This component acts as an action handler that can be registered in the
MLIRContext. It is the main orchestration of the infrastructure, and implements
support for clients to hook there and snoop on or control the execution.
This is the basis to build tracing as well as a "gdb-like" control of the
compilation flow.
The ExecutionContext acts as a handler in the MLIRContext for executing an
Action. When an action is dispatched, it'll query its set of Breakpoints
managers for a breakpoint matching this action. If a breakpoint is hit, it
passes the action and the breakpoint information to a callback. The callback
is responsible for controlling the execution of the action through an enum
value it returns. Optionally, observers can be registered to be notified
before and after the callback is executed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144812
The concept of the ActionManager acts as a sort of "Hub" that can receive
various types of action and dispatch them to a set of registered handlers.
One handler will handle the action or it'll cascade to other handlers.
This model does not really fit the current evolution of the Action tracing
and debugging: we can't foresee a good case where this behavior compose with
the use-case behind the handlers. Instead we simplify it with a single
callback installed on the Context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144811
This is a preparation for adding support for more infrastructure around the concept
of Action and make tracing Action more of a first class concept.
The doc will be updated later in a subsequent revision after the changes are
completed.
Action belongs to IR because of circular dependency: Actions are dispatched through
the MLIRContext but Action will learn to encapsulate IR construct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144809