Following discussions in #110443, and the following earlier discussions
in https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/117907.html,
https://reviews.llvm.org/D38482, https://reviews.llvm.org/D38489, this
PR attempts to overhaul the `TargetMachine` and `LLVMTargetMachine`
interface classes. More specifically:
1. Makes `TargetMachine` the only class implemented under
`TargetMachine.h` in the `Target` library.
2. `TargetMachine` contains target-specific interface functions that
relate to IR/CodeGen/MC constructs, whereas before (at least on paper)
it was supposed to have only IR/MC constructs. Any Target that doesn't
want to use the independent code generator simply does not implement
them, and returns either `false` or `nullptr`.
3. Renames `LLVMTargetMachine` to `CodeGenCommonTMImpl`. This renaming
aims to make the purpose of `LLVMTargetMachine` clearer. Its interface
was moved under the CodeGen library, to further emphasis its usage in
Targets that use CodeGen directly.
4. Makes `TargetMachine` the only interface used across LLVM and its
projects. With these changes, `CodeGenCommonTMImpl` is simply a set of
shared function implementations of `TargetMachine`, and CodeGen users
don't need to static cast to `LLVMTargetMachine` every time they need a
CodeGen-specific feature of the `TargetMachine`.
5. More importantly, does not change any requirements regarding library
linking.
cc @arsenm @aeubanks
Some targets (e.g. PPC and Hexagon) already did this. I think it's best
to do this consistently so that frontend authors don't run into
inconsistent results when they emit `naked` functions. For example, in
Zig, we had to change our emit code to also set `frame-pointer=none` to
get reliable results across targets.
Note: I don't have commit access.
The renamable flag is useful during MachineCopyPropagation but renamable
flag will be dropped after lowerCopy in some case.
This patch introduces extra arguments to pass the renamable flag to
copyPhysReg.
The parameter is confusing as it duplicates MCStreamer::isVeboseAsm
(initialized from MCTargetOptions::AsmVerbose). After
233cca169237b91d16092c82bd55ee6a283afe98, no in-tree target uses the
parameter.
- Fix build with `EXPENSIVE_CHECKS`
- Remove unused `PassName::ID` to resolve warning
- Mark `~SelectionDAGISel` virtual so AArch64 backend can work properly
This reverts commit de37c06f01772e02465ccc9f538894c76d89a7a1 to
de37c06f01772e02465ccc9f538894c76d89a7a1
It still breaks EXPENSIVE_CHECKS build. Sorry.
Port selection dag isel to new pass manager.
Only `AMDGPU` and `X86` support new pass version. `-verify-machineinstrs` in new pass manager belongs to verify instrumentation, it is enabled by default.
- Instead of lowering float/double ISD::ATOMIC_LOAD / ISD::ATOMIC_STORE
nodes to regular LOAD/STORE nodes, make them legal and select those nodes
properly instead. This avoids exposing them to the DAGCombiner.
- AtomicExpand pass no longer casts float/double atomic load/stores to integer
(FP128 is still casted).
This helper function shortens examples like
`cast<ConstantSDNode>(Node->getOperand(1))->getZExtValue();` to
`Node->getConstantOperandVal(1);`.
Implemented with:
`git grep -l
"cast<ConstantSDNode>\(.*->getOperand\(.*\)\)->getZExtValue\(\)" | xargs
sed -E -i
's/cast<ConstantSDNode>\((.*)->getOperand\((.*)\)\)->getZExtValue\(\)/\1->getConstantOperandVal(\2)/`
and `git grep -l
"cast<ConstantSDNode>\(.*\.getOperand\(.*\)\)->getZExtValue\(\)" | xargs
sed -E -i
's/cast<ConstantSDNode>\((.*)\.getOperand\((.*)\)\)->getZExtValue\(\)/\1.getConstantOperandVal(\2)/'`.
With a couple of simple manual fixes needed. Result then processed by
`git clang-format`.
This patch replaces uses of StringRef::{starts,ends}with with
StringRef::{starts,ends}_with for consistency with
std::{string,string_view}::{starts,ends}_with in C++20.
I'm planning to deprecate and eventually remove
StringRef::{starts,ends}with.
It seems TypeSize is currently broken in the sense that:
TypeSize::Fixed(4) + TypeSize::Scalable(4) => TypeSize::Fixed(8)
without failing its assert that explicitly tests for this case:
assert(LHS.Scalable == RHS.Scalable && ...);
The reason this fails is that `Scalable` is a static method of class
TypeSize,
and LHS and RHS are both objects of class TypeSize. So this is
evaluating
if the pointer to the function Scalable == the pointer to the function
Scalable,
which is always true because LHS and RHS have the same class.
This patch fixes the issue by renaming `TypeSize::Scalable` ->
`TypeSize::getScalable`, as well as `TypeSize::Fixed` to
`TypeSize::getFixed`,
so that it no longer clashes with the variable in
FixedOrScalableQuantity.
The new methods now also better match the coding standard, which
specifies that:
* Variable names should be nouns (as they represent state)
* Function names should be verb phrases (as they represent actions)
Note that llvm::support::endianness has been renamed to
llvm::endianness while becoming an enum class as opposed to an
enum. This patch replaces support::{big,little,native} with
llvm::endianness::{big,little,native}.
This will make it easy for callers to see issues with and fix up calls
to createTargetMachine after a future change to the params of
TargetMachine.
This matches other nearby enums.
For downstream users, this should be a fairly straightforward
replacement,
e.g. s/CodeGenOpt::Aggressive/CodeGenOptLevel::Aggressive
or s/CGFT_/CodeGenFileType::
reland [InlineAsm] wrap ConstraintCode in enum class NFC (#66003)
This reverts commit ee643b706be2b6bef9980b25cc9cc988dab94bb5.
Fix up build failures in targets I missed in #66003
Kept as 3 commits for reviewers to see better what's changed. Will
squash when
merging.
- reland [InlineAsm] wrap ConstraintCode in enum class NFC (#66003)
- fix all the targets I missed in #66003
- fix off by one found by llvm/test/CodeGen/SystemZ/inline-asm-addr.ll
This finishes the work of replacing OperandMatchResultTy with
ParseStatus, started in D154101.
As a drive-by change, rename some RegNo variables to just Reg
(a leftover from the days when RegNo had 'unsigned' type).
Irritatingly, atomic_store had operands in the opposite order from
regular store. This made it difficult to share patterns between
regular and atomic stores.
There was a previous incomplete attempt to move atomic_store into the
regular StoreSDNode which would be better.
I think it was a mistake for all atomicrmw to swap the operand order,
so maybe it's better to take this one step further.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D123143
Assemblers change certain relocations referencing a local symbol to
reference the section symbol instead. This conversion is disabled for
many conditions (`shouldRelocateWithSymbol`), e.g. TLS symbol, for most
targets (including AArch32, x86, PowerPC, and RISC-V) GOT-generating
relocations.
However, AArch64 encodes the GOT-generating intent in MCValue::RefKind
instead of MCSymbolRef::Kind (see commit
0999cbd0b9ed8aa893cce10d681dec6d54b200ad (2014)), therefore not affected
by the code `case MCSymbolRefExpr::VK_GOT:`. As GNU ld and ld.lld
create GOT entries based on the symbol, ignoring addend, the two ldr
instructions will share the same GOT entry, which is not expected:
```
ldr x1, [x1, :got_lo12:x] // converted to .data+0
ldr x1, [x1, :got_lo12:y] // converted to .data+4
.data
// .globl x, y would suppress STT_SECTION conversion
x:
.zero 4
y:
.long 42
```
This patch changes AArch64 to suppress local symbol to STT_SECTION
conversion for GOT relocations, matching most other targets. x and y
will use different GOT entries, which IMO is the most sensable behavior.
With this change, the ABI decision on https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/issues/217
will only affect relocations explicitly referencing STT_SECTION symbols, e.g.
```
ldr x1, [x1, :got_lo12:(.data+0)]
ldr x1, [x1, :got_lo12:(.data+4)]
// I consider this unreasonable uses
```
IMO all reasonable use cases are unaffected.
Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63418
GNU assembler PR: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30788
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158577
Change lowering store iff the data operand is leagalized. In this way,
llvm can lower only operands first, then lower store instruction later.
Reviewed By: efocht
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158253
ParseStatus is slightly more convenient to use due to implicit
conversion from bool, which allows to do something like:
```
return Error(L, "msg");
```
when with MatchOperandResultTy it had to be:
```
Error(L, "msg");
return MatchOperand_ParseFail;
```
It also has more appropriate name since parse* methods are not only for
parsing operands.
Reviewed By: kaz7
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154317
Conventionally, parsing methods return false on success and true on
error. However, directive parsing methods need a third state: the
directive is not target specific. AsmParser::parseStatement detected
this case by using a fragile heuristic: if the target parser did not
consume any tokens, the directive is assumed to be not target-specific.
Some targets fail to follow the convention: they return success after
emitting an error or do not consume the entire line and return failure
on successful parsing. This was partially worked around by checking for
pending errors in parseStatement.
This patch tries to improve the situation by introducing parseDirective
method that returns ParseStatus -- three-state class. The new method
should eventually replace the old one returning bool.
ParseStatus is intentionally implicitly constructible from bool to allow
uses like `return Error(Loc, "message")`. It also has a potential to
replace OperandMatchResulTy as it is more convenient to use due to the
implicit construction from bool and more type safe.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154101
The term "next stack offset" is misleading because the next argument is
not necessarily allocated at this offset due to alignment constrains.
It also does not make much sense when allocating arguments at negative
offsets (introduced in a follow-up patch), because the returned offset
would be past the end of the next argument.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149566
