This reverts commit d20d84fec5945fcc16aa6f63879e1458d4af9ea6.
Fixes#169788, but in a different way.
In which I changed an SBError use so that when the function succeeded,
IsValid on the SBError would be true.
This seemed to make sense but SBError acts differently to other SB
classes in this respect. For something like SBMemoryRegionInfo, if
IsValid() is false, you can't do anything with it.
However for SBError, IsValid() true only means there's some underlying
error object in there. If the SBError represents a success, there's no
need to put anything in there.
You can see this intent from a lot of its methods, many have handling
for IsValid() false.
This is not a bug but a misunderstanding of what IsValid means. Yes it
does function the way I expected for most classes, but it does not for
SBError and though that's not intuitive, it is consistent with how we
describe IsValid in the documentation.
So instead of changing that method's use of SBError I'm documenting this
initially counterintuitive behaviour in the SBError header and on the
website (https://lldb.llvm.org/resources/sbapi.html).
Add a verbose option to the version command and include the "build
configuration" in the command output. This allows users to quickly
identify if their version of LLDB was built with support for
xml/curl/python/lua etc. This data is already available through the SB
API using SBDebugger::GetBuildConfiguration, but this makes it more
discoverable.
```
(lldb) version -v
lldb version 22.0.0git (git@github.com:llvm/llvm-project.git revision 21a2aac5e5456f9181384406f3b3fcad621a7076)
clang revision 21a2aac5e5456f9181384406f3b3fcad621a7076
llvm revision 21a2aac5e5456f9181384406f3b3fcad621a7076
editline_wchar: yes
lzma: yes
curses: yes
editline: yes
fbsdvmcore: yes
xml: yes
lua: yes
python: yes
targets: [AArch64, AMDGPU, ARM, AVR, BPF, Hexagon, Lanai, LoongArch, Mips, MSP430, NVPTX, PowerPC, RISCV, Sparc, SPIRV, SystemZ, VE, WebAssembly, X86, XCore]
curl: yes
```
Resolves#170727
Fixes#169788
When this function fails to initialise the debugger, it sets the SBError
using the returned error from the initialise function. This results in
Success being false and isVaid being true. This is expected behaviour.
When it does not fail to initialise, it was returning the default
constructed SBError which has Success() == true but IsValid == false.
IsValid should be true, to show that the success can be trusted.
To fix this, construct the SBError using a default constructed Status,
which results in Success and IsValid being true.
If we open a `NativeFile` with a `FILE*`, the OpenOptions default to
`eOpenOptionReadOnly`. This is an issue in python scripts if you try to
write to one of the files like `print("Hi",
file=lldb.debugger.GetOutputFileHandle())`.
To address this, we need to specify the access mode whenever we create a
`NativeFile` from a `FILE*`. I also added an assert on the `NativeFile`
that validates the file is opened with the correct access mode and
updated `NativeFile::Read` and `NativeFile::Write` to check the access
mode.
Before these changes:
```
$ lldb -b -O 'script lldb.debugger.GetOutputFileHandle().write("abc")'
(lldb) script lldb.debugger.GetOutputFileHandle().write("abc")
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<input>", line 1, in <module>
io.UnsupportedOperation: not writable
```
After:
```
$ lldb -b -O 'script lldb.debugger.GetOutputFileHandle().write("abc")'
(lldb) script lldb.debugger.GetOutputFileHandle().write("abc")
abc3
```
Fixes#122387
### Summary
Add support for unique target ids per Target instance. This is needed
for upcoming changes to allow debugger instances to be shared across
separate DAP instances for child process debugging. We want the IDE to
be able to attach to existing targets in an already runny lldb-dap
session, and having a unique ID per target would make that easier.
Each Target instance will have its own unique id, and uses a
function-local counter in `TargetList::CreateTargetInternal` to assign
incremental unique ids.
### Tests
Added several unit tests to test basic functionality, uniqueness of
targets, and target deletion doesn't affect the uniqueness.
```
bin/lldb-dotest -p TestDebuggerAPI
```
This patch is slightly different from other impl in that we dispatch
client-telemetry via a different helper method. This is to make it
easier for vendor to opt-out (simply by overriding the method to do
nothing). There is also a configuration option to disallow collecting
client telemetry.
---------
Co-authored-by: Pavel Labath <pavel@labath.sk>
This makes GetOutputStreamSP and GetErrorStreamSP protected members of
Debugger. Users who want to print to the debugger's stream should use
GetAsyncOutputStreamSP and GetAsyncErrorStreamSP instead and the few
remaining stragglers have been migrated.
Remove Debugger::GetOutputStream and Debugger::GetErrorStream in
preparation for replacing both with a new variant that needs to be
locked and hence can't be handed out like we do right now.
The patch replaces most uses with GetAsyncOutputStream and
GetAsyncErrorStream respectively. There methods return new StreamSP
objects that automatically get flushed on destruction.
See #126630 for more details.
This typedef doesn't match the signature below, specifically the
signature takes a `lldb:SBDebugger` vs this was defined as
`lldb:SBDebugger&`.
```
lldb/source/API/SBDebugger.cpp:199:13: runtime error: call to function lldb::PluginInitialize(lldb::SBDebugger) through pointer to incorrect function type 'bool (*)(lldb::SBDebugger &)'
.../CustomPlugin.cpp:134: note: lldb::PluginInitialize(lldb::SBDebugger) defined here
```
Currently, we arbitrarily paginate editline completions to 40 elements.
On large terminals, that leaves some real-estate unused. On small
terminals, it's pretty annoying to not see the first completions. We can
address both issues by using the terminal height for pagination.
This builds on the improvements of #116456.
"statistics dump" currently report the statistics of all targets in
debugger instead of current target. This is wrong because there is a
"statistics dump --all-targets" option that supposed to include
everything.
This PR fixes the issue by only report statistics for current target
instead of all. It also includes the change to reset statistics debug
info/symbol table parsing/indexing time during debugger destroy. This is
required so that we report current statistics if we plan to reuse
lldb/lldb-dap across debug sessions
---------
Co-authored-by: jeffreytan81 <jeffreytan@fb.com>
This patch is a reworking of Pete Lawrence's (@PortalPete) proposal
for better expression evaluator error messages:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80938
Before:
```
$ lldb -o "expr a+b"
(lldb) expr a+b
error: <user expression 0>:1:1: use of undeclared identifier 'a'
a+b
^
error: <user expression 0>:1:3: use of undeclared identifier 'b'
a+b
^
```
After:
```
(lldb) expr a+b
^ ^
│ ╰─ error: use of undeclared identifier 'b'
╰─ error: use of undeclared identifier 'a'
```
This eliminates the confusing `<user expression 0>:1:3` source
location and avoids echoing the expression to the console again, which
results in a cleaner presentation that makes it easier to grasp what's
going on. You can't see it here, bug the word "error" is now also in
color, if so desired.
Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106442.
This patch is a reworking of Pete Lawrence's (@PortalPete) proposal
for better expression evaluator error messages:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80938
Before:
```
$ lldb -o "expr a+b"
(lldb) expr a+b
error: <user expression 0>:1:1: use of undeclared identifier 'a'
a+b
^
error: <user expression 0>:1:3: use of undeclared identifier 'b'
a+b
^
```
After:
```
(lldb) expr a+b
^ ^
│ ╰─ error: use of undeclared identifier 'b'
╰─ error: use of undeclared identifier 'a'
```
This eliminates the confusing `<user expression 0>:1:3` source
location and avoids echoing the expression to the console again, which
results in a cleaner presentation that makes it easier to grasp what's
going on. You can't see it here, bug the word "error" is now also in
color, if so desired.
Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106442.
(this is lldb part)
Without these explicit includes, removing other headers, who implicitly
include llvm-config.h, may have non-trivial side effects. For example,
`clangd` may report even `llvm-config.h` as "no used" in case it defines
a macro, that is explicitly used with #ifdef. It is actually amplified
with different build configs which use different set of macros.
This patch removes all of the Set.* methods from Status.
This cleanup is part of a series of patches that make it harder use the
anti-pattern of keeping a long-lives Status object around and updating
it while dropping any errors it contains on the floor.
This patch is largely NFC, the more interesting next steps this enables
is to:
1. remove Status.Clear()
2. assert that Status::operator=() never overwrites an error
3. remove Status::operator=()
Note that step (2) will bring 90% of the benefits for users, and step
(3) will dramatically clean up the error handling code in various
places. In the end my goal is to convert all APIs that are of the form
` ResultTy DoFoo(Status& error)
`
to
` llvm::Expected<ResultTy> DoFoo()
`
How to read this patch?
The interesting changes are in Status.h and Status.cpp, all other
changes are mostly
` perl -pi -e 's/\.SetErrorString/ = Status::FromErrorString/g' $(git
grep -l SetErrorString lldb/source)
`
plus the occasional manual cleanup.
@walter-erquinigo found the the [PR with testing and a fix for
DebugInfoD](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98344) caused an
issue when working with stripped binaries.
The issue is that when you're working with split-dwarf, there are *3*
possible files: The stripped binary the user is debugging, the
"only-keep-debug" *or* unstripped binary, plus the `.dwp` file. The
debuginfod plugin should provide the unstripped/OKD binary. However, if
the debuginfod plugin fails, the default symbol locator plugin will just
return the stripped binary, which doesn't help. So, to address that, the
SymbolVendorELF code checks to see if the SymbolLocator's
ExecutableObjectFile request returned the same file, and bails if that's
the case. You can see the specific diff as the second commit in the PR.
I'm investigating adding a test: I can't quite get a simple repro, and
I'm unwilling to make any additional changes to Makefile.rules to this
diff, for Pavlovian reasons.
This reverts commit 2fa1220a37a3f55b76a29803d8333b3a3937d53a.
This reverts commit b9496a74eb4029629ca2e440c5441614e766f773.
The patch #98344 causes a crash in LLDB when parsing some files like `numpy.libs/libgfortran-daac5196.so.5.0.0` on graviton (you can download it in https://drive.google.com/file/d/12ygLjJwWpzdYsrzBPp1JGiFHxcgM0-XY/view?usp=drive_link if you want to troubleshoot yourself).
The assert that is hit is the following:
```
llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/ObjectFile/ELF/ObjectFileELF.cpp:2452: std::pair<unsigned int, std::map<long unsigned int, lldb_private::AddressClass> > ObjectFileELF::ParseSymbolTable(lldb_private::Symtab*, lldb::user_id_t, lldb_private::Section*): Assertion `strtab->GetObjectFile() == this' failed.
[383588:383636:20240716,025305.572639:ERROR crashpad_client_linux.cc:780] Crashpad isn't enabled
```
This object file doesn't have apparently a strings table but LLDB still tries to process it due to the code that is being reverted.
This is all the tests and fixes I've had percolating since my first
attempt at this in January. After 6 months of trying, I've given up on
adding the ability to test DWP files in LLDB API tests. I've left both
the tests (disabled) and the changes to Makefile.rules in place, in the
hopes that someone who can configure the build bots will be able to
enable the tests once a non-borked dwp tool is widely available.
Other than disabling the DWP tests, this continues to be the same diff
that I've tried to land and
[not](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90622)
[revert](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87676)
[five](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86812)
[times](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85693)
[before](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96802). There are a
couple of fixes that the testing exposed, and I've abandoned the DWP
tests because I want to get those fixes finally upstreamed, as without
them DebugInfoD is less useful.
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#96802
Attempt #5 fails. It's been 6 months. I despise Makefile.rules and have
no ability to even *detect* these failures without _landing_ a diff. In
the mean time, we have no testing for DWP files at all (and a regression
that was introduced, that I fix with this diff) so I'm going to just
remove some of the tests and try to land it again, but with less testing
I guess.
This is the same diff I've put up at many times before. I've been trying
to add some brand new functionality to the LLDB test infrastucture
(create split-dwarf files!), and we all know that no good deed goes
unpunished. The last attempt was reverted because it didn't work on the
Fuchsia build.
There are no code differences between this and
[the](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90622)
[previous](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87676)
[four](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86812)
[diffs](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85693) landed &
reverted (due to testing infra failures). The only change in this one is
the way `dwp` is being identified in `Makefile.rules`.
Thanks to @petrhosek for helping me figure out how the fuchsia builders
are configured. I now prefer to use llvm-dwp and fall back to gnu's dwp
if the former isn't found. Hopefully this will work everywhere it needs
to.
New fixes:
- properly init the `std::optional<std::vector>` to an empty vector as
opposed to `{}` (which was effectively `std::nullopt`).
---------
Co-authored-by: Vy Nguyen <oontvoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Re-apply https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87550 with fixes.
Details:
Some tests in fuchsia failed because of the newly added assertion.
This was because `GetExceptionBreakpoint()` could be called before
`g_dap.debugger` was initted.
The fix here is to just lazily populate the list in
GetExceptionBreakpoint() rather than assuming it's already been initted.
(There is some nuisance here because we can't simply just populate it in
DAP::DAP(), which is a global ctor and is called before
`SBDebugger::Initialize()` is called. )
Here we go with attempt number five. Again, no changes to the LLDB code
diff, which has been reviewed several times.
For the tests, I added a `@skipIfCurlSupportMissing` annotation so that
the Debuginfod mocked server stuff won't run, and I also disabled
non-Linux/FreeBSD hosts altogether, as they fail for platform reasons on
macOS and Windows. In addition, I updated the process for extracting the
GNU BuildID to no create a target, per some feedback on the previous
diff.
For reference, previous PR's (landed, backed out after the fact for
various reasons) #90622, #87676, #86812, #85693
---------
Co-authored-by: Kevin Frei <freik@meta.com>
# Motivation
Individual callers of `SBDebugger::SetDestroyCallback()` might think
that they have registered their callback and expect it to be called when
the debugger is destroyed. In reality, only the last caller survives,
and all previous callers are forgotten, which might be a surprise to
them. Worse, if this is called in a race condition, which callback
survives is less predictable, which may case confusing behavior
elsewhere.
# This PR
Allows multiple destroy callbacks to be registered and all called when
the debugger is destroyed.
**EDIT**: Adds two new APIs: `AddDestroyCallback()` and
`ClearDestroyCallback()`. `SetDestroyCallback()` will first clear then
add the given callback. Tests are added for the new APIs.
## Tests
```
bin/llvm-lit -sv ../external/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/python_api/debugger/TestDebuggerAPI.py
```
## (out-dated, see comments below) Semantic change to
`SetDestroyCallback()`
~~Currently, the method overwrites the old callback with the new one.
With this PR, it will NOT overwrite. Instead, it will hold on to both.
Both callbacks get called during destroy.~~
~~**Risk**: Although the documentation of `SetDestroyCallback()` (see
[C++](https://lldb.llvm.org/cpp_reference/classlldb_1_1SBDebugger.html#afa1649d9453a376b5c95888b5a0cb4ec)
and
[python](https://lldb.llvm.org/python_api/lldb.SBDebugger.html#lldb.SBDebugger.SetDestroyCallback))
doesn't really specify the behavior, there is a risk: if existing call
sites rely on the "overwrite" behavior, they will be surprised because
now the old callback will get called. But as the above said, the current
behavior of "overwrite" itself might be unintended, so I don't
anticipate users to rely on this behavior. In short, this risk might be
less of a problem if we correct it sooner rather than later (which is
what this PR is trying to do).~~
## (out-dated, see comments below) Implementation
~~The implementation holds a `std::vector<std::pair<callback, baton>>`.
When `SetDestroyCallback()` is called, callbacks and batons are appended
to the `std::vector`. When destroy event happen, the `(callback, baton)`
pairs are invoked FIFO. Finally, the `std::vector` is cleared.~~
# (out-dated, see comments below) Alternatives considered
~~Instead of changing `SetDestroyCallback()`, a new method
`AddDestroyCallback()` can be added, which use the same
`std::vector<std::pair<>>` implementation. Together with
`ClearDestroyCallback()` (see below), they will replace and deprecate
`SetDestroyCallback()`. Meanwhile, in order to be backward compatible,
`SetDestroyCallback()` need to be updated to clear the `std::vector` and
then add the new callback. Pros: The end state is semantically more
correct. Cons: More steps to take; potentially maintaining an
"incorrect" behavior (of "overwrite").~~
~~A new method `ClearDestroyCallback()` can be added. Might be
unnecessary at this point, because workflows which need to set then
clear callbacks may exist but shouldn't be too common at least for now.
Such method can be added later when needed.~~
~~The `std::vector` may bring slight performance drawback if its
implementation doesn't handle small size efficiently. However, even if
that's the case, this path should be very cold (only used during init
and destroy). Such performance drawback should be negligible.~~
~~A different implementation was also considered. Instead of using
`std::vector`, the current `m_destroy_callback` field can be kept
unchanged. When `SetDestroyCallback()` is called, a lambda function can
be stored into `m_destroy_callback`. This lambda function will first
call the old callback, then the new one. This way, `std::vector` is
avoided. However, this implementation is more complex, thus less
readable, with not much perf to gain.~~
---------
Co-authored-by: Roy Shi <royshi@meta.com>
These are hardcoded strings that are already present in the data section
of the binary, no need to immediately place them in the ConstString
StringPools. Lots of code still calls `GetBroadcasterClass` and places
the return value into a ConstString. Changing that would be a good
follow-up.
Additionally, calls to these functions are still wrapped in ConstStrings
at the SBAPI layer. This is because we must guarantee the lifetime of
all strings handed out publicly.
Add a configuration entry for whether LLDB was configured with wide
character support in Editline and use it in a decorator to guard the
UTF-8 prompt test.
These functions have been NO-OPs since 2014 (44d937820b451). Remove them
and deprecate the corresponding functions in SBDebugger.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158000
StreamFile subclasses Stream (from lldbUtility) and is backed by a File
(from lldbHost). It does not depend on anything from lldbCore or any of its
sibling libraries, so I think it makes sense for this to live in
lldbHost instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157460
This doesn't need to be in the ConstString StringPool. There's little
benefit to having these be unique, and we don't need fast comparisons on
them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151524
Many SB classes have public constructors or methods involving types that
are private. Some are more obvious (e.g. containing lldb_private in the
name) than others (lldb::FooSP is usually std::shared_pointer<lldb_private::Foo>).
This commit explicitly does not address FileSP, so I'm leaving that one
alone for now.
Some of these were for other SB classes to use and should have been made
protected/private with a friend class entry added. Some of these were
public for some of the swig python helpers to use. I put all of those
functions into a class and made them static methods. The relevant SB
classes mark that class as a friend so they can access those
private/protected members.
I've also removed an outdated SBStructuredData test (can you guess which
constructor it was using?) and updated the other relevant tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150157
Various OptionValue related classes are passing around will_modify but
the value is never used. This patch simplifies the interfaces by
removing the redundant argument.
Instead of taking a `const std::string &` we can take an
`llvm::StringRef`. The motivation for this change is that many of the
callers of `ParseJSON` end up creating a temporary `std::string` from an existing
`StringRef` or `const char *` in order to satisfy the API. There's no
reason we need to do this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148579
Adding a new SBDebugger::SetDestroyCallback() API.
This API can be used by any client to query for statistics/metrics before
exiting debug sessions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143520
Consider the following example as motivation. Say you have to load
symbols for 3 dynamic libraries: `libFoo`, `libBar` and `libBaz`.
Currently, there are two ways to report process for this operation:
1. As 3 separate progress instances. In this case you create a progress
instance with the message "Loading symbols: libFoo", "Loading
symbols: libBar", and "Loading symbols: libBaz" respectively. Each
progress event gets a unique ID and therefore cannot be correlated
by the consumer.
2. As 1 progress instance with 3 units of work. The title would be
"Loading symbols" and you call Progress::Increment for each of the
libraries. The 3 progress events share the same ID and can easily be
correlated, however, in the current design, there's no way to
include the name of the libraries.
The second approach is preferred when the amount of work is known in
advance, because determinate progress can be reported (i.e. x out of y
operations completed). An additional benefit is that the progress
consumer can decide to ignore certain progress updates by their ID if
they are deemed to noisy, which isn't trivial for the first approach due
to the use of different progress IDs.
This patch adds the ability to add a message (detail) to a progress
event update. For the example described above, progress can now be
displayed as shown:
[1/3] Loading symbols: libFoo
[2/3] Loading symbols: libBar
[3/3] Loading symbols: libBaz
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143690
This is a preparatory patch to add an SB API to get the progress data as
SBStructuredData. The advantage of using SBStructuredData is that the
dictionary can grow over time with more fields.
This approach is identical to the way this is implemented for diagnostic
events.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143687
Hoist the code that creates a StructuredData dictionary from a
diagnostic event into the DiagnosticEventData. This addresses Ismail's
code review feedback from D143687.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143694
This patch is preparatory work for Scripted Platform support and does
multiple things:
First, it introduces new options for the `platform select` command and
`SBPlatform::Create` API, to hold a reference to the debugger object,
the name of the python script managing the Scripted Platform and a
structured data dictionary that the user can use to pass arbitrary data.
Then, it updates the various `Create` and `GetOrCreate` methods for
the `Platform` and `PlatformList` classes to pass down the new parameter
to the `Platform::CreateInstance` callbacks.
Finally, it updates every callback to reflect these changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139249
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
