This is like https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/179033, which
broke a few builders for reasons I still don't really understand. I ran
the other clang tests and this version fixes a few of the introduced
regressions.
This still regresses `CodeGen/pass-object-size.c`, but that's a
pre-existing issue.
Patch is of coursed based on #179033 by @mariusdr.
We used to create a scope for the true- and false expression of a
conditional operator. This was done so e.g. in this example:
```c++
struct A { constexpr A(){}; ~A(); constexpr int get() { return 10; } }; // all-note 2{{declared here}}
static_assert( (false ? A().get() : 1) == 1);
```
we did _not_ evaluate the true branch at all, meaning we did not
register the local variable for the temporary of type `A`, which means
we also didn't call it destructor.
However, this breaks the case where the temporary needs to outlive the
conditional operator and instead be destroyed via the surrounding
`ExprWithCleanups`:
```
constexpr bool test2(bool b) {
unsigned long __ms = b ? (const unsigned long &)0 : __ms;
return true;
}
static_assert(test2(true));
```
Before this patch, we diagnosed this example:
```console
./array.cpp:180:15: error: static assertion expression is not an integral constant expression
180 | static_assert(test2(true));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
./array.cpp:177:24: note: read of temporary whose lifetime has ended
177 | unsigned long __ms = b ? (const unsigned long &)0 : __ms;
| ^
./array.cpp:180:15: note: in call to 'test2(true)'
180 | static_assert(test2(true));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
./array.cpp:177:51: note: temporary created here
177 | unsigned long __ms = b ? (const unsigned long &)0 : __ms;
| ^
1 error generated.
```
because the temporary created for the true branch got immediately
destroyed.
The problem in essence is that since the conditional operator doesn't
create a scope at all, we register the local variables for both its
branches, but we later only execute one of them, which means we should
also only destroy the locals of one of the branches.
We fix this similar to clang codgen's `is_active` flag: In the case of a
conditional operator (which is so far the only case where this is
problematic, and this also helps minimize the performance impact of this
change), we make local variables as disabled-by-default and then emit a
`EnableLocal` opcode later, which marks them as enabled. The code
calling their destructors checks whether the local was enabled at all.
Move the `APValue` into `EvaluationResult` instead.
For a large primitive array (`#embed` of the sqlite3 amalgamation), this
improves compile times by around 25%.
The Pointer class already has the capability to be a function pointer,
but we still classifed function pointers as PT_FnPtr/FunctionPointer.
This means when converting from a Pointer to a FunctionPointer, we lost
the information of what the original Pointer pointed to.
Use the regular code paths for interpreting.
Add new instructions: `StartSpeculation` will reset the diagnostics
pointers to `nullptr`, which will keep us from reporting any diagnostics
during speculation. `EndSpeculation` will undo this.
The rest depends on what `Emitter` we use.
For `EvalEmitter`, we have no bytecode, so we implement `speculate()` by
simply visiting the first argument of `__builtin_constant_p`. If the
evaluation fails, we push a `0` on the stack, otherwise a `1`.
For `ByteCodeEmitter`, add another instrucion called `BCP`, that
interprets all the instructions following it until the next
`EndSpeculation` instruction. If any of those instructions fails, we
jump to the `EndLabel`, which brings us right before the
`EndSpeculation`. We then push the result on the stack.
Instead of heap-allocating it. This is similar to what the current
interpeter does. In C, we have no function calls, so the extra heap
allocation never makes sense.
The global scope we create when evaluating expressions might free some
of the dynamic memory allocations, so we can't check for memory leaks
before destroying it.
The new constant interpreter's `clang::interp::InterpState` contains
both `clang::interp::Context` and `clang::ASTContext`. So using `S.Ctx`
and `S.getCtx()` was a bit confusing. This PR rename `getCtx()` to
`getASTContext` to make things more clearer.
Signed-off-by: yronglin <yronglin777@gmail.com>
