By default clang emits complete contructors as alias of base constructors if they are the same.
The backend is supposed to emit symbols for the alias, otherwise it causes undefined symbols.
@yaxunl observed that this issue is related to the llvm options `-amdgpu-early-inline-all=true`
and `-amdgpu-function-calls=false`. This issue is resolved by only inlining global values
with internal linkage. The `getCalleeFunction()` in AMDGPUResourceUsageAnalysis also had
to be extended to support aliases to functions. inline-calls.ll was corrected appropriately.
Reviewed By: yaxunl, #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109707
By default clang emits complete contructors as alias of base constructors if they are the same.
The backend is supposed to emit symbols for the alias, otherwise it causes undefined symbols.
@yaxunl observed that this issue is related to the llvm options `-amdgpu-early-inline-all=true`
and `-amdgpu-function-calls=false`. This issue is resolved by only inlining global values
with internal linkage. The `getCalleeFunction()` in AMDGPUResourceUsageAnalysis also had
to be extended to support aliases to functions. inline-calls.ll was corrected appropriately.
Reviewed By: yaxunl, #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109707
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D100481, forceful inline of all non-kernel
functions using lds was disabled since AMDGPULowerModuleLDS pass now handles
static lds. However that pass does not handle extern lds so non-kernel
functions using extern lds must sill be inline.
Reviewed By: hsmhsm, arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109773
Now since LDS uses within non-kernel functions are being handled in the
pass - LowerModuleLDS, we *NO* need to *forcefully* inline non-kernel
functions just because they use LDS. Do forceful inlining only when the
pass - LowerModuleLDS is not enabled. It is enabled by default.
Reviewed By: JonChesterfield
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100481
This is a workaround for clang adding noinline to all functions at
-O0. Previously, we would just add alwaysinline, and the verifier
would complain about having both noinline and alwaysinline. We
currently can't truly codegen this case as a freestanding function, so
override the user forcing noinline.
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
These won't work for the forseeable future. These aren't allowed
from OpenCL, but IPO optimizations can make them appear.
Also directly set the attributes on functions, regardless
of the linkage rather than cloning functions like before.
llvm-svn: 336587
If set to false it does not remove global aliases. With this parameter
set to false it should be safe to run the pass before link.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31489
llvm-svn: 299108
Summary:
Simply replace usage of aliases to functions with aliasee.
This came up when bitcode linking to builtin library and
calls to aliases not being resolved.
Also made minor improvements to existing test.
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, alex-t, vpykhtin
Subscribers: arsenm, wdng, rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24023
llvm-svn: 280221
Remove the ModuleLevelChanges argument, and the ability to create new
subprograms for cloned functions. The latter was added without review in
r203662, but it has no in-tree clients (all non-test callers pass false
for ModuleLevelChanges [1], so it isn't reachable outside of tests). It
also isn't clear that adding a duplicate subprogram to the compile unit is
always the right thing to do when cloning a function within a module. If
this functionality comes back it should be accompanied with a more concrete
use case.
Furthermore, all in-tree clients add the returned function to the module.
Since that's pretty much the only sensible thing you can do with the function,
just do that in CloneFunction.
[1] http://llvm-cs.pcc.me.uk/lib/Transforms/Utils/CloneFunction.cpp/rCloneFunction
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18628
llvm-svn: 269110
