We can always fold zext.b since it is just andi. The others require
Zba/Zbb.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130302
Vector fptosi_sat and fptoui_sat were being expanded by unrolling the
vector operation. This doesn't work for scalable vector, so this patch
adds a call to TLI.expandFP_TO_INT_SAT if the vector is scalable.
Scalable tests are added for AArch64 and RISCV. Some of the AArch64
fptoi_sat operations should be legal, but that will be handled in
another patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130028
(srl (and X, 1<<C), C) is the form we receive for testing bit C.
An earlier combine removed the setcc so it wasn't there to match
when we created the SELECT_CC. This doesn't happen for BR_CC because
generic DAG combine rebuilds the setcc if it is used by BRCOND.
We can shift X left by XLen-1-C to put the bit to be tested in the
MSB, and use a signed compare with 0 to test the MSB.
If C > 10, this will require a constant to be materialized for the
And. To avoid this, we can shift X left by XLen-1-C bits to put the
tested bit in the MSB, then we can do a signed compare with 0 to
determine if the MSB is 0 or 1. Thanks to @reames for the suggestion.
I've implemented this inside of translateSetCCForBranch which is
called when setcc+brcond or setcc+select is converted to br_cc or
select_cc during lowering. It doesn't make sense to do this for
general setcc since we lack a sgez instruction.
I've tested bit 10, 11, 31, 32, 63 and a couple bits betwen 11 and 31
and between 32 and 63 for both i32 and i64 where applicable. Select
has some deficiencies where we receive (and (srl X, C), 1) instead.
This doesn't happen for br_cc due to the call to rebuildSetCC in the
generic DAGCombiner for brcond. I'll explore improving select in a
future patch.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130203
Due to the late expansion of the compare exchange sequences, there's
scope for improving codegen by folding the branches into the cmpxchg
loop (avoiding a branch-to-branch).
The "xor (X >> ShiftC), XorC --> (not X) >> ShiftC" fold is currently limited to the XOR mask being a shifted all-bits mask, but we can relax this to only need to match under the demanded bits.
This helps expose more bit extraction/clearing patterns and fixes the PowerPC testCompares*.ll regressions from D127115
Alive2: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/fl7T7K
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129933
This revision supports to scalarize a binary operation of two scalable splat vectors.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122791
This patch implements recently ratified extension Zmmul, a subextension
of M (Integer Multiplication and Division) consisting only
multiplication part of it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103313
Reviewed By: craig.topper, jrtc27, asb
(and X, 0xffffffff) requires 2 shifts in the base ISA. Since we
know the result is being used by a compare, we can use a sext_inreg
instead of an AND if we also modify C1 to have 33 sign bits instead
of 32 leading zeros. This can also improve the generated code for
materializing C1.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129980
setge/le/uge/ule selected by themselves require an xori with 1.
If we're negating the setcc, we can fold the xori with the neg
to create an addi with -1.
This works because xori X, 1 is equivalent to 1 - X if X is either
0 or 1. So we're doing -(1 - X) which is X-1 or X+-1.
This improves the code for selecting between 0 and -1 based on a
condition for some conditions.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129957
We can use lw to load 4 bytes from the stack and sign extend them
instead of loading all 8 bytes.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129948
This patch extends D124824. It uses SHXADD+SLLI to emit 3, 5, or 9 multiplied by a power 2.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129179
If X is known positive by a dominating condition, we can fill in
ones into the upper bits of C1 if that would allow it to become an
simm12 allowing the use of ANDI.
This pattern often occurs in unrolled loops where the induction
variable has been widened.
To get the best benefit from this, I had to move the pass above
ConstantHoisting which is in addIRPasses. Otherwise the AND constant
is often hoisted away from the AND.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129888
Changes since initial commit:
* Wrapping a pointer in an SCEV unknown hides the base, and SCEV is only able to compute a subtraction when the bases are known to be equal. This results in a SCEVCouldNotCompute flowing forward and triggering asserts. Test case added in d767b392.
* isLoopInvariant returns true for instructions outside the loop, but not necessarily *above* the loop. Since this code is allowed to visit uses of an IV outside of a loop, we have to make sure the operands of the compare are both invariant and dominating the header. Test case added in 2aed3cdb.
Original commit message follows...
The ICmpZero matching is checking to see if the expression is loop invariant per SCEV and expandable. This allows expressions inside the loop which can be made loop invariant to be seamlessly expanded, but is overly conservative for expressions which already *are* loop invariant.
As a simple justification for why this is correct, consider a loop invariant urem as RHS vs an alternate function with that same urem wrapped inside a helper call. Why would it be legal to match the later, but not the former?
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129793
The ICmpZero matching is checking to see if the expression is loop invariant per SCEV and expandable. This allows expressions inside the loop which can be made loop invariant to be seamlessly expanded, but is overly conservative for expressions which already *are* loop invariant.
As a simple justification for why this is correct, consider a loop invariant urem as RHS vs an alternate function with that same urem wrapped inside a helper call. Why would it be legal to match the later, but not the former?
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129793
If we have a variable shift amount and the demanded mask has leading
zeros, we can propagate those leading zeros to not demand those bits
from operand 0. This can allow zero_extend/sign_extend to become
any_extend. This pattern can occur due to C integer promotion rules.
This transform is already done by InstCombineSimplifyDemanded.cpp where
sign_extend can be turned into zero_extend for example.
Reviewed By: spatel, foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121833
Initial optimization is to convert (i64 (zext (i32 X))) to
(i64 (sext (i32 X))) if the dominating condition for the basic block
guaranteed the sign bit of X is zero.
This frequently occurs in loop preheaders where a signed induction
variable that can never be negative has been widened. There will be
a dominating check that the 32-bit trip count isn't negative or zero.
The check here is not restricted to that specific case though.
A i32->i64 sext is cheaper than zext on RV64 without the Zba
extension. Later optimizations can often remove the sext from the
preheader basic block because the dominating block also needs a sext to
evaluate the greater than 0 check.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129732
We previously enabled subregister liveness by default when compiling
with RVV. This has been shown to cause miscompilations where RVV
register operand constraints are not met. A test was added for this in
D129639 which explains the issue in more detail.
Until this issue is fixed in some way, we should not be enabling
subregister liveness unless the user asks for it.
Reviewed By: craig.topper, rogfer01, kito-cheng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129646
This patch adds a test which shows that we may incorrectly register
allocate for RVV instructions which have no-overlap constraints on
source/dest registers of different LMUL groups.
The particular case shows that a vrgatherei16 instruction writes to a
LMUL=1 register group v11 and reads from an EMUL=2 register group
v10/v11. This breaks the overlap constraints of the vrgatherei16
instruction.
The test also shows that disabling subregister liveness fixes the test.
We use `early-clobber` on the `VR` dest and the `VRM2` source to enforce
the constraint but with subregister liveness this constraint is not met.
It's unclear to me at this point whether this is per-design of
early-clobber in conjunction with subregisters (meaning we should find
another way of expressing this constraint) or whether it's a bug in the
register allocator somewhere.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129639
The former pattern will select as slliw+sraiw while the latter
will select as slli+srai. This can enable the slli+srai to be
compressed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129688
If a change alters more than a couple of tests it's really handy to be
able to regenerate any that were created by update_llc_test_checks.py
with something like `update_llc_test_checks.py -u
llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV`. I noticed this causes some extraneous changes
(perhaps due to hand editing). This commit addresses that by updating
any fails that are modified by update_llc_test_checks.py -u.
When doing scalable vectorization, the loop vectorizer uses a urem in the computation of the vector trip count. The RHS of that urem is a (possibly shifted) call to @llvm.vscale.
vscale is effectively the number of "blocks" in the vector register. (That is, types such as <vscale x 8 x i8> and <vscale x 1 x i8> both fill one 64 bit block, and vscale is essentially how many of those blocks there are in a single vector register at runtime.)
We know from the RISCV V extension specification that VLEN must be a power of two between ELEN and 2^16. Since our block size is 64 bits, the must be a power of two numbers of blocks. (For everything other than VLEN<=32, but that's already broken.)
It is worth noting that AArch64 SVE specification explicitly allows non-power-of-two sizes for the vector registers and thus can't claim that vscale is a power of two by this logic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129609
To convert CTLZ to popcount we do
x = x | (x >> 1);
x = x | (x >> 2);
...
x = x | (x >>16);
x = x | (x >>32); // for 64-bit input
return popcount(~x);
This smears the most significant set bit across all of the bits
below it then inverts the remaining 0s and does a population count.
To support non-power of 2 types, the last shift amount must be
more than half of the size of the type. For i15, the last shift
was previously a shift by 4, with this patch we add another shift
of 8.
Fixes PR56457.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129431
Including the following opcode:
Select_FPR16_Using_CC_GPR
Select_FPR32_Using_CC_GPR
Select_FPR64_Using_CC_GPR
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127871
I think it only makes sense to return true here if we aren't going
to turn around and create a constant pool for the immmediate.
I left out the check for useConstantPoolForLargeInts() thinking
that even if you don't want the commpiler to create a constant pool
you might still want to avoid materializing an integer that is
already available in a global variable.
Test file was copied from AArch64/ARM and has not been commited yet.
Will post separate review for that.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129402
Test file was taken directly from AArch64/ARM. I've added RUN
lines for aligned and unaligned since many of the test cases
are strings that aren't aligned and have an odd size.
Some of these test cases are modified by D129402.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129403
We have custom isel that tries to select the Lo12 bits using a
separate ADDI that can later folded into the load/store address
by the post-isel peephole.
This patch disables this if the load/store already had a non-zero
offset. A non-zero offset implies that CodeGenPrepare split several
large offsets used by different loads and stores into a common large
offset and multiple small offsets that could be folded. Folding more
of the lo12 bits changes this common offset by increasing the small
offsets. While this can save an instruction to materialize the common
offset, it can also prevent the small offsets from fitting in a
compressed load/store instruction.
Removing this also simplifies the last piece needed to fold the custom
isel for add into SelectAddrRegImm and remove the post-isel peephole.
This allows fixed length vectors involving splats on the LHS to commute into the _vx form of the instruction. Oddly, the generic canonicalization rules appear to catch the scalable vector cases. I haven't fully dug in to understand why, but I suspect it's because of a difference in how we represent splats (splat_vector vs build_vector).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129302
