Enables the support of `-fcf-protection=return` on RISC-V, which
requires Zicfiss. It also adds a string attribute "hw-shadow-stack"
to every function if the option is set on RISC-V
This patch enables the following command line flags for RISC-V targets:
+ `-fcf-protection=branch` turns on forward-edge control-flow integrity conditioning
+ `-mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled|func-sig` selects the label scheme used in the forward-edge CFI conditioning
Only allow GPR registers and verify the size is the same as XLen.
This fixes the crash seen in #109588 by making it a frontend error.
gcc does accept the code so we may need to consider if we can fix the
backend. Some other targets I tried appear to have similar issues so it
might not be straightforward to fix.
This patch makes unsupported target attributes emit a warning and ignore
the target attribute during semantic checks. The changes include:
1. Adding the RISCVTargetInfo::isValidFeatureName function.
2. Rejecting non-full-arch strings in the handleFullArchString function.
3. Adding test cases to demonstrate the warning behavior.
This implements the __builtin_cpu_init and __builtin_cpu_supports
builtin routines based on the compiler runtime changes in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85790.
This is inspired by https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85786.
Major changes are a) a restriction in scope to only the builtins (which
have a much narrower user interface), and the avoidance of false
generality. This change deliberately only handles group 0 extensions
(which happen to be all defined ones today), and avoids the tblgen
changes from that review.
I don't have an environment in which I can actually test this, but @BeMg
has been kind enough to report that this appears to work as expected.
Before this can make it into a release, we need a change such as
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99958. The gcc docs claim that
cpu_support can be called by "normal" code without calling the cpu_init
routine because the init routine will have been called by a high
priority constructor. Our current compiler-rt mechanism does not do
this.
These macros are used by STL implementations to support implementation
of std::hardware_destructive_interference_size and
std::hardware_constructive_interference_size
Fixes#60174
---------
Co-authored-by: Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com>
This introduces a new file, RISCVISAUtils.cpp and moves the rest of
RISCVISAInfo to the TargetParser library.
This will allow us to generate part of RISCVISAInfo.cpp using tablegen.
[RISCV] RISCV vector calling convention (1/2)
This is the vector calling convention based on
https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc,
the idea is to split between "scalar" callee-saved registers
and "vector" callee-saved registers. "scalar" ones remain the
original strategy, however, "vector" ones are handled together
with RVV objects.
The stack layout would be:
|--------------------------| <-- FP
| callee-allocated save |
| area for register varargs|
|--------------------------|
| callee-saved registers | <-- scalar callee-saved
| (scalar) |
|--------------------------|
| RVV alignment padding |
|--------------------------|
| callee-saved registers | <-- vector callee-saved
| (vector) |
|--------------------------|
| RVV objects |
|--------------------------|
| padding before RVV |
|--------------------------|
| scalar local variables |
|--------------------------| <-- BP
| variable size objects |
|--------------------------| <-- SP
Note: This patch doesn't contain "tuple" type, e.g. vint32m1x2.
It will be handled in https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc (2/2).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154576
This commit includes the necessary changes to clang and LLVM to support
codegen of `RVE` and the `ilp32e`/`lp64e` ABIs.
The differences between `RVE` and `RVI` are:
* `RVE` reduces the integer register count to 16(x0-x16).
* The ABI should be `ilp32e` for 32 bits and `lp64e` for 64 bits.
`RVE` can be combined with all current standard extensions.
The central changes in ilp32e/lp64e ABI, compared to ilp32/lp64 are:
* Only 6 integer argument registers (rather than 8).
* Only 2 callee-saved registers (rather than 12).
* A Stack Alignment of 32bits (rather than 128bits).
* ilp32e isn't compatible with D ISA extension.
If `ilp32e` or `lp64` is used with an ISA that has any of the registers
x16-x31 and f0-f31, then these registers are considered temporaries.
To be compatible with the implementation of ilp32e in GCC, we don't use
aligned registers to pass variadic arguments and set stack alignment\
to 4-bytes for types with length of 2*XLEN.
FastCC is also supported on RVE, while GHC isn't since there is only one
avaiable register.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70401
The RISC-V vector crypto extensions have been ratified. This patch
updates the Clang and LLVM support for these extensions to be
non-experimental, while leaving the C intrinsics as experimental since
the C intrinsics are not yet standardized.
Co-authored-by: Brandon Wu <brandon.wu@sifive.com>
RISC-V C API introduced predefined macro to achieve hints about
unaligned accesses ([pr]). This patch defines __riscv_misaligned_fast
when using -mno-strict-align, otherwise, defines
__riscv_misaligned_avoid.
Note: This ignores __riscv_misaligned_slow which is also defined by
spec.
[pr]: https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-c-api-doc/pull/40
Change the return type of `getClobbers` function from `const char*`
to `std::string_view`. Update the function usages in CodeGen module.
The reasoning of these changes is to remove unsafe `const char*`
strings and prevent unnecessary allocations for constructing the
`std::string` in usages of `getClobbers()` function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148799
This avoids recomputing string length that is already known at compile time.
It has a slight impact on preprocessing / compile time, see
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=3f36d2d579d8b0e8824d9dd99bfa79f456858f88&to=e49640c507ddc6615b5e503144301c8e41f8f434&stat=instructions:u
This a recommit of e953ae5bbc313fd0cc980ce021d487e5b5199ea4 and the subsequent fixes caa713559bd38f337d7d35de35686775e8fb5175 and 06b90e2e9c991e211fecc97948e533320a825470.
The above patchset caused some version of GCC to take eons to compile clang/lib/Basic/Targets/AArch64.cpp, as spotted in aa171833ab0017d9732e82b8682c9848ab25ff9e.
The fix is to make BuiltinInfo tables a compilation unit static variable, instead of a private static variable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139881
Although i32 type is illegal in the backend, RV64I has pretty good support for i32 types by using W instructions.
By adding n32 to the DataLayout string, middle end optimizations will consider i32 to be a native type. One known effect of this is enabling LoopStrengthReduce on loops with i32 induction variables. This can be beneficial because C/C++ code often has loops with i32 induction variables due to the use of `int` or `unsigned int`.
If this patch exposes performance issues, those are better addressed by tuning LSR or other passes.
Reviewed By: asb, frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116735
This follows the path that AArch64 SVE has taken. Doing this via a function attribute set in the frontend is basically a workaround for the fact that several analyzes which need the information (i.e. known bits, lvi, scev) can't easily use TTI without significant amounts of plumbing changes.
This patch hard codes "v" numbers, and directly follows the SVE precedent as a result. In a follow up, I hope to drive this from RISCVISAInfo.h/cpp instead, but the MinVLen number being returned from that interface seemed to always be 0 (which is wrong), and I haven't figured out what's going wrong there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135894
Instead of having separate implementations for RV32 and RV64,
use the triple to control the Is64Bit parameter.
Do the same for isValidTuneCPUName, fillValidCPUList, and
fillValidTuneCPUList.
clang emit wrong code sequence for `int16`(`short`) to `__fp16` conversion,
and that should fix the code gen directly is the right way I think,
but I found there is a FIXME comment in clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h say
that's should be removed in future so I think just let swich to using
generic LLVM IR rather than llvm.convert.to.fp16 intrinsics code gen
path is enough.
```
/// Check whether llvm intrinsics such as llvm.convert.to.fp16 should be used
/// to convert to and from __fp16.
/// FIXME: This function should be removed once all targets stop using the
/// conversion intrinsics.
virtual bool useFP16ConversionIntrinsics() const {
return true;
}
```
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124509
WG14 adopted the _ExtInt feature from Clang for C23, but renamed the
type to be _BitInt. This patch does the vast majority of the work to
rename _ExtInt to _BitInt, which accounts for most of its size. The new
type is exposed in older C modes and all C++ modes as a conforming
extension. However, there are functional changes worth calling out:
* Deprecates _ExtInt with a fix-it to help users migrate to _BitInt.
* Updates the mangling for the type.
* Updates the documentation and adds a release note to warn users what
is going on.
* Adds new diagnostics for use of _BitInt to call out when it's used as
a Clang extension or as a pre-C23 compatibility concern.
* Adds new tests for the new diagnostic behaviors.
I want to call out the ABI break specifically. We do not believe that
this break will cause a significant imposition for early adopters of
the feature, and so this is being done as a full break. If it turns out
there are critical uses where recompilation is not an option for some
reason, we can consider using ABI tags to ease the transition.
How many place you need to modify when implementing a new extension for RISC-V?
At least 7 places as I know:
- Add new SubtargetFeature at RISCV.td
- -march parser in RISCV.cpp
- RISCVTargetInfo::initFeatureMap@RISCV.cpp for handling feature vector.
- RISCVTargetInfo::getTargetDefines@RISCV.cpp for pre-define marco.
- Arch string parser for ELF attribute in RISCVAsmParser.cpp
- ELF attribute emittion in RISCVAsmParser.cpp, and make sure it's in
canonical order...
- ELF attribute emittion in RISCVTargetStreamer.cpp, and again, must in
canonical order...
And now, this patch provide an unified infrastructure for handling (almost)
everything of RISC-V arch string.
After this patch, you only need to update 2 places for implement an extension
for RISC-V:
- Add new SubtargetFeature at RISCV.td, hmmm, it's hard to avoid.
- Add new entry to RISCVSupportedExtension@RISCVISAInfo.cpp or
SupportedExperimentalExtensions@RISCVISAInfo.cpp .
Most codes are come from existing -march parser, but with few new feature/bug
fixes:
- Accept version for -march, e.g. -march=rv32i2p0.
- Reject version info with `p` but without minor version number like `rv32i2p`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105168
At this point it looks like a B extension will never exist. Instead
Zba, Zbb, Zbc, and Zbs are individual extensions being ratified
together as a package. Unknown at this time when or if the other
Zb* extensions will be ratified.
This patch removes references to the B extension. I've updated and
split tests accordingly.
This has been split from D110669 to make review a little easier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111338
This consists of 3 compressed instructions, c.not, c.neg, and c.zext.w.
I believe these have been picked up by the Zce effort using different
encodings. I don't think it makes sense to keep them in bitmanip. It
will eventually cause a conflict if/when Zce is implemented in llvm.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110871
The getConstraintRegister method is used by semantic checking of inline
assembly statements in order to diagnose conflicts between clobber list
and input/output lists. By overriding getConstraintRegister we get those
diagnostics and we match RISC-V GCC's behavior. The implementation is
trivial due to the lack of single-register RISC-V-specific constraints.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108624
Use _Float16 as the half-precision floating point type. Define a new
type specifier 'x' for the _Float16 type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105001
The backend can't handle this and will throw a fatal error from
type legalization. It's easy enough to fix that for this intrinsic
by just splitting the IR intrinsic since it works on individual bytes.
There will be other intrinsics in the future that would be harder
to support through splitting, for example grev, gorc, and shfl. Those
would require a compare and a select be inserted to check the MSB of
their control input.
This patch adds support for preventing this in the frontend with
a nice diagnostic.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99984
Demonstrate how to add RISC-V V builtins and lower them to IR intrinsics for V extension.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Hsiangkai Wang <kai.wang@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93446
Add the types for the RISC-V V extension builtins.
These types will be used by the RISC-V V intrinsics which require
types of the form <vscale x 1 x i64>(LMUL=1 element size=64) or
<vscale x 4 x i32>(LMUL=2 element size=32), etc. The vector_size
attribute does not work for us as it doesn't create a scalable
vector type. We want these types to be opaque and have no operators
defined for them. We want them to be sizeless. This makes them
similar to the ARM SVE builtin types. But we will have quite a bit
more types. This patch adds around 60. Later patches will add
another 230 or so types representing tuples of these types similar
to the x2/x3/x4 types in ARM SVE. But with extra complexity that
these types are combined with the LMUL concept that is unique to
RISCV.
For more background see this RFC
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-October/145850.html
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <roger.ferrer@bsc.es>
Co-Authored-by: Hsiangkai Wang <kai.wang@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92715
This avoids having to repeat all the flags in the constructor's
initializer list in the same order. This style is already used by
several other targets.
- The goal of this patch is improve option compatible with RISCV-V GCC,
-mcpu support on GCC side will sent patch in next few days.
- -mtune only affect the pipeline model and non-arch/extension related
target feature, e.g. instruction fusion; in td file it called
TuneFeatures, which is introduced by X86 back-end[1].
- -mtune accept all valid option for -mcpu and extra alias processor
option, e.g. `generic`, `rocket` and `sifive-7-series`, the purpose is
option compatible with RISCV-V GCC.
- Processor alias for -mtune will resolve according the current target arch,
rv32 or rv64, e.g. `rocket` will resolve to `rocket-rv32` or `rocket-rv64`.
- Interaction between -mcpu and -mtune:
* -mtune has higher priority than -mcpu for pipeline model and
TuneFeatures.
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D85165
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89025
Summary:
1. gcc uses `-march` and `-mtune` flag to chose arch and
pipeline model, but clang does not have `-mtune` flag,
we uses `-mcpu` to chose both infos.
2. Add SiFive e31 and u54 cpu which have default march
and pipeline model.
3. Specific `-mcpu` with rocket-rv[32|64] would select
pipeline model only, and use the driver's arch choosing
logic to get default arch.
Reviewers: lenary, asb, evandro, HsiangKai
Reviewed By: lenary, asb, evandro
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71124
This is the result of an audit of all of the ABIs in clang to implement
and enable the type for those targets.
Additionally, this finds an issue with integer-promotion passing for a
few platforms when using _ExtInt of < int, so this also corrects that
resulting in signext/zeroext being on a params of those types in some
platforms.
Differential Revisions: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79118
Summary: This ensures that libcalls aren't generated when the target supports atomics. Atomics aren't in the base RV32I/RV64I instruction sets, so MaxAtomicInlineWidth and MaxAtomicPromoteWidth are set only when the atomics extension is being targeted. This must be done in setMaxAtomicWidth, as this should be done after handleTargetFeatures has been called.
Reviewers: jfb, jyknight, wmi, asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: pzheng, MaskRay, s.egerton, lenary, dexonsmith, psnobl, benna, Jim, JohnLLVM, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, lewis-revill, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57450
llvm-svn: 370073
The RISC-V hard float calling convention requires the frontend to:
* Detect cases where, once "flattened", a struct can be passed using
int+fp or fp+fp registers under the hard float ABI and coerce to the
appropriate type(s)
* Track usage of GPRs and FPRs in order to gate the above, and to
determine when signext/zeroext attributes must be added to integer
scalars
This patch attempts to do this in compliance with the documented ABI,
and uses ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand in order to do this. @rjmccall, as
author of that code I've tagged you as reviewer for initial feedback on
my usage.
Note that a previous version of the ABI indicated that when passing an
int+fp struct using a GPR+FPR, the int would need to be sign or
zero-extended appropriately. GCC never did this and the ABI was changed,
which makes life easier as ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand can't currently
handle sign/zero-extension attributes.
Re-landed after backing out 366450 due to missed hunks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60456
llvm-svn: 366480
The RISC-V hard float calling convention requires the frontend to:
* Detect cases where, once "flattened", a struct can be passed using
int+fp or fp+fp registers under the hard float ABI and coerce to the
appropriate type(s) * Track usage of GPRs and FPRs in order to gate the
above, and to
determine when signext/zeroext attributes must be added to integer
scalars
This patch attempts to do this in compliance with the documented ABI,
and uses ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand in order to do this. @rjmccall, as
author of that code I've tagged you as reviewer for initial feedback on
my usage.
Note that a previous version of the ABI indicated that when passing an
int+fp struct using a GPR+FPR, the int would need to be sign or
zero-extended appropriately. GCC never did this and the ABI was changed,
which makes life easier as ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand can't currently
handle sign/zero-extension attributes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60456
llvm-svn: 366450
