* Need to investigate the proper solution to https://github.com/pybind/pybind11/issues/3336 or engineer something different.
* The attempt to produce an empty buffer_info as a workaround triggers asan/ubsan.
* Usage of this API does not arise naturally in practice yet, and it is more important to be asan/crash clean than have a solution right now.
* Switching back to raising an exception, even though that triggers terminate().
* This already half existed in terms of reading the raw buffer backing a DenseElementsAttr.
* Documented the precise expectations of the buffer layout.
* Extended the Python API to support construction from bitcasted buffers, allowing construction of all primitive element types (even those that lack a compatible representation in Python).
* Specifically, the Python API can now load all integer types at all bit widths and all floating point types (f16, f32, f64, bf16).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111284
Provide a couple of quality-of-life usability improvements for Python bindings,
in particular:
* give access to the list of types for the list of op results or block
arguments, similarly to ValueRange->TypeRange,
* allow for constructing empty dictionary arrays,
* support construction of array attributes by concatenating an existing
attribute with a Python list of attributes.
All these are required for the upcoming customization of builtin and standard
ops.
Reviewed By: stellaraccident
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110946
* This allows multiple MLIR-API embedding downstreams to co-exist in the same process.
* I believe this is the last thing needed to enable isolated embedding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108605
This CL introduces a generic attribute (called "encoding") on tensors.
The attribute currently does not carry any concrete information, but the type
system already correctly determines that tensor<8xi1,123> != tensor<8xi1,321>.
The attribute will be given meaning through an interface in subsequent CLs.
See ongoing discussion on discourse:
[RFC] Introduce a sparse tensor type to core MLIR
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-introduce-a-sparse-tensor-type-to-core-mlir/2944
A sparse tensor will look something like this:
```
// named alias with all properties we hold dear:
#CSR = {
// individual named attributes
}
// actual sparse tensor type:
tensor<?x?xf64, #CSR>
```
I see the following rough 5 step plan going forward:
(1) introduce this format attribute in this CL, currently still empty
(2) introduce attribute interface that gives it "meaning", focused on sparse in first phase
(3) rewrite sparse compiler to use new type, remove linalg interface and "glue"
(4) teach passes to deal with new attribute, by rejecting/asserting on non-empty attribute as simplest solution, or doing meaningful rewrite in the longer run
(5) add FE support, document, test, publicize new features, extend "format" meaning to other domains if useful
Reviewed By: stellaraccident, bondhugula
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99548
* IRModules.cpp -> (IRCore.cpp, IRAffine.cpp, IRAttributes.cpp, IRTypes.cpp).
* The individual pieces now compile in the 5-15s range whereas IRModules.cpp was starting to approach a minute (didn't capture a before time).
* More fine grained splitting is possible, but this represents the most obvious.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98978
