Unfortunately, in this configuration, the bots are forced to use the
system libcxx, which is too old for what this test is verifying.
In the future, we should re-enable building libcxx with asan on MacOS.
The original PR has been reverted because of an LLDB test failure. This
patch now works around the test failure by simply allowing the new
symbols to show up in a stack trace.
This reverts commit 72c04bb882ad70230bce309c3013d9cc2c99e9a7.
Original commit message:
This patch replaces `__can_extract_key` with an overload set to try to
extract the key. This simplifies the code, since we don't need to have
separate overload sets for the unordered and associative containers. It
also allows extending the set of extraction cases more easily, since we
have a single place to define how the key is extracted.
We had to disable the tests for libc++ <= 15 because the `std::ranges`
functions were not available, yet.
Also, on libc++17 there was still an additional `__fn` struct withing
`ranges::__sort`. The test expectation was updated to use a regular
expression, so we can match both the old and the new name.
See
https://green.lab.llvm.org/job/llvm.org/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake-matrix/912/execution/node/107/log/
This commit changes the libc++ frame recognizer to hide implementation
details of libc++ more aggressively. The applied heuristic is rather
straightforward: We consider every function name starting with `__` as
an implementation detail.
This works pretty neatly for `std::invoke`, `std::function`,
`std::sort`, `std::map::emplace` and many others. Also, this should
align quite nicely with libc++'s general coding convention of using the
`__` for their implementation details, thereby keeping the future
maintenance effort low.
However, this heuristic by itself does not work in 100% of the cases:
E.g., `std::ranges::sort` is not a function, but an object with an
overloaded `operator()`, which means that there is no actual call
`std::ranges::sort` in the call stack. Instead, there is a
`std::ranges::__sort::operator()` call. To make sure that we don't hide
this stack frame, we never hide the frame which represents the entry
point from user code into libc++ code
