5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael Buch
c64257b4b7
[lldb][Expression] Make __lldb_expr function qualifiers match source context (#177922)
We stopped marking `__lldb_expr` with the function qualifiers of the
method LLDB is stopped in ever since
`8bdcd522510f923185cdfaec66c4a78d0a0d38c0`. The assumption was that it
wasn't ever required for correctness (i.e., LLDB should just always
pretend it's in a mutable context). But since function qualifiers affect
overloading in C++, this assumption can lead to unexpected expression
evaluator behaviour. E.g., if a function is overloaded on qualifiers
(`const` vs. `non-const`), the expression evaluator would currently
always call the non-CV qualified overload.

This patch adds function qualifiers to `$__lldb_class::$__lldb_expr`
that resemble the qualifiers of the method that we're stopped in.

However, mutating variables or calling arbitrary member functions from
CV-qualified methods can be useful/is something users already may be
used to. To provide users with the ability to ignore the CV-qualifiers
of the current context, we will provide an expression evaluator flag
that switches this off in a follow-up patch.
2026-02-05 07:32:26 +00:00
Jonas Devlieghere
2238dcc393
[NFC][Py Reformat] Reformat python files in lldb
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).

If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.

RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
2023-05-25 12:54:09 -07:00
Dave Lee
4e10b2bee7 [lldb][test] Remove explicit mydir definitions (NFC) 2022-10-27 09:08:54 -07:00
Aaron Ballman
7349bc3483 Speculatively fix the lldb test bots
This should fix the issue found by:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/68/builds/41100
2022-10-14 08:37:08 -04:00
Michael Buch
8184b252cd [LLDB][ClangExpression] Allow expression evaluation from within C++ Lambdas
This patch adds support for evaluating expressions which reference
a captured `this` from within the context of a C++ lambda expression.
Currently LLDB doesn't provide Clang with enough information to
determine that we're inside a lambda expression and are allowed to
access variables on a captured `this`; instead Clang simply fails
to parse the expression.

There are two problems to solve here:
1. Make sure `clang::Sema` doesn't reject the expression due to an
illegal member access.
2. Materialize all the captured variables/member variables required
to evaluate the expression.

To address (1), we currently import the outer structure's AST context
onto `$__lldb_class`, making the `contextClass` and the `NamingClass`
match, a requirement by `clang::Sema::BuildPossibleImplicitMemberExpr`.

To address (2), we inject all captured variables as locals into the
expression source code.

**Testing**

* Added API test
2022-07-22 08:02:09 +01:00