We used to create a scope for the true- and false expression of a
conditional operator. This was done so e.g. in this example:
```c++
struct A { constexpr A(){}; ~A(); constexpr int get() { return 10; } }; // all-note 2{{declared here}}
static_assert( (false ? A().get() : 1) == 1);
```
we did _not_ evaluate the true branch at all, meaning we did not
register the local variable for the temporary of type `A`, which means
we also didn't call it destructor.
However, this breaks the case where the temporary needs to outlive the
conditional operator and instead be destroyed via the surrounding
`ExprWithCleanups`:
```
constexpr bool test2(bool b) {
unsigned long __ms = b ? (const unsigned long &)0 : __ms;
return true;
}
static_assert(test2(true));
```
Before this patch, we diagnosed this example:
```console
./array.cpp:180:15: error: static assertion expression is not an integral constant expression
180 | static_assert(test2(true));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
./array.cpp:177:24: note: read of temporary whose lifetime has ended
177 | unsigned long __ms = b ? (const unsigned long &)0 : __ms;
| ^
./array.cpp:180:15: note: in call to 'test2(true)'
180 | static_assert(test2(true));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
./array.cpp:177:51: note: temporary created here
177 | unsigned long __ms = b ? (const unsigned long &)0 : __ms;
| ^
1 error generated.
```
because the temporary created for the true branch got immediately
destroyed.
The problem in essence is that since the conditional operator doesn't
create a scope at all, we register the local variables for both its
branches, but we later only execute one of them, which means we should
also only destroy the locals of one of the branches.
We fix this similar to clang codgen's `is_active` flag: In the case of a
conditional operator (which is so far the only case where this is
problematic, and this also helps minimize the performance impact of this
change), we make local variables as disabled-by-default and then emit a
`EnableLocal` opcode later, which marks them as enabled. The code
calling their destructors checks whether the local was enabled at all.
This fixes#139614 on non-clang compilers by moving `__has_warning`
completely inside the `#if defined(__clang__)` block. This prevents a
parse failure from compilers which don't recognize `__has_warning`.
Original description:
Followup to #138741.
This adds the requested macro to silence
`-Wunnecessary-virtual-specifier` when declaring virtual anchor
functions in `final` classes, per [LLVM
policy](https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#provide-a-virtual-method-anchor-for-classes-in-headers).
It also cleans up any remaining instances of the warning, allowing us to
stop disabling it when we build LLVM.
Instead of heap-allocating it. This is similar to what the current
interpeter does. In C, we have no function calls, so the extra heap
allocation never makes sense.
