My change of D14093 is only fixed problem for "pragma target data".
The problem still here for "pragma target"
what I am missing is:
When processing "pragma target data", the VD is passed when call to
emitCombinedEntry, so check VD is null as map for this pointer.
But when processing "pragma target" the VD is passed as nullptr, so
check VD is null is not working.
To fix this I add a new parameter IsMapThis. During the call to
emitCombinedEntry passes true if it is capturing this pointer and use
that instead check of "!VD".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146000
This fix runtime problem due to generate this[:1] map info for non member
variable.
To fix this check VD, if VD is not null, it is not member from current
or base classes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144616
We already created a versioned `__tgt_kernel_arguments` struct but it
was only briefly used and its content was passed in isolation anyway.
This makes it hard to add more information in the future. With this
patch we fully embrace the struct as means to pass information from the
compiler to the plugin as part of a kernel launch.
The patch also extends and renames the struct, bumping the version
number to 2. Version 1 entries are auto-upgraded. This is in preparation
for "bare" kernel launches, per kernel dynamic shared memory, CUDA/HIP
lowering, etc.
The `__tgt_target_kernel_nowait` interface was deprecated as it was
unused. Once we actually implement support for something like that, we
can add an appropriate API.
Note: Only plugins with the `launch_kernel` interface are now supported.
That means that a new clang won't be able to use an old runtime.
An old clang can still use the new runtime since the libomptarget
interface did not change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141232
The problem is happened when base class member field is used in target
region , the size is wrong, cause runtime to fail. Currently the size of
calculation is depended on index of field, since field is in base class,
the calculation is wrong.
According OpenMP 5.2 148:21:
If the target construct is within a class non-static member function,
and a variable is an accessible data member of the object for which the
non-static data member function is invoked, the variable is treated as
if the this[:1] expression had appeared in a map clause with a map-type
of tofrom.
One way to fix this is emitting code to generate this[:1] instead only
when class has any base class.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141350
