SimplifyDemandedBits tries to agressively turn xor immediates into -1
to match a 'not' instruction. In this case, because X is a boolean, the
upper bits of (xor X, 1) are known to be 0. Because this is an AND
instruction, that means those bits aren't demanded from the other
operand, and thus SimplifyDemandedBits can turn (xor Y, 1) to (not Y).
We need to detect that this has happened to enable the DeMorgan
optimization. To do this we allow one of the xors to use -1 when
the outer operation is And.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132671
This optimizes xors that appear due to legalizing setge/setle which
require an xor with 1. This reduces the number of xors and may
allow the xor to fold with a beqz or bnez.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132614
This patch adds a Type operand to the TLI isCheapToSpeculateCttz/isCheapToSpeculateCtlz callbacks, allowing targets to decide whether branches should occur on a type-by-type/legality basis.
For X86, this patch proposes to allow CTTZ speculation for i8/i16 types that will lower to promoted i32 BSF instructions by masking the operand above the msb (we already do something similar for i8/i16 TZCNT). This required a minor tweak to CTTZ lowering - if the src operand is known never zero (i.e. due to the promotion masking) we can remove the CMOV zero src handling.
Although BSF isn't very fast, most CPUs from the last 20 years don't do that bad a job with it, although there are some annoying passthrough EFLAGS dependencies. Additionally, now that we emit 'REP BSF' in most cases, we are tending towards assuming this will most likely be executed as a TZCNT instruction on any semi-modern CPU.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132520
Similar to D132211, we can optimize x <s -1 ? x : -1 -> x <s 0 ? x : -1
Also improve the unsigned case from D132211 to use x != 0 which
will give a bnez instruction which might be compressible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132252
if x == 1,
x > 1 ? x : 1 return x, which is also 1.
x > 0 ? x : 1 return 1.
Reduce the number of load 1 instructions.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132211
This patch enables expansion or custom lowering for some integer
condition codes so that any xori that is needed is created before
the last DAG combine to enable optimization.
I've seen cases where we end up with
(or (xori (setcc), 1), (xori (setcc), 1)) which we would ideally
convert to (xori (and (setcc), (setcc)), 1). This patch doesn't
accomplish that yet, but it should allow us to add DAG
combines as follow ups. Example https://godbolt.org/z/Y4qnvsq1b
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131729
Use it to the fix a bug in the fceil/ffloor lowerings. We were
setting the passthru to IMPLICIT_DEF before and using a mask
agnostic policy. This means where the incoming bits in
the mask were 0 they could be anything in the outgoing mask. We
want those bits in the outgoing mask to be 0. This means we need to
pass the input mask as the passthru.
This generates worse code because we are unable to allocate the
v0 register to the output due to an earlyclobber constraint. We
probably need a special TIED pseudoinstruction and probably custom
isel since you can't use V0 twice in the input pattern.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132058
Extracted from D131729 where we handled C==0. It's now generalized
to more constants.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132000
This refactors the code into a separate function with early returns.
D132000 adds an additional operation to the if/else that selects
NewLHS, but can otherwise share the rest of the code.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132002
This time using N1 instead of N0 since N1 points to the original
setcc. This now affects scheduling as I expected.
Original commit message:
We change seteq<->setne but it doesn't change the semantics
of the setcc. We should keep original debug location. This is
consistent with visitXor in the generic DAGCombiner.
We change seteq<->setne but it doesn't change the semantics
of the setcc. We should keep original debug location. This is
consistent with visitXor in the generic DAGCombiner.
While (sub 0, X) can use x0 for the 0, I believe (add X, -1) is
still preferrable. (addi X, -1) can be compressed, sub with x0 on
the LHS is never compressible.
This introduce an xori in some cases. I don't believe it was the
intention of the original patch. This was an accident because
nonan FP equality compares also use SETEQ/SETNE.
Also pass the correct type to getSetCCInverse.
-Rename variable NnzC -> N0C.
-Use SelectionDAG::getSetCC to reduce code.
-Use SDValue::getOperand instead of operator-> and SDNode::getOperand.
Initial steps to add another similar combine to this code.
We have a good selection of W instructions, so promoting a truncated
value back to i64 is often free.
This appears to be a net code size reduction on SPECINT2006.
This has been split from D130397 as one of the patches needed to
complete that.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131819
(setcc x, y, eq/neq) are seqz, snez that set rd = 0/1.
addi is used to process immediate, which can save instructions for load immediate.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131471
Prior to this patch, libcalls inserted by the SelectionDAG legalizer
could never be tailcalled. The eligibility of libcalls for tail calling
is is partly determined by checking TargetLowering::isInTailCallPosition
and comparing the return type of the libcall and the calleer.
isInTailCallPosition in turn calls TargetLowering::isUsedByReturnOnly
(which always returns false if not implemented by the target).
This patch provides a minimal implementation of
TargetLowering::isUsedByReturnOnly - enough to support tail calling
libcalls on hard float ABIs. Soft-float ABIs are left for a follow on
patch. libcall-tail-calls.ll also shows missed opportunities to tail
call integer libcalls, but this is due to issues outside of
the isUsedByReturnOnly hook.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131087
This adds a +forced-atomics target feature with the same semantics
as +atomics-32 on ARM (D130480). For RISCV targets without the +a
extension, this forces LLVM to assume that lock-free atomics
(up to 32/64 bits for riscv32/64 respectively) are available.
This means that atomic load/store are lowered to a simple load/store
(and fence as necessary), as these are guaranteed to be atomic
(as long as they're aligned). Atomic RMW/CAS are lowered to __sync
(rather than __atomic) libcalls. Responsibility for providing the
__sync libcalls lies with the user (for privileged single-core code
they can be implemented by disabling interrupts). Code using
+forced-atomics and -forced-atomics are not ABI compatible if atomic
variables cross the ABI boundary.
For context, the difference between __sync and __atomic is that the
former are required to be lock-free, while the latter requires a
shared global lock provided by a shared object library. See
https://llvm.org/docs/Atomics.html#libcalls-atomic for a detailed
discussion on the topic.
This target feature will be used by Rust's riscv32i target family
to support the use of atomic load/store without atomic RMW/CAS.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130621
When folding (sra (add (shl X, 32), C1), 32 - C) -> (shl (sext_inreg (add X, C1), i32), C)
it's possible that the add is used by multiple sras. We should
allow the combine if all the SRAs will eventually be updated.
After transforming all of the sras, the shls will share a single
(sext_inreg (add X, C1), i32).
This pattern occurs if an sra with 32 is used as index in multiple
GEPs with different scales. The shl from the GEPs will be combined
with the sra before we get a chance to match the sra pattern.
When folding (sra (add (shl X, 32), C1), 32 - C) -> (shl (sext_inreg (add X, C1), C)
ignore the use count on the (shl X, 32).
The sext_inreg after the transform is free. So we're only making
2 new instructions, the add and the shl. So we only need to be
concerned with replacing the original sra+add. The original shl
can have other uses. This helps if there are multiple different
constants being added to the same shl.
D129980 converts (seteq (i64 (and X, 0xffffffff)), C1) into
(seteq (i64 (sext_inreg X, i32)), C1). If bit 31 of X is 0, it
will be turned back into an 'and' by SimplifyDemandedBits which
can cause an infinite loop.
To prevent this, check if bit 31 is 0 with computeKnownBits before
doing the transformation.
Fixes PR56905.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131113
This patch ensures consistency in the construction of FP_ROUND nodes
such that they always use ISD::TargetConstant instead of ISD::Constant.
This additionally fixes a bug in the AArch64 SVE backend where patterns
were matching against TargetConstant nodes and sometimes failing when
passed a Constant node.
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130370
An unnecessary sext.w is generated when masking the result of the
riscv_masked_cmpxchg_i64 intrinsic. Implementing handling of the
intrinsic in ComputeNumSignBitsForTargetNode allows it to be removed.
Although this isn't a particularly important optimisation, removing the
sext.w simplifies implementation of an additional cmpxchg-related
optimisation in D130192.
Although I can't produce a test with different codegen for the other
atomics intrinsics, these are added as well for completeness.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130191
This adds a merge operand to all of the binary _VL nodes. Including
integer and widening. They all share multiclasses in tablegen
so doing them all at once was easiest.
I plan to use FADD_VL in an upcoming patch. The rest are just for
consistency to keep tablegen working.
This does reduce the isel table size by about 25k so that's nice.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130816
This avoids a vmerge at the end and avoids spurious fflags updates.
This isn't used for constrained intrinsic so we technically don't have
to worry about fflags, but it doesn't cost much to support it.
To support I've extend our FCOPYSIGN_VL node to support a passthru
operand. Similar to what was done for VRGATHER*_VL nodes.
I plan to do a similar update for trunc, floor, and ceil.
Reviewed By: reames, frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130659
This patch adds shouldScalarizeBinop to RISCV target in order to convert an extract element of a vector binary operation into an extract element followed by a scalar binary operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129545
(srl (and X, 1<<C), C) is the form we receive for testing bit C.
An earlier combine removed the setcc so it wasn't there to match
when we created the SELECT_CC. This doesn't happen for BR_CC because
generic DAG combine rebuilds the setcc if it is used by BRCOND.
We can shift X left by XLen-1-C to put the bit to be tested in the
MSB, and use a signed compare with 0 to test the MSB.
The only difference between the combines were the calls to getNode
that include the true/false values for SELECT_CC or the chain
and branch target for BR_CC.
Wrap the rest of the code into a helper that reads LHS, RHS, and
CC and outputs new values and a bool if a new node needs to be
created.
If C > 10, this will require a constant to be materialized for the
And. To avoid this, we can shift X left by XLen-1-C bits to put the
tested bit in the MSB, then we can do a signed compare with 0 to
determine if the MSB is 0 or 1. Thanks to @reames for the suggestion.
I've implemented this inside of translateSetCCForBranch which is
called when setcc+brcond or setcc+select is converted to br_cc or
select_cc during lowering. It doesn't make sense to do this for
general setcc since we lack a sgez instruction.
I've tested bit 10, 11, 31, 32, 63 and a couple bits betwen 11 and 31
and between 32 and 63 for both i32 and i64 where applicable. Select
has some deficiencies where we receive (and (srl X, C), 1) instead.
This doesn't happen for br_cc due to the call to rebuildSetCC in the
generic DAGCombiner for brcond. I'll explore improving select in a
future patch.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130203
This patch implements recently ratified extension Zmmul, a subextension
of M (Integer Multiplication and Division) consisting only
multiplication part of it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103313
Reviewed By: craig.topper, jrtc27, asb
