Clang has some type sugar that only serves as a way to preserve the way a user
has typed a certain type in the source code. These types are currently not
unwrapped when we query the type name for a Clang type, which means that this
type sugar actually influences what formatters are picked for a certain type.
Currently if a user decides to reference a type by doing `::GlobalDecl Var = 3;`,
the type formatter for `GlobalDecl` will not be used (as the type sugar
around the type gives it the name `::GlobalDecl`. The same goes for other ways
to spell out a type such as `auto` etc.
With this patch most of this type sugar gets stripped when the full type name is
calculated. Typedefs are not getting desugared as that seems counterproductive.
I also don't desugar atomic types as that's technically not type sugar.
Reviewed By: jarin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87481
The ASTImporter has an `Imported(From, To)` callback that notifies subclasses
that a declaration has been imported in some way. LLDB uses this in the
`CompleteTagDeclsScope` to see which records have been imported into the scratch
context. If the record was declared inside the expression, then the
`CompleteTagDeclsScope` will forcibly import the full definition of that record
to the scratch context so that the expression AST can safely be disposed later
(otherwise we might end up going back to the deleted AST to complete the
minimally imported record). The way this is implemented is that there is a list
of decls that need to be imported (`m_decls_to_complete`) and we keep completing
the declarations inside that list until the list is empty. Every `To` Decl we
get via the `Imported` callback will be added to the list of Decls to be
completed.
There are some situations where the ASTImporter will actually give us two
`Imported` calls with the same `To` Decl. One way where this happens is if the
ASTImporter decides to merge an imported definition into an already imported
one. Another way is that the ASTImporter just happens to get two calls to
`ASTImporter::Import` for the same Decl. This for example happens when importing
the DeclContext of a Decl requires importing the Decl itself, such as when
importing a RecordDecl that was declared inside a function.
The bug addressed in this patch is that when we end up getting two `Imported`
calls for the same `To` Decl, then we would crash in the
`CompleteTagDeclsScope`. That's because the first time we complete the Decl we
remove the Origin tracking information (that maps the Decl back to from where it
came from). The next time we try to complete the same `To` Decl the Origin
tracking information is gone and we hit the `to_context_md->getOrigin(decl).ctx
== m_src_ctx` assert (`getOrigin(decl).ctx` is a nullptr the second time as the
Origin was deleted).
This is actually a regression coming from D72495. Before D72495
`m_decls_to_complete` was actually a set so every declaration in there could
only be queued once to be completed. The set was changed to a vector to make the
iteration over it deterministic, but that also causes that we now potentially
end up trying to complete a Decl twice.
This patch essentially just reverts D72495 and makes the `CompleteTagDeclsScope`
use a SetVector for the list of declarations to be completed. The SetVector
should filter out the duplicates (as the original `set` did) and also ensure that
the completion order is deterministic. I actually couldn't find any way to cause
LLDB to reproduce this bug by merging declarations (this would require that we
for example declare two namespaces in a non-top-level expression which isn't
possible). But the bug reproduces very easily by just declaring a class in an
expression, so that's what the test is doing.
Reviewed By: shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85648
TestCPP11EnumTypes is one of the most expensive tests on my system and takes
around 35 seconds to run. A relatively large amount of that time is actually
doing CPU intensive work it seems (and not waiting on timeouts like other
slow tests).
The main issue is that this test repeatedly compiles the same source files
with different compiler defines. The test is also including standard library
headers, so it will also build all system modules with the gmodules debug
info variant. This leads to the problem that this test ends up compiling all
system Clang modules 8 times (one for each subtest with a unique define). As
the system modules are quite large, this causes that this test spends most
of its runtime just recompiling all system modules on macOS.
There is also the small issue that this test is starting and start-stopping
the test process a few hundred times.
This rewrites the test to instead just use a macro to instantiate all the
enum types in a single source and uses global variables to test the values
(which means there is no more need to continue/stop or even start a process).
I kept running all the debug info variants (event though it doesn't seem really
relevant) to keep this as NFC as possible.
This reduced the test runtime by around 1.5 seconds on my system (or in relative
numbers, the runtime of this test decreases by 95%).
TypeSystemClang::CreateTypedef was creating a typedef in the right
DeclContext, but it was not actually adding it as a child of the
context. The resulting inconsistent state meant that we would be unable
to reference the typedef from an expression directly, but we could use
them if they end up being pulled in by some previous subexpression
(because the ASTImporter will set up the correct links in the expression
ast).
This patch adds the typedef to the decl context it is created in.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86140
Rename the existing expectedFailure to expectedFailureIfFn to better
describe its purpose and provide an overload for
unittest2.expectedFailure in decorators.py.
Like the other type sugar removed by RemoveWrappingTypes, SubstTemplateTypeParm
is just pure sugar that should be ignored. If we don't ignore it (as we do now),
LLDB will fail to read values from record fields that have a
SubstTemplateTypeParm type.
Only way to produce such a type in LLDB is to either use the `import-std-module`
setting to get a template into the expression parser or just create your own
template directly in the expression parser which is what we do in the test.
Reviewed By: jarin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85132
Once we start the definition of an ObjCInterfaceDecl we won't attempt to ImportDeclContext
later on. Unlike RecordDecl case which uses DefinitionCompleter to force completeDefinition
we don't seem to have a similar mechanism for ObjCInterfaceDecl.
This fix was needed due to a bug we see in LLDB expression parsing where an initial expression
cause an ObjCInterfaceDecl to be defined and subsequent expressions during import do not call
ImportDeclContext and we can end up in a situation where ivars are imported out of order and not all ivars are imported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83972
Currently expressions dealing with bit-fields in Objective-C objects is pretty broken. When generating debug-info for Objective-C bit-fields DW_AT_data_bit_offset has a different meaning than it does to C and C++.
When we parse the DWARF we validate bit offsets for C and C++ correctly but not for ObjC. For ObjC in some cases we end up incorrectly flagging an error and we don't generate further bit-fields in the AST.
Later on when we do a name lookup we don't find the ObjCIvarDecl in the ObjCInterfaceDecl in some cases since we never added it and then we don't go to the runtime to obtain the offset.
This will fix how we handle bit-fields for the Objective-C case and add tests to verify this fix but also to documents areas that still don't work and will be addressed in follow-up PRs.
Note: we can never correctly calculate offsets statically because of how Objective-C deals with the fragile base class issue. Which means the runtime may need to shift fields over.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83433
Template specializations are not handled in many of the
TypeSystemClang methods. For example, GetNumChildren does not handle
the TemplateSpecialization type class, so template specializations
always look like empty objects.
This patch just desugars template specializations in the existing
RemoveWrappingTypes desugaring helper.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83858
Summary:
Currently expect_expr will not run the expression if no target is selected. This
patch changes this behavior so that expect_expr will instead fall back to the
dummy target similar to what the `expression` command is doing. This way we
don't have to compile an empty executable to be able to use `expect_expr` (which
is a waste of resources for tests that just test generic type system features).
As a test I modernized the TestTypeOfDeclTypeExpr into a Python test +
expect_expr (as it relied on the dummy target fallback of the expression
command).
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: abidh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83388
Currently the ItaniumRecordLayoutBuilder when laying out base classes has the virtual
and non-virtual bases mixed up when pulling the base class layouts from the external source.
This came up in an LLDB bug where on arm64 because of differences in how it deals with
tail padding would layout the bases differently without the correct layout from the
external source (LLDB). This would result in some fields being off by 4 bytes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83008
and delete a bunch (but not all) redundant code. If you compare the remaining implementations of Platform*Simulator.cpp, there is still an obvious leftover cleanup task.
Specifically, this patch
- removes SDK initialization from dotest (there is equivalent but more
complete code in Makefile.rules)
- make Platform*Simulator inherit the generic implementation of
PlatformAppleSimulator (more can be done here)
- simplify the platform logic in Makefile.rules
- replace the custom SDK finding logic in Platform*Simulator with XcodeSDK
- adds a test for each supported simulator
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81980
On the buildbot long and int have the same size but long and long long don't,
so the bug where we find the first type by size will produce a different error.
Make the test dynamic based on int/long/long long size to fix the bot.
Summary:
When we get an error back from IRForTarget we directly print that error to the
debugger output stream instead of putting it in the result object. The result
object only gets a vague "The expression could not be prepared to run in the
target" error message that doesn't actually tell the user what went wrong.
This patch just puts the IRForTarget errors into the status object that is
returned to the caller instead of directly printing it to the debugger. Also
updates one test that now can actually check for the error message it is
supposed to check for (instead of the default error which is all we had before).
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81654
Before 539b47c9 this test was not actually using the debug_names section
because the -gdwarf added by Makefile.rules on windows overrode the
-gdwarf-5 flag from CFLAGS_EXTRAS. Now that -gdwarf-5 is respected, the
test is failing.
After this patch all remaining tests should pass on macOS when replayed
from a reproducer.
To capture the reproducers:
./bin/llvm-lit ../llvm-project/lldb/test/ --param lldb-run-with-repro=capture
To replay the reproducers:
./bin/llvm-lit ../llvm-project/lldb/test/ --param lldb-run-with-repro=replay
Many tests use (commented out) print statement for debugging the test
itself. This patch adds a new trace method to lldbtest to reuse the
existing tracing infrastructure and replace these print statements.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80448
This reverts commit 5f88f39ab8154682c3b1eb9d7050a9412a55d9e7. It broke these
three tests on the Window bot:
lldb-api :: commands/expression/completion/TestExprCompletion.py
lldb-api :: lang/cpp/scope/TestCppScope.py
lldb-api :: lang/cpp/standards/cpp11/TestCPP11Standard.py
Summary:
Currently we never enable C++14 in the expression evaluator. This enables it when the language of the program is C++14.
It seems C++17 and so on isn't yet in any of the language enums (and the DWARF standard it seems), so C++17 support will be a follow up patch.
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: labath, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80308
This recommits f665e80c023 which was reverted in 1cbd1b8f692d for breaking
TestFoundationDisassembly.py. The fix is to use --force in the test to avoid
bailing out on large functions.
I have also doubled the large function limit to 8000 bytes (~~ 2000 insns), as
the foundation library contains a lot of large-ish functions. The intent of this
feature is to prevent accidental disassembling of enormous (multi-megabyte)
"functions", not to get in people's way.
The original commit message follows:
If we have a binary without symbol information (and without
LC_FUNCTION_STARTS, if on a mac), then we have to resort to using
heuristics to determine the function boundaries. However, these don't
always work, and so we can easily end up thinking we have functions
which are several megabytes in size. Attempting to (accidentally)
disassemble these can take a very long time spam the terminal with
thousands of lines of disassembly.
This patch works around that problem by adding a sanity check to the
disassemble command. If we are about to disassemble a function which is
larger than a certain threshold, we will refuse to disassemble such a
function unless the user explicitly specifies the number of instructions
to disassemble, uses start/stop addresses for disassembly, or passes the
(new) --force argument.
The threshold is currently fairly aggressive (4000 bytes ~~ 1000
instructions). If needed, we can increase it, or even make it
configurable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79789
Summary:
When the ClangModulesDeclVendor currently fails it just prints very basic and often incomplete diagnostics without any source locations:
```
(lldb) p @import Foundation
error: while importing modules:
'foo/bar.h' file not found
could not build module 'Darwin'
[...]
```
or even just
```
(lldb) p @import Foundation
error: while importing modules:
could not build module 'Darwin'
[...]
```
These diagnostics help neither the user nor us with figuring out what is the reason for the failure.
This patch wires up a full TextDiagnosticPrinter in the ClangModulesDeclVendor and makes
sure we always return the error stream to the user when we fail to compile our modules.
Fixes rdar://63216849
Reviewers: aprantl, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79947
The overloaded new operator in TestCppOperators.py are working by accident because of how
we currently deal with artificial methods.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79251
Summary:
Sometimes a result variable of some expression can be presented as an elaborated
type. In this case the methods `IsTypedefType()` and `GetTypedefedType()` of
`SBType` didn't work. This patch fixes that.
I didn't find the test for these API methods, so I added a basic test for this
too.
Reviewers: aprantl, teemperor, labath, leonid.mashinskiy
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78697
Add the skipIfReproducer decorator to the remaining tests that fail to
replay because the GDB remote packets diverge during replay. This is
*not* expected and should be fixed, but figuring out exactly what caused
the divergence has proven pretty difficult to track down.
I've marked these tests as skipped for now so we can get clean results
and detect new regressions. I have no evidence to believe that these
failures have the same root cause, so I've not assigned them a PR.
Some tests are not expected to work with reproducers, for example tests
that completely circumvent the reproducers (i.e. using the side_effects
Python module) or that rely on changes to the file system.
This is a regression since:
[lldb][NFC] Modernize lang/cpp/scope test
acb0b99c8e4f1dc65a7f1e26da9db77239a67da7
rGacb0b99c8e4f
File "/home/jkratoch/redhat/llvm-monorepo/lldb/test/API/lang/cpp/scope/TestCppScope.py", line 19, in test
self.assertEqual(global_var_names, expected_var_names)
AssertionError: Lists differ: ['C::a', 'A::a', 'B::a', '::a'... != ['A::a', 'B::a', 'C::a', '::a'...
First differing element 0:
C::a
A::a
- ['C::a', 'A::a', 'B::a', '::a']
+ ['A::a', 'B::a', 'C::a', '::a']
ManualDWARFIndex using NameToDIE does not sort alphabetically:
// This is only for uniqueness, not lexicographical ordering, so we can
// just compare pointers.
return uintptr_t(lhs.GetCString()) < uintptr_t(rhs.GetCString());
