Cost modeling for GEPs should actually be target dependent but is currently
done inside SLP target-independent way.
Sinking it into TTI enables target dependent implementation.
This patch adds new TTI interface and implementation of the basic functionality
trying to retain existing cost modeling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144770
After merging main part of the gather/buildvector code, CreateShuffle
lambda can removed and ShuffleBuilder add functions can be used instead.
Also, part of the code from CreateShuffle migrated to createShuffle of
the BaseShuffleAnalysis::createShuffle function for better code emission.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145988
operation for combined entries.
The vector factor after combining of the shuffle entries is defined by
the size of the mask, not by the vector factors of the original
entries. So, need to adjust it to emit correct code.
Replace references to `enumerate` results with either const lvalue
rerences or structured bindings. I did not use structured bindings
everywhere as it wasn't clear to me it would improve readability.
This is in preparation to the switch to `zip` semantics which won't
support non-const lvalue reference to elements:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D144503.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145987
The TripCount liveins would currently be printed as badref in the vplan as they
are not allocated slots in the VPSlotTracker. This patch allocates them a slot
and adds them to the printed Live-Ins. It also makes a minor adjustment to
printing of Live-ins to reduce the empty lines when multiple Live-ins are
present.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145507
These idioms already appear a number of places in code, and upcoming changes to the various sanitizers continue to need more instances of the same patterns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145945
Required for future changes with combining shuffled nodes and
buildvector sequences to improve cost/emission of the gather nodes.
Part of D110978
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145732
DFAJumpThreading
JumpThreading
LibCallsShrink
LoopVectorize
SLPVectorizer
DeadStoreElimination
AggressiveDCE
CorrelatedValuePropagation
IndVarSimplify
These are part of the optimization pipeline, of which the legacy version is deprecated and being removed.
Previously only the very first gather/buildvector node might be probed for reshuffling of other nodes.
But the compiler may do the same for other gather/buildvector nodes too, just need to check the
dependency and postpone the emission of the dependent nodes, if the origin nodes were not emitted yet.
Part of D110978
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144958
There is no need to store information about invariance in the recipe.
Replace the fields with checks of the operands using
isDefinedOutsideVectorRegions.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144489
This caused verifier errors:
Instruction does not dominate all uses!
%8 = insertelement <2 x i64> %7, i64 %pgocount1330, i64 1
%15 = shufflevector <2 x i64> %8, <2 x i64> poison, <2 x i32> <i32 1, i32 1>
in function ?NearestInclusiveAncestorAssignedToSlot@SlotScopedTraversal@blink@@SAPAVElement@2@ABV32@@Z
(or register allocator crash when the verifier was disabled).
See comment on the code review.
> Previously only the very first gather/buildvector node might be probed for reshuffling of other nodes.
> But the compiler may do the same for other gather/buildvector nodes too, just need to check the
> dependency and postpone the emission of the dependent nodes, if the origin nodes were not emitted yet.
>
> Part of D110978
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144958
This reverts commit a611b3f3059e4c3b9e7b914091c3edaef099fd5d.
It also reverts 7a4061ae372b3262703ffeea3b64db89187db611 which depended on the above.
There is no need to store information about invariance in the recipe.
Replace the fields with checks of the operands using
isDefinedOutsideVectorRegions.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144487
This patch adds the predicate as additional operand to VPReplicateRecipe
during initial construction. The predicated recipes are later moved into
replicate regions. This simplifies constructions and some VPlan
transformations, like fixed-order recurrence handling.
It also improves codegen in some cases (e.g. for in-loop reductions),
because the recipes remain in the same block.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143865
Check if replicate recipe is in a replicate region when considering to
collect predicated instructions. This allows use IsPredicated for
recipes with a mask attached directly in D143865.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145322
Previously only the very first gather/buildvector node might be probed for reshuffling of other nodes.
But the compiler may do the same for other gather/buildvector nodes too, just need to check the
dependency and postpone the emission of the dependent nodes, if the origin nodes were not emitted yet.
Part of D110978
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144958
AArch64/reg-usage.ll has an issue with the output ordering due to use of unordered container. This was discovered by -DLLVM_REVERSE_ITERATION:BOOL=ON
cmake option.
This patch tries to address it by making use of ordered container.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145472/
IRBuilder in many cases is able to fold constant code automatically,
but in some cases (for some intrinsics) it cannot do it. Need to perform
manual calculation, if constant provided in these corner cases, to avoid
infinite loop.
This patch adds support for scalarizing calls to a function when
there is a vector variant that cannot be used, either because there
isn't a masked variant or because the cost model indicated a VF
without a masked variant was better.
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134422
Legacy passes are only supported for codegen, and I don't believe
it's possible to write backends using the C API, so we should drop
all of those. Reduces the number of places that need to be modified
when removing legacy passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144970
This work follows on from D142109 and addresses a possible regression
when we know the loop iteration counter cannot overflow.
When we know the overflow-check always evaluates to false, it's better to
use the other style of tail folding where it assumes a runtime check was
added, because that avoids having to calculate a modified trip-count.
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142894
When using tail-folding and using the predicate for both data and control-flow
(the next vector iteration's predicate is generated with the llvm.active.lane.mask
intrinsic and then tested for the backedge), the LoopVectorizer still inserts a
runtime check to see if the 'i + VF' may at any point overflow for the given
trip-count. When it does, it falls back to a scalar epilogue loop.
We can get rid of that runtime check in the pre-header and therefore also
remove the scalar epilogue loop. This reduces code-size and avoids a runtime
check.
Consider the following loop:
void foo(char * __restrict__ dst, char *src, unsigned long N) {
for (unsigned long i=0; i<N; ++i)
dst[i] = src[i] + 42;
}
If 'N' is e.g. ULONG_MAX, and the VF > 1, then the loop iteration counter
will overflow when calculating the predicate for the next vector iteration
at some point, because LLVM does:
vector.ph:
%active.lane.mask.entry = tail call <vscale x 16 x i1> @llvm.get.active.lane.mask.nxv16i1.i64(i64 0, i64 %N)
vector.body:
%index = phi i64 [ 0, %vector.ph ], [ %index.next, %vector.body ]
%active.lane.mask = phi <vscale x 16 x i1> [ %active.lane.mask.entry, %vector.ph ], [ %active.lane.mask.next, %vector.body ]
...
%index.next = add i64 %index, 16
; The add above may overflow, which would affect the lane mask and control flow. Hence a runtime check is needed.
%active.lane.mask.next = tail call <vscale x 16 x i1> @llvm.get.active.lane.mask.nxv16i1.i64(i64 %index.next, i64 %N)
%8 = extractelement <vscale x 16 x i1> %active.lane.mask.next, i64 0
br i1 %8, label %vector.body, label %for.cond.cleanup, !llvm.loop !7
The solution:
What we can do instead is calculate the predicate before incrementing
the loop iteration counter, such that the llvm.active.lane.mask is
calculated from 'i' to 'tripcount > VF ? tripcount - VF : 0', i.e.
vector.ph:
%active.lane.mask.entry = tail call <vscale x 16 x i1> @llvm.get.active.lane.mask.nxv16i1.i64(i64 0, i64 %N)
%N_minus_VF = select %N > 16 ? %N - 16 : 0
vector.body:
%index = phi i64 [ 0, %vector.ph ], [ %index.next, %vector.body ]
%active.lane.mask = phi <vscale x 16 x i1> [ %active.lane.mask.entry, %vector.ph ], [ %active.lane.mask.next, %vector.body ]
...
%active.lane.mask.next = tail call <vscale x 16 x i1> @llvm.get.active.lane.mask.nxv16i1.i64(i64 %index, i64 %N_minus_VF)
%index.next = add i64 %index, %4
; The add above may still overflow, but this time the active.lane.mask is not affected
%8 = extractelement <vscale x 16 x i1> %active.lane.mask.next, i64 0
br i1 %8, label %vector.body, label %for.cond.cleanup, !llvm.loop !7
For N = 20, we'd then get:
vector.ph:
%active.lane.mask.entry = tail call <vscale x 16 x i1> @llvm.get.active.lane.mask.nxv16i1.i64(i64 0, i64 %N)
; %active.lane.mask.entry = <1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1>
%N_minus_VF = select 20 > 16 ? 20 - 16 : 0
; %N_minus_VF = 4
vector.body: (1st iteration)
... ; using <1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1> as predicate in the loop
...
%active.lane.mask.next = tail call <vscale x 16 x i1> @llvm.get.active.lane.mask.nxv16i1.i64(i64 0, i64 4)
; %active.lane.mask.next = <1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0>
%index.next = add i64 0, 16
; %index.next = 16
%8 = extractelement <vscale x 16 x i1> %active.lane.mask.next, i64 0
; %8 = 1
br i1 %8, label %vector.body, label %for.cond.cleanup, !llvm.loop !7
; branch to %vector.body
vector.body: (2nd iteration)
... ; using <1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0> as predicate in the loop
...
%active.lane.mask.next = tail call <vscale x 16 x i1> @llvm.get.active.lane.mask.nxv16i1.i64(i64 16, i64 4)
; %active.lane.mask.next = <0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0>
%index.next = add i64 16, 16
; %index.next = 32
%8 = extractelement <vscale x 16 x i1> %active.lane.mask.next, i64 0
; %8 = 0
br i1 %8, label %vector.body, label %for.cond.cleanup, !llvm.loop !7
; branch to %for.cond.cleanup
Reviewed By: fhahn, david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142109
When gathering the counter for the reused scalars, need to use reduced
value, not the original reduced value. Same values counter is gathered
for reduced values, not original ones.
BlockFrequencyInfo should generally only be fetched in PGO builds
where a PSI profile summary is available. However, LoopVectorize
was fetching it unconditionally.
This results in a small compile-time improvement for non-PGO builds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144953
Previously, while calculating register usage due to invariants, it was assumed that invariant would always be part of widening
instructions. This resulted in calculating vector register types for vectors which cant be legalized(check the newly added test for more details).
An invariant might not always need a vector register. For e.g., invariant might just be used for iteration check.
This patch checks if the invariant is part of any widening instruction and considers register usage accordingly. Fixes issue 60493
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143422
Previously, while calculating register usage due to invariants, it was assumed that invariant would always be part of widening
instructions. This resulted in calculating vector register types for vectors which cant be legalized(check the newly added test for more details).
An invariant might not always need a vector register. For e.g., invariant might just be used for iteration check.
This patch checks if the invariant is part of any widening instruction and considers register usage accordingly. Fixes issue 60493
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143422
of scalars."' failed.
Need to check for the reused indices when checking if 2 insertelement
instruction are from the same buildvector. If the inidices are reused,
better not to match buildvectors and consider them as differenet,
otherwise need to track the order of insertelement operations.
If have just one non-undef scalar in the buildvector/gather node, we try
to put it to be the very first element, which is profitable in most
cases. Do the preliminary estimation, if this more profitable during
graph rotation and do same for all elements, including extractelements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144689
To query the maximum value for vscale, the LV queries the vscale_range
attribute or a TTI hook. To avoid having to reimplement the same behaviour
for multiple uses (such as in D142894), it makes sense to move this code
to a separate function.
The target hook prefersVectorizedAddressing() already exists to check with
target if address computations should be vectorized, so it seems like this
should be used in SLPVectorizer as well.
Reviewed By: ABataev, RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144128
Enabling assignment tracking without this patch, a significant amount of
additional compiler run time comes from the RemoveRedundantDbgInstrs call in
InstCombine. This patch reduces compiler run time by choosing better places to
call RemoveRedundantDbgInstrs.
In non-assignment-tracking builds, RemoveRedundantDbgInstrs is called by
InstCombine if LowerDbgDeclare makes a change (i.e. it is _sometimes_
called). In assignment tracking builds LowerDbgDeclare doesn't do anything. We
still need to clean up redundant intrinsics to avoid a large performance hit
due to the number of instructions, so the current approach is to have
InstCombine _always_ call RemoveRedundantDbgInstrs.
Instrumenting the compiler to run RemoveRedundantDbgInstrs after every pass and
dump the numbers and building CTMark/tramp3d-v4 indicates that SROA and
LoopVectorize give us a bigger bang (number removed) for buck (times pass is
run).
The compile time tracker reports that this patch reduces the number of
instructions retired building CTMark projects by an average of 1.1%.
Reviewed By: scott.linder
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144483
In order to allow targets to disable interleaving for scalable vectors, pass the entire VF's ElementCount to getMaxInterleaveFactor.
This is based off of the approach used here: 8d36708507
The plan would then be to disable interleaving on scalable VFs on RISC-V in a follow up patch.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D143723#4132349
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144474
No need to swap extractelements, which were not excluded from the list
during cost analysis. It leads to incorrect cost calculation and make
vector code more profitable than it is actually is.
If the scalar must be extracted and then used in the gather node,
instead we can emit shuffle instruction to avoid those extra
extractelements and vector-to-scalar and back data movement.
Part of D110978
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141940
Suggested by @Ayal as follow-up improvement in D143864.
I was unable to find a case where this actually changes generated code,
but it is a unifying code to use common infrastructure.
There is no need to update the AlsoPack field when creating
VPReplicateRecipes. It can be easily computed based on the VP def-use
chains when it is needed.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143864
