138 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Balazs Benics
068d76b480
[analyzer] Fix crash when casting the result of a malformed fptr call (#111390)
Ideally, we wouldn't workaround our current cast-modeling, but the
experimental "support-symbolic-integer-casts" is not finished so we need
to live with our current modeling.

Ideally, we could probably bind `UndefinedVal` as the result of the call
even without evaluating the call, as the result types mismatch between
the static type of the `CallExpr` and the actually function that happens
to be called.

Nevertheless, let's not crash.
https://compiler-explorer.com/z/WvcqK6MbY

CPP-5768
2024-10-09 11:39:56 +02:00
Pavel Skripkin
b1e4656e8e
[NFC][analyzer] Make invalidateRegions accept Stmt instead of Expr (#109792)
As was reported
[here](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/103714#pullrequestreview-2238037812),
`invalidateRegions` should accept `Stmt` instead of `Expr`. This
conversion is possible, since `Expr` was anyway converted back to `Stmt`
later.

This refactoring is needed to fix another FP related to use of inline
assembly. The fix would be to change `State->bindLoc` to
`state->invalidateRegions` inside inline assembly visitor, since
`bindLoc` only binds to offset 0, which is not really correct semantics
in case of inline assembly.
2024-09-24 16:48:29 +02:00
Pavel Skripkin
339282d49f
[analyzer] Refactor MallocChecker to use BindExpr in evalCall (#106081)
PR refactors `MallocChecker` to not violate invariant of `BindExpr`,
which should be called only during `evalCall` to avoid conflicts.

To achieve this, most of `postCall` logic was moved to `evalCall` with
addition return value binding in case of processing of allocation
functions. Check functions prototypes was changed to use `State` with
bound return value.

`checkDelim` logic was left in `postCall` to avoid conflicts with
`StreamChecker` which also evaluates `getline` and friends.

PR also introduces breaking change in the unlikely case when the
definition of an allocation function (e.g. `malloc()`) is visible: now
checker does not try to inline allocation functions and assumes their
initial semantics.

Closes #73830
2024-09-16 06:48:07 +02:00
DonatNagyE
0424546ed4
[analyzer] Use AllocaRegion in MallocChecker (#72402)
...to model the results of alloca() and _alloca() calls. Previously it
acted as if these functions were returning memory from the heap, which
led to alpha.security.ArrayBoundV2 producing incorrect messages.
2023-11-28 16:34:44 +01:00
Balazs Benics
bde5717d46
[analyzer][NFC] Rework SVal kind representation (#71039)
The goal of this patch is to refine how the `SVal` base and sub-kinds
are represented by forming one unified enum describing the possible
SVals. This means that the `unsigned SVal::Kind` and the attached
bit-packing semantics would be replaced by a single unified enum. This
is more conventional and leads to a better debugging experience by
default. This eases the need of using debug pretty-printers, or the use
of runtime functions doing the printing for us like we do today by
calling `Val.dump()` whenever we inspect the values.

Previously, the first 2 bits of the `unsigned SVal::Kind` discriminated
the following quartet: `UndefinedVal`, `UnknownVal`, `Loc`, or `NonLoc`.
The rest of the upper bits represented the sub-kind, where the value
represented the index among only the `Loc`s or `NonLoc`s, effectively
attaching 2 meanings of the upper bits depending on the base-kind. We
don't need to pack these bits, as we have plenty even if we would use
just a plan-old `unsigned char`.

Consequently, in this patch, I propose to lay out all the (non-abstract)
`SVal` kinds into a single enum, along with some metadata (`BEGIN_Loc`,
`END_Loc`, `BEGIN_NonLoc`, `END_NonLoc`) artificial enum values, similar
how we do with the `MemRegions`.

Note that in the unified `SVal::Kind` enum, to differentiate
`nonloc::ConcreteInt` from `loc::ConcreteInt`, I had to prefix them with
`Loc` and `NonLoc` to resolve this ambiguity.
This should not surface in general, because I'm replacing the
`nonloc::Kind` enum items with `inline constexpr` global constants to
mimic the original behavior - and offer nicer spelling to these enum
values.

Some `SVal` constructors were not marked explicit, which I now mark as
such to follow best practices, and marked others as `/*implicit*/` to
clarify the intent.
During refactoring, I also found at least one function not marked
`LLVM_ATTRIBUTE_RETURNS_NONNULL`, so I did that.

The `TypeRetrievingVisitor` visitor had some accidental dead code,
namely: `VisitNonLocConcreteInt` and `VisitLocConcreteInt`.

Previously, the `SValVisitor` expected visit handlers of
`VisitNonLocXXXXX(nonloc::XXXXX)` and `VisitLocXXXXX(loc::XXXXX)`, where
I felt that envoding `NonLoc` and `Loc` in the name is not necessary as
the type of the parameter would select the right overload anyways, so I
simplified the naming of those visit functions.

The rest of the diff is a lot of times just formatting, because
`getKind()` by nature, frequently appears in switches, which means that
the whole switch gets automatically reformatted. I could probably undo
the formatting, but I didn't want to deviate from the rule unless
explicitly requested.
2023-11-04 15:26:59 +01:00
Balazs Benics
51d15d13de
[analyzer] Fix assertion failure in CXXInstanceCall::getCXXThisVal (#70837)
Workaround the case when the `this` pointer is actually a `NonLoc`, by
returning `Unknown` instead.
The solution isn't ideal, as `this` should be really a `Loc`, but due to
how casts work, I feel this is our easiest and best option.

As this patch presents, I'm evaluating a cast to transform the `NonLoc`.
However, given that `evalCast()` can't be cast from `NonLoc` to a
pointer type thingy (`Loc`), we end up with `Unknown`.
It is because `EvalCastVisitor::VisitNonLocSymbolVal()` only evaluates
casts that happen from NonLoc to NonLocs.

When I tried to actually implement that case, I figured:
1) Create a `SymbolicRegion` from that `nonloc::SymbolVal`; but
`SymbolRegion` ctor expects a pointer type for the symbol.
2) Okay, just have a `SymbolCast`, getting us the pointer type; but
`SymbolRegion` expects `SymbolData` symbols, not generic `SymExpr`s, as
stated:

> // Because pointer arithmetic is represented by ElementRegion layers,
> // the base symbol here should not contain any arithmetic.

3) We can't use `ElementRegion`s to perform this cast because to have an
`ElementRegion`, you already have to have a `SubRegion` that you want to
cast, but the point is that we don't have that.

At this point, I gave up, and just left a FIXME instead, while still
returning `Unknown` on that path.
IMO this is still better than having a crash.

Fixes #69922
2023-11-04 11:11:24 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
af4751738d [C++] Implement "Deducing this" (P0847R7)
This patch implements P0847R7 (partially),
CWG2561 and CWG2653.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140828
2023-10-02 14:33:02 +02:00
vabridgers
da26500aa8
[analyzer] Fix crash analyzing _BitInt() in evalIntegralCast (#66782)
evalIntegralCast was using makeIntVal, and when _BitInt() types were
introduced this exposed a crash in evalIntegralCast as a result.

This is a reapply of a previous patch that failed post merge on the arm
buildbots, because arm cannot handle large
BitInts. Pinning the triple for the testcase solves that problem. 

Improve evalIntegralCast to use makeIntVal more efficiently to avoid the
crash exposed by use of _BitInt.

This was caught with our internal randomized testing.

<src-root>/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:1510:
  int64_t llvm::APInt::getSExtValue() const: Assertion
  `getSignificantBits() <= 64 && "Too many bits for int64_t"' failed.a

...
 #9 <address> llvm::APInt::getSExtValue() const
  <src-root>/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:1510:5
  llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>,
  clang::ento::SVal, clang::QualType, clang::QualType)
  <src-root>/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SValBuilder.cpp:607:24
clang::Expr const*, clang::ento::ExplodedNode*,
clang::ento::ExplodedNodeSet&)
  <src-root>/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp:413:61
...

 Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61960

 Reviewed By: donat.nagy
2023-09-20 06:11:39 -05:00
Bjorn Pettersson
929662b489 Revert "[analyzer] Fix crash analyzing _BitInt() in evalIntegralCast (#65887)"
This reverts commit 4898c33527f90b067f353a115442a9a702319fce.

Lots of buildbots are failing, probably because lots of targets not supporting
large _BitInt types.
2023-09-18 23:35:48 +02:00
vabridgers
4898c33527
[analyzer] Fix crash analyzing _BitInt() in evalIntegralCast (#65887)
evalIntegralCast was using makeIntVal, and when _BitInt() types were
introduced this exposed a crash in evalIntegralCast as a result.

Improve evalIntegralCast to use makeIntVal more efficiently to avoid the
crash exposed by use of _BitInt.

This was caught with our internal randomized testing.

<src-root>/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:1510:
  int64_t llvm::APInt::getSExtValue() const: Assertion
  `getSignificantBits() <= 64 && "Too many bits for int64_t"' failed.a

...
 #9 <address> llvm::APInt::getSExtValue() const
  <src-root>/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:1510:5
  llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::ento::ProgramState const>,
  clang::ento::SVal, clang::QualType, clang::QualType)
  <src-root>/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SValBuilder.cpp:607:24
clang::Expr const*, clang::ento::ExplodedNode*,
clang::ento::ExplodedNodeSet&)
  <src-root>/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp:413:61
...

 Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61960

 Reviewed By: donat.nagy
2023-09-18 15:18:33 -05:00
Dmitri Gribenko
daa95c7de5 [clang][analyzer][NFC] Remove unnecessary FALLTHROUGH markers
They are redundant with the [[fallthrough]]; attribute that follows.

Reviewed By: steakhal

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151723
2023-05-30 18:16:35 +02:00
Kazu Hirata
2d861436a9 [clang] Remove remaining uses of llvm::Optional (NFC)
This patch removes several "using" declarations and #include
"llvm/ADT/Optional.h".

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2023-01-14 13:37:25 -08:00
Kazu Hirata
6ad0788c33 [clang] Use std::optional instead of llvm::Optional (NFC)
This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<.  I'll post
a separate patch to remove #include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h".

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2023-01-14 12:31:01 -08:00
Kazu Hirata
a1580d7b59 [clang] Add #include <optional> (NFC)
This patch adds #include <optional> to those files containing
llvm::Optional<...> or Optional<...>.

I'll post a separate patch to actually replace llvm::Optional with
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2023-01-14 11:07:21 -08:00
Kazu Hirata
c25cc84b87 [clang] Don't including None.h (NFC)
These source files no longer use None, so they do not need to include
None.h.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2022-12-08 23:36:50 -08:00
Kazu Hirata
180600660b [StaticAnalyzer] Use std::nullopt instead of None (NFC)
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated.  The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2022-12-03 11:34:24 -08:00
Fangrui Song
3f18f7c007 [clang] LLVM_FALLTHROUGH => [[fallthrough]]. NFC
With C++17 there is no Clang pedantic warning or MSVC C5051.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131346
2022-08-08 09:12:46 -07:00
Denys Petrov
a364987368 [analyzer][NFC] Use SValVisitor instead of explicit helper functions
Summary: Get rid of explicit function splitting in favor of specifically designed Visitor. Move logic from a family of `evalCastKind` and `evalCastSubKind` helper functions to `SValVisitor`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130029
2022-07-19 23:10:00 +03:00
Gabor Marton
2df120784a [analyzer] Fix assertion in simplifySymbolCast
Depends on D128068.
Added a new test code that fails an assertion in the baseline.
That is because `getAPSIntType` works only with integral types.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126779
2022-07-05 19:00:23 +02:00
Gabor Marton
5d7fa481cf [analyzer] Do not emit redundant SymbolCasts
In `RegionStore::getBinding` we call `evalCast` unconditionally to align
the stored value's type to the one that is being queried. However, the
stored type might be the same, so we may end up having redundant
`SymbolCasts` emitted.

The solution is to check whether the `to` and `from` type are the same
in `makeNonLoc`.

Note, we can't just do type equivalence check at the beginning of `evalCast`
because when `evalCast` is called from `getBinding` then the original type
(`OriginalTy`) is not set, so one operand is missing for the comparison. In
`evalCastSubKind(nonloc::SymbolVal)` when the original type is not set,
we get the `from` type via `SymbolVal::getType()`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128068
2022-07-05 18:42:34 +02:00
Balazs Benics
96ccb690a0 [analyzer][NFC] Prefer using isa<> instead getAs<> in conditions
Depends on D125709

Reviewed By: martong

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127742
2022-06-15 16:58:13 +02:00
Balazs Benics
40940fb2a6 [analyzer][NFC] Substitute the SVal::evalMinus and evalComplement functions
Depends on D126127

Reviewed By: martong

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127734
2022-06-14 18:56:43 +02:00
Balazs Benics
cfc915149c [analyzer][NFC] Relocate unary transfer functions
This is an initial step of removing the SimpleSValBuilder abstraction. The SValBuilder alone should be enough.

Reviewed By: martong

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126127
2022-06-14 18:56:43 +02:00
Gabor Marton
b5b2aec1ff [analyzer] Add UnarySymExpr
This patch adds a new descendant to the SymExpr hierarchy. This way, now
we can assign constraints to symbolic unary expressions. Only the unary
minus and bitwise negation are handled.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125318
2022-05-26 14:00:27 +02:00
Balazs Benics
d5ffc1ed8b [analyzer][NFC] Tighten some of the SValBuilder return types
This is purely a cosmetic change.

Reviewed By: martong

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125463
2022-05-13 17:04:34 +02:00
Balazs Benics
fd7efe33f1 [analyzer] Fix cast evaluation on scoped enums in ExprEngine
We ignored the cast if the enum was scoped.
This is bad since there is no implicit conversion from the scoped enum to the corresponding underlying type.

The fix is basically: isIntegralOrEnumerationType() -> isIntegralOr**Unscoped**EnumerationType()

This materialized in crashes on analyzing the LLVM itself using the Z3 refutation.
Refutation synthesized the given Z3 Binary expression (`BO_And` of `unsigned char` aka. 8 bits
and an `int` 32 bits) with the wrong bitwidth in the end, which triggered an assert.

Now, we evaluate the cast according to the standard.

This bug could have been triggered using the Z3 CM according to
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44030

Fixes #47570 #43375

Reviewed By: martong

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85528
2022-05-02 10:54:26 +02:00
Vince Bridgers
fe8b2236ef [analyzer] Fix "RhsLoc and LhsLoc bitwidth must be same"
clang: <root>/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SimpleSValBuilder.cpp:727:
void assertEqualBitWidths(clang::ento::ProgramStateRef,
  clang::ento::Loc, clang::ento::Loc): Assertion `RhsBitwidth ==
  LhsBitwidth && "RhsLoc and LhsLoc bitwidth must be same!"'

This change adjusts the bitwidth of the smaller operand for an evalBinOp
as a result of a comparison operation. This can occur in the specific
case represented by the test cases for a target with different pointer
sizes.

Reviewed By: NoQ

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122513
2022-03-29 17:08:19 -05:00
Vince Bridgers
5fdc4dd777 [analyzer] refactor makeIntValWithPtrWidth, remove getZeroWithPtrWidth (NFC)
This is a NFC refactoring to change makeIntValWithPtrWidth
and remove getZeroWithPtrWidth to use types when forming values to match
pointer widths. Some targets may have different pointer widths depending
upon address space, so this needs to be comprehended.

Reviewed By: steakhal

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120134
2022-03-23 08:26:37 -05:00
Vince Bridgers
985888411d [analyzer] Refactor makeNull to makeNullWithWidth (NFC)
Usages of makeNull need to be deprecated in favor of makeNullWithWidth
for architectures where the pointer size should not be assumed. This can
occur when pointer sizes can be of different sizes, depending on address
space for example. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D118050 as an example.

This was uncovered initially in a downstream compiler project, and
tested through those systems tests.

steakhal performed systems testing across a large set of open source
projects.

Co-authored-by: steakhal
Resolves: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53664

Reviewed By: NoQ, steakhal

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119601
2022-03-22 07:35:13 -05:00
Denys Petrov
d835dd4cf5 [analyzer] Produce SymbolCast symbols for integral types in SValBuilder::evalCast
Summary: Produce SymbolCast for integral types in `evalCast` function. Apply several simplification techniques while producing the symbols. Added a boolean option `handle-integral-cast-for-ranges` under `-analyzer-config` flag. Disabled the feature by default.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105340
2022-01-18 16:08:04 +02:00
Balazs Benics
a6816b957d [analyzer][solver] Fix assertion on (NonLoc, Op, Loc) expressions
Previously, the `SValBuilder` could not encounter expressions of the
following kind:

  NonLoc OP Loc
  Loc OP NonLoc

Where the `Op` is other than `BO_Add`.

As of now, due to the smarter simplification and the fixedpoint
iteration, it turns out we can.
It can happen if the `Loc` was perfectly constrained to a concrete
value (`nonloc::ConcreteInt`), thus the simplifier can do
constant-folding in these cases as well.

Unfortunately, this could cause assertion failures, since we assumed
that the operator must be `BO_Add`, causing a crash.

---

In the patch, I decided to preserve the original behavior (aka. swap the
operands (if the operator is commutative), but if the `RHS` was a
`loc::ConcreteInt` call `evalBinOpNN()`.

I think this interpretation of the arithmetic expression is closer to
reality.

I also tried naively introducing a separate handler for
`loc::ConcreteInt` RHS, before doing handling the more generic `Loc` RHS
case. However, it broke the `zoo1backwards()` test in the `nullptr.cpp`
file. This highlighted for me the importance to preserve the original
behavior for the `BO_Add` at least.

PS: Sorry for introducing yet another branch into this `evalBinOpXX`
madness. I've got a couple of ideas about refactoring these.
We'll see if I can get to it.

The test file demonstrates the issue and makes sure nothing similar
happens. The `no-crash` annotated lines show, where we crashed before
applying this patch.

Reviewed By: martong

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115149
2021-12-06 18:38:58 +01:00
Balazs Benics
16be17ad4b [analyzer][NFC] Refactor llvm::isa<> usages in the StaticAnalyzer
It turns out llvm::isa<> is variadic, and we could have used this at a
lot of places.

The following patterns:
  x && isa<T1>(x) || isa<T2>(x) ...
Will be replaced by:
  isa_and_non_null<T1, T2, ...>(x)

Sometimes it caused further simplifications, when it would cause even
more code smell.

Aside from this, keep in mind that within `assert()` or any macro
functions, we need to wrap the isa<> expression within a parenthesis,
due to the parsing of the comma.

Reviewed By: martong

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111982
2021-10-20 17:43:31 +02:00
Balazs Benics
b97a96400a [analyzer] SValBuilder should have an easy access to AnalyzerOptions
`SVB.getStateManager().getOwningEngine().getAnalysisManager().getAnalyzerOptions()`
is quite a mouthful and might involve a few pointer indirections to get
such a simple thing like an analyzer option.

This patch introduces an `AnalyzerOptions` reference to the `SValBuilder`
abstract class, while refactors a few cases to use this /simpler/ accessor.

Reviewed By: martong, Szelethus

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108824
2021-09-04 10:19:57 +02:00
Vince Bridgers
d39ebdae67 [analyzer] Cleanup a FIXME in SValBuilder.cpp
This change follows up on a FIXME submitted with D105974. This change simply let's the reference case fall through to return a concrete 'true'
instead of a nonloc pointer of appropriate length set to NULL.

Reviewed By: NoQ

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107720
2021-08-10 16:12:52 -05:00
Deep Majumder
d825309352 [analyzer] Handle std::make_unique
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103750
2021-07-18 19:54:28 +05:30
Vince Bridgers
918bda1241 [analyzer] Do not assume that all pointers have the same bitwidth as void*
This change addresses this assertion that occurs in a downstream
compiler with a custom target.

```APInt.h:1151: bool llvm::APInt::operator==(const llvm::APInt &) const: Assertion `BitWidth == RHS.BitWidth && "Comparison requires equal bit widths"'```

No covering test case is susbmitted with this change since this crash
cannot be reproduced using any upstream supported target. The test case
that exposes this issue is as simple as:

```lang=c++
  void test(int * p) {
    int * q = p-1;
    if (q) {}
    if (q) {} // crash
    (void)q;
  }
```

The custom target that exposes this problem supports two address spaces,
16-bit `char`s, and a `_Bool` type that maps to 16-bits. There are no upstream
supported targets with similar attributes.

The assertion appears to be happening as a result of evaluating the
`SymIntExpr` `(reg_$0<int * p>) != 0U` in `VisitSymIntExpr` located in
`SimpleSValBuilder.cpp`. The `LHS` is evaluated to `32b` and the `RHS` is
evaluated to `16b`. This eventually leads to the assertion in `APInt.h`.

While this change addresses the crash and passes LITs, two follow-ups
are required:
  1) The remainder of `getZeroWithPtrWidth()` and `getIntWithPtrWidth()`
     should be cleaned up following this model to prevent future
     confusion.
  2) We're not sure why references are found along with the modified
     code path, that should not be the case. A more principled
     fix may be found after some further comprehension of why this
     is the case.

Acks: Thanks to @steakhal and @martong for the discussions leading to this
fix.

Reviewed By: NoQ

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105974
2021-07-16 03:22:57 -05:00
Denys Petrov
d3a6181e82 [analyzer] [NFC] Implement a wrapper SValBuilder::getCastedMemRegionVal for similar functionality on region cast
Summary: Replaced code on region cast with a function-wrapper SValBuilder::getCastedMemRegionVal. This is a next step of code refining due to suggestions in D103319.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103803
2021-06-08 10:43:43 +03:00
Denys Petrov
fae3534b30 [analyzer] Use Optional as a return type of StoreManager::castRegion
Summary: Make StoreManager::castRegion function usage safier. Replace `const MemRegion *` with `Optional<const MemRegion *>`. Simplified one of related test cases due to suggestions in D101635.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103319
2021-05-29 15:16:56 +03:00
Vince Bridgers
a27af1d816 [analyzer] Fix assertion in SVals.h
Fix assertion in SVals.h apparently caused by
https://reviews.llvm.org/D89055.

clang:clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/SVals.h:596:
clang::ento::loc::MemRegionVal::MemRegionVal(const clang::ento::MemRegion *):
  Assertion `r' failed.

Backtrace:
...
     clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/SVals.h:597:3
     clang::QualType, clang::QualType)
     clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SValBuilder.cpp:773:18
     clang::QualType, clang::QualType)
     clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SValBuilder.cpp:612:12
     clang::QualType) clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/SValBuilder.cpp:587:12
     namespace)::RegionBindingsRef const&, clang::ento::Loc, clang::QualType)
     clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RegionStore.cpp:1510:24
...

Reviewed By: ASDenysPetrov

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101635
2021-04-30 11:00:43 -05:00
Denys Petrov
b30521c28a [analyzer] Wrong type cast occurs during pointer dereferencing after type punning
Summary: During pointer dereferencing CastRetrievedVal uses wrong type from the Store after type punning. Namely, the pointer casts to another type and then assigns with a value of one more another type. It produces NonLoc value when Loc is expected.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89055

Fixes:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37503
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49007
2021-04-29 01:03:38 +03:00
Denys Petrov
01ddfa95bd [analyzer] [NFC] Eliminate dispatchCast, evalCastFromNonLoc and evalCastFromLoc functions from SValBuilder
Summary: Remove dispatchCast, evalCastFromNonLoc and evalCastFromLoc functions since their functionality has been moved to common evalCast function. Use evalCast instead.

Post-clean up patch for https://reviews.llvm.org/D96090 patch. The patch shall not change any behavior.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97277
2021-04-13 18:56:04 +03:00
Denys Petrov
7736b08c28 [analyzer] Replace StoreManager::CastRetrievedVal with SValBuilder::evalCast
Summary: Move logic from CastRetrievedVal to evalCast and replace CastRetrievedVal with evalCast. Also move guts from SimpleSValBuilder::dispatchCast inside evalCast.
evalCast intends to substitute dispatchCast, evalCastFromNonLoc and evalCastFromLoc in the future. OriginalTy provides additional information for casting, which is useful for some cases and useless for others.  If `OriginalTy.isNull()` is true, then cast performs based on CastTy only. Now evalCast operates in two ways. It retains all previous behavior and take over dispatchCast behavior. dispatchCast, evalCastFromNonLoc and evalCastFromLoc is considered as buggy since it doesn't take into account OriginalTy of the SVal and should be improved.

From this patch use evalCast instead of dispatchCast, evalCastFromNonLoc and evalCastFromLoc functions. dispatchCast redirects to evalCast.

This patch shall not change any behavior.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96090
2021-04-13 18:10:06 +03:00
Valeriy Savchenko
4b958dd6bc [analyzer] Fix crash on spaceship operator (PR47511)
rdar://68954187

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99181
2021-04-08 20:28:05 +03:00
Kazu Hirata
1a323c8a96 [analyzer] Fix a warning
This patch fixes a warning from -Wcovered-switch-default.  The switch
statement in question handles all the enum values.
2021-02-16 09:12:07 -08:00
Denys Petrov
13f4448ae7 [analyzer] Rework SValBuilder::evalCast function into maintainable and clear way
Summary: Refactor SValBuilder::evalCast function. Make the function clear and get rid of redundant and repetitive code. Unite SValBuilder::evalCast, SimpleSValBuilder::dispatchCast, SimpleSValBuilder::evalCastFromNonLoc and SimpleSValBuilder::evalCastFromLoc functions into single SValBuilder::evalCast.
This patch shall not change any previous behavior.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90157
2021-02-16 14:30:51 +02:00
Balazs Benics
163863604f [analyzer] Evaluate PredefinedExpressions
We did not evaluate such expressions, just returned `Unknown` for such cases.
After this patch, we will be able to access a unique value identifying a template instantiation via the value of the `PRETTY_FUNCTION` predefined expression.

Reviewed By: vsavchenko

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87004
2020-09-14 08:43:56 +02:00
Valeriy Savchenko
9cbfdde2ea [analyzer] Fix crash with pointer to members values
This fix unifies all of the different ways we handled pointer to
members into one.  The crash was caused by the fact that the type
of pointer-to-member values was `void *`, and while this works
for the vast majority of cases it breaks when we actually need
to explain the path for the report.

rdar://problem/64202361

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85817
2020-08-13 18:03:59 +03:00
Denys Petrov
86e1b73507 [analyzer] Simplify function SVal::getAsSymbolicExpression and similar ones
Summary: Simplify functions SVal::getAsSymbolicExpression SVal::getAsSymExpr and SVal::getAsSymbol. After revision I concluded that `getAsSymbolicExpression` and `getAsSymExpr` repeat functionality of `getAsSymbol`, thus them can be removed.

Fix: Remove functions SVal::getAsSymbolicExpression and SVal::getAsSymExpr.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85034
2020-08-03 15:03:35 +03:00
Adam Balogh
d70ec366c9 [Analyzer][NFC] Remove the SubEngine interface
The `SubEngine` interface is an interface with only one implementation
`EpxrEngine`. Adding other implementations are difficult and very
unlikely in the near future. Currently, if anything from `ExprEngine` is
to be exposed to other classes it is moved to `SubEngine` which
restricts the alternative implementations. The virtual methods are have
a slight perofrmance impact. Furthermore, instead of the `LLVM`-style
inheritance a native inheritance is used here, which renders `LLVM`
functions like e.g. `cast<T>()` unusable here. This patch removes this
interface and allows usage of `ExprEngine` directly.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80548
2020-05-26 19:56:55 +02:00
Chandler Carruth
2946cd7010 Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636
2019-01-19 08:50:56 +00:00