7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nikita Popov
bbbbbfbdcb [CodeExtractor] Convert some tests to opaque pointers (NFC) 2023-01-03 13:00:14 +01:00
Bjorn Pettersson
3528e63d89 [test] Remove duplicate RUN lines in Transform tests 2022-12-08 11:47:16 +01:00
Roman Lebedev
0ca8ddd84d
[NFC] Port all CodeExtractor tests to -passes= syntax 2022-12-07 23:15:16 +03:00
Eric Christopher
cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher
a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Teresa Johnson
c8dba682bb [hot-cold-split] Name split functions with ".cold" suffix
Summary:
The current default of appending "_"+entry block label to the new
extracted cold function breaks demangling. Change the deliminator from
"_" to "." to enable demangling. Because the header block label will
be empty for release compile code, use "extracted" after the "." when
the label is empty.

Additionally, add a mechanism for the client to pass in an alternate
suffix applied after the ".", and have the hot cold split pass use
"cold."+Count, where the Count is currently 1 but can be used to
uniquely number multiple cold functions split out from the same function
with D53588.

Reviewers: sebpop, hiraditya

Subscribers: llvm-commits, erik.pilkington

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53534

llvm-svn: 345178
2018-10-24 18:53:47 +00:00
Sergey Dmitriev
69c9cd277d [CodeExtractor] Allow extracting blocks with exception handling
This is a CodeExtractor improvement which adds support for extracting blocks
which have exception handling constructs if that is legal to do. CodeExtractor
performs validation checks to ensure that extraction is legal when it finds
invoke instructions or EH pads (landingpad, catchswitch, or cleanuppad) in
blocks to be extracted.

I have also added an option to allow extraction of blocks with alloca
instructions, but no validation is done for allocas. CodeExtractor caller has
to validate it himself before allowing alloca instructions to be extracted.
By default allocas are still not allowed in extraction blocks.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45904

llvm-svn: 332151
2018-05-11 22:49:49 +00:00