Change MCInstrDesc::operands to return an ArrayRef so we can easily use
it everywhere instead of the (IMHO ugly) opInfo_begin and opInfo_end.
A future patch will remove opInfo_begin and opInfo_end.
Also use it instead of raw access to the OpInfo pointer. A future patch
will remove this pointer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142213
C++17 allows us to call constructors pair and tuple instead of helper
functions make_pair and make_tuple.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139828
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
This patch fixes some of the V_ADD/SUB_U64_PSEUDO not getting converted to their sdwa form.
We still get below patterns in generated code:
v_and_b32_e32 v0, 0xff, v0
v_add_co_u32_e32 v0, vcc, v1, v0
v_addc_co_u32_e64 v1, s[0:1], 0, 0, vcc
and,
v_and_b32_e32 v2, 0xff, v2
v_add_co_u32_e32 v0, vcc, v0, v2
v_addc_co_u32_e32 v1, vcc, 0, v1, vcc
1st and 2nd instructions of both above examples should have been folded into sdwa add with BYTE_0 src operand.
The reason being the pseudo instruction is broken down into VOP3 instruction pair of V_ADD_CO_U32_e64 and V_ADDC_U32_e64.
The sdwa pass attempts lowering them to their VOP2 form before converting them into sdwa instructions. However V_ADDC_U32_e64
cannot be shrunk to it's VOP2 form if it has non-reg src1 operand.
This change attempts to fix that problem by only shrinking V_ADD_CO_U32_e64 instruction.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136663
In a lot of places, we were just calling `getNamedOperandIdx` to check if the result was != or == to -1.
This is fine in itself, but it's verbose and doesn't make the intention clear, IMHO. I added a `hasNamedOperand` and replaced all cases I could find with regexes and manually.
Reviewed By: arsenm, foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137540
Along with vector RC flags, this scalar flag will
make various regclass queries like `isVGPR` more
accurate.
Regclasses other than vectors are currently set
with the new flag even though certain unallocatable
classes aren't truly scalars. It would be ok as long
as they remain unallocatable.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110053
The combined vector register classes with both
VGPRs and AGPRs are currently unallocatable.
This patch turns them into allocatable as a
prerequisite to enable copy between VGPR and
AGPR registers during regalloc.
Also, added the missing AV register classes from
192b to 1024b.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109300
Previously, instructions which could be
expressed as VOP3 in addition to another
encoding had a _e64 suffix on the tablegen
record name, while those
only available as VOP3 did not. With this
patch, all VOP3s will have the _e64 suffix.
The assembly does not change, only the mir.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94341
Change-Id: Ia8ec8890d47f8f94bbbdac43745b4e9dd2b03423
The hardware has created a real mess in the naming for add/sub, which
have been renamed basically every generation. Switch the carry out
pseudos to have the gfx9/gfx10 names. We were using the original SI/CI
v_add_i32/v_sub_i32 names. Later targets reintroduced these names as
carryless instructions with a saturating clamp bit, which we do not
define. Do this rename so we can unambiguously add these missing
instructions.
The carry-in versions should also be renamed, but at least those had a
consistent _u32 name to begin with. The 16-bit instructions were also
renamed, but aren't ambiguous.
This does regress assembler error message quality in some cases. In
mismatched wave32/wave64 situations, this will switch from
"unsupported instruction" to "invalid operand", with the error
pointing at the wrong position. I couldn't quite follow how the
assembler selects these, but the previous behavior seemed accidental
to me. It looked like there was a partial attempt to handle this which
was never completed (i.e. there is an AMDGPUOperand::isBoolReg but it
isn't used for anything).
All 3 passes that change instruction encodings were dropping MI
flags. This avoids scheduling regressions caused by setting
mayRaiseFPExceptions on FP instructions for non-strictfp functions.
Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Register and changes the type of the
variable to llvm::Register (dropping the llvm:: where possible).
Partial reverts in:
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FixupLEAs.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
HexagonBitSimplify.cpp - Function takes BitTracker::RegisterRef which appears to be unsigned&
MachineVerifier.cpp - Ambiguous operator==() given MCRegister and const Register
PPCFastISel.cpp - No Register::operator-=()
PeepholeOptimizer.cpp - TargetInstrInfo::optimizeLoadInstr() takes an unsigned&
MachineTraceMetrics.cpp - MachineTraceMetrics lacks a suitable constructor
Manual fixups in:
ARMFastISel.cpp - ARMEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
HexagonSplitDouble.cpp - Ternary operator was ambiguous between unsigned/Register
HexagonConstExtenders.cpp - Has a local class named Register, used llvm::Register instead of Register.
PPCFastISel.cpp - PPCEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
Depends on D65919
Reviewers: arsenm, bogner, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: RKSimon, craig.topper, lenary, aemerson, wuzish, jholewinski, MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, tpr, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65962
llvm-svn: 369041
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The introduction of S_{ADD|SUB}_U64_PSEUDO instructions which are decomposed
into VOP3 instruction pairs for S_ADD_U64_PSEUDO:
V_ADD_I32_e64
V_ADDC_U32_e64
and for S_SUB_U64_PSEUDO
V_SUB_I32_e64
V_SUBB_U32_e64
preclude the use of SDWA to encode a constant.
SDWA: Sub-Dword addressing is supported on VOP1 and VOP2 instructions,
but not on VOP3 instructions.
We desire to fold the bit-and operand into the instruction encoding
for the V_ADD_I32 instruction. This requires that we transform the
VOP3 into a VOP2 form of the instruction (_e32).
%19:vgpr_32 = V_AND_B32_e32 255,
killed %16:vgpr_32, implicit $exec
%47:vgpr_32, %49:sreg_64_xexec = V_ADD_I32_e64
%26.sub0:vreg_64, %19:vgpr_32, implicit $exec
%48:vgpr_32, dead %50:sreg_64_xexec = V_ADDC_U32_e64
%26.sub1:vreg_64, %54:vgpr_32, killed %49:sreg_64_xexec, implicit $exec
which then allows the SDWA encoding and becomes
%47:vgpr_32 = V_ADD_I32_sdwa
0, %26.sub0:vreg_64, 0, killed %16:vgpr_32, 0, 6, 0, 6, 0,
implicit-def $vcc, implicit $exec
%48:vgpr_32 = V_ADDC_U32_e32
0, %26.sub1:vreg_64, implicit-def $vcc, implicit $vcc, implicit $exec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54882
llvm-svn: 348132
Summary:
This is a follow-up to r335942.
- Merge SISubtarget into AMDGPUSubtarget and rename to GCNSubtarget
- Rename AMDGPUCommonSubtarget to AMDGPUSubtarget
- Merge R600Subtarget::Generation and GCNSubtarget::Generation into
AMDGPUSubtarget::Generation.
Reviewers: arsenm, jvesely
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49037
llvm-svn: 336851
Summary:
MCTargetDesc/AMDGPUMCTargetDesc.h contains enums for all the instuction
and register defintions, which are huge so we only want to include
them where needed.
This will also make it easier if we want to split the R600 and GCN
definitions into separate tablegenerated files.
I was unable to remove AMDGPUMCTargetDesc.h from SIMachineFunctionInfo.h
because it uses some enums from the header to initialize default values
for the SIMachineFunction class, so I ended up having to remove includes of
SIMachineFunctionInfo.h from headers too.
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: MatzeB, kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46272
llvm-svn: 332930
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
See r331124 for how I made a list of files missing the include.
I then ran this Python script:
for f in open('filelist.txt'):
f = f.strip()
fl = open(f).readlines()
found = False
for i in xrange(len(fl)):
p = '#include "llvm/'
if not fl[i].startswith(p):
continue
if fl[i][len(p):] > 'Config':
fl.insert(i, '#include "llvm/Config/llvm-config.h"\n')
found = True
break
if not found:
print 'not found', f
else:
open(f, 'w').write(''.join(fl))
and then looked through everything with `svn diff | diffstat -l | xargs -n 1000 gvim -p`
and tried to fix include ordering and whatnot.
No intended behavior change.
llvm-svn: 331184
Summary:
Found by inspection. We care about the operand that *doesn't*
contain the immediate.
I believe this is currently not hit because we fold 0xff / 0xffff
immediates only later.
Change-Id: Ic3cf8538bc7da5eff3200d96eccf9d339e6345a7
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45886
llvm-svn: 330586
Summary:
The phase attempts to transform operations that extract a portion of a value
into an SDWA src operand in cases where that value is used only once. It
was not prepared for this use to be the preserved portion of a value for
dst:UNUSED_PRESERVE, resulting in a crash or assert.
This change either rejects the illegal SDWA attempt, or in the case where
dst:WORD_1 and the src_sel would be WORD_0, removes the unneeded
extract instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, #amdgpu
Reviewed By: arsenm, #amdgpu
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44364
llvm-svn: 328856
Right now this loops over the entire function every time there
is a change, which is not very efficient. There's no practical
reason to track this so globally, since the code motion optimization
passes should be sinking instructions with single uses and
the pass currently will not fold with multiple uses.
llvm-svn: 324667
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, avoid
printing "vreg" for virtual registers (which is one of the current MIR
possibilities).
Basically:
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E "s/%vreg([0-9]+)/%\1/g"
* grep -nr '%vreg' . and fix if needed
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E "s/ vreg([0-9]+)/ %\1/g"
* grep -nr 'vreg[0-9]\+' . and fix if needed
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40420
llvm-svn: 319427
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
Summary:
1. Instruction V_CVT_U32_F32 allow omod operand (see SIInstrInfo.td:1435). In fact this operand shouldn't be allowed here. This fix checks if SDWA pseudo instruction has OMod operand and then copy it.
2. There were several problems with support of VOPC instructions in SDWA peephole pass.
Reviewers: tstellar, arsenm, vpykhtin, airlied, kzhuravl
Subscribers: wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, sarnex, t-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34626
llvm-svn: 306413
Summary:
Added support based on merged SDWA pseudo instructions. Now peephole allow one scalar operand, omod and clamp modifiers.
Added several subtarget features for GFX9 SDWA.
This diff also contains changes from D34026.
Depends D34026
Reviewers: vpykhtin, rampitec, arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34241
llvm-svn: 305986
Summary: Previously there were two separate pseudo instruction for SDWA on VI and on GFX9. Created one pseudo instruction that is union of both of them. Added verifier to check that operands conform either VI or GFX9.
Reviewers: dp, arsenm, vpykhtin
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, artem.tamazov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34026
llvm-svn: 305886
