This patch revamps the BranchOpInterface a bit and allows a proper implementation of what was previously `getMutableSuccessorOperands` for operations, which internally produce arguments to some of the block arguments. A motivating example for this would be an invoke op with a error handling path:
```
invoke %function(%0)
label ^success ^error(%1 : i32)
^error(%e: !error, %arg0 : i32):
...
```
The advantages of this are that any users of `BranchOpInterface` can still argue over remaining block argument operands (such as `%1` in the example above), as well as make use of the modifying capabilities to add more operands, erase an operand etc.
The way this patch implements that functionality is via a new class called `SuccessorOperands`, which is now returned by `getSuccessorOperands`. It basically contains an `unsigned` denoting how many operator produced operands exist, as well as a `MutableOperandRange`, which are the usual forwarded operands we are used to. The produced operands are assumed to the first few block arguments, followed by the forwarded operands afterwards. The role of `SuccessorOperands` is to provide various utility functions to modify and query the successor arguments from a `BranchOpInterface`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123062
This CL adds a new RegionBranchTerminatorOpInterface to query information about operands that can be
passed to successor regions. Similar to the BranchOpInterface, it allows to freely define the
involved operands. However, in contrast to the BranchOpInterface, it expects an additional region
number to distinguish between various use cases which might require different operands passed to
different regions.
Moreover, we added new utility functions (namely getMutableRegionBranchSuccessorOperands and
getRegionBranchSuccessorOperands) to query (mutable) operand ranges for operations equiped with the
ReturnLike trait and/or implementing the newly added interface. This simplifies reasoning about
terminators in the scope of the nested regions.
We also adjusted the SCF.ConditionOp to benefit from the newly added capabilities.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105018
This it to make more clear the difference between this and
an AliasAnalysis.
For example, given a sequence of subviews that create values
A -> B -> C -> d:
BufferViewFlowAnalysis::resolve(B) => {B, C, D}
AliasAnalysis::resolve(B) => {A, B, C, D}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100838
