Recently https://reviews.llvm.org/D88103 introduced a nice API for
converting a JSON object into C++ types, which include nice error
messaging.
I'm using that new functioniality to perform the parsing in a much more
elegant way. As a result, the code looks simpler and more maintainable,
as we aren't parsing anymore individual fields manually.
I updated the test cases accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88264
This is the first in a series of patches that will adds a new processor trace plug-in to LLDB.
The idea for this first patch to to add the plug-in interface with simple commands for the trace files that can "load" and "dump" the trace information. We can test the functionality and ensure people are happy with the way things are done and how things are organized before moving on to adding more functionality.
Processor trace information can be view in a few different ways:
- post mortem where a trace is saved off that can be viewed later in the debugger
- gathered while a process is running and allow the user to step back in time (with no variables, memory or registers) to see how each thread arrived at where it is currently stopped.
This patch attempts to start with the first solution of loading a trace file after the fact. The idea is that we will use a JSON file to load the trace information. JSON allows us to specify information about the trace like:
- plug-in name in LLDB
- path to trace file
- shared library load information so we can re-create a target and symbolicate the information in the trace
- any other info that the trace plug-in will need to be able to successfully parse the trace information
- cpu type
- version info
- ???
A new "trace" command was added at the top level of the LLDB commmands:
- "trace load"
- "trace dump"
I did this because if we load trace information we don't need to have a process and we might end up creating a new target for the trace information that will become active. If anyone has any input on where this would be better suited, please let me know. Walter Erquinigo will end up filling in the Intel PT specific plug-in so that it works and is tested once we can agree that the direction of this patch is the correct one, so please feel free to chime in with ideas on comments!
Reviewed By: clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85705
When we fixed ImportDeclContext(...) in D71378 to make sure we complete each
FieldDecl of a RecordDecl when we are importing the definition we missed the
case where a FeildDecl was an ArrayType whose ElementType is a record.
This fix was motivated by a codegen crash during LLDB expression parsing. Since
we were not importing the definition we were crashing during layout which
required all the records be defined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86660
This adds support for substituting std::pair instantiations with enabled
import-std-module.
With the fixes in parent revisions we can currently substitute a single pair
(however, a result that returns a second pair currently causes LLDB to crash
while importing the second template instantiation).
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85141
SemaSourceWithPriorities is a special SemaSource that wraps our normal LLDB
ExternalASTSource and the ASTReader (which is used for the C++ module loading).
It's only active when the `import-std-module` setting is turned on.
The `CompleteType` function there in `SemaSourceWithPriorities` is looping over
all ExternalASTSources and asks each to complete the type. However, that loop is
in another loop that keeps doing that until the type is complete. If that
function is ever called on a type that is a forward decl then that causes LLDB
to go into an infinite loop.
I remember I added that second loop and the comment because I thought I saw a
similar pattern in some other Clang code, but after some grepping I can't find
that code anywhere and it seems the rest of the code base only calls
CompleteType once (It would also be kinda silly to have calling it multiple
times). So it seems that's just a silly mistake.
The is implicitly tested by importing `std::pair`, but I also added a simpler
dedicated test that creates a dummy libc++ module with some forward declarations
and then imports them into the scratch AST context. At some point the
ASTImporter will check if one of the forward decls could be completed by the
ExternalASTSource, which will cause the `SemaSourceWithPriorities` to go into an
infinite loop once it receives the `CompleteType` call.
Reviewed By: shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87289
targetHasSVE helper function was added to test for availability of SVE support
by connected platform. We now intend to use this function in other testcases
and I am moving it to a generic location in lldbtest.py to allow usage by
other upcoming testcases.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86872
This patch adds the ability to use a custom interpreter with the
`platform shell` command. If the user set the `-s|--shell` option
with the path to a binary, lldb passes it down to the platform's
`RunShellProcess` method and set it as the shell to use in
`ProcessLaunchInfo to run commands.
Note that not all the Platforms support running shell commands with
custom interpreters (i.e. RemoteGDBServer is only expected to use the
default shell).
This patch also makes some refactoring and cleanups, like swapping
CString for StringRef when possible and updating `SBPlatformShellCommand`
with new methods and a new constructor.
rdar://67759256
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86667
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
This adds a minor test case fix to previously submitted AArch64 SVE
ptrace support. This was failing on LLDB/AArch64 Linux buildbot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79699
This patch adds NativeRegisterContext_arm64 ptrace routines to access
AArch64 SVE register set. This patch also adds a test-case to test
AArch64 SVE register access and dynamic size configuration capability.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79699
I intentionally decided not to reset the column automatically
anywhere, because I don't know where and if at all that should happen.
There should be always an indication of being scrolled (too much)
to the right, so I'll leave this to whoever has an opinion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85290
Rename the existing expectedFailure to expectedFailureIfFn to better
describe its purpose and provide an overload for
unittest2.expectedFailure in decorators.py.
This is the error message from the OS, so we shouldn't check against the
OS-specific part of the string.
Fixes the test on Windows which returns a different error message.
We didn't do anything with the llvm::Error we get from `Open`, so when we end up in the
error case we just crash due to the llvm::Error sanity check. Also add the missing newline
behind the error message so it no longer messes with the next (lldb) prompt.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85970
This is relanding D81001. The patch originally failed as on newer editline
versions it seems CC_REFRESH will move the cursor to the start of the line via
\r and then back to the original position. On older editline versions like
the one used by default on macOS, CC_REFRESH doesn't move the cursor at all.
As the patch changed the way we handle tab completion (previously we did
REDISPLAY but now we're doing CC_REFRESH), this caused a few completion tests
to receive this unexpected cursor movement in the output stream.
This patch updates those tests to also accept output that contains the specific
cursor movement commands (\r and then \x1b[XC). lldbpexpect.py received an
utility method for generating the cursor movement escape sequence.
Original summary:
I implemented autosuggestion if there is one possible suggestion.
I set the keybinds for every character. When a character is typed, Editline::TypedCharacter is called.
Then, autosuggestion part is displayed in gray, and you can actually input by typing C-k.
Editline::Autosuggest is a function for finding completion, and it is like Editline::TabCommand now, but I will add more features to it.
Testing does not work well in my environment, so I can't confirm that it goes well, sorry. I am dealing with it now.
Reviewed By: teemperor, JDevlieghere, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81001
When LLDB sees only one possible completion for an input, it will add a trailing
space to the completion to signal that to the user. If the current argument is
quoted, that also means LLDB needs to add the trailing quote to finish the
current argument first.
In case the user is in a function with only one local variable and is currently
editing an empty line in the multiline expression editor, then we are in the
unique situation where we can have a unique completion for an empty input line.
(In a normal LLDB session this would never occur as empty input would just list
all the possible commands).
In this special situation our check if the current argument needs to receive a
trailing quote will crash LLDB as there is no current argument and the
completion code just unconditionally tries to access the current argument. This
just adds the missing check if we even have a current argument before we check
if we need to add a terminating quote character.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85903
Without this, sources with long lines or variable names may overwrite
panel frames, or even overrun to the following line. There's currently
no way to scroll left/right in the views, so that should be added
to handle these cases.
This commit includes fixing constness of some Window functions,
and also makes PutCStringTruncated() consistent with the added
printf-like variant to take the padding as the first argument (can't
add it after the format to the printf-like function).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85123
This patch modifies the skipIfRemote decorator so it can apply to a
whole class, which allows us to skip all PExpect tests as a whole.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85365
Between the time it was created and it was pushed upstream,
99451b4453688a94c6014cac233d371ab4cc342d has moved the existing
gui gui tests to lldb/test, so move this one too.
And update it to contain TestGuiBasic.py changes since the time
when it was based on that test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85106
lldb-platform contains a very minimal support for the qfProcessInfo
packet, only allowing the simplest query to get most of the testsuite
running, and returning very little information about the matched
processes.
Currently, `target create` has no --platform option. However,
TargetList::CreateTargetInternal which is called under the hood, will
return an error when either no platform or multiple matching platforms
are found, saying that a platform should be specified with --platform.
This patch adds the platform option, but that doesn't solve either of
these errors.
- If more than one platform matches, specifying the platform isn't
going to fix that. The current code will only look at the
architecture instead. I've updated the error message to ask the user
to specify an architecture.
- If no architecture is found, specifying a new one via platform isn't
going to change that either because we already try to find one that
matches the given architecture.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84809
Summary:
Frame recognizers are stored alongside a flag that indicates whether they were
deleted by the user. If the flag is set, they are supposed to be ignored by the
rest of the frame recognizer code. 'frame recognizer delete' is supposed to set
that flag. 'frame recognizer clear' however actually deletes all frame
recognizers (so, it doesn't set the flag but directly deletes them from the
list).
The current implementation of this concept is pretty broken. `frame recognizer
delete` sets the flag, but it somehow thinks that the recognizer id is an index
in the recognizer list. That's not true as it's actually just a member of each
recognizer entry. So it actually just sets the `deleted` flag for a random other
recognizer. The tests for the recognizer still pass as `frame recognizer list`
is also broken and just completely ignored the `deleted` flag and lists all
recognizers. Also `frame recognizer delete` just ignores if it can't actually
delete a recognizer if the id is invalid.
I think we can simplify this whole thing by just actually deleting recognizers
instead of making sure all code is actually respecting the `deleted` flag. I
assume the intention of this was to make sure that all recognizers are getting
unique ids over the course of an LLDB session, but as `clear` is actually
deleting them and we keep recycling ids, that didn't really work to begin with.
This patch deletes the `deleted` flag and just actually deletes the stored
recognizer. Also adds the missing error message in case it find a recognizer
with a given id.
Reviewers: mib
Reviewed By: mib
Subscribers: abidh, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84404
This patch moves the `history` subcommand from the `command` to `session`
command. I think it makes more sense to have it there because as the `command`
usage suggests, it should be used to manage custom LLDB commands.
However, `history` is essentially tied to a debugging session and holds
all the commands (not specifically custom ones).
This also makes it more discoverable by adding an alias for it (mimicking
the shell builtin).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84307
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
This patch introduce a new feature that allows the users to save their
debugging session's transcript (commands + outputs) to a file.
It differs from the reproducers since it doesn't require to capture a
session preemptively and replay the reproducer file in lldb.
The user can choose the save its session manually using the session save
command or automatically by setting the interpreter.save-session-on-quit
on their init file.
To do so, the patch adds a Stream object to the CommandInterpreter that
will hold the input command from the IOHandler and the CommandReturnObject
output and error. This way, that stream object accumulates passively all
the interactions throughout the session and will save them to disk on demand.
The user can specify a file path where the session's transcript will be
saved. However, it is optional, and when it is not provided, lldb will
create a temporary file name according to the session date and time.
rdar://63347792
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82155
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Summary:
registerSharedLibrariesWithTarget was setting the library path
environment variable to the process build directory, but the function is
also accepting libraries in other directories (in which case they won't
be found automatically).
This patch makes the function set the path variable correctly for these
libraries too. This enables us to remove the code for setting the path
variable in TestWeakSymbols.py, which was working only accidentally --
it was relying on the fact that
launch_info.SetEnvironmentEntries(..., append=True)
would not overwrite the path variable it has set, but that is going to
change with D83306.
Reviewers: davide, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83552
Summary:
Currently the frame recognizers are stored in a global list (the list in the
StackFrameRecognizersManagerImpl singleton to be precise). All commands and
plugins that modify the list are just modifying that global list of recognizers
which is shared by all Target and Debugger instances.
This is clearly against the idea of LLDB being usable as a library and it also
leads to some very obscure errors as now multiple tests are sharing the used
frame recognizers. For example D83400 is currently failing as it reorders some
test_ functions which permanently changes the frame recognizers of all
debuggers/targets. As all frame recognizers are also initialized in a 'once'
guard, it's also impossible to every restore back the original frame recognizers
once they are deleted in a process.
This patch just moves the frame recognizers into the current target. This seems
the way everyone assumes the system works as for example the assert frame
recognizers is using the current target to find the function/so-name to look for
(which only works if the recognizers are stored in the target).
Reviewers: jingham, mib
Reviewed By: jingham, mib
Subscribers: MrHate, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83757
Always clean up subprocesses on tear down instead of relying on the
caller to do so. This is not only less error prone but also means the
tests can be more concise.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83787
Summary:
The Scalar class claims to follow the C type conversion rules. This is
true for the Promote function, but it is not true for the implicit
conversions done in the getter methods.
These functions had a subtle bug: when extending the type, they used the
signedness of the *target* type in order to determine whether to do
sign-extension or zero-extension. This is not how things work in C,
which uses the signedness of the *source* type. I.e., C does
(sign-)extension before it does signed->unsigned conversion, and not the
other way around.
This means that: (unsigned long)(int)-1
is equal to (unsigned long)0xffffffffffffffff
and not (unsigned long)0x00000000ffffffff
Unsurprisingly, we have accumulated code which depended on this
inconsistent behavior. It mainly manifested itself as code calling
"ULongLong/SLongLong" as a way to get the value of the Scalar object in
a primitive type that is "large enough". Previously, the ULongLong
conversion did not do sign-extension, but now it does.
This patch makes the Scalar getters consistent with the declared
semantics, and fixes the couple of call sites that were using it
incorrectly.
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82772
Summary:
This replaces the current use of LLDB's own `StringConvert` with LLVM's
`to_integer` which has a less error-prone API and doesn't use special 'error
values' to designate parsing problems.
Where needed I also added missing error handling code that prints a parsing
error instead of continuing with the error value returned from `StringConvert`
(which either gave a cryptic error message or just took the error value
performed an incorrect action with it. For example, `frame recognizer delete -1`
just deleted the frame recognizer at index 0).
Reviewers: #lldb, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: labath, abidh, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82297
Summary:
A lot of our tests do 'self.assertTrue(error.Success()'. The problem
with that is that when this fails, it produces a completely useless
error message (False is not True) and the most important piece of
information -- the actual error message -- is completely hidden.
Sometimes we mitigate that by including the error message in the "msg"
argument, but this has two additional problems:
- as the msg argument is evaluated unconditionally, one needs to be
careful to not trigger an exception when the operation was actually
successful.
- it requires more typing, which means we often don't do it
assertSuccess solves these problems by taking the entire SBError object
as an argument. If the operation was unsuccessful, it can format a
reasonable error message itself. The function still accepts a "msg"
argument, which can include any additional context, but this context now
does not need to include the error message.
To demonstrate usage, I replace a number of existing assertTrue
assertions with the new function. As this process is not easily
automatable, I have just manually updated a representative sample. In
some cases, I did not update the code to use assertSuccess, but I went
for even higher-level assertion apis (runCmd, expect_expr), as these are
even shorter, and can produce even better failure messages.
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arphaman, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82759
These tests are flaky on the reproducer bot. I suspect it has something
to do with the module cache. Skipping the whole category while I
investigate the issue.
The reproducer don't model timeouts so tests that rely on them end up
with unexpected packets during replay. Skip them until we can handle
this scenario.
