accessed at least once as a vector. This prevents it from
compiling the example in not-a-vector into:
define double @test(double %A, double %B) {
%tmp4 = insertelement <7 x double> undef, double %A, i32 0
%tmp = insertelement <7 x double> %tmp4, double %B, i32 4
%tmp2 = extractelement <7 x double> %tmp, i32 4
ret double %tmp2
}
instead, producing the integer code. Producing vectors when they
aren't otherwise in the program is dangerous because a lot of other
code treats them carefully and doesn't want to break them down.
OTOH, many things want to break down tasty i448's.
llvm-svn: 63638
With the new world order, it can handle cases where the first
store into the alloca is an element of the vector, instead of
requiring the first analyzed store to have the vector type
itself. This allows us to un-xfail
test/CodeGen/X86/vec_ins_extract.ll.
llvm-svn: 63590
be able to handle *ANY* alloca that is poked by loads and stores of
bitcasts and GEPs with constant offsets. Before the code had a number
of annoying limitations and caused it to miss cases such as storing into
holes in structs and complex casts (as in bitfield-sroa) where we had
unions of bitfields etc. This also handles a number of important cases
that are exposed due to the ABI lowering stuff we do to pass stuff by
value.
One case that is pretty great is that we compile
2006-11-07-InvalidArrayPromote.ll into:
define i32 @func(<4 x float> %v0, <4 x float> %v1) nounwind {
%tmp10 = call <4 x i32> @llvm.x86.sse2.cvttps2dq(<4 x float> %v1)
%tmp105 = bitcast <4 x i32> %tmp10 to i128
%tmp1056 = zext i128 %tmp105 to i256
%tmp.upgrd.43 = lshr i256 %tmp1056, 96
%tmp.upgrd.44 = trunc i256 %tmp.upgrd.43 to i32
ret i32 %tmp.upgrd.44
}
which turns into:
_func:
subl $28, %esp
cvttps2dq %xmm1, %xmm0
movaps %xmm0, (%esp)
movl 12(%esp), %eax
addl $28, %esp
ret
Which is pretty good code all things considering :).
One effect of this is that SROA will start generating arbitrary bitwidth
integers that are a multiple of 8 bits. In the case above, we got a
256 bit integer, but the codegen guys assure me that it can handle the
simple and/or/shift/zext stuff that we're doing on these operations.
This addresses rdar://6532315
llvm-svn: 63469
loads from allocas that cover the entire aggregate. This handles
some memcpy/byval cases that are produced by llvm-gcc. This triggers
a few times in kc++ (with std::pair<std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator
<kc::impl_abstract_phylum*>,bool>) and once in 176.gcc (with %struct..0anon).
llvm-svn: 61915
integer to a (transitive) bitcast the alloca and if that integer
has the full size of the alloca, then it clobbers the whole thing.
Handle this by extracting pieces out of the stored integer and
filing them away in the SROA'd elements.
This triggers fairly frequently because the CFE uses integers to
pass small structs by value and the inliner exposes these. For
example, in kimwitu++, I see a bunch of these with i64 stores to
"%struct.std::pair<std::_Rb_tree_const_iterator<kc::impl_abstract_phylum*>,bool>"
In 176.gcc I see a few i32 stores to "%struct..0anon".
In the testcase, this is a difference between compiling test1 to:
_test1:
subl $12, %esp
movl 20(%esp), %eax
movl %eax, 4(%esp)
movl 16(%esp), %eax
movl %eax, (%esp)
movl (%esp), %eax
addl 4(%esp), %eax
addl $12, %esp
ret
vs:
_test1:
movl 8(%esp), %eax
addl 4(%esp), %eax
ret
The second half of this will be to handle loads of the same form.
llvm-svn: 61853
This includes not marking a GEP involving a vector as unsafe, but only when it
has all zero indices. This allows scalarrepl to work in a few more cases.
llvm-svn: 57177
structures. Its default threshold is to promote things that are
smaller than 128 bytes, which is sane. However, it is not sane
to do this for things that turn into 128 *registers*. Add a cap
on the number of registers introduced, defaulting to 128/4=32.
llvm-svn: 52611
work and how to replace them into individual values. Also, when trying to
replace an aggregrate that is used by load or store with a single (large)
integer, don't crash (but don't replace the aggregrate either).
Also adds a testcase for both structs and arrays.
llvm-svn: 51997
are the same as in unpacked structs, only field
positions differ. This only matters for structs
containing x86 long double or an apint; it may
cause backwards compatibility problems if someone
has bitcode containing a packed struct with a
field of one of those types.
The issue is that only 10 bytes are needed to
hold an x86 long double: the store size is 10
bytes, but the ABI size is 12 or 16 bytes (linux/
darwin) which comes from rounding the store size
up by the alignment. Because it seemed silly not
to pack an x86 long double into 10 bytes in a
packed struct, this is what was done. I now
think this was a mistake. Reserving the ABI size
for an x86 long double field even in a packed
struct makes things more uniform: the ABI size is
now always used when reserving space for a type.
This means that developers are less likely to
make mistakes. It also makes life easier for the
CBE which otherwise could not represent all LLVM
packed structs (PR2402).
Front-end people might need to adjust the way
they create LLVM structs - see following change
to llvm-gcc.
llvm-svn: 51928
a union containing a vector and an array whose elements were smaller than
the vector elements. this means we need to compile the load of the
array elements into an extract element plus a truncate.
llvm-svn: 47752
or getTypeSizeInBits as appropriate in ScalarReplAggregates.
The right change to make was not always obvious, so it would
be good to have an sroa guru review this. While there I noticed
some bugs, and fixed them: (1) arrays of x86 long double have
holes due to alignment padding, but this wasn't being spotted
by HasStructPadding (renamed to HasPadding). The same goes
for arrays of oddly sized ints. Vectors also suffer from this,
in fact the problem for vectors is much worse because basic
vector assumptions seem to be broken by vectors of type with
alignment padding. I didn't try to fix any of these vector
problems. (2) The code for extracting smaller integers from
larger ones (in the "int union" case) was wrong on big-endian
machines for integers with size not a multiple of 8, like i1.
Probably this is impossible to hit via llvm-gcc, but I fixed
it anyway while there and added a testcase. I also got rid of
some trailing whitespace and changed a function name which
had an obvious typo in it.
llvm-svn: 43672
