This was originally introduced to support kalimba DSPs featuring 24-bit
bytes by f03e6d84 and also c928de3e, but the kalimba support was mostly
removed by f8819bd5. This change removes the rest of the support, which
was far from complete.
This pr fixes#167388 .
## Description
This pr adds new method `GetArchName` to `SBTarget` so that no need to
parse triple to get arch name in client code.
## Testing
### All from `TestTargetAPI.py`
run test with
```
./build/bin/lldb-dotest -v -p TestTargetAPI.py
```
<details>
<summary>existing tests (without newly added)</summary>
<img width="1425" height="804" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/617e4c69-5c6b-44c4-9aeb-b751a47e253c"
/>
</details>
<details>
<summary>existing tests (with newly added)</summary>
<img width="1422" height="778" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/746990a1-df88-4348-a090-224963d3c640"
/>
</details>
### Only `test_get_arch_name`
run test with
```
./build/bin/lldb-dotest -v -p TestTargetAPI.py -f test_get_arch_name_dwarf -f test_get_arch_name_dwo -f test_get_arch_name_dsym lldb/test/API/python_api/target
```
<details>
<summary>only newly added</summary>
<img width="1422" height="778" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fcaafa5d-2622-4171-acee-e104ecee0652"
/>
</details>
---------
Signed-off-by: Nikita B <n2h9z4@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Devlieghere <jonas@devlieghere.com>
The architectures provided to skipIf / expectedFail are regular
expressions (v. _match_decorator_property() in decorators.py
so on Darwin systems "arm64" would match the skips for "arm" (32-bit
Linux). Update these to "arm$" to prevent this, and also update
three tests (TestBuiltinFormats.py, TestCrossDSOTailCalls.py,
TestCrossObjectTailCalls.py) that were skipped for arm64 via this
behavior, and need to be skipped or they will fail.
This was moviated by the new TestDynamicValue.py test which has
an expected-fail for arm, but the test was passing on arm64 Darwin
resulting in failure for the CIs.
Original in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134626 was
written as if it was "this or this" but it's "this and this".
So the test ran on AArch64 Linux, because Linux is not Windows.
Split out the Windows check to fix that.
When you call the `SBTarget::ReadInstructions` with flavor from lldb
crashes. This is because the wrong order of the `DisassemblyBytes`
constructor this fixes that
---------
Signed-off-by: Ebuka Ezike <yerimyah1@gmail.com>
Expose u target API mutex through the SB API. This is motivated by
lldb-dap, which is built on top of the SB API and needs a way to execute
a series of SB API calls in an atomic manner (see #131242).
We can solve this problem by either introducing an additional layer of
locking at the DAP level or by exposing the existing locking at the SB
API level. This patch implements the second approach.
This was discussed in an RFC on Discourse [0]. The original
implementation exposed a move-only lock rather than a mutex [1] which
doesn't work well with SWIG 4.0 [2]. This implement the alternative
solution of exposing the mutex rather than the lock. The SBMutex
conforms to the BasicLockable requirement [3] (which is why the methods
are called `lock` and `unlock` rather than Lock and Unlock) so it can be
used as `std::lock_guard<lldb::SBMutex>` and
`std::unique_lock<lldb::SBMutex>`.
[0]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-exposing-the-target-api-lock-through-the-sb-api/85215/6
[1]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131404
[2]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-bumping-the-minimum-swig-version-to-4-1-0/85377/9
[3]: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/named_req/BasicLockable
The function should use the by-ref SBError argument instead of creating
a new one. This code has been here since ~forever, and was probably
copied from methods which return an SBError result (where one needs to
create a local variable).
This uses [teyit](https://pypi.org/project/teyit/) to modernize asserts,
as recommended by the [unittest release
notes](https://docs.python.org/3.12/whatsnew/3.12.html#id3).
For example, `assertTrue(a == b)` is replaced with `assertEqual(a, b)`.
This produces better error messages, e.g. `error: unexpectedly found 1
and 2 to be different` instead of `error: False`.
A user found a crash when they would do code like:
```
(lldb) script
>>> target = lldb.SBTarget()
>>> lldb.debugger.SetSelectedTarget(target)
```
We were not checking if the target was valid in and it caused a crash..
All Python files in the LLVM repository were reformatted with Black [1].
Files inside the LLDB subproject were reformatted in 2238dcc39358. This
patch updates a handful of tests that were added or modified since then
and weren't formatted with Black.
[1] https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style/68257
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
This patch add or removes XFAIL decorator from various tests which were marked
xfail for windows.
since 44363f2 various tests have started passing but introduced a couple of new failures.
Weight is in favor of new XPasses and I have removed XFail decorator from them. Also
some new tests have started failing for which we need to file separate bugs. I have
marked them xfail for now and will add the bug id after investigating the issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149235
`GetPropertyAtIndexAsArgs` returns true on success and false on failure. Right
now it returns the converted `size_t` returned from `GetArgs` which describes
the number of arguments in the argument list. So for empty argument lists
(`(size_t)0` -> `(bool)false`) this function always fails.
The only observable effect of this seems to be that empty arguments are never
propagated to the internal LaunchInfo for a process. This causes that once any
argument has been added to `target.run-args`, clearing `target.run-args` doesn't
have any effect.
Fixes issue #55568
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, jingham
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126057
Fixes broken support for: `target.module[re.compile("libFoo")]`
There were two issues:
1. The type check was expecting `re.SRE_Pattern`
2. The expression to search the module path had a typo
In the first case, `re.SRE_Pattern` does not exist in Python 3, and is replaced
with `re.Pattern`.
While editing this code, I changed the type checks to us `isinstance`, which is
the conventional way of type checking.
From the docs on `type()`:
> The `isinstance()` built-in function is recommended for testing the type of an object, because it takes subclasses into account.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133130
Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077
They don't require that the memory return address be restored prior to
function exit, so there's no guarantee the value is correct. It's better
to return nothing that something that's not accurate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121348
Replace forms of `assertTrue(err.Success())` with `assertSuccess(err)` (added in D82759).
* `assertSuccess` prints out the error's message
* `assertSuccess` expresses explicit higher level semantics, both to the reader and for test failure output
* `assertSuccess` seems not to be well known, using it where possible will help spread knowledge
* `assertSuccess` statements are more succinct
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119616
There is a .categories file in the python_api directory that makes all nested tests
belong to the category "pyapi". The decorator is unnecessary for these tests.
Convert `assertTrue(a == b)` to `assertEqual(a, b)` to produce better failure messages.
These were mostly done via regex search & replace, with some manual fixes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95813
This patch skips the test for the SBTarget::IsLoaded method on windows
since the logic is different.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95686
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
This patch adds an `SBTarget::IsLoaded(const SBModule&) const` endpoint
to lldb's Scripting Bridge API. As the name suggests, it will allow the
user to know if the module is loaded in a specific target.
rdar://37957625
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95686
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Second try, handling both a bogus arch string and the "null file & arch" used
to create an empty but valid target.
Also check in that case before logging (previously the logging would have
crashed.)
Also revert "Follow on to: f05dc40c31d1883b46b8bb60547087db2f4c03e3"
After these changes, multiple lldb tests are failing. Calls to
CreateTargetWithFileAndArch(None, None) appear to fail after these
changes.
This reverts commit f05dc40c31d1883b46b8bb60547087db2f4c03e3 and
1fba21778f84f266f7d32153c88e59e1900fbe5b.
Those two decorators have identical behaviour. This removes
`not_remote_testsuite_ready` as `skipIfRemote` seems more consistent with the
other decorator names we have
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89376
This test checks that the output of `SBTarget.GetDescription()` contains the
substrings `'a.out', 'Target', 'Module', 'Breakpoint'` in that order. This test
is currently failing on Apple simulators as apparently 'Module' can't be found
in the output after 'Target".
The reason for that is that the actual output of `SBTarget.GetDescription()` looks like this:
```
Target
Module /build/path/lldb-test-build.noindex/python_api/target/TestTargetAPI.test_get_description_dwarf/a.out
0x7ff2b6d3f990: ObjectFileMachO64, file = /build/path/lldb-test-build.noindex/python_api/target/TestTargetAPI.test_get_description
[...]
0x7ff307150000: BreakpointList with 0 Breakpoints:
<LLDB module output repeats for each loaded module>
```
Clearly the string order should be `'Target', 'Module', 'a.out', 'Breakpoint'`.
However, LLDB is also a bunch of system shared libraries (libxpc.dylib,
libobjc.A.dylib, etc.) when *not* running against a simulator, we end up
unintentionally finding the `'Target', 'Module', 'Breakpoint'` substrings in the
trailing descriptions of the system modules. When running against a simulator we
however don't load shared system libraries.
This patch just moves the substrings in the correct order to make this test pass
without having any shared library modules in the description output.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89698
This test is flaky on Green Dragon as it often fails when the process state
is "Invalid" in the assert:
self.assertEqual(process.GetState(), lldb.eStateExited)
It seems this is related to just doing "run" which apparently invalidates
the Target's process in case it's still running and needs to be restarted.
Just doing 'continue' on the process (and ignoring the error in case it already
finished) prevents that and makes this consistently pass for me.
Just pushing this out to get Green Dragon back online.
Recently added TestTargetAPI.py test "test_launch_simple" is failing on
Arm/AArch64 Linux targets. Putting them to skip until fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85235
Currently SBTarget::LaunchSimple creates a new LaunchInfo which means it
ignores any target properties that have been set. Instead, it should
start from the target's LaunchInfo and populated the specified fields.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85235
Many tests use (commented out) print statement for debugging the test
itself. This patch adds a new trace method to lldbtest to reuse the
existing tracing infrastructure and replace these print statements.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80448
Summary:
Around a third of our test sources have LLVM license headers. This patch removes those headers from all test
sources and also fixes any tests that depended on the length of the license header.
The reasons for this are:
* A few tests verify line numbers and will start failing if the number of lines in the LLVM license header changes. Once I landed my patch for valid SourceLocations in debug info we will probably have even more tests that verify line numbers.
* No other LLVM project is putting license headers in its test files to my knowledge.
* They make the test sources much more verbose than they have to be. Several tests have longer license headers than the actual test source.
For the record, the following tests had their line numbers changed to pass with the removal of the license header:
lldb-api :: functionalities/breakpoint/breakpoint_by_line_and_column/TestBreakpointByLineAndColumn.py
lldb-shell :: Reproducer/TestGDBRemoteRepro.test
lldb-shell :: Reproducer/TestMultipleTargets.test
lldb-shell :: Reproducer/TestReuseDirectory.test
lldb-shell :: ExecControl/StopHook/stop-hook-threads.test
lldb-shell :: ExecControl/StopHook/stop-hook.test
lldb-api :: lang/objc/exceptions/TestObjCExceptions.py
Reviewers: #lldb, espindola, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: emaste, aprantl, arphaman, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74839
