In https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168534 we made the
`TypePrinter` re-use `printNestedNameSpecifier` for printing scopes.
However, the way that the names of anonymous/unnamed types get printed
by the two are slightly inconsistent with each other.
`printNestedNameSpecifier` calls all `TagType`s without an identifer
`(anonymous)`. On the other hand, `TypePrinter` prints them slightly
more accurate (it differentiates anonymous vs. unnamed decls) and allows
for some additional customization points. E.g., with `MSVCFormatting`,
it will print `` `unnamed struct'`` instead of `(unnamed struct)`.
`printNestedNameSpecifier` already accounts for `MSVCFormatting` for
namespaces, but doesn't for `TagType`s. This inconsistency means that if
an unnamed tag is printed as part of a scope then it's displayed as
`(anonymous struct)`, but if it's the entity whose scope is being
printed, then it shows as `(unnamed struct)`.
This patch moves the printing of anonymous/unnamed tags into
`TagDecl::printName`. All the callsites that previously printed
anonymous tag decls now call `printName` to handle it. To preserve the
behaviour of not printing the kind name (i.e., `struct`/`class`/`enum`)
when printing the inner type of an elaborated type (i.e., avoiding
`struct (unnamed struct)`), this patch adds a
`PrintingPolicy::SuppressTagKeywordInAnonNames` that is appropriately
set when we want to suppress the tag keyword inside the anonymous name.
I had to make sure we set this bit to `false` when printing
nested-name-specifiers because we always want the tag keyword there
(e.g., `foo::(anonymous struct)::bar`) and for a `clangd` special case
which is described in a comment in the source.
**Test changes**
Mostly we now more accurately print the kind name of anonymous entities.
So there's a lot of `anonymous` -> `unnamed` changes. There are a
handful of `clangd` tests where the name of the entity is now `(unnamed
struct)` instead of just `(unnamed)`. That should be consistent with how
we choose to omit the tag keyword elsewhere. Since we're just printing
the name of the entity here, we include the kind tag.
Instead of always displaying the mangled name, try to do better
and get something closer to regular functions.
Recommit r287039 (that was reverted in r287039) with a tweak to
be more generic, and test fixes!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26522
llvm-svn: 287085
Instead of always displaying the mangled name, try to do better
and get something closer to regular functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26522
llvm-svn: 287039