- Use TypeRange instead of ArrayRef<Type> where possible.
- Change some of the custom builders to also use TypeRange
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87944
Historically, the operations in the MLIR's LLVM dialect only checked that the
operand are of LLVM dialect type without more detailed constraints. This was
due to LLVM dialect types wrapping LLVM IR types and having clunky verification
methods. With the new first-class modeling, it is possible to define type
constraints similarly to other dialects and use them to enforce some
correctness rules in verifiers instead of having LLVM assert during translation
to LLVM IR. This hardening discovered several issues where MLIR was producing
LLVM dialect operations that cannot exist in LLVM IR.
Depends On D85900
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85901
Unsigned and Signless attributes use uintN_t and signed attributes use intN_t, where N is the fixed width. The 1-bit variants use bool.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86739
Legacy implementation of the LLVM dialect in MLIR contained an instance of
llvm::Module as it was required to parse LLVM IR types. The access to the data
layout of this module was exposed to the users for convenience, but in practice
this layout has always been the default one obtained by parsing an empty layout
description string. Current implementation of the dialect no longer relies on
wrapping LLVM IR types, but it kept an instance of DataLayout for
compatibility. This effectively forces a single data layout to be used across
all modules in a given MLIR context, which is not desirable. Remove DataLayout
from the LLVM dialect and attach it as a module attribute instead. Since MLIR
does not yet have support for data layouts, use the LLVM DataLayout in string
form with verification inside MLIR. Introduce the layout when converting a
module to the LLVM dialect and keep the default "" description for
compatibility.
This approach should be replaced with a proper MLIR-based data layout when it
becomes available, but provides an immediate solution to compiling modules with
different layouts, e.g. for GPUs.
This removes the need for LLVMDialectImpl, which is also removed.
Depends On D85650
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85652
Now that LLVM dialect types are implemented directly in the dialect, we can use
MLIR hooks for verifying type construction invariants. Implement the verifiers
and use them in the parser.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85663
This patch moves the registration to a method in the MLIRContext: getOrCreateDialect<ConcreteDialect>()
This method requires dialect to provide a static getDialectNamespace()
and store a TypeID on the Dialect itself, which allows to lazyily
create a dialect when not yet loaded in the context.
As a side effect, it means that duplicated registration of the same
dialect is not an issue anymore.
To limit the boilerplate, TableGen dialect generation is modified to
emit the constructor entirely and invoke separately a "init()" method
that the user implements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85495
Original modeling of LLVM IR types in the MLIR LLVM dialect had been wrapping
LLVM IR types and therefore required the LLVMContext in which they were created
to outlive them, which was solved by placing the LLVMContext inside the dialect
and thus having the lifetime of MLIRContext. This has led to numerous issues
caused by the lack of thread-safety of LLVMContext and the need to re-create
LLVM IR modules, obtained by translating from MLIR, in different LLVM contexts
to enable parallel compilation. Similarly, llvm::Module had been introduced to
keep track of identified structure types that could not be modeled properly.
A recent series of commits changed the modeling of LLVM IR types in the MLIR
LLVM dialect so that it no longer wraps LLVM IR types and has no dependence on
LLVMContext and changed the ownership model of the translated LLVM IR modules.
Remove LLVMContext and LLVM modules from the implementation of MLIR LLVM
dialect and clean up the remaining uses.
The only part of LLVM IR that remains necessary for the LLVM dialect is the
data layout. It should be moved from the dialect level to the module level and
replaced with an MLIR-based representation to remove the dependency of the
LLVMDialect on LLVM IR library.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85445
Due to the original type system implementation, LLVMDialect in MLIR contains an
LLVMContext in which the relevant objects (types, metadata) are created. When
an MLIR module using the LLVM dialect (and related intrinsic-based dialects
NVVM, ROCDL, AVX512) is converted to LLVM IR, it could only live in the
LLVMContext owned by the dialect. The type system no longer relies on the
LLVMContext, so this limitation can be removed. Instead, translation functions
now take a reference to an LLVMContext in which the LLVM IR module should be
constructed. The caller of the translation functions is responsible for
ensuring the same LLVMContext is not used concurrently as the translation no
longer uses a dialect-wide context lock.
As an additional bonus, this change removes the need to recreate the LLVM IR
module in a different LLVMContext through printing and parsing back, decreasing
the compilation overhead in JIT and GPU-kernel-to-blob passes.
Reviewed By: rriddle, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85443
Historical modeling of the LLVM dialect types had been wrapping LLVM IR types
and therefore needed access to the instance of LLVMContext stored in the
LLVMDialect. The new modeling does not rely on that and only needs the
MLIRContext that is used for uniquing, similarly to other MLIR types. Change
LLVMType::get<Kind>Ty functions to take `MLIRContext *` instead of
`LLVMDialect *` as first argument. This brings the code base closer to
completely removing the dependence on LLVMContext from the LLVMDialect,
together with additional support for thread-safety of its use.
Depends On D85371
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85372
This prepares for the removal of llvm::Module and LLVMContext from the
mlir::LLVMDialect.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85371
- Moved TypeRange into its own header/cpp file, and add hashing support.
- Change FunctionType::get() and TupleType::get() to use TypeRange
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85075
A new first-party modeling for LLVM IR types in the LLVM dialect has been
developed in parallel to the existing modeling based on wrapping LLVM `Type *`
instances. It resolves the long-standing problem of modeling identified
structure types, including recursive structures, and enables future removal of
LLVMContext and related locking mechanisms from LLVMDialect.
This commit only switches the modeling by (a) renaming LLVMTypeNew to LLVMType,
(b) removing the old implementaiton of LLVMType, and (c) updating the tests. It
is intentionally minimal. Separate commits will remove the infrastructure built
for the transition and update API uses where appropriate.
Depends On D85020
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85021
The current modeling of LLVM IR types in MLIR is based on the LLVMType class
that wraps a raw `llvm::Type *` and delegates uniquing, printing and parsing to
LLVM itself. This is model makes thread-safe type manipulation hard and is
being progressively replaced with a cleaner MLIR model that replicates the type
system. In the new model, LLVMType will no longer have an underlying LLVM IR
type. Restrict access to this type in the current model in preparation for the
change.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84389
This patch introduces 2 new optional attributes to `llvm.load`
and `llvm.store` ops: `volatile` and `nontemporal`. These attributes
are translated into proper LLVM as a `volatile` marker and a metadata node
respectively. They are also helpful with SPIR-V to LLVM dialect conversion
since they are the mappings for `Volatile` and `NonTemporal` Memory Operands.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84396
`llvm.mlir.constant` was originally introduced as an LLVM dialect counterpart
to `std.constant`. As such, it was supporting "function pointer" constants
derived from the symbol name. This is different from `std.constant` that allows
for creation of a "function" constant since MLIR, unlike LLVM IR, supports
this. Later, `llvm.mlir.addressof` was introduced as an Op that obtains a
constant pointer to a global in the LLVM dialect. It naturally extends to
functions (in LLVM IR, functions are globals) and should be used for defining
"function pointer" values instead.
Fixes PR46344.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82667
Summary:
With this change, a function argument attribute of the form
"llvm.align" = <int> will be translated to the corresponding align
attribute in LLVM by the ModuleConversion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82161
Summary:
This makes a common pattern of
`dyn_cast_or_null<OpTy>(v.getDefiningOp())` more concise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79681
This is a wrapper around vector of NamedAttributes that keeps track of whether sorted and does some minimal effort to remain sorted (doing more, e.g., appending attributes in sorted order, could be done in follow up). It contains whether sorted and if a DictionaryAttr is queried, it caches the returned DictionaryAttr along with whether sorted.
Change MutableDictionaryAttr to always return a non-null Attribute even when empty (reserve null cases for errors). To this end change the getter to take a context as input so that the empty DictionaryAttr could be queried. Also create one instance of the empty dictionary attribute that could be reused without needing to lock context etc.
Update infer type op interface to use DictionaryAttr and use NamedAttrList to avoid incurring multiple conversion costs.
Fix bug in sorting helper function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79463
This range allows for performing many different operations on successor operands, including erasing/adding/setting. This removes the need for the explicit canEraseSuccessorOperand and eraseSuccessorOperand methods.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79077
Makes the relationship and function clearer. Accordingly rename getAttrList to getMutableAttrDict.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79125
As we start defining more complex Ops, we increasingly see the need for
Ops-with-regions to be able to construct Ops within their regions in
their ::build methods. However, these methods only have access to
Builder, and not OpBuilder. Creating a local instance of OpBuilder
inside ::build and using it fails to trigger the operation creation
hooks in derived builders (e.g., ConversionPatternRewriter). In this
case, we risk breaking the logic of the derived builder. At the same
time, OpBuilder::create, which is by far the largest user of ::build
already passes "this" as the first argument, so an OpBuilder instance is
already available.
Update all ::build methods in all Ops in MLIR and Flang to take
"OpBuilder &" instead of "Builder *". Note the change from pointer and
to reference to comply with the common style in MLIR, this also ensures
all other users must change their ::build methods.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78713
This change makes the ModuleTranslation threadsafe by locking on the
LLVMContext. Furthermore, we now clone the llvm module into a new
context when compiling to PTX similar to what the OrcJit does.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78207
Similarly to actual LLVM IR, and to `llvm.mlir.func`, allow the custom syntax
of `llvm.mlir.global` to omit the linkage keyword. If omitted, the linkage is
assumed to be external. This makes the modeling of globals in the LLVM dialect
more consistent, both within the dialect and with LLVM IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78096
Summary:
Remove usages of asserting vector getters in Type in preparation for the
VectorType refactor. The existence of these functions complicates the
refactor while adding little value.
Reviewers: rriddle, efriedma, sdesmalen
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Subscribers: frgossen, mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, aartbik, liufengdb, Joonsoo, grosul1, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77258
Summary:
This revision adds support to lower 1-D vector transfers to LLVM.
A mask of the vector length is created that compares the base offset + linear index to the dim of the vector.
In each position where this does not overflow (i.e. offset + vector index < dim), the mask is set to 1.
A notable fact is that the lowering uses llvm.dialect_cast to allow writing code in the simplest form by targeting the simplest mix of vector and LLVM dialects and
letting other conversions kick in.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77703
Summary:
This revision removes all of the functionality related to successor operands on the core Operation class. This greatly simplifies a lot of handling of operands, as well as successors. For example, DialectConversion no longer needs a special "matchAndRewrite" for branching terminator operations.(Note, the existing method was also broken for operations with variadic successors!!)
This also enables terminator operations to define their own relationships with successor arguments, instead of the hardcoded "pass-through" behavior that exists today.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75318
This interface contains the necessary components to provide the same builtin behavior that terminators have. This will be used in future revisions to remove many of the hardcoded constraints placed on successors and successor operands. The interface initially contains three methods:
```c++
// Return a set of values corresponding to the operands for successor 'index', or None if the operands do not correspond to materialized values.
Optional<OperandRange> getSuccessorOperands(unsigned index);
// Return true if this terminator can have it's successor operands erased.
bool canEraseSuccessorOperand();
// Erase the operand of a successor. This is only valid to call if 'canEraseSuccessorOperand' returns true.
void eraseSuccessorOperand(unsigned succIdx, unsigned opIdx);
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75314
This revision add support for formatting successor variables in a similar way to operands, attributes, etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74789
This revision add support in ODS for specifying the successors of an operation. Successors are specified via the `successors` list:
```
let successors = (successor AnySuccessor:$target, AnySuccessor:$otherTarget);
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74783
In the previous state, we were relying on forcing the linker to include
all libraries in the final binary and the global initializer to self-register
every piece of the system. This change help moving away from this model, and
allow users to compose pieces more freely. The current change is only "fixing"
the dialect registration and avoiding relying on "whole link" for the passes.
The translation is still relying on the global registry, and some refactoring
is needed to make this all more convenient.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74461
Summary: This revision add support for accepting a few type constraints, e.g. AllTypesMatch, when inferring types for operands and results. This is used to remove the c++ parsers for several additional operations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73735
Summary:
Replace the generic zero- and one-result builders in LLVM::CallOp with a custom
builder that takes an LLVMFuncOp, which can be used to extract the result type
and create the symbol reference attribute. This is merely a convenience for
upcoming changes. The ODS-generated builders remain present.
Introduce LLVM::LLVMType::isVoidTy by analogy with the underlying LLVM type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73895
Summary:
In some cases, one may want to use different names for C++ symbol of an
enumerand from its string representation. In particular, in the LLVM dialect
for, e.g., Linkage, we would like to preserve the same enumerand names as LLVM
API and the same textual IR form as LLVM IR, yet the two are different
(CamelCase vs snake_case with additional limitations on not being a C++
keyword).
Modify EnumAttrCaseInfo in OpBase.td to include both the integer value and its
string representation. By default, this representation is the same as C++
symbol name. Introduce new IntStrAttrCaseBase that allows one to use different
names. Exercise it for LLVM Dialect Linkage attribute. Other attributes will
follow as separate changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73362
Summary: The new internal representation of operation results now allows for accessing the result types to be more efficient. Changing the API to ArrayRef is more efficient and removes the need to explicitly materialize vectors in several places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73429
Summary:
Add a `llvm.cmpxchg` op as a counterpart to LLVM IR's `cmpxchg` instruction.
Note that the `weak`, `volatile`, and `syncscope` attributes are not yet supported.
This will be useful for upcoming parallel versions of affine.for and generally
for reduction-like semantics (especially for reductions that can't make use
of `atomicrmw`, e.g. `fmax`).
Reviewers: ftynse, nicolasvasilache
Reviewed By: ftynse
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, jfb, mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, liufengdb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72995
Summary:
Modernize some of the existing custom parsing code in the LLVM dialect.
While this reduces some boilerplate code, it also reduces the precision
of the diagnostic error messges.
Reviewers: ftynse, nicolasvasilache, rriddle
Reviewed By: rriddle
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, liufengdb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72967
Summary:
This op is the counterpart to LLVM's atomicrmw instruction. Note that
volatile and syncscope attributes are not yet supported.
This will be useful for upcoming parallel versions of `affine.for` and generally
for reduction-like semantics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72741
