After skeleton of the `Parallel Op` is created set the insertion point to start of the block. So that later `CodeGen` can proceed.
Note: This patch reflects the work that can be upstreamed from PR(merged)
PR: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18-llvm-project/pull/424
Reviewed By: schweitz, kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88221
The Flang driver depends on libclangBasic. This means, among other
things, that some of the tablegen files (e.g. diagnostic definitions)
need to be generated before various libclangBasic header files can be
included (e.g. DiagnosticIDs.h). If we are lucky, libclangBasic is
indeed built before various flang driver libraries that depend on it
are. This patch makes sure that this is deterministic - i.e.
libclangBasic is built before the Flang driver libraries are.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88110
In the frontend driver we should be using FC1Option (frontend driver
options) instead of FlangOption (flang driver options).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88108
Fortran 2018 15.4.2.2(4)(c) says nonassumed or explicit non-constant
length parameter require explicit interface. The "nonassumed" part was
missing in f18 characteristic analysis causing CanBeCalledViaImplicitInterface
to return false for `CHARACTER(*) function foo()` like interfaces.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88075
The Microsoft compiler seems to have difficulties to decide between a const/non-const method of a captured object context in a closure. The error message is:
```
symbol.cpp(261): error C2668: 'Fortran::semantics::Symbol::detailsIf': ambiguous call to overloaded function
symbol.h(535): note: could be 'const D *Fortran::semantics::Symbol::detailsIf<Fortran::semantics::DerivedTypeDetails>(void) const'
symbol.h(534): note: or 'D *Fortran::semantics::Symbol::detailsIf<Fortran::semantics::DerivedTypeDetails>(void)'
symbol.cpp(261): note: while trying to match the argument list '()'
```
Explicitly using the this-pointer resolves this problem.
This patch is part of the series to make flang compilable with MS Visual Studio <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2020-July/000448.html>.
Reviewed By: DavidTruby
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88052
Like in D87961, msvc has difficulties deducing the template argument. The error message is:
```
expr-parsers.cpp(383): error C2672: 'applyLambda': no matching overloaded function found
```
Explicitly pass the first template argument to help it.
This patch is part of the series to make flang compilable with MS Visual Studio <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2020-July/000448.html>.
Reviewed By: DavidTruby
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88001
Msvc has difficulties deducing the template argument here. The error message is:
```
basic-parsers.h(790,12): error C2672: 'applyFunction': no matching overloaded function found
```
Explicitly pass the first template argument to help it.
This patch is part of the series to make flang compilable with MS Visual Studio <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2020-July/000448.html>.
Reviewed By: DavidTruby
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87961
Hew more closely to the C17 standard; perform macro replacement
of arguments to function-like macros unless they're being stringified
or pasted. Test with a model "assert" macro idiom that exposed
the problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87650
According to section 9.4.1, paragraph 3,
If the starting point is greater than the ending point, the substring has
length zero
But the compilers code for substring processing was failing a call to `CHECK()`
in this case. I fixed this by just setting the number of items in the
resulting string to 0 for this situation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87799
MSVC tries to expand templates that are in the false-branch of a `if constexpr` construct. In this case, the condition checks whether a tuple has at least one element and then is trying to access it using `std::get<0>`, which fails when the tuple has 0 elements.
The workaround is to extract that case into a separate method.
This patch is part of the series to make flang compilable with MS Visual Studio <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2020-July/000448.html>.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87728
C-style /*comments*/ are removed during preprocessing directive
tokenization, but Fortran !comments need to be specifically
allowed.
Fixes LLVM bugzilla 47466.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87638
A type name in an IMPLICIT declaration that was later used in a PARAMETER
statement caused problems because the default symbol scope had not yet been
initialized. I avoided dereferencing in the situation where the default scope
was uninitialized and added a test that triggers the problem.
Also, once I corrected the bad dereference, the compiler was putting out
misleading error messages. The underlying error us due to violating section
7.5.10, paragraph 4, which states:
A structure constructor shall not appear before the referenced type is
defined.
I fixed this by testing to see if a type that is used in a structure
constructor is forward referenced.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87535
The std::string holding the content of a CookedSource no longer
needs to be exposed in its API after the recent work that allows
the parsing context to hold multiple instances of a CookedSource.
So clean the API. These changes were extracted from some work in
progress that was made easier by the API changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87635
Now backends spell out which namespace they want to be in, instead of relying on
clients #including them inside already-opened namespaces. This also means that
cppNamespaces should be fully qualified, and there's no implicit "::mlir::"
prepended to them anymore.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86811
Change the analyzed form of type-bound assignment to match that of call
statements. Resolve the binding name to a specific subprogram when
possible by using `GetBindingResolution`. Otherwise leave it as a
type-bound procedure call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87541
A type name in an IMPLICIT declaration that was later used in a PARAMETER
statement caused problems because the default symbol scope had not yet been
initialized. I avoided dereferencing in the situation where the default scope
was uninitialized and added a test that triggers the problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87535
Define Fortran::Semantics::Scope::GetName in the header so it is available
to Fortran::Evaluate::Tool::AttachDeclaration without a circular dependency
introduced in 82edd42.
Reviewed By: tskeith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87505
Summary:
This is the first patch implementing the new Flang driver as outlined in [1],
[2] & [3]. It creates Flang driver (`flang-new`) and Flang frontend driver
(`flang-new -fc1`). These will be renamed as `flang` and `flang -fc1` once the
current Flang throwaway driver, `flang`, can be replaced with `flang-new`.
Currently only 2 options are supported: `-help` and `--version`.
`flang-new` is implemented in terms of libclangDriver, defaulting the driver
mode to `FlangMode` (added to libclangDriver in [4]). This ensures that the
driver runs in Flang mode regardless of the name of the binary inferred from
argv[0].
The design of the new Flang compiler and frontend drivers is inspired by it
counterparts in Clang [3]. Currently, the new Flang compiler and frontend
drivers re-use Clang libraries: clangBasic, clangDriver and clangFrontend.
To identify Flang options, this patch adds FlangOption/FC1Option enums.
Driver::printHelp is updated so that `flang-new` prints only Flang options.
The new Flang driver is disabled by default. To enable it, set
`-DBUILD_FLANG_NEW_DRIVER=ON` when configuring CMake and add clang to
`LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS` (e.g. -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=“clang;flang;mlir”).
[1] “RFC: new Flang driver - next steps”
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2020-July/000470.html
[2] “RFC: Adding a fortran mode to the clang driver for flang”
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-June/062669.html
[3] “RFC: refactoring libclangDriver/libclangFrontend to share with Flang”
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-July/066393.html
[4] https://reviews.llvm.org/rG6bf55804924d5a1d902925ad080b1a2b57c5c75c
co-authored-by: Andrzej Warzynski <andrzej.warzynski@arm.com>
Reviewed By: richard.barton.arm, sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86089
When we define a derived type that extends another derived type, we can then
create a structure constructor that contains values for the fields of both the
child type and its parent. The compiler's internal representation of that
value contains the name of the parent type where a component name would
normally appear. This caused an assert during contant folding.
There are three cases for components that appear in structure constructors.
The first is the normal case of a component appearing in a structure
constructor for its type.
The second is a component of the parent (or grandparent) type appearing in a
structure constructor for the child type.
The third is the parent type component, which can appear in the structure
constructor of its child.
There are also cases where the component can be arrays.
I created the test case folding12.f90 that covers all of these cases and
modified the code to handle them.
Most of my changes were to the "Find()" method of the type
"StructureConstructor" where I added code to cover the second and third cases
described above. To handle these cases, I needed to create a
"StructureConstructor" for the parent type component and return it. To handle
returning a newly created "StructureConstructor", I changed the return type of
"Find()" to be "std::optional" rather than an ordinary pointer.
This change supersedes D86172.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87151
Change how generic operators and assignments are checked for
distinguishable procedures. Because of how they are invoked, available
type-bound generics and normal generics all have to be considered
together. This is different from how generic names are checked.
Move common part of checking into DistinguishabilityHelper so that it
can be used in both cases after the appropriate procedures have been
added.
Cache result of Procedure::Characterize(Symbol) in a map in
CheckHelper so that we don't have to worry about passing the
characterized Procedures around or the cost of recomputing them.
Add MakeOpName() to construct names for defined operators and assignment
for using in error messages. This eliminates the need for different
messages in those cases.
When the procedures for a defined operator or assignment are undistinguishable,
include the type name in the error message, otherwise it may be ambiguous.
Add missing check that procedures for defined operators are functions
and that their dummy arguments are INTENT(IN) or VALUE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87341
These are owned by an instance of a new class AllCookedSources.
This removes the need for a Scope to own a string containing
a module's cooked source stream, and will enable errors to be
emitted when parsing module files in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86891
The DumpSymbolsSources() routine ordered its output by the addresses
of the names of the symbols, and was susceptible to variation across
environments. Fixed by using a multimap using the values of the names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87035
Don't use just 128-bit integer as the type for integer
CASE statement constants. Use the actual type of the
literal constants that appeared.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86875
Conformance checking of the shapes of the operands of
array expressions can't, of course, always be done at
compilation time; but when the shapes are known and
nonconformable, we should catch the errors that we can.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86887
Change the expression representation TypeParamInquiry from being
a class that's templatized on the integer KIND of its result into
a monomorphic representation that results in a SubscriptInteger
that can then be converted.
This is a minor simplification, but it's worth doing because
it is believed to also be a work-around for bugs in the MSVC
compiler with overload resolution that affect the expression
traversal framework.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86551
Compilation of the following program currently generates a warning message:
i = 1
if (i .eq. 0) then
write(6, 200) i
200 format (I8)
end if
write(6, 200) i
end
x.f90:6:9: Label '200' is not in scope
write(6, 200) i
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Whereas branch targets must conform to the Clause 11.1.2.1 program
requirement "Transfer of control to the interior of a block from
outside the block is prohibited, ...", this doesn't apply to format
statement references.
When an error is associated with a symbol, it was marked with a flag
from Symbol::Flag. The problem with that is that you need a mutable
symbol to do that. Instead, store the set of error symbols in the
SemanticsContext. This allows for some const_casts to be eliminated.
Also, improve the internal error that occurs if SetError is called
but no fatal error has been reported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86740
This patch fix the prasing for the gang-arg values for the gang clause. It also adds
some clause validity tests for the loop construct.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86584
The tile clause in OpenACC 3.0 imposes some restriction. Element in the tile size list are either * or a
constant positive integer expression. If there are n tile sizes in the list, the loop construct must be immediately
followed by n tightly-nested loops.
This patch implement these restrictions and add some tests.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86655
A number of I/O syntax rules involve variables that will be written to,
and must therefore be definable. This includes internal file variables,
IOSTAT= and IOMSG= specifiers, most INQUIRE statement specifiers, a few
other specifiers, and input variables. This patch checks for
these violations, and implements several additional I/O TODO constraint
checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86557
When an illegal character appears in Fortran source (after
preprocessing), catch and report it in the prescanning phase
rather than leaving it for the parser to cope with.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86553
Accept and represent "global" compiler directives that appear
before and between program units in a source file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86555
If the label field is empty, and macro replacement occurs,
the rescanned text might be misclassified as a comment card
if it happens to begin with a C or a D. Insert a leading
space into these otherwise empty label fields.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47173
If an error has occurred a symbol may have a DeclTypeSpec but no
valid DynamicType. There is no need to compute the size of erroneous
symbols.
Also, we only need to process object entities and procedure entities.
All other kinds of symbols can be skipped.
This fixes another problem revealed by https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47265
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86484
A specification expression can reference an implicitly declared variable
in the host procedure. Because we have to process specification parts
before execution parts, this may be the first time we encounter the
variable. We were assuming the variable was implicitly declared in the
scope where it was encountered, leading to an error because local
variables may not be referenced in specification expressions.
The fix is to tentatively create the implicit variable in the host
procedure because that is the only way the specification expression can
be valid. We mark it with the flag `ImplicitOrError` to indicate that
either it must be implicitly defined in the host (by being mentioned in
the execution part) or else its use turned out to be an error.
We need to apply the implicit type rules of the host, which requires
some changes to implicit typing.
Variables in common blocks are allowed to appear in specification expressions
(because they are not locals) but the common block definition may not appear
until after their use. To handle this we create common block symbols and object
entities for each common block object during the `PreSpecificationConstruct`
pass. This allows us to remove the corresponding code in the main visitor and
`commonBlockInfo_.curr`. The change in order of processing causes some
different error messages to be emitted.
Some cleanup is included with this change:
- In `ExpressionAnalyzer`, if an unresolved name is encountered but
no error has been reported, emit an internal error.
- Change `ImplicitRulesVisitor` to hide the `ImplicitRules` object
that implements it. Change the interface to pass in names rather
than having to get the first character of the name.
- Change `DeclareObjectEntity` to have the `attrs` argument default
to an empty set; that is the typical case.
- In `Pre(parser::SpecificationPart)` use "structured bindings" to
give names to the pieces that make up a specification-part.
- Enhance `parser::Unwrap` to unwrap `Statement` and `UnlabeledStatement`
and make use of that in PreSpecificationConstruct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86322
This patch fix the usage of the wait-argument in a clause and add several tests and fix the unparsing of
the wait-argument.
Reviewed By: sscalpone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86325
Msvc has trouble defining a struct/class and defining a constexpr symbol in the same declarator. It reports the following error:
```
basic-parsers.h(809): error C2131: expression did not evaluate to a constant
basic-parsers.h(809): note: failure was caused by call of undefined function or one not declared 'constexpr'
basic-parsers.h(809): note: see usage of 'Fortran::parser::OkParser::OkParser'
```
Fix the msvc compilation by splitting the two definitions into two separate declarators.
This patch is part of the series to [[ http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2020-July/000448.html | make flang compilable with MS Visual Studio ]].
Reviewed By: DavidTruby, klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85937
When we report an error for a bad character kind, don't keep it in the
`DeclTypeSpec`. Otherwise there could be further problems. In this case,
`ComputeOffsets()` got an assertion error because we didn't recognize
`CHARACTER(*,8)` as needing a descriptor because of the bad kind.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86357
This greatly simplifies a large portion of the underlying infrastructure, allows for lookups of singleton classes to be much more efficient and always thread-safe(no locking). As a result of this, the dialect symbol registry has been removed as it is no longer necessary.
For users broken by this change, an alert was sent out(https://llvm.discourse.group/t/removing-kinds-from-attributes-and-types) that helps prevent a majority of the breakage surface area. All that should be necessary, if the advice in that alert was followed, is removing the kind passed to the ::get methods.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86121
When a procedure name was used on the RHS of an assignment we were not
reporting the error. When one was used in an expression the error
message wasn't very good (e.g. "Operands of + must be numeric; have
INTEGER(4) and untyped").
Detect these cases in ArgumentAnalyzer and emit better messages,
depending on whether the named procedure is a function or subroutine.
Procedure names may appear as actual arguments to function and
subroutine calls so don't report errors in those cases. That is the same
case where assumed type arguments are allowed, so rename `isAssumedType_`
to `isProcedureCall_` and use that to decide if it is an error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86107
