This adds support for using `ATTACH` map-type for proper
pointer-attachment when mapping list-items that have base-pointers.
For example, for the following:
```c
int *p;
#pragma omp target enter data map(p[1:10])
```
The following maps are now emitted by clang:
```
(A)
&p[0], &p[1], 10 * sizeof(p[1]), TO | FROM
&p, &p[1], sizeof(p), ATTACH
```
Previously, the two possible maps emitted by clang were:
```
(B)
&p[0], &p[1], 10 * sizeof(p[1]), TO | FROM
(C)
&p, &p[1], 10 * sizeof(p[1]), TO | FROM | PTR_AND_OBJ
````
(B) does not perform any pointer attachment, while (C) also maps the
pointer p, both of which are incorrect.
-----
With this change, we are using ATTACH-style maps, like `(A)`, for cases
where the expression has a base-pointer. For example:
```cpp
int *p, **pp;
S *ps, **pps;
... map(p[0])
... map(p[10:20])
... map(*p)
... map(([20])p)
... map(ps->a)
... map(pps->p->a)
... map(pp[0][0])
... map(*(pp + 10)[0])
```
#### Grouping of maps based on attach base-pointers
We also group mapping of clauses with the same base decl in the order of
the increasing complexity of their base-pointers, e.g. for something
like:
```
S **spp;
map(spp[0][0], spp[0][0].a), // attach-ptr: spp[0]
map(spp[0]), // attach-ptr: spp
map(spp), // attach-ptr: N/A
```
We first map `spp`, then `spp[0]` then `spp[0][0]` and `spp[0][0].a`.
This allows us to also group "struct" allocation based on their attach
pointers. This resolves the issues of us always mapping everything from
the beginning of the symbol `spp`. Each group is mapped independently,
and at the same level, like `spp[0][0]` and its member `spp[0][0].a`, we
still get map them together as part of the same contiguous struct
`spp[0][0]`. This resolves issue #141042.
#### use_device_ptr/addr fixes
The handling of `use_device_ptr/addr` was updated to use the attach-ptr
information, and works for many cases that were failing before. It has
to be done as part of this series because otherwise, the switch from
ptr_to_obj to attach-style mapping would have caused regressions in
existing use_device_ptr/addr tests.
#### Handling of attach-pointers that are members of implicitly mapped
structs:
* When a struct member-pointer, like `p` below, is a base-pointer in a
`map` clause on a target construct (like `map(p[0:1])`, and the base of
that struct is either the `this` pointer (implicitly or explicitly), or
a struct that is implicitly mapped on that construct, we add an implicit
`map(p)` so that we don't implicitly map the full struct.
```c
struct S { int *p;
void f1() {
#pragma omp target map(p[0:1]) // Implicitly map this->p, to ensure
// that the implicit map of `this[:]` does
// not map the full struct
printf("%p %p\n", &p, p);
}
```
#### Scope for improvement:
* We may be able to compute attach-ptr expr while collecting
component-lists in Sema.
* But we cache the computation results already, and `findAttachPtrExpr`
is fairly simple, and fast.
* There may be a better way to implement semantic expr comparison.
#### Needs future work:
* Attach-style maps not yet emitted for declare mappers.
* Mapping of class member references: We are still using PTR_AND_OBJ
maps for them. We will likely need to change that to handle
`ref_ptr/ref_ptee`, and `attach` map-type-modifier on them.
* Implicit capturing of "this" needs to map the full `this[0:1]` unless
there is an explicit map on one of the members, or a map with a member
as its base-pointer.
* Implicit map added for capturing a class member pointer needs to also
add a zero-length-array-section map.
* `use_device_addr` on array-sections-on-pointers need further
improvements (documented using FIXMEs)
#### Why a large PR
While it's unfortunate that this PR has gotten large and difficult to
review, the issue is that all the functional changes have to be made
together, to prevent regressions from partially implemented changes.
For example, the changes to capturing were previously done separately
(#145454), but they would still cause stability issues in absence of
full attach-mapping. And attach-mapping needs those changes to be able
to launch kernels.
We extracted the utilities and functions, like those for finding
attach-ptrs, or comparing exprs, out as a separate NFC PR that doesn't
call those functions, just adds them (#155625). Maybe the change that
adds a new error message for use_device_addr on array-sections with
non-var base-pointers could have been extracted out too (but that would
have had to be a follow-up change in that case, and we would get
comp-fails with this PR when the erroneous case was not
caught/diagnosed).
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Duran <alejandro.duran@intel.com>
Generate nuw GEPs for struct member accesses, as inbounds + non-negative
implies nuw.
Regression tests are updated using update scripts where possible, and by
find + replace where not.
We already created a versioned `__tgt_kernel_arguments` struct but it
was only briefly used and its content was passed in isolation anyway.
This makes it hard to add more information in the future. With this
patch we fully embrace the struct as means to pass information from the
compiler to the plugin as part of a kernel launch.
The patch also extends and renames the struct, bumping the version
number to 2. Version 1 entries are auto-upgraded. This is in preparation
for "bare" kernel launches, per kernel dynamic shared memory, CUDA/HIP
lowering, etc.
The `__tgt_target_kernel_nowait` interface was deprecated as it was
unused. Once we actually implement support for something like that, we
can add an appropriate API.
Note: Only plugins with the `launch_kernel` interface are now supported.
That means that a new clang won't be able to use an old runtime.
An old clang can still use the new runtime since the libomptarget
interface did not change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141232
This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be part of the migration approach described in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/enabling-opaque-pointers-by-default/61322/9.
The patch has been produced by replacing %clang_cc1 with
%clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers for tests that fail with opaque
pointers enabled. Worth noting that this doesn't cover all tests,
there's a remaining ~40 tests not using %clang_cc1 that will need
a followup change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123115
Changed the we handle llvm::Constants in sizes arrays. ConstExprs and
GlobalValues cannot be used as initializers, need to put them at the
runtime, otherwise there wight be the compilation errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105297
Changed the we handle llvm::Constants in sizes arrays. ConstExprs and
GlobalValues cannot be used as initializers, need to put them at the
runtime, otherwise there wight be the compilation errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105297
This patch implements Clang support for an original OpenMP extension
we have developed to support OpenACC: the `ompx_hold` map type
modifier. The next patch in this series, D106510, implements OpenMP
runtime support.
Consider the following example:
```
#pragma omp target data map(ompx_hold, tofrom: x) // holds onto mapping of x
{
foo(); // might have map(delete: x)
#pragma omp target map(present, alloc: x) // x is guaranteed to be present
printf("%d\n", x);
}
```
The `ompx_hold` map type modifier above specifies that the `target
data` directive holds onto the mapping for `x` throughout the
associated region regardless of any `target exit data` directives
executed during the call to `foo`. Thus, the presence assertion for
`x` at the enclosed `target` construct cannot fail. (As usual, the
standard OpenMP reference count for `x` must also reach zero before
the data is unmapped.)
Justification for inclusion in Clang and LLVM's OpenMP runtime:
* The `ompx_hold` modifier supports OpenACC functionality (structured
reference count) that cannot be achieved in standard OpenMP, as of
5.1.
* The runtime implementation for `ompx_hold` (next patch) will thus be
used by Flang's OpenACC support.
* The Clang implementation for `ompx_hold` (this patch) as well as the
runtime implementation are required for the Clang OpenACC support
being developed as part of the ECP Clacc project, which translates
OpenACC to OpenMP at the directive AST level. These patches are the
first step in upstreaming OpenACC functionality from Clacc.
* The Clang implementation for `ompx_hold` is also used by the tests
in the runtime implementation. That syntactic support makes the
tests more readable than low-level runtime calls can. Moreover,
upstream Flang and Clang do not yet support OpenACC syntax
sufficiently for writing the tests.
* More generally, the Clang implementation enables a clean separation
of concerns between OpenACC and OpenMP development in LLVM. That
is, LLVM's OpenMP developers can discuss, modify, and debug LLVM's
extended OpenMP implementation and test suite without directly
considering OpenACC's language and execution model, which can be
handled by LLVM's OpenACC developers.
* OpenMP users might find the `ompx_hold` modifier useful, as in the
above example.
See new documentation introduced by this patch in `openmp/docs` for
more detail on the functionality of this extension and its
relationship with OpenACC. For example, it explains how the runtime
must support two reference counts, as specified by OpenACC.
Clang recognizes `ompx_hold` unless `-fno-openmp-extensions`, a new
command-line option introduced by this patch, is specified.
Reviewed By: ABataev, jdoerfert, protze.joachim, grokos
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106509
