For internal functions, globals-aa returns different ModRefInfo
results if they are inlined and are no longer called by external
functions. This causes an assertion failure when cloning memoryssa
accesses.
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59546
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141185
A few more that I missed in commit 3528e63d89305907b3d6e.
There could be more duplicates remaining, since I've only focused
on exactly duplicated "RUN: opt" lines (ignoring multi line RUN
lines ending with '\').
If globals-aa is enabled, because of the deletion of memory instructions, there
may be call instruction that is not in ModOrRefSet but is a MemoryUseOrDef.
This causes the crash in the process of cloning uses and defs.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/58719
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137553
Forget SCEVs based on exit phis in case SCEV looked through the phi.
After unswitching, it may not be possible to look through the phi due to
it having multiple incoming values, so it needs to be re-computed.
Fixes#58868
Unswitching adjusts the CFG in ways that may invalidate cached loop
dispositions. Clear all cached block and loop dispositions during
trivial unswitching. The same is already done for non-trivial
unswitching.
Fixes#58751.
SimpleLoopUnswitch may remove blocks from loops. Clear block and loop
dispositions in that case, to clean up invalid entries in the cache.
Fixes#58158.
Fixes#58159.
This simplifies the test case added in e399dd601 to only require indvars
and simple-loop-unswitch. This allows adding the test case for #58158 to
the same file, keeping related tests together.
This ensures PreservedCFGCheckerAnalysis is always added, independent of
whether opt was built with assertions enabled or not.
This fixes a few buildbot failures for bots that don't have assertions
enabled.
At the moment, LoopAccessAnalysis is a loop analysis for the new pass
manager. The issue with that is that LAI caches SCEV expressions and
modifications in a loop may impact SCEV expressions in other loops, but
we do not have a convenient way to invalidate LAI for other loops
withing a loop pipeline.
To avoid this issue, turn it into a function analysis which returns a
manager object that keeps track of the individual LAI objects per loop.
Fixes#50940.
Fixes#51669.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134606
Summary:
The code for generating a name for loops for various reporting scenarios
created a name by serializing the loop into a string. This may result in
a very large name for a loop containing many blocks. Use the getName()
function on the loop instead.
Author: Jamie Schmeiser <schmeise@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed By: Whitney (Whitney Tsang), aeubanks (Arthur Eubanks)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133587
In the current main branch, all cold loops will not be applied non-trivial unswitch. As reported in D129599, skipping these cold loops will incur regression in SPEC benchmark.
Thus, instead of skipping cold loops, now only skipping loops in cold functions.
Reviewed By: alexgatea, aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133275
With profile data, non-trivial LoopUnswitch will only apply on non-cold loops, as unswitching cold loops may not gain much benefit but significantly increase the code size.
Reviewed By: aeubanks, asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129599
Following some recent discussions, this changes the representation
of callbrs in IR. The current blockaddress arguments are replaced
with `!` label constraints that refer directly to callbr indirect
destinations:
; Before:
%res = callbr i8* asm "", "=r,r,i"(i8* %x, i8* blockaddress(@test8, %foo))
to label %asm.fallthrough [label %foo]
; After:
%res = callbr i8* asm "", "=r,r,!i"(i8* %x)
to label %asm.fallthrough [label %foo]
The benefit of this is that we can easily update the successors of
a callbr, without having to worry about also updating blockaddress
references. This should allow us to remove some limitations:
* Allow unrolling/peeling/rotation of callbr, or any other
clone-based optimizations
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/41834)
* Allow duplicate successors
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/45248)
This is just the IR representation change though, I will follow up
with patches to remove limtations in various transformation passes
that are no longer needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129288
When updating the branch instruction outside the loopduring non-trivial
unswitching, always skip trivial selects and update the condition.
Otherwise we might create invalid IR, because the trivial select is
inside the loop, while the condition is outside the loop.
Fixes#55697.
After D97756, collectHomogenousInstGraphLoopInvariants may collect
conditions for both logical ANDs and logical ORs in case the root is a
select that matches both logical AND & OR.
This means the function won't return invariant values of either AND/OR
chains, but both. This can result in incorrect transformations.
See llvm/test/Transforms/SimpleLoopUnswitch/trivial-unswitch-logical-and-or.ll.
Without the patch, Alive2 rejects the modified tests with:
Source and target don't have the same return domain.
Note that this also applies to the test case added in D97756
(@test_partial_condition_unswitch_or_select). We can't unswitch on
%cond6, because the graph leading to it contains and AND and an OR.
This only fixes trivial unswitching for now, but a similar problem
likely exists with non-trivial unswitching.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124526
We cannot skip the freezing the condition if the unswitched branch
executes, if the condition is a chain of ANDs/ORs. For example, if if we
have an AND %c1, %c2 with %c1 == undef and %c2 == 0, there would be no
branch on undef in the original code, but a branch on undef if we
unswitch %c1.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124603
In some cases, it is not enough to freeze the final AND/OR operation
when chaining a number of invariant conditions together.
After creating a chain of ANDs/ORs, we assume all unswitched operands to
be either true or false. But if any of the operands is poison, the rest
of the operands could have any value after branching on the frozen
condition.
To avoid that, freeze individual operands, if needed. In some cases this
may lead to unnecessary freezes, but it seems required at least for some
cases (see trivial-unswitch-freeze-individual-conditions.ll)
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124554
Trivial unswitching can also introduce new branches on undef/poison.
Freeze the conditions if needed.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124549
Add tests with selects that match both logical AND and logical OR. Note
that some of the tests get miscompiled at the moment.
Also moves a related test to the newly added test file.
This fixes a series of mis-compiles by SimpleLoopUnswitch.
My measurements showed no performance regression with -O3 on AArch64
in SPEC2006, SPEC2017 and a set of internal benchmarks.
Fixes#50387, #50430
Depends on D124251.
Reviewed By: nikic, aqjune
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124252
When enabling freeze-loop-unswitch-cond the inserted freeze instruction
may block unswitching of parent loops if they get inserted in a block in
the parent loop (as the llvm::Loop-based invariance check only checks
whether an instruction is in a loop block or not).
In the optimization pipeline, LICM is responsible to hoist out loop
invariant instructions to enable further unswitching. Also run LICM for
nested unswitching tests in preparation for flipping the default of
freeze-loop-unswitch-cond.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124251
We only need to insert a Freeze instruction if any of the conditions
may be poison. Similar checks are already done in the other places
SimpleLoopUnswitch creates Freeze instruction.
Reviewed By: aeubanks, efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124259
In D115311, we're looking to modify clang to emit i constraints rather
than X constraints for callbr's indirect destinations. Prior to doing
so, update all of the existing tests in llvm/ to match.
Reviewed By: void, jyknight
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115410
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27506https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31652https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51043
Problems with SimpleLoopUnswitch cause the bug reports above.
```
while (...) {
if (C) { A }
else { B }
}
Into:
C' = freeze(C)
if (C') {
while (...) { A }
} else {
while (...) { B }
}
```
This problem can be solved by adding a freeze on hoisted branches(above transform) and has been solved by D29015.
However, D29015 is now reverted by performance regression(2b5a897651)
It is not the first time that an added freeze has caused performance regression.
SimplifyCFG also had a problem with UB caused by branching-on-undef, which was solved by adding freeze to the branching condition. (D104569)
Performance regression occurred in D104569, and patches such as D105344 and D105392 were written to minimize it.
This patch will correct the SimpleLoopUnswitch as D104569 handles the SimplyCFG while minimizing performance loss by introducing patches like D105344 and D105392(This patch was rebased with the author's permission)
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106041
Added an additional check for constants after simplification of
"select _, true, false" pattern. We need to prevent attempts to unswitch constant
conditions for two reasons:
a) Doing that doesn't make any sense, in the best case it will just burn
some compile time.
b) SimpleLoopUnswitch isn't designed to unswitch constant conditions
(due to (a)), so attempting that can cause miscompiles. The attached
testcase is an example of such miscompile.
Also added an assertion that'll make sure we aren't trying to replace
constants, so it will help us prevent such bugs in future. The assertion
from D110751 is another layer of protection against such cases.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110752
As part of the nontrivial unswitching we could end up removing child
loops. This patch add a notification to the pass manager when
that happens (using the markLoopAsDeleted callback).
Without this there could be stale LoopAccessAnalysis results cached
in the analysis manager. Those analysis results are cached based on
a Loop* as key. Since the BumpPtrAllocator used to allocate
Loop objects could be resetted between different runs of for
example the loop-distribute pass (running on different functions),
a new Loop object could be created using the same Loop pointer.
And then when requiring the LoopAccessAnalysis for the loop we
got the stale (corrupt) result from the destroyed loop.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109257
This is enabled by default. Drop explicit uses in preparation for
removing the option.
Also drop RUN lines that are now the same (typically modulo a
-verify-memoryssa option).
