Summary:
This commit renames ClangASTContext to TypeSystemClang to better reflect what this class is actually supposed to do
(implement the TypeSystem interface for Clang). It also gets rid of the very confusing situation that we have both a
`clang::ASTContext` and a `ClangASTContext` in clang (which sometimes causes Clang people to think I'm fiddling
with Clang's ASTContext when I'm actually just doing LLDB work).
I also have plans to potentially have multiple clang::ASTContext instances associated with one ClangASTContext so
the ASTContext naming will then become even more confusing to people.
Reviewers: #lldb, aprantl, shafik, clayborg, labath, JDevlieghere, davide, espindola, jdoerfert, xiaobai
Reviewed By: clayborg, labath, xiaobai
Subscribers: wuzish, emaste, nemanjai, mgorny, kbarton, MaskRay, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, jingham, xiaobai, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72684
Target doesn't really need to know about ClangASTContext more than any
other TypeSystem. We can create a method ClangASTContext::GetScratch for
anything who needs a ClangASTContext specifically instead of just a
generic TypeSystem.
Summary:
This patch adds code which will substitute references to the full object
constructors/destructors with their base object versions.
Like all substitutions in this category, this operation is not really
sound, but doing this in a more precise way allows us to get rid of a
much larger hack -- matching function according to their demangled
names, which effectively does the same thing, but also much more.
This is a (very late) follow-up to D54074.
Background: clang has an optimization which can eliminate full object
structors completely, if they are found to be equivalent to their base
object versions. It does this because it assumes they can be regenerated
on demand in the compile unit that needs them (e.g., because they are
declared inline). However, this doesn't work for the debugging scenario,
where we don't have the structor bodies available -- we pretend all
constructors are defined out-of-line as far as clang is concerned. This
causes clang to emit references to the (nonexisting) full object
structors during expression evaluation.
Fun fact: This is not a problem on darwin, because the relevant
optimization is disabled to work around a linker bug.
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70721
Performance issues lead to the libc++ std::function formatter to be disabled. We addressed some of those performance issues by adding caching see D67111
This PR fixes the first lookup performance by not using FindSymbolsMatchingRegExAndType(...) and instead finding the compilation unit the std::function wrapped callable should be in and then searching for the callable directly in the CU.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69913
The lifetime of a ValueObject and all its derivative ValueObjects (children, clones, etc.) is managed by a ClusterManager. These objects are only destroyed when every shared pointer to any of the managed objects in the cluster is destroyed. This means that no object in the cluster can store a shared pointer to another object in the cluster without creating a memory leak of the entire cluster. However, some of the synthetic children front-end implementations do exactly this; this patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68641
llvm-svn: 374195
There is now std::shared_ptr passed around which is expensive for manycore
CPUs. Most of the times (except for 3 cases) it is now just std::moved with no
CPU locks needed. It also makes it possible to sort the keys (which is now not
needed much after D66398).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67049
llvm-svn: 370863
Since D66174 I see failures of TestDataFormatterStdList in about 50% of runs on
Fedora 30 x86_64 libstdc++. I have found out that LLDB internally expects these
RegularExpressions to be matched in their alphabetical order:
^std::(__cxx11::)?list<.+>(( )?&)?$
^std::__[[:alnum:]]+::list<.+>(( )?&)?$
But since D66174 they are sometimes matched in reverse order. In fact it was
only some luck it worked before as there is internally
std::map<lldb::RegularExpressionSP, FormatterImpl> (FormattersContainer).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66398
llvm-svn: 369655
Summary: We have been seeing increased reports of performance issue around large project and formatting std::function variables especially in functions signatures in back traces. There are some possible fixes but exploring those fixes may take time and it is better to temporarily disable the formatter due to its impact and re-enable it once we have a fix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65666
llvm-svn: 367701
Summary:
This commit achieves the following:
- Functions used to return a `TypeSystem *` return an
`llvm::Expected<TypeSystem *>` now. This means that the result of a call
is always checked, forcing clients to move more carefully.
- `TypeSystemMap::GetTypeSystemForLanguage` will either return an Error or a
non-null pointer to a TypeSystem.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide, compnerd
Subscribers: jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65122
llvm-svn: 367360
Summary: This seems better suited to be in a plugin.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, jingham, compnerd, labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64599
llvm-svn: 365951
This is a followup to rL362981, in which I moved GetObjCLanguageRuntime
from Process to ObjCLanguageRuntime, renaming it to Get along the way.
llvm-svn: 362984
Summary:
I want to remove this method because I think that Process should be
language agnostic, or at least, not have knowledge about specific language
runtimes. There is "GetLanguageRuntime()" which should be used instead. If the
caller a CPPLanguageRuntime, they should cast it as needed. Ideally, this
should only happen in plugins that need C++ specific knowledge.
The next step I would like to do is remove "GetObjCLanguageRuntime()" as well.
There are a lot more instances of that function being used, so I wanted to
upload this one first to get the general reception to this idea.
Reviewers: compnerd, davide, JDevlieghere, jingham, clayborg, labath, aprantl
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62755
llvm-svn: 362544
There is likely also an underlying bug in all code that calls
CPlusPlusNameParser with nullptrs, but this patch can also stand for
itself.
rdar://problem/49072829
llvm-svn: 362177
Summary:
According to [C128] "Virtual functions should specify exactly one
of `virtual`, `override`, or `final`", I've added override where a
virtual function is overriden but the explicit `override` keyword
was missing. Whenever both `virtual` and `override` were specified,
I removed `virtual`. As C.128 puts it:
> [...] writing more than one of these three is both redundant and
> a potential source of errors.
I anticipate a discussion about whether or not to add `override` to
destructors but I went for it because of an example in [ISOCPP1000].
Let me repeat the comment for you here:
Consider this code:
```
struct Base {
virtual ~Base(){}
};
struct SubClass : Base {
~SubClass() {
std::cout << "It works!\n";
}
};
int main() {
std::unique_ptr<Base> ptr = std::make_unique<SubClass>();
}
```
If for some odd reason somebody removes the `virtual` keyword from the
`Base` struct, the code will no longer print `It works!`. So adding
`override` to destructors actively protects us from accidentally
breaking our code at runtime.
[C128]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#c128-virtual-functions-should-specify-exactly-one-of-virtual-override-or-final
[ISOCPP1000]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/issues/1000#issuecomment-476951555
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, davide, shafik
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: kwk, arphaman, kadircet, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61440
llvm-svn: 359868
Summary:
When we want to compare a ConstString against a string literal (or any other non-ConstString),
we currently have to explicitly turn the other string into a ConstString. This makes sense as
comparing ConstStrings against each other is only a fast pointer comparison.
However, currently we (rather incorrectly) use in several places in LLDB temporary ConstStrings when
we just want to compare a given ConstString against a hardcoded value, for example like this:
```
if (extension != ConstString(".oat") && extension != ConstString(".odex"))
```
Obviously this kind of defeats the point of ConstStrings. In the comparison above we would
construct two temporary ConstStrings every time we hit the given code. Constructing a
ConstString is relatively expensive: we need to go to the StringPool, take a read and possibly
an exclusive write-lock and then look up our temporary string in the string map of the pool.
So we do a lot of heavy work for essentially just comparing a <6 characters in two strings.
I initially wanted to just fix these issues by turning the temporary ConstString in static variables/
members, but that made the code much less readable. Instead I propose to add a new overload
for the ConstString comparison operator that takes a StringRef. This comparison operator directly
compares the ConstString content against the given StringRef without turning the StringRef into
a ConstString.
This means that the example above can look like this now:
```
if (extension != ".oat" && extension != ".odex")
```
It also no longer has to unlock/lock two locks and call multiple functions in other TUs for constructing
the temporary ConstString instances. Instead this should end up just being a direct string comparison
of the two given strings on most compilers.
This patch also directly updates all uses of temporary and short ConstStrings in LLDB to use this new
comparison operator. It also adds a some unit tests for the new and old comparison operator.
Reviewers: #lldb, JDevlieghere, espindola, amccarth
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, amccarth
Subscribers: amccarth, clayborg, JDevlieghere, emaste, arichardson, MaskRay, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60667
llvm-svn: 359281
Summary:
This previous fix 5469bda296 did not have a test since we did not have a reproducer.
This is related to how formatters deal with pointers and references. The added tests both the new behavior and covers the previous bug fix as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60588
llvm-svn: 359118
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
There's a single report of a crash coming from this current_sp being NULL. I don't
have a repro case, and I couldn't get it to happen by hand-corrupting a list. We
always get an error instead. So I don't have a test case. But checking for null
is clearly right here.
<rdar://problem/48503320>
llvm-svn: 355957
My apologies for the large patch. With the exception of ConstString.h
itself it was entirely produced by sed.
ConstString has exactly one const char * data member, so passing a
ConstString by reference is not any more efficient than copying it by
value. In both cases a single pointer is passed. But passing it by
value makes it harder to accidentally return the address of a local
object.
(This fixes rdar://problem/48640859 for the Apple folks)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59030
llvm-svn: 355553
libc++ has programmable ABI versioning controllable with the _LIBCPP_ABI_VERSION
macro. Currently there are at least 3 settings used in real systems (1 as the
default, ndk1 for Anroid, Cr for Chromium).
Only the 1 and ndk1 cases were handled. This change relaxes the check to allow
any ABI version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57466
llvm-svn: 352899
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The code in LLDB assumes that CompilerType and friends use the size 0
as a sentinel value to signal an error. This works for C++, where no
zero-sized type exists, but in many other programming languages
(including I believe C) types of size zero are possible and even
common. This is a particular pain point in swift-lldb, where extra
code exists to double-check that a type is *really* of size zero and
not an error at various locations.
To remedy this situation, this patch starts by converting
CompilerType::getBitSize() and getByteSize() to return an optional
result. To avoid wasting space, I hand-rolled my own optional data
type assuming that no type is larger than what fits into 63
bits. Follow-up patches would make similar changes to the ValueObject
hierarchy.
rdar://problem/47178964
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56688
llvm-svn: 351214
This patch simplifies boolean expressions acorss LLDB. It was generated
using clang-tidy with the following command:
run-clang-tidy.py -checks='-*,readability-simplify-boolean-expr' -format -fix $PWD
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55584
llvm-svn: 349215
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
Summary:
Now that llvm demangler supports more generic customization, we can
implement type substitution directly on top of this API. This will allow
us to remove the specialized hooks which were added to the demangler to
support this use case.
Reviewers: sgraenitz, erik.pilkington, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54074
llvm-svn: 346233
This patch introduces the simple MSVCUndecoratedNameParser. It is needed for
parsing names of PDB symbols corresponding to template instantiations. For
example, for the name `operator<<A>'::`2'::B::operator> we can't just split the
name with :: (as it is implemented for now) to retrieve its scopes. This parser
processes such names in a more correct way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52461
llvm-svn: 346213
Clang recently improved its DWARF support for C VLA types. The DWARF
now looks like this:
0x00000051: DW_TAG_variable [4]
DW_AT_location( fbreg -32 )
DW_AT_name( "__vla_expr" )
DW_AT_type( {0x000000d3} ( long unsigned int ) )
DW_AT_artificial( true )
...
0x000000da: DW_TAG_array_type [10] *
DW_AT_type( {0x000000cc} ( int ) )
0x000000df: DW_TAG_subrange_type [11]
DW_AT_type( {0x000000e9} ( __ARRAY_SIZE_TYPE__ ) )
DW_AT_count( {0x00000051} )
Without this patch LLDB will naively interpret the DIE offset 0x51 as
the static size of the array, which is clearly wrong. This patch
extends ValueObject::GetNumChildren to query the dynamic properties of
incomplete array types.
See the testcase for an example:
4 int foo(int a) {
5 int vla[a];
6 for (int i = 0; i < a; ++i)
7 vla[i] = i;
8
-> 9 pause(); // break here
10 return vla[a-1];
11 }
(lldb) fr v vla
(int []) vla = ([0] = 0, [1] = 1, [2] = 2, [3] = 3)
(lldb) quit
rdar://problem/21814005
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53530
llvm-svn: 346165
- Added LibcxxFunctionSummaryProvider
- Removed LibcxxFunctionFrontEnd
- Modified data formatter tests to test new summary functionality
Patch by Shafik Yaghmour!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50864
llvm-svn: 340543
Patch by Shafik Yaghmour!
This reapplies an earlier version after addressing some post-commit feedback.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49271
llvm-svn: 339828
