The 'RM' flag model the "Rounding Mode" and it has nothing to do with the load/store instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69551
This adds AA to Post-RA Machine Scheduling, allowing the pass more
freedom when handling memory operations.
My understanding is that this was just never done, not that it is
inherently incorrect to do so. The older PostRA List scheduler already
makes use of AA, it's just that the MI PostRA Scheduler was never taught
to use it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69814
This patch (second of two patches) lowers the generic PowerPC vector
entries to PowerPC subtarget-specific entries.
For instance, the PowerPC generic entry 'cbrtd2_massv' is lowered to
'cbrtd2_P9' or Power9 subtarget.
The first patch enables the vectorizer to recognize the IBM MASS vector
library routines. This patch specifically adds support for recognizing
the '-vector-library=MASSV' option, and defines mappings from IEEE
standard scalar math functions to generic PowerPC MASS vector
counterparts.
For instance, the generic PowerPC MASS vector entry for double-precision
'cbrt' function is '__cbrtd2_massv'
The overall support for MASS vector library is presented as such in two
patches for ease of review.
Patch by pjeeva01 (Jeeva P.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59883
Summary:
Make sure RAGreedy informs LiveDebugVariables about new VRegs
that is introduced at spill by InlineSpiller.
Consider this example
LDV: !"var" [48r;128r):0 Loc0=%2
48B %2 = ...
...
128B %7 = ADD %2, ...
If %2 is spilled the InlineSpiller will insert spill/reload
instructions and introduces some new vregs. So we get
48B %4 = ...
56B spill %4
...
120B reload %5
128B %3 = ADD %5, ...
In the past we did not inform LDV about this, and when reintroducing
DBG_VALUE instruction LDV still got information that "var" had the
location of the spilled register %2 for the interval [48r;128r).
The result was bad, since we mapped "var" to the spill slot even
before the spill happened:
%4 = ...
DBG_VALUE %spill.0, !"var"
spill %4 to %spill.0
...
reload %5
%3 = ADD %5, ...
This patch will inform LDV about the interval split introduced
due to spilling. So the location map in LDV will become
!"var" [48r;56r):1 [56r;120r):0 [120r;128r):2 Loc0=%2 Loc1=%4 Loc2=%5
And when inserting DBG_VALUE instructions we get
%4 = ...
DBG_VALUE %4, !"var"
spill %4 to %spill.0
DBG_VALUE %spill.0, !"var"
...
reload %5
DBG_VALUE %5, !"var"
%3 = ADD %5, ...
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38899
Reviewers: jmorse, vsk, aprantl
Reviewed By: jmorse
Subscribers: dstenb, wuzish, MatzeB, qcolombet, nemanjai, hiraditya, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69584
Adds support for generating the XCOFF data section in object files for global variables with initialization.
Merged aix-xcoff-common.ll into aix-xcoff-data.ll.
Changed variable name charr to chrarray in the test case to test if readobj works with 8-character names.
Authored by: xingxue
Reviewers: hubert.reinterptrtcast, sfertile, jasonliu, daltenty, Xiangling_L.
Reviewed by: hubert.reinterpretcast, sfertile, daltenty.
Subscribers: DiggerLin, Wuzish, nemanjai, hiraditya, MaskRay, jsji, shchenz, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67125
If the instruction have match pattern, llvm-tblgen will infer the sideeffect bit from the match pattern and it works well.
If not, the tblgen will set it as true that hurt the scheduling.
PowerPC has some instructions that didn't specify the match pattern(i.e. LXSD etc), which is manually selected post-ra according
to the register pressure. We need to clear the sideeffect flag for these instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69232
Teach combineVectorSizedSetCCEquality() to handle arbitrary memcmp
expansions but do not change any default policy for now.
This also fixes a bug in the memcmp expansion itself when large
displacements are needed.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69507
VSX provides floating point minimum and maximum instructions that conform
to IEEE semantics. This legalizes the respective nodes and emits VSX code
for them. Furthermore, on Power9 cores we have xsmaxcdp and xsmincdp
instructions that conform to language semantics for the conditional operator
even in the presence of NaNs.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62993
These two intrinsics are lowered to calls so should prevent the formation of
CTR loops. In a subsequent patch, we will handle all currently known intrinsics
and prevent the formation of HW loops if any unknown intrinsics are encountered.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68841
This patch reworks the AIX call lowering to use CCState. Some defensive errors
are added in this patch to protect from emitting bad code for calling convention
logic that has not been implemented by design. The use of CCState follows the
precedent of other targets and enables the reuse of calling convention logic in
LowerFormalArguments, which will be rewritten to also use CCState in a late
patch.
Patch by Chris Bowler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69101
This enhances D69127 (rGe6c145e0548e3b3de6eab27e44e1504387cf6b53)
to handle the looser "any_extend" cast in addition to zext.
This is a prerequisite step for canonicalizing in the other direction
(narrow the popcount) in IR - PR43688:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43688
zext (ctpop X) --> ctpop (zext X)
This is a prerequisite step for canonicalizing in the other direction (narrow the popcount) in IR - PR43688:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43688
I'm not sure if any other targets are affected, but I found a missing fold for PPC, so added tests based on that.
The reason we widen all the way to 64-bit in these tests is because the initial DAG looks something like this:
t5: i8 = ctpop t4
t6: i32 = zero_extend t5 <-- created based on IR, but unused node?
t7: i64 = zero_extend t5
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69127
This re-commits r375152 which was pulled in r375233 because it broke
the EXPENSIVE_CHECKS bot on Windows.
The reason for the failure was a bug in the pass that the commit turned
on by default. This patch fixes that bug and turns the pass back on.
This patch has been verified on the buildbot that originally failed
thanks to Simon Pilgrim.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52431
llvm-svn: 375497
Quite a while ago, we implemented a pass that will reduce the number of
CR-logical operations we emit. It does so by converting a CR-logical operation
into a branch. We have kept this off by default because it seemed to cause a
significant regression with one benchmark.
However, that regression turned out to be due to a completely unrelated
reason - AADB introducing a self-copy that is a priority-setting nop and it was
just exacerbated by this pass.
Now that we understand the reason for the only degradation, we can turn this
pass on by default. We have long since fixed the cause for the degradation.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52431
llvm-svn: 375152
This patch provides support for peudo ops including ADDIStocHA8, ADDIStocHA, LWZtocL,
LDtoc, LDtocL for AIX, lowering them from MIR to assembly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68341
llvm-svn: 375113
This is remaining part of rG41ca91f2995b: [AIX][XCOFF] Output XCOFF
object text section header and symbol entry for rogram code.
SUMMARY:
Original form of this patch is provided by Stefan Pintillie.
1. The patch try to output program code section header , symbol entry for
program code (PR) and Instruction into the raw text section.
2. The patch include how to alignment and layout the CSection in the text
section.
3. The patch also reorganize the code , put some codes into a function.
(XCOFFObjectWriter::writeSymbolTableEntryForControlSection)
Additional: We can not add raw data of text section test in the patch, If want
to output raw text section data,it need a function description patch first.
Reviewers: hubert.reinterpretcast, sfertile, jasonliu, xingxue.
Subscribers: wuzish, nemanjai, hiraditya, MaskRay, jsjji.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66969
llvm-svn: 374923
SUMMARY
Original form of this patch is provided by Stefan Pintillie.
The patch try to output program code section header , symbol entry for program code (PR) and Instruction into the raw text section.
The patch include how to alignment and layout the CSection in the text section.
The patch also reorganize the code , put some codes into a function(XCOFFObjectWriter::writeSymbolTableEntryForControlSection)
Additional: We can not add raw data of text section test in the patch, If want to output raw text section data,it need a function description patch first.
Reviewers: hubert.reinterpretcast, sfertile, jasonliu, xingxue.
Subscribers: wuzish, nemanjai, hiraditya, MaskRay, jsjji.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66969
llvm-svn: 374914
This patch kills off a significant user of the "IsIndirect" field of
DBG_VALUE machine insts. Brought up in in PR41675, IsIndirect is
techncally redundant as it can be expressed by the DIExpression of a
DBG_VALUE inst, and it isn't helpful to have two ways of expressing
things.
Rather than setting IsIndirect, have DBG_VALUE creators add an extra deref
to the insts DIExpression. There should now be no appearences of
IsIndirect=True from isel down to LiveDebugVariables / VirtRegRewriter,
which is ensured by an assertion in LDVImpl::handleDebugValue. This means
we also get to delete the IsIndirect handling in LiveDebugVariables. Tests
can be upgraded by for example swapping the following IsIndirect=True
DBG_VALUE:
DBG_VALUE $somereg, 0, !123, !DIExpression(DW_OP_foo)
With one where the indirection is in the DIExpression, by _appending_
a deref:
DBG_VALUE $somereg, $noreg, !123, !DIExpression(DW_OP_foo, DW_OP_deref)
Which both mean the same thing.
Most of the test changes in this patch are updates of that form; also some
changes in how the textual assembly printer handles these insts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68945
llvm-svn: 374877
Summary:
The AIX system assembler does not understand .zero, so we should prefer
emitting .space.
Subscribers: nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, MaskRay, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68815
llvm-svn: 374564
The assertion is everzealous and fail tests like:
renamable $x3 = LI8 0
STD renamable $x3, 16, $x1
renamable $x3 = LI8 0
Remove the assertion since killed flag of $x3 is not mandentory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68344
llvm-svn: 374515
Added some tests testing urem and srem operations with a constant divisor.
Patch by TG908 (Tim Gymnich)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68421
llvm-svn: 373830
This reverts r371177 (git commit f879c6875563c0a8cd838f1e13b14dd33558f1f8)
It caused PR43566 by removing empty, address-taken MachineBasicBlocks.
Such blocks may have references from blockaddress or other operands, and
need more consideration to be removed.
See the PR for a test case to use when relanding.
llvm-svn: 373805
A set of function attributes is required in any function that uses constrained
floating point intrinsics. None of our tests use these attributes.
This patch fixes this.
These tests have been tested against the IR verifier changes in D68233.
Reviewed by: andrew.w.kaylor, cameron.mcinally, uweigand
Approved by: andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67925
llvm-svn: 373761
Summary:
This is follow up patch of https://reviews.llvm.org/D67595.
Adjust naming and the Commutable operands for additional patterns
to make it easier to read.
The testcase update also show that we can save some unecessary fmr as
well.
Reviewers: #powerpc, steven.zhang, hfinkel, nemanjai
Reviewed By: #powerpc, nemanjai
Subscribers: wuzish, hiraditya, kbarton, MaskRay, shchenz, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68112
llvm-svn: 373652
Store rlwinm Rx, Ry, 32, 0, 31 as rlwinm Rx, Ry, 0, 0, 31 and store
rldicl Rx, Ry, 64, 0 as rldicl Rx, Ry, 0, 0. Otherwise SH field is overflow and
fails assertion in assembly printing stage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66991
llvm-svn: 373519
The fma mutate test will not exercise what it was intended to test
once we simplify those ops immediately, but the test will still
pass with the existing CHECKs, so I'm leaving it in case that
still has minimal value.
llvm-svn: 373149
This patch emits the function descriptor csect for functions with definitions
under both 32-bit/64-bit mode on AIX.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66724
llvm-svn: 373009
Summary:
This was found during review of https://reviews.llvm.org/D66050.
In the simple test of fdiv, we miss to fold
```
fneg 2, 2
xsmaddasp 3, 2, 0
```
to
```
xsnmsubasp 3, 2, 0
```
We have the patterns for Double Precision and vectors, just missing
Single Precision, the patch add that.
Reviewers: #powerpc, hfinkel, nemanjai, steven.zhang
Reviewed By: #powerpc, steven.zhang
Subscribers: wuzish, hiraditya, kbarton, MaskRay, shchenz, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67595
llvm-svn: 372985
We currently produce a load, followed by (possibly a move for integers and) a
splat as separate instructions. VSX has always had a splatting load for
doublewords, but as of Power9, we have it for words as well. This patch just
exploits these instructions.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63624
llvm-svn: 372139
This is a follow up patch from https://reviews.llvm.org/D57857 to handle
extract_subvector v4f32. For cases where we fpext of v2f32 to v2f64 from
extract_subvector we currently generate on P9 the following:
lxv 0, 0(3)
xxsldwi 1, 0, 0, 1
xscvspdpn 2, 0
xxsldwi 3, 0, 0, 3
xxswapd 0, 0
xscvspdpn 1, 1
xscvspdpn 3, 3
xscvspdpn 0, 0
xxmrghd 0, 0, 3
xxmrghd 1, 2, 1
stxv 0, 0(4)
stxv 1, 0(5)
This patch custom lower it to the following sequence:
lxv 0, 0(3) # load the v4f32 <w0, w1, w2, w3>
xxmrghw 2, 0, 0 # Produce the following vector <w0, w0, w1, w1>
xxmrglw 3, 0, 0 # Produce the following vector <w2, w2, w3, w3>
xvcvspdp 2, 2 # FP-extend to <d0, d1>
xvcvspdp 3, 3 # FP-extend to <d2, d3>
stxv 2, 0(5) # Store <d0, d1> (%vecinit11)
stxv 3, 0(4) # Store <d2, d3> (%vecinit4)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61961
llvm-svn: 372029
All tests with -run-pass !=none should not in MIR/, See MIR/README.
```
Tests for codegen passes should NOT be here but in
test/CodeGen/sometarget. As
a rule of thumb this directory should only contain tests using
'llc -run-pass none'.
```
llvm-svn: 371857
Summary:
Since the SPE4RC register class contains an identical set of registers
and an identical spill size to the GPRC class its slightly confusing
the tablegen emitter. It's preventing the GPRC_and_GPRC_NOR0 synthesized
register class from inheriting VTs and AltOrders from GPRC or GPRC_NOR0.
This is because SPE4C is found first in the super register class list
when inheriting these properties and it doesn't set the VTs or
AltOrders the same way as GPRC or GPRC_NOR0.
This patch replaces all uses of GPE4RC with GPRC and allows GPRC and
GPRC_NOR0 to contain f32.
The test changes here are because the AltOrders are being inherited
to GPRC_NOR0 now.
Found while trying to determine if getCommonSubClass needs to take
a VT argument. It was originally added to support fp128 on x86-64,
I've changed some things about that so that it might be needed
anymore. But a PowerPC test crashed without it and I think its
due to this subclass issue.
Reviewers: jhibbits, nemanjai, kbarton, hfinkel
Subscribers: wuzish, nemanjai, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, kbarton, MaskRay, dexonsmith, jsji, shchenz, steven.zhang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67513
llvm-svn: 371779
Current implementation of estimating divisions loses precision since it
estimates reciprocal first and does multiplication. This patch is to re-order
arithmetic operations in the last iteration in DAGCombiner to improve the
accuracy.
Reviewed By: Sanjay Patel, Jinsong Ji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66050
llvm-svn: 371713
Summary:
This catches malformed mir files which specify alignment as log2 instead of pow2.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D65945 for reference,
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, s.egerton, pzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67433
llvm-svn: 371608
