The patch in D136100 added custom handling for pragmas to assist in
formatting OpenMP clauses correctly. One of these changes added extra
indentation. This is desirable for OpenMP pragmas as they are several
complete tokens that would otherwise we on the exact same line. However,
this is not desired for the other pragmas.
This solution is extremely hacky, I'm not overly familiar with the
`clang-format` codebase. A better solution would probably require
actually parsing these as tokens, but I just wanted to propose a
solution.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59473
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144884
Add configuration to specify macros.
Macros will be expanded, and the code will be parsed and annotated
in the expanded state. In a second step, the formatting decisions
in the annotated expanded code will be reconstructed onto the
original unexpanded macro call.
Eventually, this will allow to remove special-case code for
various macro options we accumulated over the years in favor of
one principled mechanism.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144170
For example, use 'Next' instead of 'Next != nullptr',
and '!Next' instead of 'Next == nullptr'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144355
This reverts commit 879bfe6a979295f834b76df66b19a203b93eed0f.
owenpan@ pointed out on https://reviews.llvm.org/D140956 that this
actually makes the formatting more consistent, so it's not a regression.
This patch properly recognizes the generic selection expression
introduced in C11, by adding an additional token type for the colons
present in such expressions.
Previously, they would be recognized as
"inline ASM colons" purely by the fact that those are the last thing
checked for.
I tried to avoid adding an addition token type, but since colons by
default like having spaces around them, I chose to add a new type so
that no space is added after the type selector.
Currently, no aspect of the formatting of these expressions in able to
be configured, as I'm not sure what could even be configured here.
One notable thing is that association list is always formatted as
either entirely on one line, if it can fit, or with line breaks
after every comma in the expression (also after the controlling expr.)
This visually makes them more similar to switch statements when long,
matching the behaviour of the selection expression, being that of a sort
of switch on types, but also allows for terseness when only selecting
for a few things.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/18080
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan, MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139211
This reverts commit a28f0747c2f3728bd8a6f64f7c8ba80b4e0cda9f.
It appears that this regresses some function definitions, added an
example as a comment over at https://reviews.llvm.org/D140956.
The BracketAlignmentStyle BAS_BlockIndent was forcing breaks before a
closing right parenthesis yielding strange-looking results in case of
code structures that have a left parens immediately following a right
parens ")(" such as is seen with indirect function calls via function
pointers and with type casting.
Fixes 57250.
Fixes 58496.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137762
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
If true, colons in ASM parameters will be placed after line breaks.
true:
asm volatile("string",
:
: val);
false:
asm volatile("string", : : val);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91950
Without the patch UnwrappedLineFormatter::analyzeSolutionSpace just ran
out of possible formattings and would put everything just on one line.
The problem was that the the line break was forbidden, but putting the
conditional colon on the same line is also forbidden.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135918
Adds an option whether requires clause body should be aligned with
the `requires` keyword.
This option is now the default, both without configuration and in LLVM
style.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56283
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129443
Co-authored-by: Emilia Dreamer <emilia@rymiel.space>
Currently, we parse lines inside of a compiler `#pragma` the same way we
parse any other line. This is fine for some cases, like separating
expressions and adding proper spacing, but in others it causes some poor
results from miscategorizing some tokens.
For example, the OpenMP offloading uses certain clauses that contain
special characters like `map(tofrom : A[0:N])`. This will be formatted
poorly as it will be split between lines on the first colon.
Additionally the subscript notation will lead to poor spacing. This can
be seen in the OpenMP tests as the automatic clang formatting with
inevitably ruin the formatting.
For example, the following contrived example will be formatted poorly.
```
#pragma omp target teams distribute collapse(2) map(to: A[0 : M * K]) \
map(to: B[0:K * N]) map(tofrom:C[0:M*N]) firstprivate(Alpha) \
firstprivate(Beta) firstprivate(X) firstprivate(D) firstprivate(Y) \
firstprivate(E) firstprivate(Z) firstprivate(F)
```
This results in this when formatted, which is far from ideal.
```
#pragma omp target teams distribute collapse(2) map(to \
: A [0:M * K]) \
map(to \
: B [0:K * N]) map(tofrom \
: C [0:M * N]) firstprivate(Alpha) \
firstprivate(Beta) firstprivate(X) firstprivate(D) firstprivate(Y) \
firstprivate(E) firstprivate(Z) firstprivate(F)
```
This patch seeks to improve this by adding extra logic where the parsing goes
awry. This is primarily caused by the colon being parsed as an inline-asm
directive and the brackes an objective-C expressions. Also the line gets
indented every single time the line is dropped.
This doesn't implement true parsing handling for OpenMP statements.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136100
These statements are like switch statements in C, but without the 'case'
keyword in labels.
How labels are parsed. In UnwrappedLineParser, the program tries to
parse a statement every time it sees a colon. In TokenAnnotator, a
colon that isn't part of an expression is annotated as a label.
The token type `TT_GotoLabelColon` is added. We did not include Verilog
in the name because we thought we would eventually have to fix the
problem that case labels in C can't contain ternary conditional
expressions and we would use that token type.
The style is like below. Labels are on separate lines and indented by
default. The linked style guide also has examples where labels and the
corresponding statements are on the same lines. They are not supported
for now.
https://github.com/lowRISC/style-guides/blob/master/VerilogCodingStyle.md
```
case (state_q)
StIdle:
state_d = StA;
StA: begin
state_d = StB;
end
endcase
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128714
Break after a constructor initializer colon only if it's not followed by a
comment on the same line.
Fixes#41128.
Fixes#43246.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129057
Setting a boolean within an if and only using it in the very next if is
a bit confusing. Merge it into one if.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120237
We can return as early as possible and only calculate IsComparison if we
really need to. Also cache getPrecedence() instead of querying it at
most 4 times.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119923
This style is similar to AlwaysBreak, but places closing brackets on new lines.
For example, if you have a multiline parameter list, clang-format currently only supports breaking per-parameter, but places the closing bracket on the line of the last parameter.
Function(
param1,
param2,
param3);
A style supported by other code styling tools (e.g. rustfmt) is to allow the closing brackets to be placed on their own line, aiding the user in being able to quickly infer the bounds of the block of code.
Function(
param1,
param2,
param3
);
For prior work on a similar feature, see: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33029.
Note: This currently only supports block indentation for closing parentheses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109557
Make sure we do not try to change line comments that are non-regular, i.e. do
not start with "//" or "#". This can for example happen when "//" is
broken into two lines with an escaped newline.
1. IndexTokenSource::getNextToken cannot return nullptr; some code was
still written assuming it can; make getNextToken more resilient against
incorrect input and fix its call-sites.
2. Change various asserts that can happen due to user provided input to
conditionals in the code.
Add a new option PackConstructorInitializers and deprecate the
related options ConstructorInitializerAllOnOneLineOrOnePerLine and
AllowAllConstructorInitializersOnNextLine. Below is the mapping:
PackConstructorInitializers ConstructorInitializer... AllowAll...
Never - -
BinPack false -
CurrentLine true false
NextLine true true
The option value Never fixes PR50549 by always placing each
constructor initializer on its own line.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108752
