Update comment to reflect current code, which also allows for
VPScalarIVStepsRecipes to be uniform.
Suggested by @Ayal during review of D136068, thanks!
The existing code already unconditionally dereferences RepR, so
cast_or_null can be replaced by just cast.
Suggested by @Ayal during review of D136068, thanks!
The return value of getDef is guaranteed to be a VPRecipeBase and all
users can also accept a VPRecipeBase *. Most users actually case to
VPRecipeBase or a specific recipe before using it, so this change
removes a number of redundant casts.
Also rename it to getDefiningRecipe to make the name a bit clearer.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136068
If same instruction is reduced several times, but in one graph is part
of buildvector sequence and in another it is vectorized, we may loose
information that it was part of buildvector and must be extracted from
later vectorized value.
If the graph is only the buildvector node without main operation, need
to inherit insrtpoint from the redution instruction. Otherwise the
compiler crashes trying to insert instruction at the entry block.
Need to use advanced check for the same vectorized node to avoid
possible compiler crash. We may have 2 similar nodes (vector one and
gather) after graph nodes rotation, need to do extra checks for the
exact match.
The Assignment Tracking debug-info feature is outlined in this RFC:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/
rfc-assignment-tracking-a-better-way-of-specifying-variable-locations-in-ir
The SLP-Vectorizer can merge a set of scalar stores into a single vectorized
store. Merge DIAssignID intrinsics from the scalar stores onto the new
vectorized store.
Reviewed By: jmorse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133320
This adapts/copies code from the existing fold that allows
widening of load scalar+insert. It can help in IR because
it removes a shuffle, and the backend can already narrow
loads if that is profitable in codegen.
We might be able to consolidate more of the logic, but
handling this basic pattern should be enough to make a small
difference on one of the motivating examples from issue #17113.
The final goal of combining loads on those patterns is not
solved though.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137341
Gather nodes are vectorized as simply vector of the scalars instead of
relying on the actual node. It leads to the fact that in some cases
we may miss incorrect transformation (non-matching set of scalars is
just ended as a gather node instead of possible vector/gather node).
Better to rely on the actual nodes, it allows to improve stability and
better detect missed cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135174
Need to check if the insertelement mask size is reached during cost analysis to avoid compiler crash.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137639
Reapplies 87a2086 (which was reverted in 656f1d8).
Fix for scalable vectors in getInsertIndex merged in 46d53f4.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137537
This was done as a test for D137302 and it makes sense to push these changes
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137493
Gather nodes are vectorized as simply vector of the scalars instead of
relying on the actual node. It leads to the fact that in some cases
we may miss incorrect transformation (non-matching set of scalars is
just ended as a gather node instead of possible vector/gather node).
Better to rely on the actual nodes, it allows to improve stability and
better detect missed cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135174
Replace custom code to check if only the first lane is used by generic
helper `onlyFirstLaneUsed`. This enables VPlan-based sinking in a few
additional cases and was suggested in D133760.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136368
Epilogue loop vectorization is a feature in the vectorize intended to avoid running fully scalar code when the vector length of the main loop turns out to be either longer than the trip count of the actual loop, or with a huge remainder.
In practice, this feature appears to not have been well tuned. I honestly don't think it should be on by default at all, but it definitely shouldn't be on for RISCV. Note that other targets have also disabled it, but they've done so via disabling interleaving - which is, well, completely unrelated - and we don't want to do that for RISCV.
In the near term, many examples I'm seeing have terrible codegen for epilogue vectorization. We are greatly increasing code size for little value at reasonable VLEN values for small types. In the long term, the cases that epilogue vectorization are intended to handle are likely better handled via tail folding on RISCV.
As an aside, I also don't really trust the correctness of epilogue vectorization. The code structure is such that otherwise straight forward changes sometimes break only epilogue vectorization. The reuse of an existing vplan without careful validation opens significant room for nasty bugs. Given how rarely the code is exercised, that is not a good combination.
As such, this patch introduces a TTI hook, and completely disables epilogue vectorization on RISCV.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136695
Improve O(N^2) to O(N) in some cases, reduce number of allocations by
reserving memory.
Also, improve analysis of loads reduction values to avoid analysis
of not vectorizable cases.
The code in buildScalarSteps already properly handles creating the
scalar induction values with VF = 1. Use it directly instead of using
extra code to handle that case.
Suggested by @Ayal in D133760.
@Ayal suggested a better named helper than using `!getDef()` to check if
a value is invariant across all parts.
The property we are using here is that the VPValue is defined outside
any vector loop region. There's a TODO left to handle recipes defined in
pre-header blocks.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133666
Generalized the cost model estimation. Improved cost model estimation
for repeated scalars (no need to count their cost anymore), improved
cost model for extractelement instructions.
cpu2017
511.povray_r 0.57
520.omnetpp_r -0.98
521.wrf_r -0.01
525.x264_r 3.59 <+
526.blender_r -0.12
531.deepsjeng_r -0.07
538.imagick_r -1.42
Geometric mean: 0.21
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115757
Generalized the cost model estimation. Improved cost model estimation
for repeated scalars (no need to count their cost anymore), improved
cost model for extractelement instructions.
cpu2017
511.povray_r 0.57
520.omnetpp_r -0.98
521.wrf_r -0.01
525.x264_r 3.59 <+
526.blender_r -0.12
531.deepsjeng_r -0.07
538.imagick_r -1.42
Geometric mean: 0.21
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115757
We can't assume that operand 0 is the negated operand because
the matcher handles "fsub -0.0, X" (and also +0.0 with FMF).
By capturing the extract within the match, we avoid the bug
and make the transform more robust (can't assume that this
pass will only see canonical IR).
Instead of checking whether a map entry exists to decide if we should
initialize it or add to it, we can rely on the map entry being constructed
and initialized to 0 before the addition happens.
For the std::max case, I've made a reference to the map entry to
avoid looking it up twice.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135977
When generating masked gathers nodes, SLP vectorizer accounts the cost
of the GEPs for loads as part of the scalar-vector transformation cost
estimation. But it does not do it for vectorized loads/stores, while it
may completely remove some of the GEPs completely. Because of this in
some cases masked gather operation can be much more profitable rather
than regular vectorization (masked-gather cost + vector GEP - scalar
loads + GEPs comparing to vectorized loads - scalar loads).
Added the analysis of the removed scalarGEPs for vectorized load/store nodes for better cost estimation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135282
