For memory5.test, ld.bfd appears to ignore `. += 0x2000;`, so the test was testing
a wrong behavior. After deleting the code added in rLLD336335, we match ld.bfd and thus fix PR41357.
PR37836 (memory4.test) seems to have been fixed by another change.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62177
llvm-svn: 361228
This is https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=37836
Previously LLD could assign to Dot or set the address
for the section with address expression but did not advance
the position in a memory region.
Patch fixes the issue.
llvm-svn: 336335