This check does not always work because not all of the GEPs use a constant offset, but it happens often enough to reduce the number of times we use SCEV.
llvm-svn: 186465
If an outside loop user of the reduction value uses the header phi node we
cannot just reduce the vectorized phi value in the vector code epilog because
we would loose VF-1 reductions.
lp:
p = phi (0, lv)
lv = lv + 1
...
brcond , lp, outside
outside:
usr = add 0, p
(Say the loop iterates two times, the value of p coming out of the loop is one).
We cannot just transform this to:
vlp:
p = phi (<0,0>, lv)
lv = lv + <1,1>
..
brcond , lp, outside
outside:
p_reduced = p[0] + [1];
usr = add 0, p_reduced
(Because the original loop iterated two times the vectorized loop would iterate
one time, but p_reduced ends up being zero instead of one).
We would have to execute VF-1 iterations in the scalar remainder loop in such
cases. For now, just disable vectorization.
PR16522
llvm-svn: 186256
In general, one should always complete CFG modifications first, update
CFG-based analyses, like Dominatores and LoopInfo, then generate
instruction sequences.
LoopVectorizer was creating a new loop, calling SCEVExpander to
generate checks, then updating LoopInfo. I just changed the order.
llvm-svn: 186241
Address calculation for gather/scather in vectorized code can incur a
significant cost making vectorization unbeneficial. Add infrastructure to add
cost.
Tests and cost model for targets will be in follow-up commits.
radar://14351991
llvm-svn: 186187
Before we could vectorize PHINodes scanning successors was a good way of finding candidates. Now we can vectorize the phinodes which is simpler.
llvm-svn: 186139
We can vectorize them because in the case where we wrap in the address space the
unvectorized code would have had to access a pointer value of zero which is
undefined behavior in address space zero according to the LLVM IR semantics.
(Thank you Duncan, for pointing this out to me).
Fixes PR16592.
llvm-svn: 186088
Commit 185883 fixes a bug in the IRBuilder that should fix the ASan bot. AssertingVH can help in exposing some RAUW problems.
Thanks Ben and Alexey!
llvm-svn: 185886
This is a complete re-write if the bottom-up vectorization class.
Before this commit we scanned the instruction tree 3 times. First in search of merge points for the trees. Second, for estimating the cost. And finally for vectorization.
There was a lot of code duplication and adding the DCE exposed bugs. The new design is simpler and DCE was a part of the design.
In this implementation we build the tree once. After that we estimate the cost by scanning the different entries in the constructed tree (in any order). The vectorization phase also works on the built tree.
llvm-svn: 185774
Math functions are mark as readonly because they read the floating point
rounding mode. Because we don't vectorize loops that would contain function
calls that set the rounding mode it is safe to ignore this memory read.
llvm-svn: 185299
To support this we have to insert 'extractelement' instructions to pick the right lane.
We had this functionality before but I removed it when we moved to the multi-block design because it was too complicated.
llvm-svn: 185230
In this code we keep track of pointers that we are allowed to read from, if they are accessed by non-predicated blocks.
We use this list to allow vectorization of conditional loads in predicated blocks because we know that these addresses don't segfault.
llvm-svn: 185214
I used the class to safely reset the state of the builder's debug location. I
think I have caught all places where we need to set the debug location to a new
one. Therefore, we can replace the class by a function that just sets the debug
location.
llvm-svn: 185165
When we store values for reversed induction stores we must not store the
reversed value in the vectorized value map. Another instruction might use this
value.
This fixes 3 test cases of PR16455.
llvm-svn: 185051
This should hopefully have fixed the stage2/stage3 miscompare on the dragonegg
testers.
"LoopVectorize: Use the dependence test utility class
We now no longer need alias analysis - the cases that alias analysis would
handle are now handled as accesses with a large dependence distance.
We can now vectorize loops with simple constant dependence distances.
for (i = 8; i < 256; ++i) {
a[i] = a[i+4] * a[i+8];
}
for (i = 8; i < 256; ++i) {
a[i] = a[i-4] * a[i-8];
}
We would be able to vectorize about 200 more loops (in many cases the cost model
instructs us no to) in the test suite now. Results on x86-64 are a wash.
I have seen one degradation in ammp. Interestingly, the function in which we
now vectorize a loop is never executed so we probably see some instruction
cache effects. There is a 2% improvement in h264ref. There is one or the other
TSCV loop kernel that speeds up.
radar://13681598"
llvm-svn: 184724
We now no longer need alias analysis - the cases that alias analysis would
handle are now handled as accesses with a large dependence distance.
We can now vectorize loops with simple constant dependence distances.
for (i = 8; i < 256; ++i) {
a[i] = a[i+4] * a[i+8];
}
for (i = 8; i < 256; ++i) {
a[i] = a[i-4] * a[i-8];
}
We would be able to vectorize about 200 more loops (in many cases the cost model
instructs us no to) in the test suite now. Results on x86-64 are a wash.
I have seen one degradation in ammp. Interestingly, the function in which we
now vectorize a loop is never executed so we probably see some instruction
cache effects. There is a 2% improvement in h264ref. There is one or the other
TSCV loop kernel that speeds up.
radar://13681598
llvm-svn: 184685
