Summary:
This commit renames ClangASTContext to TypeSystemClang to better reflect what this class is actually supposed to do
(implement the TypeSystem interface for Clang). It also gets rid of the very confusing situation that we have both a
`clang::ASTContext` and a `ClangASTContext` in clang (which sometimes causes Clang people to think I'm fiddling
with Clang's ASTContext when I'm actually just doing LLDB work).
I also have plans to potentially have multiple clang::ASTContext instances associated with one ClangASTContext so
the ASTContext naming will then become even more confusing to people.
Reviewers: #lldb, aprantl, shafik, clayborg, labath, JDevlieghere, davide, espindola, jdoerfert, xiaobai
Reviewed By: clayborg, labath, xiaobai
Subscribers: wuzish, emaste, nemanjai, mgorny, kbarton, MaskRay, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, jingham, xiaobai, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72684
LLDB frequently converts QualType to CompilerType. This is currently done like this:
result = CompilerType(this, qual_type_var.getAsOpaquePtr())
There are a few shortcomings in this current approach:
1. CompilerType's constructor takes a void* pointer so it isn't type safe.
2. We can't add any sanity checks to the CompilerType constructor (e.g. that the type
actually belongs to the passed ClangASTContext) without expanding the TypeSystem API.
3. The logic for converting QualType->CompilerType is spread out over all of LLDB so
changing it is difficult (e.g., what if we want to just pass the type ptr and not the
1type_ptr | qual_flags1 to CompilerType).
This patch adds a `ClangASTContext::GetType` function similar to the other GetTypeForDecl
functions that does this conversion in a type safe way.
It also adds a sanity check for Tag-based types that the type actually belongs to the
current ClangASTContext (Types don't seem to know their ASTContext, so we have to
workaround by looking at the decl for the underlying TagDecl. This doesn't cover all types
we construct but it's better than no sanity check).
ClangASTContext::getASTContext() currently returns a ptr but we have an assert there since a
while that the ASTContext is not a nullptr. This causes that we still have a lot of code
that is doing nullptr checks on the result of getASTContext() which is all unreachable code.
This patch changes the return value to a reference to make it clear this can't be a nullptr
and deletes all the nullptr checks.
Summary:
Right now, NSException::GetSummary() has the following output:
"name: $exception_name - reason: $exception_reason"
It would be better to simplify the output by removing the name and only
showing the exception's reason. This way, annotations would look nicer in
the editor, and would be a shorter summary in the Variables Inspector.
Accessing the exception's name can still be done by expanding the
NSException object in the Variables Inspector.
rdar://54770115
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71311
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Target doesn't really need to know about ClangASTContext more than any
other TypeSystem. We can create a method ClangASTContext::GetScratch for
anything who needs a ClangASTContext specifically instead of just a
generic TypeSystem.
Summary:
This patch adds code which will substitute references to the full object
constructors/destructors with their base object versions.
Like all substitutions in this category, this operation is not really
sound, but doing this in a more precise way allows us to get rid of a
much larger hack -- matching function according to their demangled
names, which effectively does the same thing, but also much more.
This is a (very late) follow-up to D54074.
Background: clang has an optimization which can eliminate full object
structors completely, if they are found to be equivalent to their base
object versions. It does this because it assumes they can be regenerated
on demand in the compile unit that needs them (e.g., because they are
declared inline). However, this doesn't work for the debugging scenario,
where we don't have the structor bodies available -- we pretend all
constructors are defined out-of-line as far as clang is concerned. This
causes clang to emit references to the (nonexisting) full object
structors during expression evaluation.
Fun fact: This is not a problem on darwin, because the relevant
optimization is disabled to work around a linker bug.
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70721
Remove hardcoded string prefix length assumption causing issues when
concatenating summary for NSURL in NSURLSummaryProvider. Provider relies
on concatenation of NSStringProvider results for summary, and while the
strings are prefixed with '@' in Objective-C, that is not the case in
Swift causing part of the description to be truncated.
This will be tested in the downstream fork.
Patch by Martin Svensson!
Summary:
Clang's raw Lexer doesn't produce any tokens for trailing backslashes in a line. This doesn't work with
LLDB's Clang highlighter which builds the source code to display from the list of tokens the Lexer returns.
This causes that lines with trailing backslashes are lacking the backslash and the following newline when
rendering source code in LLDB.
This patch removes the trailing newline from the current line we are highlighting. This way Clang doesn't
drop the backslash token and we just restore the newline after tokenising.
Fixes rdar://57091487
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, labath
Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70177
Performance issues lead to the libc++ std::function formatter to be disabled. We addressed some of those performance issues by adding caching see D67111
This PR fixes the first lookup performance by not using FindSymbolsMatchingRegExAndType(...) and instead finding the compilation unit the std::function wrapped callable should be in and then searching for the callable directly in the CU.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69913
We call IsPossibleDynamicType but we also need to check if this is a Clang type,
otherwise other languages with dynamic types (like Swift) might end up being interpreted
as potential Obj-C dynamic types.
The lifetime of a ValueObject and all its derivative ValueObjects (children, clones, etc.) is managed by a ClusterManager. These objects are only destroyed when every shared pointer to any of the managed objects in the cluster is destroyed. This means that no object in the cluster can store a shared pointer to another object in the cluster without creating a memory leak of the entire cluster. However, some of the synthetic children front-end implementations do exactly this; this patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68641
llvm-svn: 374195
Link against clang-cpp dylib rather than split libs when
CLANG_LINK_CLANG_DYLIB is enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68456
llvm-svn: 373734
ClangASTContext doesn't use m_persistent_variables in a way specific to
ClangPersistentVariables. Therefore, it should hold a unique pointer to
PersistentExpressionState instead of a ClangPersistentVariablesUP.
This also prevents you from pulling in a plugin header when including
ClangASTContext.h
Doing this exposed an implicit dependency in ObjCLanguage that was
corrected by including ClangModulesDeclVendor.h
llvm-svn: 371470
There is now std::shared_ptr passed around which is expensive for manycore
CPUs. Most of the times (except for 3 cases) it is now just std::moved with no
CPU locks needed. It also makes it possible to sort the keys (which is now not
needed much after D66398).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67049
llvm-svn: 370863
Since D66174 I see failures of TestDataFormatterStdList in about 50% of runs on
Fedora 30 x86_64 libstdc++. I have found out that LLDB internally expects these
RegularExpressions to be matched in their alphabetical order:
^std::(__cxx11::)?list<.+>(( )?&)?$
^std::__[[:alnum:]]+::list<.+>(( )?&)?$
But since D66174 they are sometimes matched in reverse order. In fact it was
only some luck it worked before as there is internally
std::map<lldb::RegularExpressionSP, FormatterImpl> (FormattersContainer).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66398
llvm-svn: 369655
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368933
Summary:
Ideally CompilerType would have no knowledge of clang or any individual
TypeSystem. Decoupling clang is relatively straightforward.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66102
llvm-svn: 368741
Summary: We have been seeing increased reports of performance issue around large project and formatting std::function variables especially in functions signatures in back traces. There are some possible fixes but exploring those fixes may take time and it is better to temporarily disable the formatter due to its impact and re-enable it once we have a fix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65666
llvm-svn: 367701
Summary:
This commit achieves the following:
- Functions used to return a `TypeSystem *` return an
`llvm::Expected<TypeSystem *>` now. This means that the result of a call
is always checked, forcing clients to move more carefully.
- `TypeSystemMap::GetTypeSystemForLanguage` will either return an Error or a
non-null pointer to a TypeSystem.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide, compnerd
Subscribers: jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65122
llvm-svn: 367360
Summary:
Following up to my CPPLanguageRuntime change, I'm moving
ObjCLanguageRuntime into a plugin as well.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, compnerd, jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, arphaman, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64763
llvm-svn: 366148
Summary: This seems better suited to be in a plugin.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, jingham, compnerd, labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64599
llvm-svn: 365951
Summary:
Following up on the plan I outlined in D63622, we can remove the
dependence on clang in all the places where we only want to find the
types from the DeclVendor. This means that currently DeclVendor depends
on clang, but centralizing the dependency makes it easier to refactor
cleanly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63853
llvm-svn: 364962
This is a followup to rL362981, in which I moved GetObjCLanguageRuntime
from Process to ObjCLanguageRuntime, renaming it to Get along the way.
llvm-svn: 362984
Summary:
In an effort to make Process more language agnostic, I removed
GetCPPLanguageRuntime from Process. I'm following up now with an equivalent
change for ObjC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63052
llvm-svn: 362981
Summary:
Using llvm-style rtti gives us stronger guarantees around casting
LanguageRuntimes.
As discussed in D62755
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62934
llvm-svn: 362884
Summary:
I want to remove this method because I think that Process should be
language agnostic, or at least, not have knowledge about specific language
runtimes. There is "GetLanguageRuntime()" which should be used instead. If the
caller a CPPLanguageRuntime, they should cast it as needed. Ideally, this
should only happen in plugins that need C++ specific knowledge.
The next step I would like to do is remove "GetObjCLanguageRuntime()" as well.
There are a lot more instances of that function being used, so I wanted to
upload this one first to get the general reception to this idea.
Reviewers: compnerd, davide, JDevlieghere, jingham, clayborg, labath, aprantl
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62755
llvm-svn: 362544
There is likely also an underlying bug in all code that calls
CPlusPlusNameParser with nullptrs, but this patch can also stand for
itself.
rdar://problem/49072829
llvm-svn: 362177
Summary:
Breakpoint shouldn't need to depend on any specific details from a
programming language. Currently the only language-specific detail it takes
advantage of are the different qualified names an objective-c method name might
have when adding a name lookup. This is reasonably generalizable.
The current method name I introduced is "GetVariantMethodNames", which I'm not
particularly tied to. If you have a better suggestion, please do let me know.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61746
llvm-svn: 360509
Summary:
According to [C128] "Virtual functions should specify exactly one
of `virtual`, `override`, or `final`", I've added override where a
virtual function is overriden but the explicit `override` keyword
was missing. Whenever both `virtual` and `override` were specified,
I removed `virtual`. As C.128 puts it:
> [...] writing more than one of these three is both redundant and
> a potential source of errors.
I anticipate a discussion about whether or not to add `override` to
destructors but I went for it because of an example in [ISOCPP1000].
Let me repeat the comment for you here:
Consider this code:
```
struct Base {
virtual ~Base(){}
};
struct SubClass : Base {
~SubClass() {
std::cout << "It works!\n";
}
};
int main() {
std::unique_ptr<Base> ptr = std::make_unique<SubClass>();
}
```
If for some odd reason somebody removes the `virtual` keyword from the
`Base` struct, the code will no longer print `It works!`. So adding
`override` to destructors actively protects us from accidentally
breaking our code at runtime.
[C128]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#c128-virtual-functions-should-specify-exactly-one-of-virtual-override-or-final
[ISOCPP1000]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/issues/1000#issuecomment-476951555
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, davide, shafik
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: kwk, arphaman, kadircet, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61440
llvm-svn: 359868
Summary:
When we want to compare a ConstString against a string literal (or any other non-ConstString),
we currently have to explicitly turn the other string into a ConstString. This makes sense as
comparing ConstStrings against each other is only a fast pointer comparison.
However, currently we (rather incorrectly) use in several places in LLDB temporary ConstStrings when
we just want to compare a given ConstString against a hardcoded value, for example like this:
```
if (extension != ConstString(".oat") && extension != ConstString(".odex"))
```
Obviously this kind of defeats the point of ConstStrings. In the comparison above we would
construct two temporary ConstStrings every time we hit the given code. Constructing a
ConstString is relatively expensive: we need to go to the StringPool, take a read and possibly
an exclusive write-lock and then look up our temporary string in the string map of the pool.
So we do a lot of heavy work for essentially just comparing a <6 characters in two strings.
I initially wanted to just fix these issues by turning the temporary ConstString in static variables/
members, but that made the code much less readable. Instead I propose to add a new overload
for the ConstString comparison operator that takes a StringRef. This comparison operator directly
compares the ConstString content against the given StringRef without turning the StringRef into
a ConstString.
This means that the example above can look like this now:
```
if (extension != ".oat" && extension != ".odex")
```
It also no longer has to unlock/lock two locks and call multiple functions in other TUs for constructing
the temporary ConstString instances. Instead this should end up just being a direct string comparison
of the two given strings on most compilers.
This patch also directly updates all uses of temporary and short ConstStrings in LLDB to use this new
comparison operator. It also adds a some unit tests for the new and old comparison operator.
Reviewers: #lldb, JDevlieghere, espindola, amccarth
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, amccarth
Subscribers: amccarth, clayborg, JDevlieghere, emaste, arichardson, MaskRay, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60667
llvm-svn: 359281
Summary:
This previous fix 5469bda296 did not have a test since we did not have a reproducer.
This is related to how formatters deal with pointers and references. The added tests both the new behavior and covers the previous bug fix as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60588
llvm-svn: 359118
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
There's a single report of a crash coming from this current_sp being NULL. I don't
have a repro case, and I couldn't get it to happen by hand-corrupting a list. We
always get an error instead. So I don't have a test case. But checking for null
is clearly right here.
<rdar://problem/48503320>
llvm-svn: 355957
My apologies for the large patch. With the exception of ConstString.h
itself it was entirely produced by sed.
ConstString has exactly one const char * data member, so passing a
ConstString by reference is not any more efficient than copying it by
value. In both cases a single pointer is passed. But passing it by
value makes it harder to accidentally return the address of a local
object.
(This fixes rdar://problem/48640859 for the Apple folks)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59030
llvm-svn: 355553
In r353906 we hooked up clang and lldb's reproducer infrastructure to
capture files used by clang. This patch adds the necessary logic to have
clang reuse the files from lldb's reproducer during replay.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58309
llvm-svn: 354283
Type punning through a union -> no good.
double to uint64 to double again -> no good either.
The nice side effect, other than silencing the sanitizer bot
is that it fixes the formatting of some dates, e.g. Jan 1st 1970.
<rdar://problem/47617983>
llvm-svn: 353191
libc++ has programmable ABI versioning controllable with the _LIBCPP_ABI_VERSION
macro. Currently there are at least 3 settings used in real systems (1 as the
default, ndk1 for Anroid, Cr for Chromium).
Only the 1 and ndk1 cases were handled. This change relaxes the check to allow
any ABI version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57466
llvm-svn: 352899
