When functions exist for some but not all run lines we need to be
careful when selecting the prefix. So far, a common prefix was
potentially chosen as there was never a "conflict" that would have
caused otherwise. With this patch we avoid common prefixes if they
are used by run lines that do not emit the function.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68850
If we have `int foo(int a) { return a; }` and we run with --function-signature
enabled, we want a single variable declaration for `a` which is reused
later.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69722
Attribute annotations on calls, e.g., #0, are not useful on their own.
This patch adds a flag to update_test_checks.py to scrub them.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68851
This reverts part of commit 240aff80e0e59b79779d046b3275904fc0750d59.
It reverts cc802ea67beb66d2f8a935e647c3aedcf7848211.
We currently run LLVM tests in environments where python3 exists on
PATH, but it is broken. I don't think PATH discovery is a strong enough
signal that a working Python 3 installation exists.
If this will be the way forward, IMO we should follow the direction of
debug-info-tests, and use CMake's PYTHON_EXECUTABLE, which in the near
future will be a known-to-work Python 3 executable. If it's not Python
3, then we don't have to run this test.
The %update_cc_test_checks substitution only gets added if python3
is on path, so the test fails if it isn't. Don't run the test
when it would fail.
Also include the '%' in the arg to add_update_script_substition(),
to help greppability.
Summary:
This commit adds basic tests for these update script to validate that
they still work as expected. In the future we could extend these tests
whenever new features are added to avoid introducing regressions.
Reviewers: xbolva00, MaskRay, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70660
