Most clients only used these methods because they wanted to be able to
extend or truncate to the same bit width (which is a no-op). Now that
the standard zext, sext and trunc allow this, there is no reason to use
the OrSelf versions.
The OrSelf versions additionally have the strange behaviour of allowing
extending to a *smaller* width, or truncating to a *larger* width, which
are also treated as no-ops. A small amount of client code relied on this
(ConstantRange::castOp and MicrosoftCXXNameMangler::mangleNumber) and
needed rewriting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125557
During early gather/scatter enablement two different approaches
were taken to represent scaled indices:
* A Scale operand whereby byte_offsets = Index * Scale
* An IndexType whereby byte_offsets = Index * sizeof(MemVT.ElementType)
Having multiple representations is bad as shown by this patch which
fixes instances where the two are out of sync. The dedicated scale
operand is more flexible and pervasive so this patch removes the
UNSCALED values from IndexType. This means all indices are scaled
but the scale can be one, hence unscaled. SDNodes now use the scale
operand to answer the "isScaledIndex" question.
I toyed with the idea of keeping the UNSCALED enums and helper
functions but because they will have no uses and force SDNodes to
validate the set of supported values I figured it's best to remove
them. We can re-add them if there's a real need. For similar
reasons I've kept the IndexType enum when a bool could be used as I
think being explicitly looks better.
Depends On D123347
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123381
This patch replaces some for-each set with the new arrayref argument API, since it already used an array in defination, I think this change won't cause any ambiguity.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125455
When building the final merged node, we were using the original chain
rather than the output chain of the new operation. After some collapsing
of the chain this could cause the loads be incorrectly scheduled respect
to later stores.
This was uncovered by SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/pr36038.c
of the llvm testsuite.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D125560
The goal is support tail and mask policy in RVV builtins.
We focus on IR part first.
If the passthru operand is undef, we use tail agnostic, otherwise
use tail undisturbed.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125323
This hook determines if SimplifySetcc transforms (X & (C l>>/<< Y))
==/!= 0 into ((X <</l>> Y) & C) ==/!= 0. Where C is a constant and
X might be a constant.
The default implementation favors doing the transform if X is not
a constant. Otherwise the code is left alone. There is a provision
that if the target supports a bit test instruction then the transform
will favor ((1 << Y) & X) ==/!= 0. RISCV does not say it has a variable
bit test operation.
RISCV with Zbs does have a BEXT instruction that performs (X >> Y) & 1.
Without Zbs, (X >> Y) & 1 still looks preferable to ((1 << Y) & X) since
we can fold use ANDI instead of putting a 1 in a register for SLL.
This patch overrides this hook to favor bit extract patterns and
otherwise falls back to the "do the transform if X is not a constant"
heuristic.
I've added tests where both C and X are constants with both the shl form
and lshr form. I've also added a test for a switch statement that lowers
to a bit test. That was my original motivation for looking at this.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124639
Type legalization will want to turn (srl X, Y) into RISCVISD::SRLW,
which will prevent us from using a BEXT instruction.
I don't think there is any precedent for type promotion checking
users to decide how to promote. Instead, I've added this DAG combine to
do it before type legalization.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124109
Rather than VP_SEXT/VP_ZEXT/VP_TRUNC, having
VP_SIGN_EXTEND/VP_ZERO_EXTEND/VP_TRUNCATE better matches their non-VP
counterparts.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125298
This patch adds rvv codegen support for vp.fpext. The lowering of fp_round, vp.fptrunc, fp_extend and vp.fpext share most code so use a common lowering function to handle these four.
And this patch changes the intermediate cast from ISD::FP_EXTEND/ISD::FP_ROUND to the RVV VL version op RISCVISD::FP_EXTEND_VL and RISCVISD::FP_ROUND_VL for scalable vectors.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123975
This improves opportunities to use bset/bclr/binv. Unfortunately,
there are no W versions of these instrcutions so this isn't always
a clear win. If we use SLLW we get free sign extend and shift masking,
but need to put a 1 in a register and can't remove an or/xor. If
we use bset/bclr/binv we remove the immediate materializationg and
logic op, but might need a mask on the shift amount and sext.w.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124096
We can't shift-right negative numbers to divide them, so avoid emitting
such sequences. Use negative numerators as a proxy for this situation, since
the indices are always non-negative.
An alternative strategy could be to add a compiler flag to emit division
instructions, which would at least allow us to test the VID sequence
matching itself.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123796
There's an existing generic combine that does this for legal types.
This patch adds a RISCV specific combine for W instructions.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123983
This patch fixes a bug when lowering BUILD_VECTOR via VID sequences.
After adding support for fractional steps in D106533, elements with zero
steps may be skipped if no step has yet been computed. This allowed
certain sequences to slip through the cracks, being identified as VID
sequences when in fact they are not.
The fix for this is to perform a second loop over the BUILD_VECTOR to
validate the entire sequence once the step has been computed. This isn't
the most efficient, but on balance the code is more readable and
maintainable than doing back-validation during the first loop.
Fixes the tests introduced in D123785.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123786
This patch adds rvv codegen support for vp.fptrunc. The lowering of fp_round and vp.fptrunc share most code so use a common lowering function to handle those two, similar to vp.trunc.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123841
Materializing constants on RISCV is simpler if the constant is sign
extended from i32. By default i32 constant operands of phis are
zero extended.
This patch adds a hook to allow RISCV to override this for i32. We
have an existing isSExtCheaperThanZExt, but it operates on EVT which
we don't have at these places in the code.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122951
This was added before Zve extensions were defined. I think users
should use Zve32x or Zve32f now. Though we will lose support for limiting
ELEN to 16 or 8, but I hope no one was using that.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123418
This patch adds the minimum required to successfully lower vp.icmp via
the new ISD::VP_SETCC node to RVV instructions.
Regular ISD::SETCC goes through a lot of canonicalization which targets
may rely on which has not hereto been ported to VP_SETCC. It also
supports expansion of individual condition codes and a non-boolean
return type. Support for all of that will follow in later patches.
In the case of RVV this largely isn't a problem as the vector integer
comparison instructions are plentiful enough that it can lower all
VP_SETCC nodes on legal integer vectors except for boolean vectors,
which regular SETCC folds away immediately into logical operations.
Floating-point VP_SETCC operations aren't as well supported in RVV and
the backend relies on condition code expansion, so support for those
operations will come in later patches.
Portions of this code were taken from the VP reference patches.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122743
We can do this conversion by converting the same sized integer type, then compare the result with 0. The conversion is undefined if the converted FP value doesn't fit in an i1.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122678
If we expand (uaddo X, 1) we previously expanded the overflow calculation
as (X + 1) <u X. This potentially increases the live range of X and
can prevent X+1 from reusing the register that previously held X.
Since we're adding 1, overflow only occurs if X was UINT_MAX in which
case (X+1) would be 0. So this patch adds a special case to expand
the overflow calculation to (X+1) == 0.
This seems to help with uaddo intrinsics that get introduced by
CodeGenPrepare after LSR. Alternatively, we could block the uaddo
transform in CodeGenPrepare for this case.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122933
The splat_vector will be legalized to build_vector eventually
anyway. This patch makes it take fewer steps.
Unfortunately, this results in some codegen changes. It looks
like it comes down to how the nodes were ordered in the topological
sort for isel. Because the build_vector is created earlier we end up
with a different ordering of nodes.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122185
This function now takes a uint64_t instead of an APInt. The caller
is responsible for masking the shift amount, extracting and inserting
into the KnownBits APInts, and inverting to compute zeros.
This is less code and cleaner division of responsibilities.
Modified DAGCombiner to pass the shift the bittest input and the shift amount
to hasBitTest. This matches the other call to hasBitTest in TargetLowering.h
This is an alternative to D122454.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122458
Don't call EltVT.getSizeInBits() or SrcEltVT.getSizeInBits() a second
time. They are already in EltSize or SrcEltSize variables.
Refactor some comparisons to use multiply instead of division.
On RV32, we need to type legalize i64 scalar arguments to intrinsics.
We usually do this by splatting the value into a vector separately.
If the scalar happens to be sign extended, we can continue using a .vx
intrinsic.
We already special cased sign extended constants, this extends it
to any sign extended value.
I've only added tests for one case of vadd. Most intrinsics go
through the same check.
Reviewed By: khchen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122186
On RV32, we need to type legalize i64 scalar arguments to intrinsics.
We usually do this by splatting the value into a vector separately.
If the scalar happens to be sign extended, we can continue using a .vx
intrinsic.
We already special cased sign extended constants, this extends it
to any sign extended value.
I've only added tests for one case of vadd. Most intrinsics go
through the same check. I can add more tests if we're concerned.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122186
RISCVISelDAGToDAG's selectImm uses RISCVTargetLowering::getAddr
(specifically the ConstantPoolSDNode) as of 41454ab25645 ("[RISCV] Use
constant pool for large integers"), but nothing explicitly instantiates
any of the templates, the only reason they exist is because of the
various lowering methods in RISCVISelLowering.cpp that themselves use
the methods. However, with inlining, those can end up not existing as
real functions and thus not be exported, leading to link errors. Up
until now this hasn't happened, but for whatever reason D121654 has
triggered this on the sanitizer-ppc64be-linux buildbot, giving:
../../../../lib/libLLVMRISCVCodeGen.a(RISCVISelDAGToDAG.cpp.o): In function `selectImm(llvm::SelectionDAG*, llvm::SDLoc const&, llvm::MVT, long, llvm::RISCVSubtarget const&)':
RISCVISelDAGToDAG.cpp:(.text._ZL9selectImmPN4llvm12SelectionDAGERKNS_5SDLocENS_3MVTElRKNS_14RISCVSubtargetE+0x3d8): undefined reference to `llvm::SDValue llvm::RISCVTargetLowering::getAddr<llvm::ConstantPoolSDNode>(llvm::ConstantPoolSDNode*, llvm::SelectionDAG&, bool) const'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Fix this by explicitly instantiating getAddr in its four different forms
so separate translation units can reliably use it.
Fixes: 41454ab25645 ("[RISCV] Use constant pool for large integers")
Since we have SPLAT_VECTOR_PARTS these days, I don't think we need
to go through extra lengths to avoid introducing an illegal scalar type.
We can just call getConstant using the scalable vector type and let
it create either a SPLAT_VECTOR or a SPLAT_VECTOR_PARTS.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121645
Since we mark the pseudos as mayLoad but do not provide any MMOs,
isSafeToMove conservatively returns false, stopping MachineLICM from
hoisting the instructions. PseudoLA_TLS_GD does not actually expand to a
load, so stop marking that as mayLoad to allow it to be hoisted, and for
the others make sure to add MMOs during lowering to indicate they're GOT
loads and thus can be freely moved.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54372
Reviewed By: MaskRay, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121654
This code handles fixed vector SPLAT_VECTOR, but is never called in
any tests.
We only form fixed vector splat vectors for vXi64 on RV32 as part
of DAGCombine. This will be type legalized to SPLAT_VECTOR_PARTS.
So the Custom handling for SPLAT_VECTOR is never needed.
This patch makes SPLAT_VECTOR for vXi64 'Legal' on RV32 so that
DAGCombine will create it, but there's no need for Custom handler.
It will still be type legalized to SPLAT_VECTOR_PARTS.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121673
