Summary:
This patch simplifies register accesses in NativeRegisterContextLinux_arm64
and also adds some bare minimum caching to avoid multiple calls to ptrace
during a stop.
Linux ptrace returns data in the form of structures containing GPR/FPR data.
This means that one single call is enough to read all GPRs or FPRs. We do
that once per stop and keep reading from or writing to the buffer that we
have in NativeRegisterContextLinux_arm64 class. Before a resume or detach we
write all buffers back.
This is tested on aarch64 thunder x1 with Ubuntu 18.04. Also tested
regressions on x86_64.
Reviewers: labath, clayborg
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69371
Summary:
Previously the ABI plugin exposed some "register infos" and the
gdb-remote code used those to fill in the missing bits. Now, the
"filling in" code is in the ABI plugin itself, and the gdb-remote code
just invokes that.
The motivation for this is two-fold:
a) the "augmentation" logic is useful outside of process gdb-remote. For
instance, it would allow us to avoid repeating the register number
definitions in minidump code.
b) It gives more implementation freedom to the ABI classes. Now that
these "register infos" are essentially implementation details, classes
can use other methods to obtain dwarf/eh_frame register numbers -- for
instance they can consult llvm MC layer.
Since the augmentation code was not currently tested anywhere, I took
the opportunity to create a simple test for it.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg, tatyana-krasnukha
Subscribers: aprantl, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70906
InitializeContext is useful for allocating a (potentially variable
size) CONTEXT struct in an unaligned byte buffer. In this case, we
already have a fixed size CONTEXT we want to initialize, and we only
used this as a very roundabout way of zero initializing it.
Instead just memset the CONTEXT we have, and set the ContextFlags field
manually.
This matches how it is done in NativeRegisterContextWindows_*.cpp.
This also makes LLDB run successfully in Wine (for a trivial tested
case at least), as Wine hasn't implemented the InitializeContext
function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70742
Fix handling concurrent watchpoint events so that they are reported
correctly in LLDB.
If multiple watchpoints are hit concurrently, the NetBSD kernel reports
them as series of SIGTRAPs with a thread specified, and the debugger
investigates DR6 in order to establish which watchpoint was hit. This
is normally fine.
However, LLDB disables and reenables the watchpoint on all threads after
each hit, which results in the hit status from DR6 being wiped.
As a result, it can't establish which watchpoint was hit in successive
SIGTRAP processing.
In order to workaround this problem, clear DR6 only if the breakpoint
is overwritten with a new one. More specifically, move cleaning DR6
from ClearHardwareWatchpoint() to SetHardwareWatchpointWithIndex(),
and do that only if the newly requested watchpoint is different
from the one being set previously. This ensures that the disable-enable
logic of LLDB does not clear watchpoint hit status for the remaining
threads.
This also involves refactoring of watchpoint logic. With the old logic,
clearing watchpoint involved wiping dr6 & dr7, and setting it setting
dr{0..3} & dr7. With the new logic, only enable bit is cleared
from dr7, and the remaining bits are cleared/overwritten while setting
new watchpoint.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70025
NetBSD ptrace interface does not populate watchpoints to newly-created
threads. Solve this via copying the watchpoints from the current thread
when new thread is reported via TRAP_LWP.
Add a test that verifies that when the user does not have permissions
to set watchpoints on NetBSD, the 'watchpoint set' errors out gracefully
and thread monitoring does not crash on being unable to copy watchpoints
to new threads.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70023
Implement major improvements to multithreaded program support. Notably,
support tracking new and exited threads, associate signals and events
with correct threads and support controlling individual threads when
resuming.
Firstly, use PT_SET_EVENT_MASK to enable reporting of created and exited
threads via SIGTRAP. Handle TRAP_LWP events to keep track
of the currently running threads.
Secondly, update the signal (both generic and SIGTRAP) handling code
to account for per-thread signals correctly. Signals delivered
to the whole process are reported on all threads, while per-thread
signals and events are reported only to the specific thread.
The remaining threads are marked as 'stopped with no reason'. Note that
NetBSD always stops all threads on debugger events.
Thirdly, implement the ability to set every thread as running, stopped
or single-stepping separately while continuing the process. This also
provides the ability to send a signal to the whole process or to one
of its thread while resuming.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70022
lldb would silently accept a response to the 'g' packet
(read all registers) which was too large; this handles the
case where it is too small.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70417
<rdar://problem/34916465>
Implement thread name getting sysctl() on NetBSD. Also fix
the incorrect type in pthread_setname_np() in the relevant test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70363
until we can automatically fall back to p/P if g/G are not supported;
it looks like there is a bug in debugserver's g/G packets taht needs
to be fixed, or debugserver should stop supporting g/G until that bug
is fixed. But we need lldb to be able to fall back to p/P correctly
for that to be a viable workaround.
While investigating an issue where a different packet was sent during
replay I noticed how annoying it is that the existing assert doesn't
specify what packet is actually different. It's printed to the log, but
enabling logging has the potential to change LLDB's behavior. The same
is true when debugging LLDB while it's replaying the reproducer.
I replaced the assert with a printf of the unexpected packet followed by
a fatal_error wrapped in ifndef NDEBUG. The behavior is the same as the
previous assert, just with more/better context.
Following up on https://reviews.llvm.org/D62221, this change introduces
the settings plugin.process.gdb-remote.use-g-packet-for-reading. When
they are on, 'g' packets are used for reading registers.
Using 'g' packets can improve performance by reducing the number of
packets exchanged between client and server when a large number of
registers needs to be fetched.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62931
Add info for all register sets supported in NetBSD, particularly for all
registers 'expected' by LLDB. This is necessary in order to fix
python_api/lldbutil/iter/TestRegistersIterator.py test that currently
fails due to missing names of register sets (None).
This copies fpreg descriptions from Linux, and combines Linux' AVX
and MPX registers into a single XState group, to fit NetBSD register
group design. Technically, we do not support MPX registers
at the moment but gdb-remote insists on passing their errors anyway,
and if we do not include it in any group, they end up in a separate
anonymous group that breaks the test.
While at it, swap the enums for XState and DBRegs to match register set
ordering.
This also adds a few consts to the lldb-x86-register-enums.h to provide
more consistency between user registers and debug registers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69667
Summary:
Not all minidumps contain information about memory permissions. However,
it is still important to know which regions of memory contain
potentially executable code. This is particularly important for
unwinding on win32, as the default unwind method there relies on
scanning the stack for things which "look like" code pointers.
This patch enables ProcessMinidump to reconstruct the likely permissions
of memory regions using the sections of loaded object files. It only
does this if we don't have a better source (memory info list stream, or
linux /proc/maps) for this information, and only if the information in
the object files does not conflict with the information in the minidump.
Theoretically that last bit could be improved, since the permissions
obtained from the MemoryList streams is also only a very rough guess,
but it did not seem worthwhile to complicate the implementation because
of that because there will generally be no overlap in practice as the
MemoryList will contain the stack contents and not any module data.
The patch adds a test checking that the module section permissions are
entered into the memory region list, and also a test which demonstrate
that now the unwinder is able to correctly find return addresses even in
minidumps without memory info list streams.
There's one TODO left in this patch, which is that the "memory region"
output does not give any indication about the "don't know" values of
memory region permissions (it just prints them as if they permission bit
was set). I address this in a follow up.
Reviewers: amccarth, clayborg
Subscribers: mgrang, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69105
Summary:
This change increases the offset of MPX registers (by 128) so they
do not overlap with the offset associated with AVX registers. That was
causing MPX data in GDBRemoteRegisterContext::m_reg_data to get overwritten.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68874
This can e.g. happen if the debugged executable exits before the initial
stop, e.g. if it fails to load dependent DLLs.
Add a virtual destructor to ProcessDebugger and let it clean up the
session, and make ProcessWindows::OnExitProcess call
ProcessDebugger::OnExitProcess for shared parts.
Fix suggestion by Adrian McCarthy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69503
Contrary to WoW64 on x86_64, there's no struct similar to WOW64_CONTEXT
defined, for storing and handling the CPU state of an ARM32 process
from an ARM64 process. Thus, making an ARM64 lldb-server able to
control ARM32 processes seems infeasible at the moment.
(The normal CONTEXT struct has a different layout on each architecture.
In addition to this, a WOW64_CONTEXT struct always is defined, that
can store the CPU state of an x86_32 process, to allow handling it from
an x86_64 process. But there's no similar universally available struct
for ARM32.)
The architecture enum contains two kinds of contstants: the "official" ones
defined by Microsoft, and unofficial constants added by breakpad to cover the
architectures not described by the first ones.
Up until now, there was no big need to differentiate between the two. However,
now that Microsoft has defined
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/sysinfoapi/ns-sysinfoapi-system_info
a constant for ARM64, we have a name clash.
This patch renames all breakpad-defined constants with to include the prefix
"BP_". This frees up the name "ARM64", which I'll re-introduce with the new
"official" value in a follow-up patch.
Reviewers: amccarth, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69285
The goal of this refactor is to enable ProcessMinidump to take into
account the loaded modules and their sections when computing the
permissions of various ranges of memory, as discussed in D66638.
This patch moves some of the responsibility for computing the ranges
from MinidumpParser into ProcessMinidump. MinidumpParser still does the
parsing, but ProcessMinidump becomes responsible for answering the
actual queries about memory ranges. This will enable it (in a follow-up
patch) to augment the information obtained from the parser with data
obtained from actual object files.
The changes in the actual code are fairly straight-forward and just
involve moving code around. MinidumpParser::GetMemoryRegions is renamed
to BuildMemoryRegions to emphasize that it does no caching. The only new
thing is the additional bool flag returned from this function. This
indicates whether the returned regions describe all memory mapped into
the target process. Data obtained from /proc/maps and the MemoryInfoList
stream is considered to be exhaustive. Data obtained from Memory(64)List
is not. This will be used to determine whether we need to augment the
data or not.
This reshuffle means that it is no longer possible/easy to test some of
this code via unit tests, as constructing a ProcessMinidump instance is
hard. Instead, I update the unit tests to only test the parsing of the
actual data, and test the answering of queries through a lit test using
the "memory region" command. The patch also includes some tweaks to the
MemoryRegion class to make the unit tests easier to write.
Reviewers: amccarth, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69035
Summary:
The minidump exception stream can report an exception record with
signal 0. If we try to create a stop reason with signal zero, processing
of the stop event won't find anything, and the debugger will hang.
So, simply early-out of RefreshStateAfterStop in this case.
Also set the UnixSignals object in DoLoadCore as is done for
ProcessElfCore.
Reviewers: labath, clayborg, jfb
Reviewed By: labath, clayborg
Subscribers: dexonsmith, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68096
llvm-svn: 375244
Summary: The types defined for it in LLDB are now redundant with core types.
Reviewers: labath, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68658
llvm-svn: 375243
This patch removes the size_t return value and the append parameter
from the remainder of the Find.* functions in LLDB's internal API. As
in the previous patches, this is motivated by the fact that these
parameters aren't really used, and in the case of the append parameter
were frequently implemented incorrectly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69119
llvm-svn: 375160
Summary:
This patch re-types everywhere that passes a File::OpenOptions
as a uint32_t so it actually uses File::OpenOptions.
It also converts some OpenOptions related functions that fail
by returning 0 or NULL into llvm::Expected
split off from https://reviews.llvm.org/D68737
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68853
llvm-svn: 374817
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374631
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374626
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374622
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374620
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374609
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
llvm-svn: 374584
This patch adds an implementation of unwinding using PE EH info. It allows to
get almost ideal call stacks on 64-bit Windows systems (except some epilogue
cases, but I believe that they can be fixed with unwind plan disassembly
augmentation in the future).
To achieve the goal the CallFrameInfo abstraction was made. It is based on the
DWARFCallFrameInfo class interface with a few changes to make it less
DWARF-specific.
To implement the new interface for PECOFF object files the class PECallFrameInfo
was written. It uses the next helper classes:
- UnwindCodesIterator helps to iterate through UnwindCode structures (and
processes chained infos transparently);
- EHProgramBuilder with the use of UnwindCodesIterator constructs EHProgram;
- EHProgram is, by fact, a vector of EHInstructions. It creates an abstraction
over the low-level unwind codes and simplifies work with them. It contains
only the information that is relevant to unwinding in the unified form. Also
the required unwind codes are read from the object file only once with it;
- EHProgramRange allows to take a range of EHProgram and to build an unwind row
for it.
So, PECallFrameInfo builds the EHProgram with EHProgramBuilder, takes the ranges
corresponding to every offset in prologue and builds the rows of the resulted
unwind plan. The resulted plan covers the whole range of the function except the
epilogue.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, asmith, amccarth, clayborg, JDevlieghere, stella.stamenova, labath, espindola
Reviewed By: jasonmolenda
Subscribers: leonid.mashinskiy, emaste, mgorny, aprantl, arichardson, MaskRay, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67347
llvm-svn: 374528
Summary:
After rLLDB365761, and with `LLVM_ENABLE_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS` enabled,
launching any process on FreeBSD crashes lldb with:
```
Expected<T> must be checked before access or destruction.
Expected<T> value was in success state. (Note: Expected<T> values in success mode must still be checked prior to being destroyed).
```
This is because `m_operation_thread` and `m_monitor_thread` were wrapped
in `llvm::Expected<>`, but this requires the objects to be correctly
initialized before accessing them.
To fix the crashes, use `llvm::Optional<>` for the members (as indicated
by labath), and use local variables to store the return values of
`LaunchThread` and `StartMonitoringChildProcess`. Then, only assign to
the member variables after checking if the return values indicated
success.
Reviewers: devnexen, emaste, MaskRay, mgorny
Reviewed By: devnexen
Subscribers: jfb, labath, krytarowski, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68723
llvm-svn: 374444
Summary:
This patch introduces a switch, based on the environment variable
`LLDB_USE_LLDB_SERVER`, to determine whether to use the `ProcessWindows` plugin
(the old way) or the `lldb-server` way for debugging on Windows.
Reviewers: labath, amccarth, asmith, stella.stamenova
Reviewed By: labath, amccarth
Subscribers: mstorsjo, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits, leonid.mashinskiy
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68258
llvm-svn: 374325
Stack unwinding was sometimes failing when trying to unwind stacks in 32 bit ARM. I discovered this was because the EH frame register numbers were not set. This patch fixes this issue and adds a unit test to verify this doesn't regress.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68088
llvm-svn: 374246
Summary: The PlaceholderObjectFile has an assert in SetLoadAddress that fires if "m_base == value" is not true. To avoid this, we create check that the base address matches, and if it doesn't we clear the module that was found using the UUID so that we create a new PlaceholderObjectFile. Added a test to cover this issue.
Reviewers: labath, aadsm, dvlahovski
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68106
llvm-svn: 374242
LLDB appears to have at least partial support for PPC, but PPC on Mach
isn't a thing AFAIK.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68661
llvm-svn: 374114
