit_value vs. DW_OP_const+DW_OP_stack_value) into
DwarfExpression::addUnsignedConstant. This logic is not FP-specific, and
it will be needed for large integers too.
The refactor also makes DW_OP_implicit_value (DW_OP_stack_value worked
already) be used for floating point constants other than float and
double, so I've added a _Float16 test for it.
Split off from D90916.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91058
With a function pass manager, it would insert debuginfo metadata before
getting to function passes while processing the pass manager, causing
debugify to skip while running the function passes.
Skip special passes + verifier + printing passes. Compared to the legacy
implementation of -debugify-each, this additionally skips verifier
passes. Probably no need to update the legacy version since it will be
obsolete soon.
This fixes 2 instcombine tests using -debugify-each under NPM.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91558
Extend the existing basic block sections debug info test to check for the correctness of the generated line table.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90989
Imagine we have a YAML declaration of few sections: `foo1`, `<unnamed 2>`, `foo3`, `foo4`.
To put them into segment we can do (1*):
```
Sections:
- Section: foo1
- Section: foo4
```
or we can use (2*):
```
Sections:
- Section: foo1
- Section: foo3
- Section: foo4
```
or (3*) :
```
Sections:
- Section: foo1
## "(index 2)" here is a name that we automatically created for a unnamed section.
- Section: (index 2)
- Section: foo3
- Section: foo4
```
It looks really confusing that we don't have to list all of sections.
At first I've tried to make this rule stricter and report an error when there is a gap
(i.e. when a section is included into segment, but not listed explicitly).
This did not work perfect, because such approach conflicts with unnamed sections/fills (see (3*)).
This patch drops "Sections" key and introduces 2 keys instead: `FirstSec` and `LastSec`.
Both are optional.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90458
This caused an explosion in ICF times during linking on Windows when libfuzzer
instrumentation is enabled. For a small binary we see ICF time go from ~0 to
~10 s. For a large binary it goes from ~1 s to forevert (I gave up after 30
minutes).
See comment on the code review.
> If we are going to write handler data (that is written as variable
> length data following after the unwind info in .xdata), we need to
> emit the handler data immediately, but for cases where no such
> info is going to be written, skip emitting it right away. (Unwind
> info for all remaining functions that hasn't gotten it emitted
> directly is emitted at the end.)
>
> This does slightly change the ordering of sections (triggering a
> bunch of updates to DebugInfo/COFF tests), but the change should be
> benign.
>
> This also matches GCC's assembly output, which doesn't output
> .seh_handlerdata unless it actually is needed.
>
> For ARM64, the unwind info can be packed into the runtime function
> entry itself (leaving no data in the .xdata section at all), but
> that can only be done if there's no follow-on data in the .xdata
> section. If emission of the unwind info is triggered via
> EmitWinEHHandlerData (or the .seh_handlerdata directive), which
> implicitly switches to the .xdata section, there's a chance of the
> caller wanting to pass further data there, so the packed format
> can't be used in that case.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87448
This reverts commit 36c64af9d7f97414d48681b74352c9684077259b.
Minimum amount of tests to cover (most) of the DISubprogram verifier
checks.
Reviewed By: vsk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90340
Change-Id: Icd25dac64f87f6dcf67ff3443eb4f95af18d05a8
Since Wasm comdat sections work similarly to ELF, we can use that mechanism
to eliminate duplicate dwarf type information in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88603
We used to only emit static const data members in CodeView as
S_CONSTANTS when they were used; this patch makes it so they are always emitted.
This changes CodeViewDebug.cpp to find the static const members from the
class debug info instead of creating DIGlobalVariables in the IR
whenever a static const data member is used.
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47580
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89072
This reverts commit 504615353f31136dd6bf7a971b6c236fd70582be.
This is needed to support fortran assumed rank arrays which
have runtime rank.
Summary:
Fortran assumed rank arrays have dynamic rank. DWARF TAG
DW_TAG_generic_subrange is needed to support that.
Testing:
unit test cases added (hand-written)
check llvm
check debug-info
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89218
Fix an out-of-bounds shift in emitLegacyZExt by using a slightly more
complicated dwarf expression to create the zext mask.
This addresses a UBSan diagnostic seen when compiling compiler-rt
(llvm.org/PR47927).
rdar://70307714
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89838
Since Wasm comdat sections work similarly to ELF, we can use that mechanism
to eliminate duplicate dwarf type information in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88603
We used to only emit static const data members in CodeView as
S_CONSTANTS when they were used; this patch makes it so they are always emitted.
I changed CodeViewDebug.cpp to find the static const members from the
class debug info instead of creating DIGlobalVariables in the IR
whenever a static const data member is used.
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47580
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89072
This patch enables emitting DWARF `DW_OP_implicit_value` opcode when
tuning debug information for LLDB (`-debugger-tune=lldb`).
This will also propagate to Darwin platforms, since they use LLDB tuning
as a default.
rdar://67406059
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90001
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Deciding where to place debugging instructions when normal instructions
sink between blocks is difficult -- see PR44117. Dealing with this with
instruction-referencing variable locations is simple: we just tolerate
DBG_INSTR_REFs referring to values that haven't been computed yet. This
patch adds support into InstrRefBasedLDV to record when a variable value
appears in the middle of a block, and should have a DBG_VALUE added when it
appears (a debug use before def).
While described simply, this relies heavily on the value-propagation
algorithm in InstrRefBasedLDV. The implementation doesn't attempt to verify
the location of a value unless something non-trivial occurs to merge
variable values in vlocJoin. This means that a variable with a value that
has no location can retain it across all control flow (including loops).
It's only when another debug instruction specifies a different variable
value that we have to check, and find there's no location.
This property means that if a machine value is defined in a block dominated
by a DBG_INSTR_REF that refers to it, all the successor blocks can
automatically find a location for that value (if it's not clobbered). Thus
in a sense, InstrRefBasedLDV is already supporting and implementing
use-before-defs. This patch allows us to specify a variable location in the
block where it's defined.
When loading live-in variable locations, TransferTracker currently discards
those where it can't find a location for the variable value. However, we
can tell from the machine value number whether the value is defined in this
block. If it is, add it to a set of use-before-def records. Then, once the
relevant instruction has been processed, emit a DBG_VALUE immediately after
it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85775
Handle DBG_INSTR_REF instructions in LiveDebugValues, to determine and
propagate variable locations. The logic is fairly straight forwards:
Collect a map of debug-instruction-number to the machine value numbers
generated in the first walk through the function. When building the
variable value transfer function and we see a DBG_INSTR_REF, look up the
instruction it refers to, and pick the machine value number it generates,
That's it; the rest of LiveDebugValues continues as normal.
Awkwardly, there are two kinds of instruction numbering happening here: the
offset into the block (which is how machine value numbers are determined),
and the numbers that we label instructions with when generating
DBG_INSTR_REFs.
I've also restructured the TransferTracker redefVar code a little, to
separate some DBG_VALUE specific operations into its own method. The
changes around redefVar should be largely NFC, while allowing
DBG_INSTR_REFs to specify a value number rather than just a location.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85771
This patch copies @vsk's fix to instcombine from D85555 over to mem2reg. The
motivation and rationale are exactly the same: When mem2reg removes an alloca,
it erases the dbg.{addr,declare} instructions which refer to the alloca. It
would be better to instead remove all debug intrinsics which describe the
contents of the dead alloca, namely all dbg.value(<dead alloca>, ...,
DW_OP_deref)'s.
As far as I can tell, prior to D80264 these `dbg.value+deref`s would have been
silently dropped instead of being made `undef`, so we're just returning to
previous behaviour with these patches.
Testing:
`llvm-lit llvm/test` and `ninja check-clang` gave no unexpected failures. Added
3 tests, each of which covers a dbg.value deletion path in mem2reg:
mem2reg-promote-alloca-1.ll
mem2reg-promote-alloca-2.ll
mem2reg-promote-alloca-3.ll
The first is based on the dexter test inlining.c from D89543. This patch also
improves the debugging experience for loop.c from D89543, which suffers
similarly after arg promotion instead of inlining.
When switching the register debug operands to $noreg in
setupDebugValueUndef() also clear the sub-register indices for virtual
registers. This is done when marking DBG_VALUEs undef in other cases,
e.g. in LiveDebugVariables. I have not found any cases where leaving the
sub-register index causes any issues, and the indices would eventually
get dropped when LiveDebugVariables reinserted the undef DBG_VALUEs
after register scheduling, but if nothing else it looked a bit weird in
printouts to have sub-register indices on $noreg, and I don't think the
sub-register index holds any meaningful information at that point.
I have not been able to find any source-level reproducer for this with
an upstream target, so I have just added an instrumented machine-sink
test.
Reviewed By: djtodoro, jmorse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89941
Testing reveals that lldb and gdb have some problems with supporting
DW_OP_convert - gdb with Split DWARF tries to resolve the CU-relative
DIE offset relative to the skeleton DIE. lldb tries to treat the offset
as absolute, which judging by the llvm-dsymutil support for
DW_OP_convert, I guess works OK in MachO? (though probably llvm-dsymutil
is producing invalid DWARF by resolving the relative reference to an
absolute one?).
Specifically this disables DW_OP_convert usage in DWARFv5 if:
* Tuning for GDB and using Split DWARF
* Tuning for LLDB and not targeting MachO
Both FastRegAlloc and LiveDebugVariables/greedy need to cope with
DBG_INSTR_REFs. None of them actually need to take any action, other than
passing DBG_INSTR_REFs through: variable location information doesn't refer
to any registers at this stage.
LiveDebugVariables stashes the instruction information in a tuple, then
re-creates it later. This is only necessary as the register allocator
doesn't expect to see any debug instructions while it's working. No
equivalence classes or interval splitting is required at all!
No changes are needed for the fast register allocator, as it just ignores
debug instructions. The test added checks that both of them preserve
DBG_INSTR_REFs.
This also expands ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp to treat DBG_INSTR_REFs the same as
DBG_VALUEs when rescheduling instructions around. The current movement of
DBG_VALUEs around is less than ideal, but it's not a regression to make
DBG_INSTR_REFs subject to the same movement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85757
The instruction referencing work currently only works on X86, and all the
tests for it will be X86 based for the time being. Configure the whole
directory to be X86-only, seeing how I keep on landing tests that don't
have the correct REQUIRES lines.
This patch touches two optimizations, TwoAddressInstruction and X86's
FixupLEAs pass, both of which optimize by re-creating instructions. For
LEAs, various bits of arithmetic are better represented as LEAs on X86,
while TwoAddressInstruction sometimes converts instrs into three address
instructions if it's profitable.
For debug instruction referencing, both of these require substitutions to
be created -- the old instruction number must be pointed to the new
instruction number, as illustrated in the added test. If this isn't done,
any variable locations based on the optimized instruction are
conservatively dropped.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85756
Seems users have enough different uses of the symbolizer where they
might have unknown binaries and offsets such that "best effort" behavior
is all that's expected of llvm-symbolizer - so even erroring on unknown
executables and out of bounds offsets might not be suitable.
This reverts commit 1de0199748ef2a20cd146c100ea1b8e6726c4767.
This reverts commit a7b209a6d40d77b43a38664b1fe64513587f24c6.
This reverts commit 338dd138ea4a70b52ab48e0c8aa38ec152b3569a.
Create the LLVM / CodeView register mappings for the 32-bit ARM Window targets.
Reviewed By: compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89622
LLVM rejects DWARF operator DW_OP_over. This DWARF operator is needed
for Flang to support assumed rank array.
Summary:
Currently LLVM rejects DWARF operator DW_OP_over. Below error is
produced when llvm finds this operator.
[..]
invalid expression
!DIExpression(151, 20, 16, 48, 30, 35, 80, 34, 6)
warning: ignoring invalid debug info in over.ll
[..]
There were some parts missing in support of this operator, which are
now completed.
Testing
-added a unit testcase
-check-debuginfo
-check-llvm
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89208
