This patch proposes new a tuning feature string format that helps users
to build a performance model by "configuring" an existing tune CPU,
along with its scheduling model. For example, this string
```
"sifive-x280:single-element-vec-fp64"
```
takes ``sifive-x280`` as the "base" tune CPU and configured it with
``single-element-vec-fp64``. This gives us a performance model that
looks exactly like that of ``sifive-x280``, except some of the 64-bit
vector floating point instructions now produce only a single element per
cycle due to ``single-element-vec-fp64``.
This string could eventually be used in places like ``-mtune`` at the
frontend. Right now, this patch only implements the parser part, which
is put under the TargetParser library.
The grammar for this string is:
```
tune-cpu ::= 'tuning CPU name in lower case'
directive ::= "[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+"
tune-features ::= directive ["," directive]*
```
A *directive* can and can only _enable_ or _disable_ a certain tuning
feature from the tuning CPU. A **positive directive**, like the
``single-element-vec-fp64`` we just saw, enables an additional tuning
feature in the associated tuning model.
A **negative directive**, on the other hand, removes a certain tuning
feature. For example, ``sifive-x390`` already has the
``single-element-vec-fp64`` feature, and we can use
"sifive-x390:no-single-element-vec-fp64" to create a new performance
model that looks nearly the same as ``sifive-x390`` except
``single-element-vec-fp64`` being cut out. In this case,
``no-single-element-vec-fp64`` is a negative directive.
There are additional restrictions on what we can put in the list of
directives, please refer to the documentations for more details.
Right now, this string only accepts directives that are explicitly
supported by the tune CPU. For example, "sifive-x280:prefer-w-inst" is
not a valide string as ``prefer-w-inst`` is not supported by
``sifive-x280`` at this moment. Vendors of these processors are expected
to maintain the compatibility of their supported directives across
different versions.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sam Elliott <aelliott@qti.qualcomm.com>
Refactor some logic in transferBefore to handle hasSEWLMULRatioOnly()
before calling getSEW/getLMUL.
Update adjustIncoming to use getSEWLMULRatio(). Update the interface of
RISCVVType::getSameRatioLMUL to take the ratio instead of SEW and LMUL.
Update the few other callers to call RISCVVType::getSEWLMULRatio first.
This patch supports the naive vset* insertion. If the state(tm, tn, tk,
sew, widen) changes, it emits all of the vset* instructions that are
needed, partial compatibility is not supported yet.
This is follow up patch for:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133031
Co-authored-by: Piyou Chen <piyou.chen@sifive.com>
Co-authored-by: Craig Topper <craig.topper@sifive.com>
We can get the `mvendorid/marchid/mimpid` via hwprobe and then we
can compare these IDs with those defined in processors to find the
CPU name.
With this change, `-mcpu/-mtune=native` can set the proper name.
This adds assembler/disassembler support for XSfmmbase 0.6 and related
SiFive matrix multiplication extensions based on the spec here
https://www.sifive.com/document-file/xsfmm-matrix-extensions-specification
Functionality-wise, this is the same as the Zvma extension proposal that
SiFive shared with the Attached Matrix Extension Task Group. The
extension names and instruction mnemonics have been changed to use
vendor prefixes.
Note this is a non-conforming extension as the opcodes used here are in
the standard opcode space in OP-V or OP-VE.
---------
Co-authored-by: Brandon Wu <brandon.wu@sifive.com>
The VLMUL and policy enums originally lived in RISCVBaseInfo.h in the
backend which is where everything else in the RISCVII namespace is
defined.
RISCVTargetParser.h is used by much more of the compiler and it
doesn't really make sense to have 2 different namespaces exposed.
These enums are both associated with VTYPE so using the RISCVVType
namespace seems like a good home for them.
We have defined `__riscv_cpu_model` variable in #101449. It contains
`mvendorid`, `marchid` and `mimpid` fields which are read via system
call `sys_riscv_hwprobe`.
We can support `__builtin_cpu_is` via comparing values in compiler's
CPU definitions and `__riscv_cpu_model`.
This depends on #116202.
Reviewers: lenary, BeMg, kito-cheng, preames, lukel97
Reviewed By: lenary
Pull Request: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116231
This reverts commit b36fcf4f493ad9d30455e178076d91be99f3a7d8.
This reverts commit c11b6b1b8af7454b35eef342162dc2cddf54b4de.
This reverts commit 775148f2367600f90d28684549865ee9ea2f11be.
multiple bot build breakages, e.g. https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/3/builds/8076
The variable name can't be the same as the struct name or we will
have "error: declaration of ‘llvm::RISCV::CPUModel llvm::RISCV::CPUInfo::CPUModel’
changes meaning of ‘CPUModel’ [-fpermissive]".
We have defined `__riscv_cpu_model` variable in #101449. It contains
`mvendorid`, `marchid` and `mimpid` fields which are read via system
call `sys_riscv_hwprobe`.
We can support `__builtin_cpu_is` via comparing values in compiler's
CPU definitions and `__riscv_cpu_model`.
This depends on #116202.
Reviewers: lenary, BeMg, kito-cheng, preames, lukel97
Reviewed By: lenary
Pull Request: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116231
Base on https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-c-api-doc/pull/74.
This patch defines the groupid/bitmask in RISCVFeatures.td and generates
the corresponding table in RISCVTargetParserDef.inc.
The groupid/bitmask of extensions provides an abstraction layer between
the compiler and runtime functions.
This introduces a new file, RISCVISAUtils.cpp and moves the rest of
RISCVISAInfo to the TargetParser library.
This will allow us to generate part of RISCVISAInfo.cpp using tablegen.
This function parse the cpu and return it's supported
features placed in EnabledFeatures. It is same as the
one in X86TargetParser and also is used in IREE.
This patch reference ac1ffd3caca12c254e0b8c847aa8ce8e51b6cfbf to suppot
a soft coding way to identify whether a cpu has a feature
`unaligned-scalar-mem` by `RISCVProcessors.td`.
This patch does not provide test case since there is no risc-v cpu
support `unaligned-scalar-mem` in llvm upstream now.
Similar for RISCV::parseTuneCPU and RISCV::checkTuneCPUKind.
This makes the CPUKind enum no longer part of the API. It wasn't
providing much value. It was only used to pass between the two
functions.
By removing it, we can remove a dependency on a tablegen generated
file from the RISCVTargetParser.h file. Then we can remove a
dependency from several CMakeLists.txt.
This function was used to force +64bit or -64bit into the feature
string basd on -mcpu.
It's not entirely clear to me why this was needed. This informationo
is redundant with the triple. RISCVTargetInfo::initFeatureMap
independently recomputes it from the triple for the feature map.
It is ultimately needed in the backend, but that should be handled
by RISCVSubtarget processing the CPU name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147978
Fuchsia's ABI always reserves the x18 (s2) register for the
ShadowCallStack ABI, even when -fsanitize=shadow-call-stack is
not enabled.
Reviewed By: phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143355
Instead of having separate feature bits, get information from march.
Invalid is now implied by empty march.
64-bit is now implied by march starting with "rv64".
Reviewed By: fpetrogalli
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142230
Rework the change to prevent build failures. NFCI.
The failing code was submitted as
cf7a8305a2b4ddfd299c748136cb9a2960ef7089 and reverted via
8bd65e535fb33bc48805bafed8217b16a853e158.
The rework in this new commit prevents failures like the following:
FAILED: tools/clang/lib/Basic/CMakeFiles/obj.clangBasic.dir/Targets/RISCV.cpp.o
/usr/bin/c++ [bunch of non interesting stuff] -c <path-to>/llvm-project/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp
In file included from <path-to>/llvm-project/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp:19:
<path-to>/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/RISCVTargetParser.h:29:10: fatal error: llvm/TargetParser/RISCVTargetParserDef.inc: No such file or directory
29 | #include "llvm/TargetParser/RISCVTargetParserDef.inc"
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
These failures happen because the library LLVMTargetParser depends on
RISCVTargetParserTableGen, which is a tablegen target that generates
the list of CPUs in
llvm/TargetParser/RISCVTargetParserDef.inc. This *.inc file is
included by the public header file
llvm/TargetParser/RISCVTargetParser.h.
The header file llvm/TargetParser/RISCVTargetParser.h is also used in
components (clangDriver and clangBasic) that link into
LLVMTargetParser, but on some configurations such components might end
up being built before TargetParser is ready.
The fix is to make sure that clangDriver and clangBasic depend on the
tablegen target RISCVTargetParserTableGen, which generates the .inc
file whether or not LLVMTargetParser is ready.
WRT the original patch at https://reviews.llvm.org/D137517, this
commit is just adding RISCVTargetParserTableGen in the DEPENDS list of
clangDriver and clangBasic.
This patch removes the file `llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/RISCVTargetParser.def` and replaces it with a tablegen-generated `.inc` file out of `llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCV.td`.
The module system has been updated to make sure we can build clang/llvm with `-DLLVM_ENABLE_MODULES=On`
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137517
