Check for NoNaNsFPMath function attribute in isKnownNeverSNaN.
Function attributes are in held in 'TargetMachine.Options'.
Among other things, this allows selection of some patterns imported
in D87351 since G_FCANONICALIZE is not generated when isKnownNeverSNaN
returns true in lowerFMinNumMaxNum.
However we notice some incorrect results since function attributes are
not correctly written in TargetMachine.Options when next function is
processed. Take a look at @v_test_no_global_nnans_med3_f32_pat0_srcmod0,
it has "no-nans-fp-math"="false" but TargetMachine.Options still has it
set to true since first function in test file had this attribute set to
true. This will be fixed in D87511.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87456
The "name" of a non-leaf complex pattern (MY_PAT $op1, $op2) is
"MY_PAT:op1:op2" and the ones with same "name" represent same operand.
Add 'same operand check' for this case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87351
GlobalIsel emitter does not import patterns where complex sub-operand
of a non-leaf complex pattern is referenced more then once. Multiple
references of complex patterns with same name and same sub-operands
represent the same operand. Document this with a test.
Predicates with 'let PredicateCodeUsesOperands = 1' want to examine
matched operands. When we encounter predicate code that uses operands,
analyze its named operand arguments and create a map between argument
index and name. Later, when leaf node with name is encountered, emit
GIM_RecordNamedOperand that will store that operand at its argument
index in operand list. This operand list will be an argument to c++
code of the predicate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87285
The tests have been updated and I plan to move them from the MSSA
directory up.
Some end-to-end tests needed small adjustments. One difference to the
legacy DSE is that legacy DSE also deletes trivially dead instructions
that are unrelated to memory operations. Because MemorySSA-backed DSE
just walks the MemorySSA, we only visit/check memory instructions. But
removing unrelated dead instructions is not really DSE's job and other
passes will clean up.
One noteworthy change is in llvm/test/Transforms/Coroutines/ArgAddr.ll,
but I think this comes down to legacy DSE not handling instructions that
may throw correctly in that case. To cover this with MemorySSA-backed
DSE, we need an update to llvm.coro.begin to treat it's return value to
belong to the same underlying object as the passed pointer.
There are some minor cases MemorySSA-backed DSE currently misses, e.g. related
to atomic operations, but I think those can be implemented after the switch.
This has been discussed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-August/144417.html
For the MultiSource/SPEC2000/SPEC2006 the number of eliminated stores
goes from ~17500 (legayc DSE) to ~26300 (MemorySSA-backed). More numbers
and details in the thread on llvm-dev.
Impact on CTMark:
```
Legacy Pass Manager
exec instrs size-text
O3 + 0.60% - 0.27%
ReleaseThinLTO + 1.00% - 0.42%
ReleaseLTO-g. + 0.77% - 0.33%
RelThinLTO (link only) + 0.87% - 0.42%
RelLO-g (link only) + 0.78% - 0.33%
```
http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=3f22e96d95c71ded906c67067d75278efb0a2525&to=ae8be4642533ff03803967ee9d7017c0d73b0ee0&stat=instructions
```
New Pass Manager
exec instrs. size-text
O3 + 0.95% - 0.25%
ReleaseThinLTO + 1.34% - 0.41%
ReleaseLTO-g. + 1.71% - 0.35%
RelThinLTO (link only) + 0.96% - 0.41%
RelLO-g (link only) + 2.21% - 0.35%
```
http://195.201.131.214:8000/compare.php?from=3f22e96d95c71ded906c67067d75278efb0a2525&to=ae8be4642533ff03803967ee9d7017c0d73b0ee0&stat=instructions
Reviewed By: asbirlea, xbolva00, nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87163
It was found some packed immediate operands (e.g. `<half 1.0, half 2.0>`) are
incorrectly processed so one of two packed values were lost.
Introduced new function to check immediate 32-bit operand can be folded.
Converted condition about current op_sel flags value to fall-through.
Fixes: SWDEV-247595
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87158
We weren't using this before, so none of the MachineFunction CFG edges had the
branch probability information added. As a result, block placement later in the
pipeline was flying blind.
This is enabled only with optimizations enabled like SelectionDAG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86824
This combine previously tried to take sequences like:
%cond = G_ICMP pred, a, b
G_BRCOND %cond, %truebb
G_BR %falsebb
%truebb:
...
%falsebb:
...
and by inverting the compare predicate and swapping branch targets, delete the
G_BR and instead have a single conditional branch to the falsebb. Since in an
earlier patch we have a combine to fold not(icmp) into just an inverted icmp,
we don't need this combine to do as much. This patch instead generalizes the
combine by just looking for:
G_BRCOND %cond, %truebb
G_BR %falsebb
%truebb:
...
%falsebb:
...
and then inverting the condition using a not (xor). The xor can be folded away
in a separate combine. This change also lets us avoid some optimization code
in the IRTranslator.
I also think that deleting G_BRs in the combiner is unnecessary. That's
something that targets can decide to do at selection time and could simplify
generic code in future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86664
Add subtarget feature check to avoid using ds_read/write_b96/128 with too
low alignment if a bug is present on that specific hardware.
Add this "feature" to GFX 10.1.1 as it is also affected.
Add global-isel test.
optimizeEndCF removes EXEC restoring instruction case this instruction is the only one except the branch to the single successor and that successor contains EXEC mask restoring instruction that was lowered from END_CF belonging to IF_ELSE.
As a result of such optimization we get the basic block with the only one instruction that is a branch to the single successor.
In case the control flow can reach such an empty block from S_CBRANCH_EXEZ/EXECNZ it might happen that spill/reload instructions that were inserted later by register allocator are placed under exec == 0 condition and never execute.
Removing empty block solves the problem.
This change require further work to re-implement LIS updates. Recently, LIS is always nullptr in this pass. To enable it we need another patch to fix many places across the codegen.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86634
During the PEI pass, the dead TargetStackID::SGPRSpill spill slots
are not being removed while spilling the FP/BP to memory.
Fixes: SWDEV-250393
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87032
This is a followup to 1ccfb52a61748, which made a number of changes
including the apparently innocuous reordering of required passes in
MemCpyOptimizer. This however altered the creation order of BasicAA vs
Phi Values analysis, meaning BasicAA did not pick up PhiValues as a
cached result. Instead if we require MemoryDependence first it will
require PhiValuesAnalysis allowing BasicAA to use it for better results.
I don't claim this is an excellent design, but it fixes a nasty little
regressions where a query later in JumpThreading was getting worse
results.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87027
The addend in a REL32 reloc needs to be adjusted to account for the
offset from the PC value returned by the s_getpc instruction to the
point where the reloc is applied. This was being done correctly for
(GOTPC)REL32_LO but not for (GOTPC)REL32_HI. This will only make a
difference if the target symbol happens to get loaded almost exactly
a multiple of 4G away from the relocated instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86938
Summary:
Analyses are preserved in MemCpyOptimizer.
Get analyses before running the pass and store the pointers, instead of
using lambdas and getting them every time on demand.
Reviewers: lenary, deadalnix, mehdi_amini, nikic, efriedma
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74494
This is needed for an upcoming change to how we translate conditional branches
which might generate these.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86383
Unmerges have the same fundamental problem as G_TRUNC, and G_TRUNC
could be implemented in terms of G_UNMERGE_VALUES. Reducing the number
of elements in unmerge results ends up producing the original unmerge
type profile, so the artifact combiner needs to eliminate the
intermediate illegal registers. This avoids infinite looping in the
legalizer in a future change.
Assuming an unmerge has each result unmerged the same way, this ends
up producing a new unmerge of the source for every definition. I'm not
sure if the artifact combiner should either insert temporary merges
here and erase the original merge, or if the combiner should look at
uses from defs rather than defs from uses for unmerges.
In a few cases this regresses from using 16-bit shifts for 8-bit
values to using 32-bit shifts, but I think these can be legalized
later (the other legalization rules don't try very hard to use 16-bit
shifts either).
Currently the dbg_value ends up in the relaxed branch block. A future
commit will push the dbg_value out of this block, and I'm not sure how
to coax the IR into producing the same MIR at the relevant point.
For an instruction in the basic block BB, SinkingPass enumerates basic blocks
dominated by BB and BB's successors. For each enumerated basic block,
SinkingPass uses `AllUsesDominatedByBlock` to check whether the basic
block dominates all of the instruction's users. This is inefficient.
Use the nearest common dominator of all users to avoid enumerating the
candidate. The nearest common dominator may be in a parent loop which is
not beneficial. In that case, find the ancestors in the dominator tree.
In the case that the instruction has no user, with this change we will
not perform unnecessary move. This causes some amdgpu test changes.
A stage-2 x86-64 clang is a byte identical with this change.
The implicit def of the super register would appear to kill any live
uses of components before the spill, and would be deleted by
MachineCopyPropagation. We need to add implicit uses of the super
register, similarly to what copyPhysReg does. VGPR tuples appear to be
correctly handled already. I need to double check the SGPR->memory
path.
The global-isel feature has been required for a long time and was
removed in c9455d3c579292e7ae5b7559ad0302d459e69a95, so this was
causing all tests to be skipped.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D83833
Patch adds two new GICombinerRules for G_SELECT. The rules include:
combining selects with undef comparisons into their first selectee value,
and to combine away selects with constant comparisons. Patch additionally
adds a new combiner test for the AArch64 target to test these new G_SELECT
combiner rules and the existing select_same_val combiner rule.
Patch by mkitzan
This is the first of a set of DAGCombiner changes enabling strictfp
optimizations. I want to test to waters with this to make sure changes
like these are acceptable for the strictfp case- this particular change
should preserve exception ordering and result precision perfectly, and
many other possible changes appear to be able to as well.
Copied from regular fadd combines but modified to preserve ordering via
the chain, this change allows strict_fadd x, (fneg y) to become
struct_fsub x, y and strict_fadd (fneg x), y to become strict_fsub y, x.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85548
There is no justification for changing vcc_lo to vcc
when shrinking V_CNDMASK, and such a change could
later confuse live variable analysis.
Make sure the original register is preserved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86541
This would assert with unaligned DS access enabled. The offset may not
be aligned. Theoretically the pattern predicate should check the
memory alignment, although it is possible to have the memory be
aligned but not the immediate offset.
In this case I would expect it to use ds_{read|write}_b64 with
unaligned access, but am not clear if there's a reason it doesn't.
If the condition output is negated, swap the branch targets. This is
similar to what SelectionDAG does for when SelectionDAGBuilder
decides to invert the condition and swap the branches.
This is leaving behind a dead constant def for some reason.
This produces less work for addressing mode matching. I think this is
safe since I don't think machine IR is supposed to give the same
aliasing properties as getelementptr in the IR.
If a workgroup size is known to be not greater than wavefront size
the s_barrier instruction is not needed since all threads are guaranteed
to come to the same point at the same time.
This is the same optimization that was implemented for SelectionDAG in
D31731.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86609
