If a gather/scatter is masked and will need to be scalarized then the cost
should be higher than we currently produce. An additional cost for scalarizing
the mask, extracting i1s and branching on the result needs to be added, which
this patch gives a cost of 5.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147331
Given just how many arguments we pass to
preferPredicateOverEpilogue and considering this list may
grow over time I've decided to pass in a pointer to a new
TailFoldingInfo structure instead, similar to what we do
with IntrinsicCostAttributes, etc. In addition, many of the
arguments we pass in are actually available in the
LoopVectorizationLegality class so I've managed to
reduce the set of pointers that we need to pass in the
TailFoldingInfo struct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146127
This work follows on from D142109 and addresses a possible regression
when we know the loop iteration counter cannot overflow.
When we know the overflow-check always evaluates to false, it's better to
use the other style of tail folding where it assumes a runtime check was
added, because that avoids having to calculate a modified trip-count.
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142894
[Originally committed as f6ddf7781471b71243fa3c3ae7c93073f95c7dff;
reverted in bbef38352fbade9e014ec97d5991da5dee306da7 due to test
breakage; now relanded with the Arm tests conditioned on
`arm-registered-target`]
The LowerTypeTests pass emits a jump table in the form of an
`inlineasm` IR node containing a string representation of some
assembly. It tests the target triple to see what architecture it
should be generating assembly for. But that's not good enough for
`Triple::thumb`, because the 32-bit PC-relative `b.w` branch
instruction isn't available in all supported architecture versions. In
particular, Armv6-M doesn't support that instruction (although the
similar Armv8-M Baseline does).
Most of this patch is concerned with working out whether the
compilation target is Armv6-M or not, which I'm doing by going through
all the functions in the module, retrieving a TargetTransformInfo for
each one, and querying it via a new method I've added to check its
SubtargetInfo. If any function's TTI indicates that it's targeting an
architecture supporting B.W, then we assume we're also allowed to use
B.W in the jump table.
The Armv6-M compatible jump table format requires a temporary
register, and therefore also has to use the stack in order to restore
that register.
Another consequence of this change is that jump tables on Arm/Thumb
are no longer always the same size. In particular, on an architecture
that supports Arm and Thumb-1 but not Thumb-2, the Arm and Thumb
tables are different sizes from //each other//. As a consequence,
``getJumpTableEntrySize`` can no longer base its answer on the target
triple's architecture: it has to take into account the decision that
``selectJumpTableArmEncoding`` made, which meant I had to move that
function to an earlier point in the code and store its answer in the
``LowerTypeTestsModule`` class.
Reviewed By: lenary
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143576
This reverts commit f6ddf7781471b71243fa3c3ae7c93073f95c7dff.
Eight buildbots reported that the two test files changed by that
commit had started failing. The buildbots in question all had in
common that they build with a very restricted `LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD`,
such as only X86 or AArch64 or Hexagon. I didn't notice this before
commit because my own build has the full default set of targets, and
in that circumstance, the tests pass.
I assume the problem has something to do with the attempt to query
TargetTransformInfo: if you can't make a valid TTI for the target
triple then you can't ask it what kind of inline assembler you should
be emitting, and so `opt` without the Arm backend can't get the Arm
cases of these tests right.
I don't have time to fix this until next week, so I'll revert the
change for now to keep the buildbots happy.
The LowerTypeTests pass emits a jump table in the form of an
`inlineasm` IR node containing a string representation of some
assembly. It tests the target triple to see what architecture it
should be generating assembly for. But that's not good enough for
`Triple::thumb`, because the 32-bit PC-relative `b.w` branch
instruction isn't available in all supported architecture versions. In
particular, Armv6-M doesn't support that instruction (although the
similar Armv8-M Baseline does).
Most of this patch is concerned with working out whether the
compilation target is Armv6-M or not, which I'm doing by going through
all the functions in the module, retrieving a TargetTransformInfo for
each one, and querying it via a new method I've added to check its
SubtargetInfo. If any function's TTI indicates that it's targeting an
architecture supporting B.W, then we assume we're also allowed to use
B.W in the jump table.
The Armv6-M compatible jump table format requires a temporary
register, and therefore also has to use the stack in order to restore
that register.
Another consequence of this change is that jump tables on Arm/Thumb
are no longer always the same size. In particular, on an architecture
that supports Arm and Thumb-1 but not Thumb-2, the Arm and Thumb
tables are different sizes from //each other//. As a consequence,
``getJumpTableEntrySize`` can no longer base its answer on the target
triple's architecture: it has to take into account the decision that
``selectJumpTableArmEncoding`` made, which meant I had to move that
function to an earlier point in the code and store its answer in the
``LowerTypeTestsModule`` class.
Reviewed By: lenary
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143576
This NFC (intended) patch has several small changes:
* It renames PredicationStyle to TailFoldingStyle.
* It renames TTI.emitActiveLaneMask() to TTI.getPreferredTailFoldingStyle()
* Simplifies some of its uses in the LoopVectorizer
Rationale: To my surprise PredicationStyle::None did not mean 'no
predication', but rather 'no active lane mask intrinsic', such that the
predicate is created using a splat + compare with stepvector. The enum is
also highly specific to tail folding, so it seems better to name this
around that feature, i.e. 'tail folding style'.
This also makes it more amenable to extend it to other tail folding styles,
such as the one added in D142109.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142887
LoopUnroll estimates the loop size via getInstructionCost(),
but getInstructionCost() cannot pass CostKind to getVectorInstrCost().
And so does getShuffleCost() to getBroadcastShuffleOverhead(),
getPermuteShuffleOverhead(), getExtractSubvectorOverhead(),
and getInsertSubvectorOverhead().
To address this, this patch adds an argument CostKind to these
functions.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142116
Need to include the cost of the initial insertelement to the cost of the
broadcasts. Also, need to adjust the cost of the gather/buildvector if
the element is inserted into poison/undef vector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140498
This is purely NFC restructure in advance of a change which actually exposes zero strides. This is mostly because I find this interface confusing each time I look at it.
This has the effect of exposing the power-of-two property for use in memory op costing, but no target actually uses it yet. The main point of this change is simple consistency with the recently changes getArithmeticInstrCost, and to remove the last (interface) use of OperandValueKind.
This change completes the process of replacing OperandValueKind and OperandValueProperties which were previously passed independently in this API with a single container class which contains both.
This is the change which motivated the whole sequence which preceeded it. In an original spike version of this change, I'd noticed a nasty bug: I'd changed the signature without changing names, and as result, we silently passed additional information through a callsite which previously dropped the power-of-two fact. This might be harmless in most cases, but at least a couple clearly dependend for correctness on not passing that property through.
I did my best to split off prior changes which reduced the scope of this one, and which made it possible to use compiler assistance. For instance, every parameter which changes type in this change also changes name. This was intentional to make sure that every call site possible effected must show up in the diff. This let me audit each one closely.
Defaults to TCK_RecipThroughput - as most explicit calls were assuming TCK_RecipThroughput (vectorizers) or was just doing a before-vs-after comparison (vectorcombiner). Calls via getInstructionCost were just dropping the CostKind, so again there should be no change at this time (as getShuffleCost and its expansions don't use CostKind yet) - but it will make it easier for us to better account for size/latency shuffle costs in inline/unroll passes in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132287
* Replace getUserCost with getInstructionCost, covering all cost kinds.
* Remove getInstructionLatency, it's not implemented by any backends, and we should fold the functionality into getUserCost (now getInstructionCost) to make it easier for targets to handle the cost kinds with their existing cost callbacks.
Original Patch by @samparker (Sam Parker)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79483
TragetLowering had two last InstructionCost related `getTypeLegalizationCost()`
and `getScalingFactorCost()` members, but all other costs are processed in TTI.
E.g. it is not comfortable to use other TTI members in these two functions
overrided in a target.
Minor refactoring: `getTypeLegalizationCost()` now doesn't need DataLayout
parameter - it was always passed from TTI.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117723
If we have interleave groups in the loop we want to vectorise then
we should fall back on normal vectorisation with a scalar epilogue. In
such cases when tail-folding is enabled we'll almost certainly go on to
create vplans with very high costs for all vector VFs and fall back on
VF=1 anyway. This is likely to be worse than if we'd just used an
unpredicated vector loop in the first place.
Once the vectoriser has proper support for analysing all the costs
for each combination of VF and vectorisation style, then we should
be able to remove this.
Added an extra test here:
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/sve-tail-folding-option.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128342
Now the API getExtendedAddReductionCost is used to determine the cost of extended Add reduction with optional Mul. For Arm, it could cover the cases. But for other target, for example: RISCV, they support other kinds of extended recution, such as FAdd.
This patch does the following changes:
1, Split getExtendedAddReductionCost into 2 new API: getExtendedReductionCost which handles the extended reduction with addtional input of Opcode; getMulAccReductionCost which handle the MLA cases the getExtendedAddReductionCost.
2, Refactor getReductionPatternCost, add some contraint condition to make sure the getMulAccReductionCost should only handle the reuction of Add + Mul.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130868
This patch adds the AArch64 hook for preferPredicateOverEpilogue,
which currently returns true if SVE is enabled and one of the
following conditions (non-exhaustive) is met:
1. The "sve-tail-folding" option is set to "all", or
2. The "sve-tail-folding" option is set to "all+noreductions"
and the loop does not contain reductions,
3. The "sve-tail-folding" option is set to "all+norecurrences"
and the loop has no first-order recurrences.
Currently the default option is "disabled", but this will be
changed in a later patch.
I've added new tests to show the options behave as expected here:
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/sve-tail-folding-option.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129560
Currently, for vectorised loops that use the get.active.lane.mask
intrinsic we only use the mask for predicated vector operations,
such as masked loads and stores, etc. The loop itself is still
controlled by comparing the canonical induction variable with the
trip count. However, for some targets this is inefficient when it's
cheap to use the mask itself to control the loop.
This patch adds support for using the active lane mask for control
flow by:
1. Generating the active lane mask for the next iteration of the
vector loop, rather than the current one. If there are still any
remaining iterations then at least the first bit of the mask will
be set.
2. Extract the first bit of this mask and use this bit for the
conditional branch.
I did this by creating a new VPActiveLaneMaskPHIRecipe that sets
up the initial PHI values in the vector loop pre-header. I've also
made use of the new BranchOnCond VPInstruction for the final
instruction in the loop region.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125301
The MVE shuffle costing for VREV instructions was making incorrect
assumptions as to legalized vector types remaining as vectors. Add a
quick check to ensure they are indeed vectors before attempting to get
the number of elements.
Building on top of D125665, this adds MVE costs for fptosi.sat and
fptoui.sat, providing MVE is available and the types are legal.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125666
Similar to D124357, this adds some cost modelling for fptoi_sat for Arm
targets. Where VFP2 is available (and FP64/FP16 for the relevant types),
the operations are legal as the Arm instructions naturally saturate.
Otherwise they will need an extra smin/smax clamp, similar to AArch64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125665
Before this patch `Args` was used to pass a broadcat's arguments by SLP.
This patch changes this. `Args` is now used for passing the operands of
the shuffle.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124202
I assume we meant to return the result of the call to
BaseT::isLoweredToCall(F).
This might not be a functional change in practice because it would
still hit the default case in the switch and call
BaseT::isLoweredToCall(F) at the end.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123333
Inspecting the pointer element type here is incompatible with
opaque pointers, and doesn't seem necessary to me. I think the
intention might have been to check the type of load/store pointer
arguments, but I believe those should get checked through their
return type or value operand anyway. I don't get any test failures
if I simply drop this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118353
This is required to query the legality more precisely in the LoopVectorizer.
This adds another TTI function named 'forceScalarizeMaskedGather/Scatter'
function to work around the hack introduced for MVE, where
isLegalMaskedGather/Scatter would return an answer by second-guessing
where the function was called from, based on the Type passed in (vector
vs scalar). The new interface makes this explicit. It is also used by
X86 to check for vector widths where gather/scatters aren't profitable
(or don't exist) for certain subtargets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115329
Given a min(max(fptosi, INT_MIN), INT_MAX) with the correct constants,
we can now generate a fptosi.sat. But in the arm backend, the constant
can be treated as high cost, pulling it out of the basic block in a way
that the DAG combine can no longer see it. This teaches it again that it
is a low cost constant, not worth hoisting out.
Recommitted from 0e98659ea1193c with a fix for APInt comparison.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114380
This reverts commit 6d41de380f223c8da02fd4d6a7f7dd1e7a404a24 as the
windows bots are not happy, in a way I do not understand. Revert whilst
we figure out what is wrong.
Given a min(max(fptosi, INT_MIN), INT_MAX) with the correct constants,
we can now generate a fptosi.sat. But in the arm backend, the constant
can be treated as high cost, pulling it out of the basic block in a way
that the DAG combine can no longer see it. This teaches it again that it
is a low cost constant, not worth hoisting out.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114380
Inspired by D111968, provide a isNegatedPowerOf2() wrapper instead of obfuscating code with (-Value).isPowerOf2() patterns, which I'm sure are likely avenues for typos.....
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111998
Stop using APInt constructors and methods that were soft-deprecated in
D109483. This fixes all the uses I found in llvm, except for the APInt
unit tests which should still test the deprecated methods.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110807
A <= -1 constant on a compare can be converted to a < 0 operation, which
is usually cheap. If we mark the constant as cheap, preventing hoisting,
we allow that fold to happen even across different blocks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109360
