To authenticate pointers, CodeGen needs access to the key and
discriminators that were used to sign the pointer. That information is
sometimes known from the context, but not always, which is why `Address`
needs to hold that information.
This patch adds methods and data members to `Address`, which will be
needed in subsequent patches to authenticate signed pointers, and uses
the newly added methods throughout CodeGen. Although this patch isn't
strictly NFC as it causes CodeGen to use different code paths in some
cases (e.g., `mergeAddressesInConditionalExpr`), it doesn't cause any
changes in functionality as it doesn't add any information needed for
authentication.
In addition to the changes mentioned above, this patch introduces class
`RawAddress`, which contains a pointer that we know is unsigned, and
adds several new functions for creating `Address` and `LValue` objects.
This reapplies d9a685a9dd589486e882b722e513ee7b8c84870c, which was
reverted because it broke ubsan bots. There seems to be a bug in
coroutine code-gen, which is causing EmitTypeCheck to use the wrong
alignment. For now, pass alignment zero to EmitTypeCheck so that it can
compute the correct alignment based on the passed type (see function
EmitCXXMemberOrOperatorMemberCallExpr).
To authenticate pointers, CodeGen needs access to the key and
discriminators that were used to sign the pointer. That information is
sometimes known from the context, but not always, which is why `Address`
needs to hold that information.
This patch adds methods and data members to `Address`, which will be
needed in subsequent patches to authenticate signed pointers, and uses
the newly added methods throughout CodeGen. Although this patch isn't
strictly NFC as it causes CodeGen to use different code paths in some
cases (e.g., `mergeAddressesInConditionalExpr`), it doesn't cause any
changes in functionality as it doesn't add any information needed for
authentication.
In addition to the changes mentioned above, this patch introduces class
`RawAddress`, which contains a pointer that we know is unsigned, and
adds several new functions for creating `Address` and `LValue` objects.
This reapplies 8bd1f9116aab879183f34707e6d21c7051d083b6. The commit
broke msan bots because LValue::IsKnownNonNull was uninitialized.
To authenticate pointers, CodeGen needs access to the key and
discriminators that were used to sign the pointer. That information is
sometimes known from the context, but not always, which is why `Address`
needs to hold that information.
This patch adds methods and data members to `Address`, which will be
needed in subsequent patches to authenticate signed pointers, and uses
the newly added methods throughout CodeGen. Although this patch isn't
strictly NFC as it causes CodeGen to use different code paths in some
cases (e.g., `mergeAddressesInConditionalExpr`), it doesn't cause any
changes in functionality as it doesn't add any information needed for
authentication.
In addition to the changes mentioned above, this patch introduces class
`RawAddress`, which contains a pointer that we know is unsigned, and
adds several new functions for creating `Address` and `LValue` objects.
This patch converts `ImplicitParamDecl::ImplicitParamKind` into a scoped enum at namespace scope, making it eligible for forward declaring. This is useful for `preferred_type` annotations on bit-fields.
Partial progress towards replacing `CreateElementBitCast`, as it no
longer does what its name suggests. Either replace its uses with
`Address::withElementType()`, or remove them if no longer needed.
Reviewed By: barannikov88, nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153314
Partial progress towards replacing in-tree uses of `Type::getPointerTo()`.
This needs to be done before deprecating the API.
Reviewed By: nikic, barannikov88
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152321
TLS initializers, for example constructors of thread-local variables, don't necessarily get called. If a thread was created before a module is loaded, the module's TLS initializers are not executed for this particular thread.
This is why Microsoft added support for dynamic TLS initialization. Before every use of thread-local variables, a check is added that runs the module's TLS initializers on-demand.
To do this, the method `__dyn_tls_on_demand_init` gets called. Internally, it simply calls `__dyn_tls_init`.
No additional TLS initializer that sets the guard needs to be emitted, as the guard always gets set by `__dyn_tls_init`.
The guard is also checked again within `__dyn_tls_init`. This makes our check redundant, however, as Microsoft's compiler also emits this check, the behaviour is adopted here.
Reviewed By: majnemer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115456
UBSan was using the complete-object align rather than nv alignment
when checking the "this" pointer of a method.
Furthermore, CGF.CXXABIThisAlignment was also being set incorrectly,
due to an incorrectly negated test. The latter doesn't appear to have
had any impact, due to it not really being used anywhere.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93072
mangling support for non-type template parameters of class type and
template parameter objects.
The Itanium side of this follows the approach I proposed in
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/47 on 2020-09-06.
The MSVC side of this was determined empirically by observing MSVC's
output.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89998
thunk's return value slot directly when the return type is an aggregate
instead of doing so via a temporary
This fixes PR45997 (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45997), which
is caused by a bug that has existed since we started passing and
returning C++ structs with ObjC strong pointer members (see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44908) or structs annotated with trivial_abi
directly.
rdar://problem/63740936
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82513
Summary:
This is needed in Swift for C++ interop -- see here for the corresponding Swift change:
https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/30630
As part of this change, I've had to make some changes to the interface of CGCXXABI to return the additional parameters separately rather than adding them directly to a `CallArgList`.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79942
The static analyzer is warning about potential null dereferences, but in these cases we should be able to use castAs<RecordType> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 373584
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54862 removed the usages of `ASTContext&` from
within the `CXXMethodDecl::getThisType` method. Remove the parameter
altogether, as well as all usages of it. This does not result in any
functional change because the parameter was unused since
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54862.
Test Plan: check-clang
Reviewers: akyrtzi, mikael
Reviewed By: mikael
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56509
llvm-svn: 350914
Summary:
Previously we tried too hard to uphold the fiction that destructor
variants work like they do on Itanium throughout the ABI-neutral parts
of clang. This lead to MS C++ ABI incompatiblities and other bugs. Now,
-mconstructor-aliases will no longer control this ABI detail, and clang
-cc1's LLVM IR output will be this much closer to the clang driver's.
Based on a patch by Zahira Ammarguellat:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39063
I've tried to move the logic that Zahira added into MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp.
There is only one ABI-specific detail sticking out, and that is in
CodeGenModule::getAddrOfCXXStructor, where we collapse complete dtors to
base dtors in the MS ABI.
This fixes PR32990.
Reviewers: erichkeane, zahiraam, majnemer, rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44505
llvm-svn: 327732
Summary:
The MS ABI convention is that the 'this' pointer on entry is the address
of the vfptr that was used to make the virtual method call. In other
words, the pointer on entry always points to the base subobject that
introduced the virtual method. Consider this hierarchy:
struct A { virtual void f() = 0; };
struct B { virtual void g() = 0; };
struct C : A, B {
void f() override;
void g() override;
};
On entry to C::g, [ER]CX will contain the address of C's B subobject,
and C::g will have to subtract sizeof(A) to recover a pointer to C.
Before this change, we applied this adjustment in the prologue and
stored the new value into the "this" local variable alloca used for
debug info. However, MSVC does not do this, presumably because it is
often profitable to fold the adjustment into later field accesses. This
creates a problem, because the debugger expects the variable to be
unadjusted. Unfortunately, CodeView doesn't have anything like DWARF
expressions for computing variables that aren't in the program anymore,
so we have to declare 'this' to be the unadjusted value if we want the
debugger to see the right value.
This has the side benefit that, in optimized builds, the 'this' pointer
will usually be available on function entry because it doesn't require
any adjustment.
Reviewers: hans
Subscribers: aprantl, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40109
llvm-svn: 318440
constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
Based on a patch by Vassil Vassilev, which was based on a patch by Bernd
Schmidt, which was based on a patch by Reid Kleckner!
This is a re-commit of r310401, which was reverted in r310464 due to ARM
failures (which should now be fixed).
llvm-svn: 310983
constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
llvm-svn: 310401
Summary:
If the first parameter of the function is the ImplicitParamDecl, codegen
automatically marks it as an implicit argument with `this` or `self`
pointer. Added internal kind of the ImplicitParamDecl to separate
'this', 'self', 'vtt' and other implicit parameters from other kind of
parameters.
Reviewers: rjmccall, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33735
llvm-svn: 305075
abstract information about the callee. NFC.
The goal here is to make it easier to recognize indirect calls and
trigger additional logic in certain cases. That logic will come in
a later patch; in the meantime, I felt that this was a significant
improvement to the code.
llvm-svn: 285258
`pass_object_size` is our way of enabling `__builtin_object_size` to
produce high quality results without requiring inlining to happen
everywhere.
A link to the design doc for this attribute is available at the
Differential review link below.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13263
llvm-svn: 254554
Certain CXXConstructExpr nodes require zero-initialization before a
constructor is called. We had a bug in the case where the constructor
is called on a virtual base: we zero-initialized the base's vbptr field.
A complementary bug is present in MSVC where no zero-initialization
occurs for the subobject at all.
This fixes PR25370.
llvm-svn: 251783
Summary: It breaks the build for the ASTMatchers
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13893
llvm-svn: 250827
This avoids building a fake LLVM IR global variable just to ferry an i32
down into LLVM codegen. It also puts a nail in the coffin of using MS
ABI C++ EH with landingpads, since now we'll assert in the lpad code
when flags are present.
llvm-svn: 247843
Introduce an Address type to bundle a pointer value with an
alignment. Introduce APIs on CGBuilderTy to work with Address
values. Change core APIs on CGF/CGM to traffic in Address where
appropriate. Require alignments to be non-zero. Update a ton
of code to compute and propagate alignment information.
As part of this, I've promoted CGBuiltin's EmitPointerWithAlignment
helper function to CGF and made use of it in a number of places in
the expression emitter.
The end result is that we should now be significantly more correct
when performing operations on objects that are locally known to
be under-aligned. Since alignment is not reliably tracked in the
type system, there are inherent limits to this, but at least we
are no longer confused by standard operations like derived-to-base
conversions and array-to-pointer decay. I've also fixed a large
number of bugs where we were applying the complete-object alignment
to a pointer instead of the non-virtual alignment, although most of
these were hidden by the very conservative approach we took with
member alignment.
Also, because IRGen now reliably asserts on zero alignments, we
should no longer be subject to an absurd but frustrating recurring
bug where an incomplete type would report a zero alignment and then
we'd naively do a alignmentAtOffset on it and emit code using an
alignment equal to the largest power-of-two factor of the offset.
We should also now be emitting much more aggressive alignment
attributes in the presence of over-alignment. In particular,
field access now uses alignmentAtOffset instead of min.
Several times in this patch, I had to change the existing
code-generation pattern in order to more effectively use
the Address APIs. For the most part, this seems to be a strict
improvement, like doing pointer arithmetic with GEPs instead of
ptrtoint. That said, I've tried very hard to not change semantics,
but it is likely that I've failed in a few places, for which I
apologize.
ABIArgInfo now always carries the assumed alignment of indirect and
indirect byval arguments. In order to cut down on what was already
a dauntingly large patch, I changed the code to never set align
attributes in the IR on non-byval indirect arguments. That is,
we still generate code which assumes that indirect arguments have
the given alignment, but we don't express this information to the
backend except where it's semantically required (i.e. on byvals).
This is likely a minor regression for those targets that did provide
this information, but it'll be trivial to add it back in a later
patch.
I partially punted on applying this work to CGBuiltin. Please
do not add more uses of the CreateDefaultAligned{Load,Store}
APIs; they will be going away eventually.
llvm-svn: 246985
Summary:
This add support for the C++11 feature, thread_local global variables.
The ABI Clang implements is an improvement of the MSVC ABI. Sadly,
further improvements could be made but not without sacrificing ABI
compatibility.
The feature is implemented as follows:
- All thread_local initialization routines are pointed to from the
.CRT$XDU section.
- All non-weak thread_local variables have their initialization routines
call from a single function instead of getting their own .CRT$XDU
section entry. This is done to open up optimization opportunities to
the compiler.
- All weak thread_local variables have their own .CRT$XDU section entry.
This entry is in a COMDAT with the global variable it is initializing;
this ensures that we will initialize the global exactly once.
- Destructors are registered in the initialization function using
__tlregdtor.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5597
llvm-svn: 219074
Let's not expose ABI specific minutia inside of CodeGenModule and Type.
Instead, let's abstract it through CXXABI.
This gets rid of:
CodeGenModule::getCompleteObjectLocator,
CodeGenModule::EmitFundamentalTypeDescriptor{s,},
CodeGenModule::getMSTypeDescriptor,
CodeGenModule::getMSCompleteObjectLocator,
CGCXXABI::shouldRTTIBeUnique,
CGCXXABI::classifyRTTIUniqueness.
CGRTTI was *almost* entirely centered around providing Itanium-style
RTTI information. Instead of providing interfaces that only it
consumes, move it to the ItaniumCXXABI implementation file. This allows
it to have access to Itanium-specific implementation details without
providing useless expansion points for the Microsoft ABI side.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4261
llvm-svn: 212435
This undoes half of r208786.
It had problems with lazily declared special members in cases like this:
struct A {
A();
A &operator=(A &&o);
void *p;
};
void foo(A);
void bar() {
foo({});
}
In this case, the copy and move constructors are implicitly deleted.
However, Clang doesn't eagerly declare the copy ctor in the AST, so we
pass the struct in registers. Furthermore, GCC passes this in registers
even though this class should be uncopyable.
Revert this for now until the dust settles.
llvm-svn: 208836
This affects both the Itanium and Microsoft C++ ABIs.
This is in anticipation of a change to the Itanium C++ ABI, and should
match GCC's current behavior. The new text will likely be:
"""
Pass an object of class type by value if every copy constructor and
move constructor is deleted or trivial and at least one of them is not
deleted, and the destructor is trivial.
"""
http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/cxx-abi-dev/2014-May/002728.html
On x86 Windows, we can mostly use the same logic, where we use inalloca
instead of passing by address. However, on Win64, there are register
parameters, and we have to do what MSVC does. MSVC ignores the presence
of non-trivial move constructors and only considers the presence of
non-trivial or deleted copy constructors. If a non-trivial or deleted
copy ctor is present, it passes the argument indirectly.
This change fixes bugs and makes us more ABI compatible with both GCC
and MSVC.
Fixes PR19668.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3660
llvm-svn: 208786
The MS ABI requires that we determine the vbptr offset if have a
virtual inheritance model. Instead, raise an error pointing to the
diagnostic when this happens.
This fixes PR18583.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2842
llvm-svn: 201824
Unlike Itanium's VTTs, the 'most derived' boolean or bitfield is the
last parameter for non-variadic constructors, rather than the second.
For variadic constructors, the 'most derived' parameter comes after the
'this' parameter. This affects constructor calls and constructor decls
in a variety of places.
Reviewers: timurrrr
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2405
llvm-svn: 197518
