This reverts the following commits:
37ca7a795b277c20c02a218bf44052278c03344b
9aa6c72b92b6c89cc6d23b693257df9af7de2d15
705387c5074bcca36d626882462ebbc2bcc3bed4
8ca4b3ef19fe82d7ad6a6e1515317dcc01b41515
80dba72a669b5416e97a42fd2c2a7bc5a6d3f44a
This patch updates test files after D105169.
Autogenerated test codes are changed by `utils/update_cc_test_checks.py,` and non-autogenerated test codes are changed as follows:
(1) I wrote a python script that (partially) updates the tests using regex: {F18594904} The script is not perfect, but I believe it gives hints about which patterns are updated to have `noundef` attached.
(2) The remaining tests are updated manually.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108453
Summary:
C guarantees that brace-init with fewer initializers than members in the
aggregate will initialize the rest of the aggregate as-if it were static
initialization. In turn static initialization guarantees that padding is
initialized to zero bits.
Quoth the Standard:
C17 6.7.9 Initialization ❡21
If there are fewer initializers in a brace-enclosed list than there are elements
or members of an aggregate, or fewer characters in a string literal used to
initialize an array of known size than there are elements in the array, the
remainder of the aggregate shall be initialized implicitly the same as objects
that have static storage duration.
C17 6.7.9 Initialization ❡10
If an object that has automatic storage duration is not initialized explicitly,
its value is indeterminate. If an object that has static or thread storage
duration is not initialized explicitly, then:
* if it has pointer type, it is initialized to a null pointer;
* if it has arithmetic type, it is initialized to (positive or unsigned) zero;
* if it is an aggregate, every member is initialized (recursively) according to
these rules, and any padding is initialized to zero bits;
* if it is a union, the first named member is initialized (recursively)
according to these rules, and any padding is initialized to zero bits;
<rdar://problem/50188861>
Reviewers: glider, pcc, kcc, rjmccall, erik.pilkington
Subscribers: jkorous, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61280
llvm-svn: 359628
