The `lowerMSASplatImm` function zero-extends `i32` immediates while
building constant. If target type is `i64`, negative immediate loses
the sign. As a result, for example `__builtin_msa_ldi_d(-1)` lowered
to series of instruction loads incorrect value 0xffffffff to the `$w0`
register instead of single `ldi.d $w0, -1` instruction.
The fix zero-extends unsigned immediates and signed-extend signed
immediates.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D59884
llvm-svn: 357264
After investigating the examples from D59777 targeting an SSE4.1 machine,
it looks like a very different problem due to how we map illegal types (256-bit in these cases).
We're missing a shuffle simplification that maps elements of a vector back to a shuffled operand.
We have a more general version of this transform in DAGCombiner::visitVECTOR_SHUFFLE(), but that
generality means it is limited to patterns with a one-use constraint, and the examples here have
2 uses. We don't need any uses or legality limitations for a simplification (no new value is
created).
It looks like we miss this pattern in IR too.
In one of the zext examples here, we have shuffle masks like this:
Shuf0 = vector_shuffle<0,u,3,7,0,u,3,7>
Shuf = vector_shuffle<4,u,6,7,u,u,u,u>
...so that's moving the high half of the 1st vector into the low half. But the high half of the
1st vector is already identical to the low half.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59961
llvm-svn: 357258
This is a sibling to rL357178 that I noticed we'd hit if we chose
an alternate transform in D59818.
%z = zext i8 %x to i32
%dec = add i32 %z, -1
%r = sext i32 %dec to i64
=>
%z2 = zext i8 %x to i64
%r = add i64 %z2, -1
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/kPP
The x86 vector diffs show a slight regression, so there's a chance
that we should limit this and the previous transform to scalars.
But given that we allowed vectors before, I'm matching that behavior
here. We should change both transforms together if that's the right
thing to do.
llvm-svn: 357254
In the example below, we would previously emit two range checks, one for cases
1--3 and one for 4--6. This patch makes us exploit the fact that the
fall-through is unreachable and only one range check is necessary.
switch i32 %i, label %default [
i32 1, label %bb1
i32 2, label %bb1
i32 3, label %bb1
i32 4, label %bb2
i32 5, label %bb2
i32 6, label %bb2
]
default: unreachable
llvm-svn: 357252
Summary:
PowerPC64/PowerPC64le supports the builtin function __builtin_setrnd to set the floating point rounding mode. This function will use the least significant two bits of integer argument to set the floating point rounding mode.
double __builtin_setrnd(int mode);
The effective values for mode are:
0 - round to nearest
1 - round to zero
2 - round to +infinity
3 - round to -infinity
Note that the mode argument will modulo 4, so if the int argument is greater than 3, it will only use the least significant two bits of the mode. Namely, builtin_setrnd(102)) is equal to builtin_setrnd(2).
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59405
llvm-svn: 357241
The register index can only really be an SGPR. Lie that a VGPR index
is legal, and then rewrite the instruction in a waterfall loop to
handle the index.
llvm-svn: 357235
A shift and add/sub sequence combination is faster in place of a multiply by constant.
Because the cycle or latency of multiply is not huge, we only consider such following
worthy patterns.
```
(mul x, 2^N + 1) => (add (shl x, N), x)
(mul x, -(2^N + 1)) => -(add (shl x, N), x)
(mul x, 2^N - 1) => (sub (shl x, N), x)
(mul x, -(2^N - 1)) => (sub x, (shl x, N))
```
And the cycles or latency is subtarget-dependent so that we need consider the
subtarget to determine to do or not do such transformation.
Also data type is considered for different cycles or latency to do multiply.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58950
llvm-svn: 357233
Summary:
It does not currently make sense to use WebAssembly features in some functions
but not others, so this CL adds an IR pass that takes the union of all used
feature sets and applies it to each function in the module. This allows us to
prevent atomics from being lowered away if some function has opted in to using
them. When atomics is not enabled anywhere, we detect whether there exists any
atomic operations or thread local storage that would be stripped and disallow
linking with objects that contain atomics if and only if atomics or tls are
stripped. When atomics is enabled, mark it as used but do not require it of
other objects in the link. These changes allow libraries that do not use atomics
to be built once and linked into both single-threaded and multithreaded
binaries.
Reviewers: aheejin, sbc100, dschuff
Subscribers: jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59625
llvm-svn: 357226
For multi-dimensional array like below
int a[2][3];
the previous implementation generates BTF_KIND_ARRAY type
like below:
. element_type: int
. index_type: unsigned int
. number of elements: 6
This is not the best way to represent arrays, esp.,
when converting BTF back to headers and users will see
int a[6];
instead.
This patch generates proper support for multi-dimensional arrays.
For "int a[2][3]", the two BTF_KIND_ARRAY types will be
generated:
Type #n:
. element_type: int
. index_type: unsigned int
. number of elements: 3
Type #(n+1):
. element_type: #n
. index_type: unsigned int
. number of elements: 2
The linux kernel already supports such a multi-dimensional
array representation properly.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59943
llvm-svn: 357215
For 64-bit operations we should consider if the immediate can be made to fit
in an unsigned 32-bits immedate. For OR/XOR this allows us to load the immediate
with MOV32ri instead of movabsq. For AND this allows us to fold the immediate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59867
llvm-svn: 357196
This is probably the least important of our movmsk problems, but I'm starting
at the bottom to reduce distractions.
We were creating a select_cc which bypasses the select and bitmask codegen
optimizations that we have now. If we produce a compare+negate instead, we
allow things like neg/sbb carry bit hacks, and in all cases we avoid a cmov.
There's no partial register update danger in these sequences because we always
produce the zero-register xor ahead of the 'set' if needed.
There seems to be a missing fold for sext of a bool bit here:
negl %ecx
movslq %ecx, %rax
...but that's an independent transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59818
llvm-svn: 357172
Summary:
This adds a BranchFusion feature to replace the usage of the MacroFusion
for AMD CPUs.
See D59688 for context.
Reviewers: andreadb, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59872
llvm-svn: 357171
If scalar truncates are free, attempt to pre-truncate build_vectors source operands.
Only attempt to do this before legalization as we often end up with truncations/extensions during build_vector lowering.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59654
llvm-svn: 357161
G_SELECT uses a 1-bit scalar for the condition, and is currently
implemented with a plain CMPri against 0. This means that values such as
0x1110 are interpreted as true, when instead the higher bits should be
treated as undefined and therefore ignored. Replace the CMPri with a
TSTri against 0x1, which performs an implicit AND, yielding the expected
result.
llvm-svn: 357153
Summary:
Add tests for selection across basic block boundary:
* one test containing a buffer load, where part of the offset
computation is placed in the predecessor of the load
* similar test, but containing two buffer loads and shared
computations
Please note that the behaviour being tested will be updated in
a subsequent commit.
This commit was extracted from https://reviews.llvm.org/D59535.
Reviewers: RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: jvesely, nhaehnle, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59690
llvm-svn: 357149
If we know the 2 halves of an oversized zext-in-reg are the same,
don't create those halves independently.
I tried several different approaches to fold this, but it's difficult
to get right during legalization. In the default path, we are creating
a generic shuffle that looks like an unpack high, but it can get
transformed into a different mask (a blend), so it's not
straightforward to match that. If we try to fold after it actually
becomes an X86ISD::UNPCKH node, we can't be sure what the operand node
is - it might be a generic shuffle, or it could be some x86-specific op.
From the test output, we should be doing something like this for SSE4.1
as well, but I'd rather leave that as a follow-up since it involves
changing lowering actions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59777
llvm-svn: 357129
When lowering a load or store for TypeWidenVector, the type legalizer
would use a single load or store if the associated integer type was legal
or promoted. E.g. it loads a v4i8 as an i32 if i32 is legal/promotable.
(See https://reviews.llvm.org/rL236528 for reference.)
This applies that behaviour to vector types. If the vector type is
TypePromoteInteger, the element type is going to be TypePromoteInteger
as well, which will lead to have a single promoting load rather than N
individual promoting loads. For instance, if we have a v3i1, we would
now have a load of v4i1 instead of 3 loads of i1.
Patch by Guillaume Marques. Thanks!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56201
llvm-svn: 357120
ARMBaseInstrInfo::getNumLDMAddresses is making bad assumptions about the
memory operands of load and store-multiple operations. This doesn't
really fix the problem properly, but it's enough to prevent crashing,
at least.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41231 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59834
llvm-svn: 357109
If there were only dbg_values in the block, recede would hit the
beginning of the block and try to use thet dbg_value as a real
instruction.
llvm-svn: 357105
The artifact combiners push instructions which have been marked for deletion
onto an list for the legalizer to deal with on return. However, for trunc(ext)
combines the combiner routine recursively calls itself. When it does this the
dead instructions list may not be empty, and the other combiners don't expect
to be dealing with essentially invalid MIR (multiple vreg defs etc).
This change fixes it by ensuring that the dead instructions are processed on
entry into tryCombineInstruction.
As a result, this fix exposed a few places in tests where G_TRUNC instructions
were not being deleted even though they were dead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59892
llvm-svn: 357101
This reapplies r356149, using the correct overload of findUnusedReg
which passes the current iterator.
This worked most of the time, because the scavenger iterator was moved
at the end of the frame index loop in PEI. This would fail if the
spill was the first instruction. This was further hidden by the fact
that the scavenger wasn't passed in for normal frame index
elimination.
llvm-svn: 357098
Haswell CPUs have special support for SHLD/SHRD with the same register for both sources. Such an instruction will go to the rotate/shift unit on port 0 or 6. This gives it 1 cycle latency and 0.5 cycle reciprocal throughput. When the register is not the same, it becomes a 3 cycle operation on port 1. Sandybridge and Ivybridge always have 1 cyc latency and 0.5 cycle reciprocal throughput for any SHLD.
When FastSHLDRotate feature flag is set, we try to use SHLD for rotate by immediate unless BMI2 is enabled. But MachineCopyPropagation can look through a copy and change one of the sources to be different. This will break the hardware optimization.
This patch adds psuedo instruction to hide the second source input until after register allocation and MachineCopyPropagation. I'm not sure if this is the best way to do this or if there's some other way we can make this work.
Fixes PR41055
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59391
llvm-svn: 357096
This patch removes an overly conservative check that would prevent
simplifying copies when the value we were tracking would go through
several subregister indices.
Indeed, the intend of this check was to not track values whenever
we have to compose subregister, but actually what the check was
doing was bailing anytime we see a second subreg, even if that
second subreg would actually be the new source of truth (as opposed
to a part of that subreg).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59891
llvm-svn: 357095
Also includes one example of how this transform is unsound. This isn't
verifying the copies are used in the control flow intrinisic patterns.
Also add option to disable exec mask opt pass. Since this pass is
unsound, it may be useful to turn it off until it is fixed.
llvm-svn: 357091
The AMDGPU implementation of getReservedRegs depends on
MachineFunctionInfo fields that are parsed from the YAML section. This
was reserving the wrong register since it was setting the reserved
regs before parsing the correct one.
Some tests were relying on the default reserved set for the assumed
default calling convention.
llvm-svn: 357083
The .BTF.ext FuncInfoTable and LineInfoTable contain
information organized per ELF section. Current definition
of FuncInfoTable/LineInfoTable is:
std::unordered_map<uint32_t, std::vector<BTFFuncInfo>> FuncInfoTable
std::unordered_map<uint32_t, std::vector<BTFLineInfo>> LineInfoTable
where the key is the section name off in the string table.
The unordered_map may cause the order of section output
different for different platforms.
The same for unordered map definition of
std::unordered_map<std::string, std::unique_ptr<BTFKindDataSec>>
DataSecEntries
where BTF_KIND_DATASEC entries may have different ordering
for different platforms.
This patch fixed the issue by using std::map.
Test static-var-derived-type.ll is modified to generate two
DataSec's which will ensure the ordering is the same for all
supported platforms.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 357077
Original commit by Ayonam Ray.
This commit adds a regression test for the issue discovered in the
previous commit: that the range check for the jump table can only be
omitted if the fall-through destination of the jump table is
unreachable, which isn't necessarily true just because the default of
the switch is unreachable.
This addresses the missing optimization in PR41242.
> During the lowering of a switch that would result in the generation of a
> jump table, a range check is performed before indexing into the jump
> table, for the switch value being outside the jump table range and a
> conditional branch is inserted to jump to the default block. In case the
> default block is unreachable, this conditional jump can be omitted. This
> patch implements omitting this conditional branch for unreachable
> defaults.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52002
> Reviewers: Hans Wennborg, Eli Freidman, Roman Lebedev
llvm-svn: 357067
