For the targets that have in their ABI the requirement that arguments and
return values are extended to the full register bitwidth, it is important
that calls when built also take care of this detail.
The OMPIRBuilder, AddressSanitizer, GCOVProfiling, MemorySanitizer and
ThreadSanitizer passes are with this patch hopefully now doing this properly.
Reviewed By: Eli Friedman, Ulrich Weigand, Johannes Doerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133949
value() has undesired exception checking semantics and calls
__throw_bad_optional_access in libc++. Moreover, the API is unavailable without
_LIBCPP_NO_EXCEPTIONS on older Mach-O platforms (see
_LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS).
This fixes clang.
After https://reviews.llvm.org/rG463aa814182a23 tsan replaces llvm
intrinsics with calls to glibc functions. However this approach is
fragile, as slight changes in pipeline can return llvm intrinsics back.
In particular InstCombine can do that.
Msan/Asan already declare own version of these memory
functions for the similar purpose.
KCSAN, or anything that uses something else than compiler-rt, needs to
implement this callbacks.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133268
After https://reviews.llvm.org/rG463aa814182a23 tsan replaces llvm
intrinsics with calls to glibc functions. However this approach is
fragile, as slight changes in pipeline can return llvm intrinsics back.
In particular InstCombine can do that.
Msan/Asan already declare own version of these memory
functions for the similar purpose.
KCSAN, or anything that uses something else than compiler-rt, needs to
implement this callbacks.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133268
Factor our InstrumentationIRBuilder and share it between ThreadSanitizer
and SanitizerCoverage. Simplify its usage at the same time (use function
of passed Instruction or BasicBlock).
This class may be used in other instrumentation passes in future.
NFCI.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125038
When building with debug info enabled, some load/store instructions do
not have a DebugLocation attached. When using the default IRBuilder, it
attempts to copy the DebugLocation from the insertion-point instruction.
When there's no DebugLocation, no attempt is made to add one.
This is problematic for inserted calls, where the enclosing function has
debug info but the call ends up without a DebugLocation in e.g. LTO
builds that verify that both the enclosing function and calls to
inlinable functions have debug info attached.
This issue was noticed in Linux kernel KCSAN builds with LTO and debug
info enabled:
| ...
| inlinable function call in a function with debug info must have a !dbg location
| call void @__tsan_read8(i8* %432)
| ...
To fix, ensure that all calls to the runtime have a DebugLocation
attached, where the possibility exists that the insertion-point might
not have any DebugLocation attached to it.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124937
Running iwyu-diff on LLVM codebase since fa5a4e1b95c8f37796 detected a few
regressions, fixing them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124847
Using the legacy PM for the optimization pipeline was deprecated in 13.0.0.
Following recent changes to remove non-core features of the legacy
PM/optimization pipeline, remove ThreadSanitizerLegacyPass.
Reviewed By: #sanitizers, vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124209
An analysis may just be interested in checking if an instruction is
atomic but system scoped or single-thread scoped, like ThreadSanitizer's
isAtomic(). Unfortunately Instruction::isAtomic() can only answer the
"atomic" part of the question, but to also check scope becomes rather
verbose.
To simplify and reduce redundancy, introduce a common helper
getAtomicSyncScopeID() which returns the scope of an atomic operation.
Start using it in ThreadSanitizer.
NFCI.
Reviewed By: dvyukov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121910
Tsan pass does 2 optimizations based on presence of calls:
1. Don't emit function entry/exit callbacks if there are no calls
and no memory accesses.
2. Combine read/write of the same variable if there are no
intervening calls.
However, all debug info is represented as CallInst as well
and thus effectively disables these optimizations.
Don't consider debug info calls as calls.
Reviewed By: glider, melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114079
Split ThreadSanitizerPass into ThreadSanitizerPass (as a function
pass) and ModuleThreadSanitizerPass (as a module pass).
Main reason is to make sure that we have a unique mapping from
ClassName to PassName in the new passmanager framework, making it
possible to correctly identify the passes when dealing with options
such as -print-after and -print-pipeline-passes.
This is a follow-up to D105006 and D105007.
SystemZ ABI requires zero-extending function parameters to 64-bit. The
compiler is free to optimize the code around this assumption, e.g.
failing to zero-extend __tsan_atomic32_load()'s morder may cause
crashes in to_mo() switch table lookup.
Fix by adding zeroext attributes to TSan's FunctionCallees, similar to
how it was done in commit 3bc439bdff8b ("[MSan] Add instrumentation for
SystemZ"). This is a no-op on arches that don't need it.
Reviewed By: dvyukov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105629
This adds option -tsan-compound-read-before-write to emit different
instrumentation for the write if the read before that write is omitted
from instrumentation. The default TSan runtime currently does not
support the different instrumentation, and the option is disabled by
default.
Alternative runtimes, such as the Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer (KCSAN)
can make use of the feature. Indeed, the initial motivation is for use
in KCSAN as it was determined that due to the Linux kernel having a
large number of unaddressed data races, it makes sense to improve
performance and reporting by distinguishing compounded operations. E.g.
the compounded instrumentation is typically emitted for compound
operations such as ++, +=, |=, etc. By emitting different reports, such
data races can easily be noticed, and also automatically bucketed
differently by CI systems.
Reviewed By: dvyukov, glider
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83867
Add -tsan-instrument-read-before-write which allows instrumenting reads
of reads-before-writes.
This is required for KCSAN [1], where under certain configurations plain
writes behave differently (e.g. aligned writes up to word size may be
treated as atomic). In order to avoid missing potential data races due
to plain RMW operations ("x++" etc.), we will require instrumenting
reads of reads-before-writes.
[1] https://github.com/google/ktsan/wiki/KCSAN
Author: melver (Marco Elver)
Reviewed-in: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79983
Summary: This was preventing MemorySanitizerLegacyPass from appearing in --print-after-all.
Reviewers: vitalybuka
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79661
Add support to optionally emit different instrumentation for accesses to
volatile variables. While the default TSAN runtime likely will never
require this feature, other runtimes for different environments that
have subtly different memory models or assumptions may require
distinguishing volatiles.
One such environment are OS kernels, where volatile is still used in
various places for various reasons, and often declare volatile to be
"safe enough" even in multi-threaded contexts. One such example is the
Linux kernel, which implements various synchronization primitives using
volatile (READ_ONCE(), WRITE_ONCE()). Here the Kernel Concurrency
Sanitizer (KCSAN) [1], is a runtime that uses TSAN instrumentation but
otherwise implements a very different approach to race detection from
TSAN.
While in the Linux kernel it is generally discouraged to use volatiles
explicitly, the topic will likely come up again, and we will eventually
need to distinguish volatile accesses [2]. The other use-case is
ignoring data races on specially marked variables in the kernel, for
example bit-flags (here we may hide 'volatile' behind a different name
such as 'no_data_race').
[1] https://github.com/google/ktsan/wiki/KCSAN
[2] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CANpmjNOfXNE-Zh3MNP=-gmnhvKbsfUfTtWkyg_=VqTxS4nnptQ@mail.gmail.com
Author: melver (Marco Elver)
Reviewed-in: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78554
This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is
very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it
caused lots of recompilation.
I found this fact by looking at this table, which is sorted by the
number of times a file was changed over the last 100,000 git commits
multiplied by the number of object files that depend on it in the
current checkout:
recompiles touches affected_files header
342380 95 3604 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h
314730 234 1345 llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h
307036 118 2602 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h
213049 59 3611 llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h
170422 47 3626 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Compiler.h
162225 45 3605 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h
158319 63 2513 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h
140322 39 3598 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h
137647 59 2333 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h
131619 73 1803 llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h
Before this change, touching InitializePasses.h would cause 1345 files
to recompile. After this change, touching it only causes 550 compiles in
an incremental rebuild.
Reviewers: bkramer, asbirlea, bollu, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70211
Summary:
If we insert them from function pass some analysis may be missing or invalid.
Fixes PR42877.
Reviewers: eugenis, leonardchan
Reviewed By: leonardchan
Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68832
> llvm-svn: 374481
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka@google.com>
llvm-svn: 374527
Summary:
If we insert them from function pass some analysis may be missing or invalid.
Fixes PR42877.
Reviewers: eugenis, leonardchan
Reviewed By: leonardchan
Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68832
llvm-svn: 374481
Summary:
This is the first change to enable the TLI to be built per-function so
that -fno-builtin* handling can be migrated to use function attributes.
See discussion on D61634 for background. This is an enabler for fixing
handling of these options for LTO, for example.
This change should not affect behavior, as the provided function is not
yet used to build a specifically per-function TLI, but rather enables
that migration.
Most of the changes were very mechanical, e.g. passing a Function to the
legacy analysis pass's getTLI interface, or in Module level cases,
adding a callback. This is similar to the way the per-function TTI
analysis works.
There was one place where we were looking for builtins but not in the
context of a specific function. See FindCXAAtExit in
lib/Transforms/IPO/GlobalOpt.cpp. I'm somewhat concerned my workaround
could provide the wrong behavior in some corner cases. Suggestions
welcome.
Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel
Subscribers: arsenm, dschuff, jvesely, nhaehnle, mehdi_amini, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, eraman, aheejin, steven_wu, george.burgess.iv, dexonsmith, jfb, asbirlea, gchatelet, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66428
llvm-svn: 371284
Recommit r352791 after tweaking DerivedTypes.h slightly, so that gcc
doesn't choke on it, hopefully.
Original Message:
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.
Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.
One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.
However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)
Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315
llvm-svn: 352827
This reverts commit f47d6b38c7a61d50db4566b02719de05492dcef1 (r352791).
Seems to run into compilation failures with GCC (but not clang, where
I tested it). Reverting while I investigate.
llvm-svn: 352800
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.
Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.
One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.
However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)
Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315
llvm-svn: 352791
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Second iteration of D56433 which got reverted in rL350719. The problem
in the previous version was that we dropped the thunk calling the tsan init
function. The new version keeps the thunk which should appease dyld, but is not
actually OK wrt. the current semantics of function passes. Hence, add a
helper to insert the functions only on the first time. The helper
allows hooking into the insertion to be able to append them to the
global ctors list.
Reviewers: chandlerc, vitalybuka, fedor.sergeev, leonardchan
Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56538
llvm-svn: 351314
A straightforward port of tsan to the new PM, following the same path
as D55647.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56433
llvm-svn: 350647
